What is the issue with smaller swf output file sizes?
If you use link-report and load-externs, you can optimize swf size for
both the modules and the main app without any issues.
Just out of curiosity, have you filed any bugs regarding the other
issues you've encountered? (Cross-SWF font
.
This is just a perspective of the the pain i've been through.
Bjorn
On 09/03/2007, at 5:17 AM, Roger Gonzalez wrote:
What is the issue
Er, this isn't strictly correct.
The module (the SWF and the class factory it contains) are only ever
loaded/instantiated once, ever, no matter how many times you call
load.
ModuleLoader, on the other hand, creates -instances- using the module's
class factory, and adds them as a child. These
The URL for a given module is a unique key for the module at that URL,
no matter how many times you get it. Each time you get a ModuleInfo,
you can use it to request an unload. (Note that unload just makes
things available for GC, it does not force things to unload.)
There's no reason why you
the navigator will GC eventually clean up the child module
on
that tab?
Aaron
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Roger Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The URL for a given module is a unique
You should use the 2.0.1 Modules feature for this, its pretty much
exactly what you want.
In any case, whenever you do make a reference to objects within
dynamically loaded code, you should design some interfaces for
communication so that you're not making hard type references to
implementation
Modules were a point-release feature that were released earlier than the
corresponding IDE support so that we could get feedback from the
community about what people wanted.
If we had waited to get Module support into FlexBuilder, you wouldn't
have seen Modules until 3.0.
Would that have been
Note that you can also cause an entire directory tree to be compiled in.
This should be used with caution, since it will also try to compile any
included helper code as if they were classes, which might not be what
you want.
-rg
From:
What you're doing is a little odd, but you can build your own version of
the MovieClipLoaderAsset class (which is what is used to do embedding of
visual SWFs).
Basically, embed the RSL SWF using
[Embed(source='as3rsl.swf', mimeType='application/octet-stream')]
public class MyBinaryBlob extends
It makes sense to ignore CSS errors when a CSS file is first parsed at
runtime. You want a best effort rendering of the CSS.
Web pages aren't required to be compiled and typechecked before they're
put on the server. If they were, you would in fact want to catch the
error at authoring time.
Yes, the module loading code dispatches loading events, so you can
create a component that displays very similar to the Flex download
progress bar.
My preferred way to do it so that it is usable from MXML is to subclass
ModuleLoader.
-rg
From:
Cool problem.
If you're willing to write some code, I think its entirely feasible to
do this in AS3. Rendering MathML in Actionscript would be a really fun
project!
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I had a similar problem drawing dependency graphs. I've had the best
luck simply drawing them to a Graphics, adding them as children was too
expensive and couldn't keep up with the frame rate.
You'll probably want to create a spatial partitioning scheme so that you
can quickly determine
Your syntax is incorrect. Remove the double quotes, it should just be
[Embed(source='assets/ResizeArrow.swf')].
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janis Radins
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:52 AM
If you mark the library as external from the modules, you'll need to
ensure that it is either fully included in the application or else
loaded as a RSL by the application.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
This sort of situation usually arises when the interface isn't defined
in a common ApplicationDomain (generally the parent). Did you load the
module into a separate ApplicationDomain rooted off the system domain?
If so, then the two interfaces are unrelated (even though they have the
same
This isn't technically a module question. I believe that you will find
the same behavior if you were to new a frameworks class and then try
to access it. Did you call addChild() on the product of the factory?
I'd get that working first in a simple hard-linked case.
Note that you may well run
Where is getInfo called from?
I'd need to see the actual code, I guess.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of lar.drolet
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:23 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Apologies if I'm being dense, but I can't imagine any problem where this
would be the best solution in Flex. Why not just use the -data- from
the database to change the behavior dynamically?
But if this really is the best solution, why not use the mxmlc command
line for this? Its much more
For what its worth, it appears at first glance that your code should
work.
Have you tried strong typing rather than using *?
var results:IResults= IResults(modMyModule2.child)
Not sure why it isn't working though, sorry.
-rg
From:
be a hard
work to remove all the references of the loaded application's objects
(without talking about the Flex framework per se) to elect they to GC.
Thanks
Fabio Terracini
On 1/9/07, Roger Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
This is called lost in translation between engineering and
documentation, because its somewhat subtle.
It means that if you are using modules for code that doesn't include any
frameworks code, you should extend ModuleBase.
If your modules use code that interacts directly with the frameworks
if the shell is a debug version?
Thanks,
Brian
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 2:35 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Just make a new project. You'll need to change the root tag from
mx:Application to mx:Module for a MXML project, or change the base
class of an ActionScript project from flash.display.Sprite to
mx.modules.ModuleBase because FlexBuilder doesn't know about modules
directly.
(There is some odd
I can't think of any reason why you would want to do this.
Modules are class factories, not instances.
You will create an instance of the class baked into the module, and then
the application can pass those parameters to the instance.
-rg
From:
You just described it. Its just a normal project. Create a project for
your module, create a project for your application, make sure you know
what the binary path is going to be, and use that SWF path as your
ModuleLoader url.
Modules were functionality snuck into a dot release. There's no
Are you loading them into new child ApplicationDomains, or into
ApplicationDomain.currentDomain?
I assume that something in main.swf contains both SuperClass and
BaseInterface? (Have you looked into the externs options to leave out
redundant classes?) The VM is supposed to ignore subsequent
Symbols don't exist in AS3, there are only classes.
If you exported the SWF from Flash as an AS3 SWF, you should be able to
use getDefinitionByName to find the class instance in the dynamically
loaded SWF.
The compiler knows how to reference old-style Flash symbols at compile
time (via
SWC files are compile-time only. A HTML wrapper wouldn't know what to
do with it.
In theory, you could write an unzip implementation in Actionscript, load
a SWC as raw data, decompress it, extract its bits, and then send those
bits around to AS or JS or whatever, but realistically, you're not
Your class isn't being linked in, because it isn't referenced.
Your options are:
(a) force it to be linked in, either with an explicit reference, or via
a compiler flag.
(b) make sure that the code below is in a SWF is loaded into (or as a
child of) an ApplicationDomain containing your class.
You always need to embed onto a variable of type class or string. Using
[Embed] on XML is actually an undocumented trick, I believe, but it
works something like this:
[Embed('Data/Summary.xml')]
private var summaryClass:Class;
If I remember correctly, it creates a class with a (static?) data
It is a real feature in the 2.0.1 release. That release will be the
authoratative source of docs/info, but for now, you can check out my blog
http://blogs.adobe.com/rgonzalez for details. Check out my MAX preso.
-rg
From:
Yep, browse the powerpoint (turn on the notes pages as well) and check
out the samples.
Collin, this is basically the purpose of the 2.0.1 Modules feature, so I
think its exactly what you want.
Shannon, the only way to not load classes that have already been loaded
is to omit them from
Hi,
RSLs aren't the best match for what you need. Look into the new 2.0.1
Modules feature.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wljammal
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:36 AM
To:
I don't believe there's a UI for this, but you can always add additional
command-line parameters to the FlexBuilder project.
Use --namespace uri manifestfile.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cluebcke
Because Flex always creates a root class for the SWF, the [SWF] metadata
must be attached to (i.e. immediately before) the root class definition.
The parameters may not be documented, as they're pretty much intended
for code generated by the compiler from MXML source. End users are
encouraged
the root class definition. I've deduced from this that
the
Default Application is not the root class.
Could you guide me further?
Sincerely,
Elibol
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Roger
SWC files are used at compile time. SWFLoader is runtime. Won't work.
(Note that if you caused MyTest.swf to be embedded instead of included
when you built TestLib.swc, you can then refer to it as a class from
your main project, and just instantiate an object of type SpriteAsset,
to use this
component
in my flex applications, but alas the images just don't show up.
Any ideas?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com , Roger Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
SWC files are used
That seems like a crazy amount of compilation time for 40 files.
Something is wrong. BTW, have you tried creating some library projects
and linking to them, instead of having just one source tree?
However, you said that Flex is actually crashing during the compile.. is
it? Or is it just slow?
: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:51
PMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders]
Re: Get BitmapData from symbol in SWF file?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
"Roger Gonzalez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote: You can't
cast a Class to a Bitmap. You need to do BitmapAsset(new
You can't cast a Class to a Bitmap. You need to do BitmapAsset(new
c()).
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joshuajnobleSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:18
AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders]
Re: Get BitmapData
http://blogs.adobe.com/rgonzalez
Cheers, :-)
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bjorn
SchultheissSent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:35 PMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders]
ModuleManager
Yo!
Word on
library-path causes the libraries to be available as a source for
linking.
include-libraries includesALL symbols from a library, and I believe
does not work for compc in 2.0.1 beta, there was a bug. It only works for
mxmlc.
Its the
difference between eating at a salad bar vs. having
It is however possible to [Embed] font(s) into an AS class used to build
a SWF, and then dynamically load that SWF.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
HornSent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:23 PMTo:
Odds are good that there's a Flash 8 SWF tag in the file that we don't
support in Flex 2. You're only looking at the error messages, I think
uncaught compiler exceptions are logged in "About Flex Builder 2
Configuration Details Error Log". (Or run mxmlc at the command
line.)
We have a
You can also use "mxmlc -dump-config=mycfg.xml -otheroptions..." to build
a starter config file. In general, you'll then want to edit it down to the
bare minimum settings you need.
I somehow overlooked to have "dump-config" enabled on compc (will put
this into a dot release) but the
Glad it will help.
Note that "append" and "+=" work with any "list" config var. Most
of the time when you set a config var, it clears out the value set at a lower
level...
defaults
system properties
flex-config.xml
(other config files)
command line
but if you use the "append" variants,
Your second thought is the technique that we recommend. Since you
want to build all the classes, that's a library. You then want to include
everything, so use include-libraries.
In general, our philosophy for mxmlc/compc was to make a bunch of small
"atomic" behaviors that could be
Your SWC is including all its dependencies - which includes most of the
frameworks.
You can build a SWC that doesn't do this by using adding frameworks.swc
to the external-library-path configuration option.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Without the slash, the path resolution will be relative to the
referencing source file.
With the slash, I believe it will be relative to the referencing source
file's local subtree root (i.e. the particular entry in the
source-path).
Topoint toa file
outsidethereferencingsource subtree,
Yes, but not easily. I'll be writing a blog post with example code
on this soon. :-)
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
ClarkSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:51 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Generate
Flex is unhappy about the SWF you're trying to embed. Your Embed
syntax looks fine, but it appears that your SWF contains a button (built in
Flash?) that is either corrupted, or else our decoder is getting out of sync for
some other reason.
Since Flex doesn't really support Flash buttons
To provide a little more detail, the problem is:
1) MXML imposes ADDITIONAL constraints above and beyond what can be
expressed in DTD or XSD.
2) MXML is open-ended, and the rules for how new namespaces
tietogether cannot be expressed in DTD or XSD.
For example, lets say we did provide the
Hello, I have a couple of questions relating to Application level
access and binding. First off, why can I not bind to a property using
this syntax even if the var is declared [Bindable]?:
dataProvider={Application.application.arr_selectedPlans}
I get the 'Data binding will not be able to
: [flexcoders] Re: Accessing and binding to (and from)
Application level vars
What is the proper way to access application-level vars and
methods then?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Roger Gonzalez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I have a couple of questions relating to Application level
Yeah, Adobe is so terribly unresponsive. Its too
bad that their engineers don't actuallytake time to respondon
randomforums or anything.Why won't they just put out
anew version that directly addresses the community's reaction to the 1.0
product? Hmm...
Thank you, drive through.
-rg
, and so there's a lot of
red-tape going on in this project.
So I ask again...can it be done?
Thanks in advance.
J.
-Mensaje original-
De: Roger Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 10 de Abril de 2006 08:35 p.m.
Para: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Asunto: RE
I'm not sure about the specifics of this samples app, but
the error is because you're mixing stuff from two different
releases. During the beta program, we're still making bytecode changes, so
you need to keep the SWF files synchronized with their matching
player.
-rg
From:
That would be pretty impractical in Flex 1.5 without
providing truckloads of RAM. I suspect you need to either do it on the
server as an image sent to the client, or else do it in Flex
2.
What kind of graph is this? Do you really need 100k
samples on screen simultaneously? Can you do
post/send my enhancement
request?Thanks,
Sönke
-Original
Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger
Gonzalez Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:59 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE
playerglobal.swc needs to be in external-library-path, because it only
contains class intrinsics for definitions that are actually in the
player itself.
-rg
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hari Krishna Dara
Sent: Friday,
Flash 8 SWFs and Flash 8.5 SWFs run different versions of
Actionscript, and cannot communicate directly.
You need to build a layer using LocalConnection to
proxycommunications between the two different virtual
machines.
(Once the next version of Flash Authoring is out, this
won't be
I used include instead and it worked.
It did?? That's odd. Are you sure you don't mean import?
Each MXML file generates a class. Script snippets are simply added to
that class, including stuff included with include. If these script
snippets are a class definition, you're basically adding an
We don't support direct embedding of .FLV (feel free to file an enhancement
request that we should!) but Beta 3 will have a nifty workaround that might
actually make this work. I'll investigate a bit.
Stay tuned...
-rg
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Hrm. Are you using the webtier compiler? Based on the namespace you're
using, you're obviously using Flex 2, but if you're using Flex Builder
(or mxmlc.exe), this example won't work.
Loading test.mxml.swf requires server side compilation, so if you
don't have that, you need to precompile
I'm not positive this is the issue, but playerglobal.swc should be in
external-library-path, because it contains definitions that are built
in the player. I suspect you're confusing the linker by telling it to
force-link empty definitions.
-rg
-Original Message-
From:
Its quite possible to implement this sort of thing via the lower
level flash.graphics.* Actionscript API, but we do not currently
provide any prebuilt drawing components usable via declarative
MXML elements.
Once you write the components, I bet lots of people in the community
here would love to
All assets in Flash 8.5 and AS3 are now
class-based.
The equivilent to attachMovie is "new", as in "create a
class instance".
Because there is no public version of Flash Authoring out
that emits AS3 classes, we're in a temporary phase where we embed old-style
assets and have Flex
Does it happen to remove the unused components? What if I'm
only using one button - does Flex include all components?
Flex only includes classes found in the dependency chain from
your application class (or configuration settings).
When you create an application that extends
I've fixed everything I have testcases for!
If you have one that is broken, please email both the original Flash 8
SWF and the resulting Flex SWF. DO NOT ZIP THE FILES, OR OUR SPAM FILTER
WILL THROW IT AWAY!
Thanks,
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yes, it can. Multiple SWFs. Tradeoffs are increased potential for
errors, a bit more architecture work needed up front, and the potential
that the Flex frameworks isn't fully designed for this case, so you
might run into some tricky (but not unsolvable) issues. (It works
pretty well for pure-AS
frameworkAND loosely bounded resources for
UI/server interaction code approach. I should provide link to an article on
the subject next week.
Thank you,
Anatole Tartakovsky
- Original Message -
From:
Roger
Gonzalez
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
You have the purpose backwards. (There's an
entirely different mechanism for what trust you want to grant to a particular
SWF.)
The point is fora server owner to prevent you from
distributing a SWF that canact as a distributeddenial-of-service
attack on a server.
Consider the case of
Existence proof:
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/homer.php
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dos
dedosSent: Friday, March 24, 2006 6:12 PMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Flex 2: can you
play audio
-include-libraries will force entire SWCs to be linked in. (And Beta 3
will have -include, which will do it for individual definitions.)
A better path might be to dynamically load another SWF that contains the
definitions that you want to have soft references to.
-rg
-Original
Hi... due to changes between the virtual machines in Flash Player 8 and
8.5, there is no cross-compatibility with scripting between the two
versions.
Until the new AS3-basedversion of Flash Authoring comes out, we are
only supporting a workflow based on non-scripted assets. You basically
First, make certain you don't have any Beta1 SWCs being loaded by
Beta2. That will break.
If you add corelib.swc (or its parent directory) to your library path, it
will make it available to be linked in.
Its choking in the ResourceBundle code, which implies to me that
ListCollectionView
I fought the battle, and lost. :-(
It was deemed a potential security issue, and I although I think I
successfully argued that down, it was deprioritized compared to other
more critical issues. We'll hopefully revisit it for a future release.
-rg
-Original Message-
From:
It's interesting idea. But current Flex release doesn't provide good
external libraries support as for me. Some RSL initialization code
is statically injected by mxlmlc to the application SWF file during
compilation process ( binding initialization, remote class
registration etc). It
library-path makes SWCs available for resolving class
dependencies. Thisis normally what you want.
include-libraries forces all symbols in the SWCs to be
included in the application, whether they are needed or not.
I don't know why you'd get that error unless you're not
using mxmlc or
I apologize for not being able to give the walkthrough in terms of Flex
Builder; I work on the lower level, so I'm going to talk in terms of the
command line. Hopefully you'll be able to translate. You might want to
walk through it using the low level tools anyway, because its hard to
tweak
I fixedgradient fill embeddingfor Beta 2, so I'm surprised
that you're hitting a problem. What are you getting for an
error?
The AS classes need you to add framework.swc to your project.
They're still in mx.core.
Please send me the SWF you're embedding if that doesn't clear up your
Not to pick on Jeff (because even our docs use the same approach), but
I'm not a fan of this solution, because its trivial to pass in null
where its expecting a PrivateClass. To protect against that, you need
to have a runtime check, and throw. Yuck.
My personal solution is as follows (warning:
If you let the compiler generate a resource class for you, it generates
a class derived from Sprite (which does not support animation). I think
this is a bug, it should probably look to see if there are multiple
frames to make this choice or something.
If you embed at the class level, you can
You have some AS2 code that is doing something like root._th_ = ... in
your SWF, which won't work when Flex 2 comes out.
Basically, AVM- opcodes (AS1 and AS2) will not work in an AVM+ (AS3)
SWF; support will be disabled in an upcoming release, and I'll be
stripping them out when you do the embed.
My rules of thumb:
When passed in from the outside, use an interface. There's
generally no reason to bake in a dependency to a particular implementation,
whereas adding a concrete type reference will make it strongly coupled;
whenever your class is compiled, it will always
I can't speak to why your particular style isn't being set, but we
accept both style name variants as equivilent, because foo-bar-ick
gets internally converted to fooBarIck in order to map to AS
identifiers (hyphens obviously don't work in identifiers).
-rg
-Original Message-
From:
I assume you're talking about 1.5 here.
Themes in 1.5 are a linker trick that says use this replacement
definition instead of the one you were going to use. Because the use
of RSLs says don't include any of these definitions, they'll be pulled
in at runtime, the theme definitions are also
We do support the new Flash Type engine, but indirectly - you have to
export a SWF containing the font from Flash 8, and then embed it into
your Flex 2 app. This doesn't change the need to have the font
embedded, device fonts are still the default.
-rg
-Original Message-
From:
No need to do it this way, see my previous solution.
All you need is to make your Actionscript base class use FlexLoader as its
bootstrap class (which has other benefits as well).
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M.Prabhakar
Also note that we have no way to monitor an XMLList for changes (its a
snapshot), so if you want your dataprovider to update, your expression
needs to include a reference to the actual XML.
-rg
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I'm guessing that your project isn't finding the frameworks SWC. There
are a few key classes that really irk the compiler if it can't find
them. Did you remove it from your project, or perhaps move the file?
-rg
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL
@yahoogroups.com, Roger Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm guessing that your project isn't finding the frameworks SWC.
There
are a few key classes that really irk the compiler if it can't find
them. Did you remove it from your project, or perhaps move the
file?
-rg
-Original
I know this isn't going to help you at the moment, but I just tested
your code against our latest compiler, and it compiled without any
error.
I'm CC'ing the guy on our team who I suspect fixed the issue, to see if
there are any workarounds to hold you until Beta 2 is out.
Cheers,
-rg
Change the line in loadImage to:
var myloader:mx.controls.Loader = new
mx.controls.Loader();
or
var myloader:flash.display.Loader = new
flash.display.Loader();
depending on which you want.
If you were to have used mx:Loader as a MXML tag,
we spell out the entire mx.controls.Loader
=../../../../../images/
{attachmentImageLocation}/mx:Loader
/mx:VBox
/mx:TitleWindow
Thanks,
_
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Gonzalez
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 5:31 PM
To: flexcoders
So, not to get in the way of your rant, but perhaps instead of assuming
the worst and going ballistic, you could first see if perhaps there -is-
a solution. Did you contact support?
-rg
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Embed is a compile-time directive, not a runtime
directive. You need to use mx:Image or mx:Loader to pull in your
image.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shahnavaz
AlwareSent: Monday, March 06, 2006 1:56 PMTo:
--
From: Roger Gonzalez
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:08 AM
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Reading or Embedding SWFs?
If
it doesn't import your frame labels, that's a bug. I don't know of any
reason why those would be skipped.
Not sure why you
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
