I've been playing with the latest cvs version (simgear, flightgear +
data on Sept 12th) and testing my skills with VOR/DME navigation.
There is a bug that causes a segfault around long 0. the test aircraft
is the Bravo, climbing to around 4000ft with a speed of 250. The same
happens with the
*Their mission is below.*
All some of us need to do is to be there at the right time and the right
place.. right ? We'll buzz them down ;-)
Sunday September 27, 2009 at 16:00 GMT
1st combat squadron bombing mission
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
AFAIK fgrun has reportedly defaulted to a nonresolvable name on
Windows too on several occasions. Let's remove this source of unnecessary
confusion from fgrun.
Cheers,
Anders
** Nods in agreement with Anders **
pete
Maybe a bit of a tangent question about the sound but..
The scenario in mind for xmas is a couple of new proper PC's
(multiscreen) set up with FG, so two kids in different parts of the
house are concerting. In the meantime there can be some ATC presence
from some laptop in the garden shed as
If its for sale in the Uk Then I will quite willingly buy the package.
I have already made some lines of enquiries as a common muppet.
and have got some strategic replies.
Whats the issue??
in UK law is it sales of goods act or copyright ?
pete
Tim Moore wrote:
On 09/26/2009 02:55 AM, syd
As an observer..
This is a long thread with no conclusions, but maybe one.
The one firm conclusion is to get off CVS at least.
So i dont see why it can't be first be moved to svn which is tried and
tested, supported on windows as the first step.
pete
Tim Moore wrote:
The gitorious repos are being run in the pull style right now. No
one has asked for commit rights to it, and the only official source of patches
is CVS... but as I have said elsewhere, these repos are not a direct mirror of
CVS. I've been maintaining a master branch which is
Curtis Olson wrote:
I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts
hopes are that once we finalized what we were doing with our eventual
move away from CVS, We would move our code to a system that offers a
number of developer features including an integrated bug tracker.
out of it.
Curt.
I totally agree that an issue tracking system is required.
From the short run that Pete Morgan and a couple of others have had a
couple of things come to mind.
- Proforma reports with at least the following information
- Steps required to reproduce the bug
google issues as
a common complaints dept, for delegation
pete
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com
mailto:ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
I agree that a bug tracking system is a good thing. My thoughts
Source code != bug tracking..
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile
,
Curt.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com
mailto:ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote:
Precisley the problem is that me as amuppet doth not know where the
issue ie at, and where to report.
So at least if we can point users to a particular point
same here ?
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi,
Curtis Olson wrote:
Why not use the bug tracker at code.google.com/p/flightgear
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear?
Is it just me or does that project not exist? The link gives an error
page and the project
does not show up when searching
Curtis..
Thou needs to rise up and command the people.
Please dictate where we can file bugs first..
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to
So what would the source tree look like to you as a developer and pilot
eg
hanger/boeing/**
Pablo Rogina wrote:
Pete Morgan wrote:
I do like the way qt uses it with merge requests. a lot of them to do
with documentation corrections, as well as minor touches to code.
I was following
Tapping out of my thoughts
I'm new to flight gear, and am rejoicing in the pleasure. However I do
have some serious reservations about the project towards global world
domination that need to be addressed.
For a start without my coders/web/brief hat on, what must be reorganized
is that
pigeon, how can we move toward having the navaids data base seperate.
albeit it might be on the same google map, however the data sources
would be seperate eg available on desktop file with sqllite rather than
remote, or an fg-get .. ?
Pigeon wrote:
Hi all again,
As some of us
I'm working on my motion sim for xmas. Its powered by a vacum cleaner atmo..
One BIG BIG problem - am basicng the cockpit on Bravo and 787
The autopilot heading bug is very violent and JERKS to direction..
How can we solve that problem please because on my motion platform, I
cant keep up with
and
Boeing and various UAV companies and not allowed to leave their cells. :-)
Curt.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com
mailto:ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote:
I'm working on my motion sim for xmas. Its powered by a vacum
cleaner atmo..
One BIG BIG problem
We need to define the autopilot properly and define its behaviour.
At it's most basic I expect the autpoilot to fullfil the following
functions.
1) maintain a heading - ie go that way direction - this jerks
violently in the sim
2) Altitude hold - this works, and on the motion platform it works
and a mega fault.
pete
-Original Message-
From: Pete Morgan [mailto:ac...@daffodil.uk.com]
Sent: 10 October 2009 20:18
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot and violent roll
Actually my motion platform is at the momnet I am taking it one step
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Saturday 10 October 2009 22:33:01 Curtis Olson wrote:
Really, this is all in how the autopilot is tuned and configured.
FlightGear doesn't model realistic control surface deflection rates so it's
possible to command an instantaneous deflection of the control
Does the new sound system honour the command line options..
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Command_Line_Parameters#Features
--disable-sound Disable sound effects
--enable-sound Enable sound effects
--enable-sound I dont know why this option is here
what
leee wrote:
On Saturday 10 Oct 2009, Pete Morgan wrote:
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Saturday 10 October 2009 22:33:01 Curtis Olson wrote:
Really, this is all in how the autopilot is tuned and
configured.
FlightGear doesn't model realistic control surface deflection
rates
I'm a bit confused how and why the auto pilot does certain things.
I think for legacy reasons, its been hacked together and work fine..
almost.ish..
There are also duo versions of le interface as defined here.. for end
users..
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Autopilot
and interestingly,
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Instrumentation
In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24388/src/Instrumentation
Modified Files:
instrument_mgr.cxx instrument_mgr.hxx
Log Message:
Ensure we always create a GPS instrument.
What if I
Johnathan Van Why wrote:
First, I'll say I'm not a developer and do not have a full
understanding of this problem.
Should the autopilot be a separate process that just basically
inputs pilot commands?
IE. turn at the same physical rate possible?
I believe the autopilot is another
leee wrote:
On Thursday 15 Oct 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
Pete Morgan wrote:
Glad you picked the 787, this is broken in CVS with all sorts
of errors.. thats why We need an aircraft fault list...
I would not call it broken, instead, call it incomplete. To
my opinion we're
Right, I'm a web developer and been thinking a lot about the bug
tracking (in my case across projects/ventures/etc), and applying that to
FG. Thats my frustration ladies and gentlemen, and I apologize for my
harshness sometimes; this comes from frustration ;-)
Indeed as a day job, its working
Just catching up on the thread (been away).
I compiled SG and FG with CXXFLAGS=-g -O0 and its fantastic. For the
first time I can fly around London airspace without a segfault. (never
tried the dist packages so cant report on that).
As far as finding the bug, I tried a lot of areas to try and
.
Is there anything else I can do ?
pete
Pete Morgan wrote:
Just catching up on the thread (been away).
I compiled SG and FG with CXXFLAGS=-g -O0 and its fantastic. For the
first time I can fly around London airspace without a segfault. (never
tried the dist packages so cant report on that).
As far
Can the enable 3d clouds
Menu View Rendering options 3D Coluds
also appear under
Menu Enviroment Clouds
if possible
Pete
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial.
A problem shared is a problem * 0.5 apparently. With some c++ and nasal
(sneezes, dribbles and a tissue to contain tacticle stuff) then the 1/2
ratio can be rapidly reduced.
So my frustration is with the scenery part of FlightGear. Eg can I fly
from Cardiff to Barcelona without scenery
Tom P wrote:
Hi Torsten
That's an interesting concept, I was thinking about groups as well.
But instead of writing extra code on top of the current client and server,
could we use different ports on the server?
Let me explain: if I understand correctly, the server already allows
Seperate ports are gonna be a problem with firewalls.
Is there a way to create a group using the callsign? eg my_group:callsign ?
just a thought.
Pete
Jacob Burbach wrote:
Trying to fit everyone into a few pre-defined groups is not a very
good idea in my opinion. Peoples wants, needs, and
Dont know if this is the right newsgroup, but am trying to compile
terragear.
Pulled from here
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=terragear-cs;a=summary
Also simgear from here
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=simgear-cs;a=summary
It configures ok but a compile error as below.
Bright Idea. I'm interested in cloud computing, which means all us
pilots, ATC, radar controllers, scenery, ops and IRC+backup, web,
engineers can all use the same term; somewhere towards a clearer
communications ;-)
So what I am playing with atmo, is the google app engine, and
specifically
Can we use XMPP it for
* ATIS
* ATC
* MP_chat
* Creating out own groups, airlines etc
* other stuff
requirements
* Dialog
Server=flightgear.appspot.com
email=test.pi...@my_email_address
pass = enter
handle/callsign = foo
ATIS also
Means we can use it on Google.appengine (current
Join the club.
Seems that it works with terra-cs, but you HAVE to use latest cvs for
everything else.
And agree with you somewhat, the wiki documentation is outdated, and
wrong. Scenery on forums is cool, but dont expect an answer soon.
pete
syd adams wrote:
Hello ,
Ive decided to try to
Is nav.dat supposed to be updated from robin X-plane database?
If nobody else is going to do that, I'll be updating the file from
Robin's most current package during our pre-release phase (however this
is going to be defined ).
Can't the data be commited to CVS now ?
pete
Do a search for professional flight simulator, and an ad for Flight
Pro Sim appears with the title.
Plight Pro Sim A Scam ?
Sound suspect to me
http://m2.daffodil.uk.com/flight_pro_sim_scam.png
Pete
--
This
I just click thru the ads ;-)
Funny thing is I like the idea of IT, and if it was done with respect,
then it would be cool imho.
pete
Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
Pete Morgan a écrit :
Do a search for professional flight simulator, and an ad for Flight
Pro Sim appears with the title
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
There were major changes on the GPS and Route-Manager since August (3 Months
ago already!)
So this has affected the the use of the autopilot as well.
All aircrafts using the generic Autopilot-panel are affected, but not those
with an own written flightdirector
With today's cvs
On startup I get error, which explains maybe why autp[ilot doesnt work
Failed to load autopilot configuration:
/home/flight-sim/flight-gear-9/data/Aircraft/777-200/Systems/777-autopilot.xml:not
well-formed
loading scenario 'nimitz_demo'
Also as some point as I start takeoff
Something has changed recently as I now get these bugs which crash when
starting the 787
./787.sh
malformed autopilot definition - unrecognized node:target in section
True Heading Hold (DG based) Stage 1
Failed to load autopilot configuration:
Would it be possible to make the dialogs eg Autopilot (F11), Comms
(F12) remember their positions.
For example, I tend to move the Autopilot dialog bottom right, but wish
then the next time I press f11 to reopen the dialog, it opens in the
last position.
regards
Pete
Bravo is one of my favourite aircraft, however the autopilot has a few
bugs. I've tried hacking some of this, but am not experienced in what to
change. So I will be following any changes or fixes below with a keen
interest.
*** Heading Hold is wobbly ***
At higher speeds, eg 220+ knots the
This is another cool plane, but the autopilot is also a bit confused.
*** IAS BUG SPD ***
Speed hold has no effect and is inoperative.
*** Altitude Hold ***
When selecting a new altitude, eg 1000 to 1100 then the aircraft tip
up/down almost immediately, indeed each click causes the aim to
--aircraft=747
The autopilot xml has a bug, so autopilot does not work.. At the command
line it shows
malformed autopilot definition - unrecognized node:target in section
True Heading Hold (DG based) Stage 1
Failed to load autopilot configuration:
Rob Shearman, Jr. wrote:
Pete Morgan:
{re: http://tinypic.com/r/dndoip/6} The Path in Orange is the path the
NAV hold took roughly to approach Barkway, indeed at the screenshot
time it was still out. The yellow line is the path I would have
expected.
Ie the correction is not agressive
### Model Broken
The model is broken, the captain is sitting with no left panel, just
runway below.
There are a lot of startup error probably causing this (see bottom
### Wing leveler
The yoke oscillates from side to side nicely at around 60bpm, however
over a very long period of time eg 5
## Autopilot - Heading bug
When selecting a new heading, the the aircraft moved violently left
right for a few moments, before settling into the bank angle.
---
The autopilot overshoots its new heading, before very slowly moving back
to the correct heading, although it always seems to be out by
## Startup and recurring errors.
There are numerous start up error/warnings, and Error drawing more
current than available! that is constantly ouptut till fg is
terminated. See bottom below for full listing.
## Autopilot
The autopilot is broken with
malformed autopilot definition -
## Model Broken
The engine cowling looks like propellers and are rottating on all the
engines in an offset strange way.
## Panel error
On startup there is output
Error reading panel:
Failed to open file
at
/home/flight-sim/flight-gear-9/data/Aircraft/737/Panels/737-ifr-panel.xml
Error reading
syd adams wrote:
Looks like your biggest problems are autopilot... what kind of
framerate do you normally get ?
Yes, my area of focus is the autopilot, navaids.
I'm getting generally around 20+, but sometimes as low as 15 on this
olde box.
Does the frame rate really mess up the autopilot
## Startup message
Cannot find image file /home/flight-sim/flight-gear-9/data/FOO
## Heading Bug
Selecting a new heading causes the aircraft to oscillate wildly as it
turns. (broken)
The autopilot overshoots the required heading by around 5 degree, before
moving slowly back to its required
## Heading Bug
Selecting a new heading caused a violent roll.
## Altitute Hold
Selecting a new altitude causes the aircraft to bounce a few times
before settling.
## NAV1 - VOR
Selecting a new VOR/Course cause the aircraft to roll violently
## NAV1 - Localiser
When a approaching the runway,
## AutoPilot Dialog
The IAS and CRS text entry show floats instead on integers. This makes
entering new text doffocult and determining current text sometimes
impossible. eg CRS = 112.12 IAS=156.12
## Heading hold
On selecting a new heading, the aircraft oscillates throught the turn,
until
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Pete Morgan wrote:
*** Heading Hold ***
Wobbles intermittently above 350 knots, 400 knots + and it can crash the
aircraft.
Hi Pete,
It is good with bug reports but I think we need more detailed descriptions
of (some of) the problems
, same as a real autopilot.
I do not have oscillations during turns, selecting new heading or not.
As I do not use AP to shoot an ILS I've not seen the other issues.
Peter
--Original Message--
From: Pete Morgan
To: FlightGear developers discussions
ReplyTo: FlightGear developers
I tried slaving a while back, but other commitments stopped the dabbling.
In the reasearch I had set up the slave socket as another native
protocol with a high frame rate of 30, and the multiplayer at frame rate
ten.
Would to interested to know if its working well? and also how are you
using
in a cardbox box, a
real dodgy scale prototype with Action man as pilot.
This is why I've been sensitive about the auotpilot as the wobbles
will manifest themselves on the motion platform.
regards
Pete
On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Pete Morgan wrote:
Peter Brown wrote:
I guess
at
startup
Pete :-)
Csaba Halász wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Pete Morgan ac...@daffodil.uk.com wrote:
Something has changed recently as I now get these bugs which crash when
starting the 787
YASim SOLUTION FAILURE:
Zero length fuselage
I have reported this error a year ago
Since were in the new decade, maybe its time for a new look also for the
new release, also.
A Design competition for the new website and logo would be a nice.
Brief.
Design a new website and image that will make it cool for flight
simulation enviroment, thats functional and will last this
oops sorry, meant an Extra Large T-Shirt (like mr T and basic T for
pilot), a joyStick (I'll cover both) and a really small tshirt, eg to
keep your copilot the laptop warm.
anyway just a thought
pete
Victhor wrote:
You get two t-shirts and a joystick? Wow! :D
Since were in the new
leee wrote:
On Saturday 23 Jan 2010, Pete Morgan wrote:
After following the link below.. here is the fix. Not sure what
it does, but took a stab at replacing the ax=13.6. The model
looks fins in the views..
+++ b/787.xml
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Mach 1 = 576.6 kt @ 35,000 ft --
width=5.9
I'm having a successful time tuning my first autopilot on the 787.
I've managed to get rid of the jerks and wobbles, mainly by using a
noise-spike filter with max-rate-of-change. That thanks to Syd
Adams for that wonderful tip.
All flight level changes, and NAV, heading can be tuned very
thanks lee for the reply, particular about the thinking it through
part; and am already thinking about a problem I've encountered, although
I'm still trying to get the hang of the autopilot.
VNAV. - (don't know how to explain the problem well)
I've managed to get the Altitude hold, Vertical
Thanks leee..
for all the tips..
Is one of you aircraft in CVS so I cant study the autopilot.
pete
leee wrote:
On Monday 25 Jan 2010, Pete Morgan wrote:
thanks lee for the reply, particular about the thinking it
through part; and am already thinking about a problem I've
encountered
Am trying to get the autopilot to follow a NAV1 course, correctly.
It works, but the behaviour is unexpected, or I got it wrong about VOR
navigation.
Please have a look at the image link below as I am not good at explaining.
http://imgur.com/LL6b9
Approaching a VOR, from say 50nm away, just
all the PID's active (with history as leee
pointed out).. and have a switch between them
pete
leee wrote:
On Monday 25 Jan 2010, Pete Morgan wrote:
thanks lee for the reply, particular about the thinking it
through part; and am already thinking about a problem I've
encountered, although I'm
Attached is a patch that adds filters to the 777 autopilot's Heading,
LNAV and Altitude
Major bug is LNAV.
The 777 currently doesn't fly on a LNAV/CRS properly.
The aircraft ends up on the correct heading, but with no correction, ie
parallel to predicted path and not correcting. The values in
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:36 AM, syd adams wrote:
It works, but the behaviour is unexpected, or I got it wrong
about VOR
navigation.
Sounds like it could be a faulty config file ,,, but the proper
way to do a VOR navigation is :
Wonderful, brilliant stuff Giuseppe,
The way that the autopilot works with those patches is the way I expected.
Hope this stuff makes its way into CVS so at least there's a good
reference implementation.
pete
Giuseppe Venanzoni wrote:
Hi!
I would like to join the discussion about AP
The idea is to create a Distribution for use in schools.
FG will hopefully be used in the following lessons.
* Geography
* Geology
* Physics
* Technical Drawing
* Art
* Drama
* Cooking and food
* Maths
* woodwork
* english
To make it the DeFacto, we all need to get our act together.
Thats the
I would gladly make a contribution to FlightGear.
My small contrib would be around £10 per quarter and I would expect this
cash to go towards:
* Maintaining servers online and similar
Is that mechanism in place ?
Is FlightGear.com TradeMark in place?
Is there a way I can take FlightGear and
Olivier JACQ wrote:
The MP conversation is interesting.
Why should people choose between one or another MP Server :
1. Because it is written in the doc (Wiki, ...)
2. Because they check their latency from their location (which is the best
option).
3. Because they choose it based on its
My birthday is may 16..
and am near Swansea
.. cunning flight plan coming...
pete
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi,
while searching for flightsim events I came across the Flight
Simulator Convention at
the *Helicopter Museum in Weston Super Mare, North Somerset, United
Kingdom*.
As
* they do not maintain last position
* Cant be resized
* label over flow spacing
* no Validation on entry
* Changes are sometimes immediate, even tapping in or deleting a
figure, makes the entries applies to SIM REAL time key entry..
eg trying to change heading from 270 to 280, means
Erik Hofman wrote:
Pete Morgan wrote:
GUI dialogs suck
And now?
Erik
very helpful erik.
pete
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data
Thanks James.
It seems to work with my test buzzing london and associated VOR/ILS
am now trying to refine autopilot in concert.
pete
James Turner wrote:
On 28 Jan 2010, at 04:00, syd adams wrote:
you can also check the instrumentation/nav/nav-loc , but it seems to stay
stuck on true
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
We are to some extent hamstrung by the rather old GUI toolkit we use. However,
replacing that is going to be non-trivial, and it would affect not just the
core GUI but
also all the dialog boxes that have been set up for particular aircraft.
-Stuart
That is
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
We do, of course, have a set of standard Nasal libraries under data/Nasal/.
These were previously maintained by Melchior, who worked hard to ensure that
we didn't end up wth lots of slightly different per-aircraft
Curtis Olson wrote:
Here's the thing. FlightGear uses a gui widget set that is
implemented on top of OpenGL. This has many advantages from a
portability standpoint and from the standpoint of integrating with
window systems. Pui doesn't have every feature under the sun, but
it was never
I would expect my donation to go to infrastructure costs, eg wiki
Hosting which often complains about limit exceeded.
pete
Martin Spott wrote:
syd adams wrote:
Where does the donation money go ? To who ? And for what ?I dont like
donating money when I have no idea what Im donating to.
thinking
Maybe we do really need to set up some legal entity... for a variety
of reasons. Its noted that setting up an entity does have huge
ramifications in time and admin, such as legal status, cash flow, etc..
etc..atc.. and it does mean responsibility ie personally involved..
Gijs, why not just create a clone of 747 series in github, or gitorious
, and then that can be merges into CVS later maybe.
pete
Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to know if anybody was working on it so I don't
duplicate wnat other people are doing.
Do I understand correctly you are
With ATC2, I keep getting a Nasal error, which results in having to restart.
Nasal runtime error: nil used in numeric context
at /home/flight-sim/flight-gear-9/data/Nasal/multiplayer.nas, line 285
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=51
kind regards
Pete
yo John Denker
We are working on the same goal, in identifying bugz, and other little
imperfections ;-)
Please join the google code bugs experiment for FG = R+D. ie a list of
bugs. Its an independant tangent, like your spreadsheet, except its
online and you can use it also..
can you file this bug formally at
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/list
so we can track it
ta
pete
John Denker wrote:
At KSQL there is reproducibly a building sitting
partially on a taxiway and even extending onto
the runway a little bit.
The 777 is totally in dev.. and making all sorts of capers..
I guess we have to sit back and wait for Syd to decide the aircraft
and its systems is worthy of testing.
In the meantime its a pointless task as the path is not identified, or
indeed the path mapped. So come back later (BTW there is
bug #52 is quite frustrating, particular when ATC'ing
It does not directly crash FG, however the terminal output and/or the
error makes it run slow and means an FG restart, thereby loosing all ATC
context.
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=52
pete
This error at wiki.flightgear.org is happening more often, indeed I'd
say a 1 in 4 chance = 25%
Is anyone experiencing this, and if so as traffic ramps up, then maybe
we'll have no wiki at all !!!
pete
--
SOLARIS 10
Cant this cos be in .html instead of .rtf please
YOSHIMATSU Toshihide wrote:
Hi all,
Just for reference, I attached nice document, that was written by Tat
and included in 2.0.0-pre3 package for Mac OS X.
- TXT.rtf (Rich Text Format)
Cheers,
Toshi
Who is the active developer of the main flightgear.org website?
pete
--
SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Who is the active developer of the
main flightgear.org website?
pete
Well, maybe the guy which name can be read at the bottom of flightgear.org?
;-)
He's not on this site
http://www.flightgear.pl/
or this one
http://www.flightgear.jpn.org/
for example.
Solved bugs ;-)
#19 - landing lights
thanks vivian
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=19can=1
#18
by stuart.. realised it wasnt a bug anymore
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=18can=1
#35
by zakalawe ==Jaames
Fixed the font select bug.. ta
I thinks that this ball is now firmly in Curt's court..
http://74.126.30.121/ep/503.shtml
and this issue
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=53q=wiki
Wish this could be resolved sooner rather than later.
Its rather disappointing for new users.
kind regards
Pete
I AM SORRY.. everyone..
guess I replied in haste of emotion.
apologies all
pete
Alex Perry wrote:
Pete, perhaps we need to create a separate queue for
flightgear-usability-bugs-that-gene-doesnt-care-about.
--
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
also, without a clear central repository, aircraft bit-rot as soon as their
author
leaves the project. At least with CVS (or another central repository) there
is an
easy way for someone else to maintain orphaned aircraft.
... as is the case with the B787, its
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
