Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-20 Thread Durk Talsma
On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: /sim/dimensions/radius-m /sim/aircraft-class ? It might be worth having this multi-valued, so classes such as WWII fighter can be identified bit as mil-combat, and WWII. Looking at the -set.xml and Liveries/*.xml files in our aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-18 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:23:57 +0200, Durk wrote in message f2886125-96b7-40ff-a334-f92932287...@gmail.com: Hi Stuart, On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: However, I think that the properties you've defined have a use beyond just ATC, so hiding them under /sim/atc and only

[Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi All, I just added some new code to src/Main/fg_init.cxx that allows FlightGear's airport dynamics functions to give you a valid parking position without having to bother about the details of whether the parking is of hte right type, whether it is large enough, etc etc. To achieve this, the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-17 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Durk Talsma wrote: Hi All, I just added some new code to src/Main/fg_init.cxx that allows FlightGear's airport dynamics functions to give you a valid parking position without having to bother about the details of whether the parking is of hte right type,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] An extension to --parkpos

2011-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Stuart, On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:45, Stuart Buchanan wrote: However, I think that the properties you've defined have a use beyond just ATC, so hiding them under /sim/atc and only loading them as additional config feels like a bit of a wasted opportunity to me. Thanks for your comments.