Sorry we got into a big discussion about the web. I really want to discuss
POLs for rules, css being one of them. And in particular, once we have a
good POL, how to test it, and author with it--how to create a great POL
program?
But what about probablistic rules? Can we design an ultimate
I know of a few sites/tools which critcise your wesite...is there one for
css?
On Feb 15, 2013 1:02 PM, John Carlson yottz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry we got into a big discussion about the web. I really want to
discuss POLs for rules, css being one of them. And in particular, once we
have a
I guess what I am asking for is a critic service. For both POLs and uses
of POLs. Can POLs be designed such that uses of POLs ensure good design?
Good architecture? I am way beyond my technical knowledge here.
On Feb 15, 2013 1:19 PM, John Carlson yottz...@gmail.com wrote:
I know of a few
It seems this is not possible without a fitness function. A declarative
approach to defining the what of your program would probably go some way
towards making the validation of the how possible. BDD (behavior driven
development) is the closest approach I have found to this - however the
silver
Could the fitness function be # of recent users? Any other ideas?
On Feb 15, 2013 2:04 PM, shaun gilchrist shaunxc...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems this is not possible without a fitness function. A declarative
approach to defining the what of your program would probably go some way
towards
Can POLs be designed such that uses of POLs ensure good design? Good
architecture? I am way beyond my technical knowledge here.
Bad code can be written in any language, and even good code can be used to
develop bad ideas and architectures. You can't ever ensure good design,
not least of all
We have design guidelines. We have look and feel. The cell phone seems to
narrow down what is possible, pushing developers towards common metaphors.
There are app creation wizards for smartphones now. I think there may be a
turning point where people may start using wizards to create more apps.
I know a lot of programs collect usage statistics. Does # of times used
mean popular, good, or something that needs to be automated? I see your
point. We don't want to automate the back button yet.
On Feb 15, 2013 2:52 PM, David Barbour dmbarb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can POLs be designed such
Could one analyze the test code (not the main source code) assuming it is
complete enough and make a determination? That is, the style of testing
determines how good the main code is. Is there behavior driven development
for behavior driven development?
On Feb 15, 2013 2:04 PM, shaun gilchrist
I.e.: given new code is checked in
When code coverage is complete
And all tests succeed
Then deploy to integration
On Feb 15, 2013 3:30 PM, John Carlson yottz...@gmail.com wrote:
Could one analyze the test code (not the main source code) assuming it is
complete enough and make a determination?
There are people who do this sort of continuous deployment, and even swear
by it. I've not tried it, but I suppose it encourages development of good
tests and easily speeds up the feedback cycle. I've been thinking about
such approaches for Wiki-based development.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:04
11 matches
Mail list logo
