On 9/12/13 6:23 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Or do you also need [..] doping [..]
Saw this on /. this morning.
http://people.umass.edu/gbecker/BeckerChes13.pdf
Yikes..
Marcus
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays
Marcus/Glen -
On 9/12/13 6:23 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Or do you also need [..] doping [..]
Saw this on /. this morning.
http://people.umass.edu/gbecker/BeckerChes13.pdf
Yikes..
Reading this article reminded me of the following:
UNM/HPC did some Visualization work for Sandia regarding
I'm going to buy a Pi and need a little info. I've got Doug's posts:
http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/delicious-raspberry-pi.html
http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-second-helping-of-pi.html
.. but wouldn't hurt to pick up on other's experiences too before building
a
Steve Smith wrote at 09/13/2013 08:09 AM:
On 9/12/13 6:23 PM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
Or do you also need [..] doping [..]
Saw this on /. this morning. http://people.umass.edu/gbecker/BeckerChes13.pdf
Yikes..
Reading this article reminded me of the following:
[...] looking for
On 9/13/13 2:57 PM, glen wrote:
If we know this is/will-be the case, then why press for absolute
transparency at all? Why not be anarcho-capitalist and allow for the
opacity of some, strategically allowed, opacity?
The anarcho-capitalist will try to extract every bit of value from any
On 9/13/13 10:32 AM, Owen Densmore wrote:
I'm going to buy a Pi and need a little info. I've got Doug's posts:
http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/delicious-raspberry-pi.html
http://things-linux.blogspot.com/2013/07/a-second-helping-of-pi.html
.. but wouldn't hurt to pick up on other's
Marcus/Glen/et alii -
I just listened to Amy Goodman's interview with Robert Riech
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/9/13/inequality_for_all_robert_reich_warns
on his new film, Inequality for All. I was caught enough by the
following statement he made to look it up and consider it further
Marcus G. Daniels wrote at 09/13/2013 02:59 PM:
If people know how their hardware works, then some competitor can come along
and create similar hardware at a lower price point. Provided an open source
effort can come along and make a sort of similar VHDL design that puts them out
of
Proprietary Code (PC :-) has a place if people are willing to put up with it,
but then most people don't realize there are alternatives. That old Freedom vs.
Security thing seems apropos here. Many people are quite willing to put up with
a little less freedom for a little more security. I'm not
On 9/13/13 10:02 AM, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
But I'm too ignorant to understand the utility of the side-channel use
case. How would the black hat get the chip into the right place? The
same way? By flooding the target with chips that all contain the
hidden side channel?
Install staff at
On 9/13/13 12:29 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Have hardware trojans been found in the wild yet? (meaning have they
been discovered in other than an obvious, targeted venue?).
The paper mentions VisionTech, but it sounds like that was mainly just a
counterfeiting operation.
On 9/13/13 6:40 PM, glen wrote:
Membership in the cabal comes from cognitive investment, not capital.
I disagree. Membership in the set of cabal _tools_ ... the
technically competent person, comes from cognitive investment.
Ownership/control of those tools comes from capital, usually in the
On 9/13/13 6:40 PM, glen wrote:
So, it would work fairly well without a requirement for absolute
transparency.
If the goal is to develop versatile technical language, and someone
effectively owns a bunch of the useful words (interfaces , ...) that is
an impediment to giving everyone a fair
*Some Incomplete and Scattered Thoughts*
I missed some of the discussion and will have to catch up once I get the
number of unread emails I have at least less than the current year :P but I
don't see why true transparency wouldn't affect people becoming dominant
through a better understanding of
On 9/13/13 6:11 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
Democracy itself is the act of writing code; the rules of execution of
everything from government itself (compilers, interpreters, system
libraries, OS) to economics to criminal justice (exception handling?)
Ok, criminal Justice is more like crude
Markus...
Democracy itself is the act of writing code; the rules of execution
of everything from government itself (compilers, interpreters, system
libraries, OS) to economics to criminal justice (exception handling?)
Ok, criminal Justice is more like crude block-device virus scanning
for
On 9/13/13 10:14 PM, Steve Smith wrote:
No... I still think it is like an exception detection/handling
process... enforcement is roughly detection and handling is roughly
courts and penal? Intelligence is more like virus-scanning...
Crimes are punished and criminals contained -- security
17 matches
Mail list logo
