< Your comparison of "closure" to Nick's idea of "surplus"
(intentional or not) meaning. I accept that in programming a computer,
"closure" is a useful tool, to avoid unintended "side effects".>
If one thinks of the mind of two people as two circles in a Venn diagram and
the intersection as
For catholics, a confirmed unmarried man might be different than a
confirmed bachelor .
___
stephen.gue...@simtable.com
CEO, Simtable http://www.simtable.com
1600 Lena St #D1, Santa Fe, NM 87505
Glen said a lot,
That sort of pestered my thoughts. I thought some rebuttal was call for at the
time
he crossed into my personal fiefdom. But I was preoccupied and let it slip.
>From my peculiar POV the circular component so often discussed seems to suit
>certain minds
as a useful
< I'm going to skip ahead a bit and state that my entire line of rhetoric about
circularity goes back to the complexity jargon discussion we were having and
whether or not, as Nick put it, a system has a say in its own boundary. It's
all about _closure_. This particular tangent targets
Glen -
Thanks for the thoughtful analysis and return to(ward) the point at
hand. Your comparison of "closure" to Nick's idea of "surplus"
(intentional or not) meaning. I accept that in programming a computer,
"closure" is a useful tool, to avoid unintended "side effects". In
natural
Ha! I struggled to come up with "single" as an alternative name and you had 4
waiting in the wings.
I'm going to skip ahead a bit and state that my entire line of rhetoric about
circularity goes back to the complexity jargon discussion we were having and
whether or not, as Nick put it, a
Nick sez:
We have a word for tingo, don’t we? Its “to ”borrow””.
In my experience 'to "borrow" ', in our culture usually means to "take
without permission" or more bluntly "to steal". That extends to
"borrowing without returning" and anecdotally we are familiar with those
who seem to do
Marcus-
I was thinking of the ER=EPR example.
My intuition is that after we elaborate enough examples like this, as
well as Feynman's observation that since all (heretofore observed)
electrons appear identical, perhaps they are a *single* electron which
is everywhere/everywhen, we might
Stephen -
For catholics, a confirmed unmarried man might be different than a
confirmed bachelor .
being an unmarried man but not a Catholic, Confirmed or otherwise, I am
not a bachelor, though my current lifestyle mimics many of the qualities
of the canonical (but not Canonized) confirmed
Glen writes:
"How about, instead of interpretations, we think of applications, e.g.
commonalities between domain-specific languages?"
I'd make a distinction between embedded DSLs (built on general-purpose
programming languages) and DSLs which are not. I don't want to get stuck
thinking
"John Zingale referenced something in last Monday's Salon about how idioms frm
early string theory investigations was almost deprecated when it found new
utility in quantum loop gravity?"
I was thinking of the ER=EPR example.
Seems like basic questions of interpretation just get kicked down
What would you call people like me, who were reared Catholic, including
confirmation and duties as an "altar boy", but who never believed a single word
uttered in Mass, by parents, or in the official books? In fact, the only
concepts I took, believed in, from Catholicism are 1) catholicism
On 06/23/2017 12:08 PM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> Works for me, I was thinking "crypto athiest"...
Naa. I don't qualify as any sort of atheist. I have gods, they're just unique
gods.
> Interesting that you didn't believe "a word uttered in Mass" while I, as a
> young adult came to believe (or
Marcus -
The _/From Other Tongues/_ sketch is good. Both what is heard and
what is said could be modeled as a closure over some subjective
representation.
...
The squiggles suggest that the types are not yet shared amongst the
agents.
I agree with this, but the theme of the "From
OK. I mostly agree. But at some point, there might be an unresolveable
ambiguity in the kernel, at which point I would be forced to allow pluralism.
That's why I allow pluaralism from the start... to avoid having to change my
mind later. 8^) I think it's easier to go from many to one than
Marcus -
This is about the time when I expect Dave West to jump in with his rant
about how broken the metaphor of "mind as computer" (or perhaps venn
diagram) is. Though he may not be cross-subscribed here.
Ignoring those arguments for a moment and giving over to the metaphor,
let me
Steve writes:
"To the extent that the only and precise goal is to efficiently, unambiguously,
and accurately serialize the contents of one's mind and transmit it to another
mind which de-serializes with the goal of syncronizing the internal states of
Bob's mind to that of Alice's, perhaps what
Glen -
Works for me, I was thinking "crypto athiest"...
Naa. I don't qualify as any sort of atheist. I have gods, they're just unique
gods.
Understood... "crypto-animist" perhaps? I didn't think much of the
term (animist) until I encountered it in Abram's "Spell of the Sensuous"
which
Glen -
What would you call people like me, who were reared Catholic, including confirmation and duties as
an "altar boy", but who never believed a single word uttered in Mass, by parents, or in
the official books? In fact, the only concepts I took, believed in, from Catholicism are 1)
On 06/23/2017 12:07 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Many "interpretations" just put off getting to the bottom of things. Keep
> the interpretations around long enough to get parallax on a better
> interpretation, then press Delete.
How about, instead of interpretations, we think of applications,
Just how many of these Glens are out there...
I guess they just keep sprouting up like dandelions.
The use of any Word requires a little cooperation from a group.
If I were a solipsist why would I ever need the fiction that you understood my
grunts. Why does each Glen seem to stand in different
Has anybody mentioned that there are lot of unmarried men that you usually
wouldn't call bachelors? There are widowers, priests, and nineteen
year-olds, for example. I learned the word because my father's brother was
a thirty-five year old Major in the Air Force with no wife. He eventually
got
22 matches
Mail list logo