Harry Pollard wrote:
Check out:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/liberty.html
The Israeli pretext that the attack was a tragic mistake is a LIE:
Why then did the US President order American forces --twice-- to STOP
coming to the rescue of the USS Liberty during the IDF
- Original Message -
From: Cordell, Arthur: ECOM
To: Ed Weick ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Christoph Reuss
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Future of work?
Do you know the story of the frog in the pot getting warmed up?
Social-democrats keep the
Ed Weick wrote:
What Douglas did in Saskatchewan suggested that he wanted to bring the
frog all the way out even if he may not have been able to.
LOL! Of course that's always the CLAIM. You'll never meet a
social-democrat who will ADMIT that keeping the frog in the pot
until it's boiled is
Chris, you have no way of knowing Tommy Douglas who was both a Baptist
minister and a politician. If there ever was a politician who meant what he
said, it was Douglas. When I was a kid in Saskatchewan, he spoke in our
little town. Knowing that he had been a very good amatuer boxer, I watched
I just googled and read the first one that came up.
The piece brought in a number of outside contributions
which I haven't checked, but hqve simply accepted.
The reports of the survivors offer little help as they
didn't know anything about why the attack was made.
Overall, I would say the
Chris, you have no way of knowing Tommy Douglas who was both a Baptist
minister and a politician.
Yeah right, those who believe in immaculate conception will also believe
that the frog leaping out of the pot was the goal...
Chris
just reading the first one that came up is a terrible way to do research,
Harry. Surely you know this. And then not noticing the nature of the site
and assessing the likelihood that it is objective is...not research at all,
but something else. Frankly, I cannot belief that you were simply remiss
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Douglas
http://www.cbc.ca/greatest/top_ten/nominee/douglas-tommy.html
Listen to or read the story of Mouseland here
http://www.saskndp.com/history/mouseland.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Harry Pollard wrote:
I just googled and read the first one that came up.
The piece brought in a number of outside contributions
which I haven't checked, but hqve simply accepted.
This sums up your position on SUVs, CO2, DDT, Iraqi death toll etc.
pretty well.
The reports of the survivors
But the Pharmas got their huge profits from what you call
earned privilege.
Have you changed your mind again.
I didn't defend CEO payments. If shareholders accept them,
who are we to complain?
The shareholders pay them.
Harry
**
Henry George School of Social
Listen to or read the story of Mouseland here
http://www.saskndp.com/history/mouseland.html
It's just too bad that the social-democrats are gray cats, not mice.
Chris
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread
I think people do what they can. The NDP in Canada has been a force for
change. Many mistakes but usually on the side of the little guy.
So Chris, what do you suggest?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Reuss
Sent: Tuesday, June
just reading the first one that came up is a terrible way to do
research, Harry.
Indeed. OTOH, the net is loaded with contradictory assertions, claims
and observations, largely indistinguisable from fabrications and
deliberate disinformation. It's unlikely that we or anyone other than
the
So Chris, what do you suggest?
Sorry, a party with my agenda doesn't exist yet -- not even in Europe
with its putative party diversity.
Chris
___
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
Thanks, Mike. I'll check out the sources.
Too often, people allow themselves to come to conclusions and express
opinions on complicated or secretive events without genuine study. I think
with old-fashioned research we can often discern what has happened, or at
least enough of what has happened
And your agenda is:
1.
2.
3.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Reuss
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Future of work?
So Chris, what do you suggest?
Sorry, a party with my
Harry Pollard wrote:
But the Pharmas got their huge profits from what you call
earned privilege.
It's not that simple. Big Pharma got their huge profits from
wrong medical paradigms applied on vast scale, and from corruption
in the medical-industrial complex. With a sensible medical system,
After all those years on FW, I thought you'd know my agenda?
Chris
___
Futurework mailing list
Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
Enquiring minds want to know.
Doesn't have to be in detail.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph
Reuss
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Future of work?
After all those years on
It's a pleasure, Arthur:
1. Environmental elegant technology, àla 120+ mpg cars. Ban of SUVs.
2. Preventive healthcare approach, bans of drugs, junkfood, pesticides etc.
3. Protectionism, fair trade, steep tariffs on useless harmful stuff.
4. De-privatization of railways, airlines, telecoms,
Spoken like a good conspiracy theorist!
What is my position on SUVs?
**
Henry George School of Social Science
of Los Angeles.
Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042
818 352-4141
**
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawry,
I didn't post any old bit of nonsense?
I just don't care about it.
Chris brought up the subject. I googled and got the URL
which I posted and then forgot about it.
This is what I sent.
---
--
Check out:
Harry Pollard wrote:
But I am not particularly interested in this 40 year old
event, but if I were I would not listen only to the
pro-Arab input - which I suppose is anti-Israeli by
implication.
Your remarks come straight out of your pro-Arab stance -
which is all right. I look to your
Much that is agreeable.
Thanks for the posting.
arthur
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Christoph Reuss
Sent: Tue 6/12/2007 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Future of work?
It's a pleasure, Arthur:
1. Environmental elegant
Harry, I would ask that next time you don't care about something that you
refrain from posting propaganda. It gives us the impression that you do
care, and we assume that therefore you brought some thought to your posting.
Instead, it just makes us waste our time in responding to you.
It also
Yoiks!! A true social democrat! But do be careful. You could lift the
frog right out of the pot. Then what would the rest of us do?
Ed
- Original Message -
From: Christoph Reuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework]
We'd go into the Frog Massage business.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christoph Reuss
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Future of work?
Yoiks!! A true social democrat! But
Yoiks!! A true social democrat!
No, social democrats (and they are in my government, even the current
President) are not implementing a single one of my 9 points! Worse,
they actively implement the opposite of several points.
I have no idea how you can say that.
But do be careful. You
Mike,
I didn't do research. As the subject came up, I checked
it out on google to remind myself of it..
A matter of simple curiosity, whereupon I put the URL in a
post and forgot about it.
However, I stirred up the anti-Israelites, particularly
when I said I had no interest in the 40 year old
Well, Harry, you stirred me up. So are you characterizing me as an
anti-Israelite?
If so, you are despicable. I have spent decades studying the Middle East,
and am recognized as a subject matter expert on it. I have clients on both
sides of the conflict between Israelis and the Palestinians, and
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Christoph Reuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a pleasure, Arthur:
1. Environmental elegant technology, àla 120+ mpg cars. Ban of SUVs.
2. Preventive healthcare approach, bans of drugs, junkfood, pesticides
etc.
3. Protectionism, fair trade, steep tariffs on useless
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Darryl or Natalia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks and smells like Tesla, or predecessors, reapplied...I couldn't
save a scrap of it to draft, but if interested in a possible un-wiring
of parts of your home or office...
Natalia
32 matches
Mail list logo
