Hello,
I hope I'm not too late and 2.5.17 still not released. Today I found a
bug in menu code: 'CopyMenuStyle' don't copies recently introduced
'TitleColorset'. Attached patch fixes this.
Happy release have a good time everyone
--
Serge Koksharov, Free Software user supporter
GPG public
On 7/17/06, Andrei Popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dominik and thanks for you response.
You could add some dummy Gnome application to your start function.
I'm sorry, dummy Gnome application doesn't sound too clear to me,
and Google didn't help me either =) Can you perhaps provide an
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:35:15AM +0100, Leon wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Leon wrote:
However it seems it does nothing at all. All the icons still have
sticky title. Any ideas?
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:26:32PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:35:15AM +0100, Leon wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Leon wrote:
However it seems it
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still documented as (stylename)Off. So if the
flag negation is prefered to the (stylename) vs. (stylename)Off, or
the other way round,
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still documented as (stylename)Off. So if the
flag negation is
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:26:32PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:35:15AM +0100, Leon wrote:
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:01:36PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then you'd end up with lots of equal styles applying to
different situations..
I don't see how -- it still only applies to a specific group of windows
(or a specific window, depending on the style used.)
It would allow
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
Won't work.
-- Thomas Adam
--
If I were a witch's hat, sitting on her head like a paraffin
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
Won't work.
Yes, I know :) But in any case,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
Won't work.
Another thing to remember is that all
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/17 10:51:34
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in
Log message:
updated the manpage to reflect the prefered !* style negation method.
(only Title, StippledTitle and
On 7/17/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:02:47PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Yes, but then the 2.5 manual should be updated. I'll start doing
that..
Don't be too hasty. :) Things like:
Style foo !Icon
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:36:08PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On the other hand, BackColor and ForeColor apply to both situations.
Don't get too attached to those though -- they're deprecated in favour
of using colorsets. :)
So you can
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:56:18PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Lol.. Yes, but how do you specify if its an and or an or?
Just have two separate lines for them?
Style (title=foo, winstate=normal) .
Style (title=fii, winstate=iconic) .
-- Thomas Adam
--
If I were a witch's hat,
Hi.
This idea just came into my head: why not #ifdef'ing the deprecated
code and having configure.ac option --disable-backcompat?
Examples:
User A has an old config. So he downloads the new package, compiles it
and installs it just like he allways did.
User B has a new config and wants to
On 7/17/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 04:56:18PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Lol.. Yes, but how do you specify if its an and or an or?
Just have two separate lines for them?
Style (title=foo, winstate=normal) .
Style (title=fii, winstate=iconic) .
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/17 13:44:15
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in
Log message:
another update to the man page regarding !* style negation.
(NoButton, NoIconTitle)
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:19:48PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
This idea just came into my head: why not #ifdef'ing the deprecated
code and having configure.ac option --disable-backcompat?
Examples:
User A has an old config. So he downloads the new package, compiles it
and installs
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 07:46:24PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:19:48PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
This idea just came into my head: why not #ifdef'ing the deprecated
code and having configure.ac option --disable-backcompat?
It's all about compatibility and
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 01:55:47PM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote:
Hello,
I hope I'm not too late and 2.5.17 still not released. Today I found a
bug in menu code: 'CopyMenuStyle' don't copies recently introduced
'TitleColorset'. Attached patch fixes this.
Happy release
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/07/17 15:24:29
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : menustyle.c
Log message:
* Fixed copying of TitleColorset menustyle.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still documented as (stylename)Off. So if the
flag negation is
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:16:08PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 07:46:24PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 06:19:48PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
This idea just came into my head: why not #ifdef'ing
the deprecated code and having configure.ac
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/07/17 15:40:30
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : move_resize.c
Log message:
* Allow moving windows without icons while iconified with MoveToPage and
MoveToScreen.
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:47:13PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
I have a question. Is the flag vs. !flag syntax the prefered one? I
ask this because even though some styles only have the !(stylename)
counterpart, some are still documented as
27 matches
Mail list logo
