On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 08:33, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 12-02-26 11:20 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
Hi folks,
Just something I thought on last merges based on Jiri's patches. Its
hard to understand what this merges do just by reading the commit
message. Given, that we want to
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 19:23, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:40:50 +0100
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 17:51, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since you are changing the project signals anyway, can you do
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 17:51, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Jiří,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:35:24 +0100
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
I've created new pull request with the changes here:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/25
Since you are changing the project
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 21:16, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 22:57, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 01/13/2012 03:31 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
What if we deprecate the old
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 17:57, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 21:16, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 22:57, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 01/13/2012 03
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:17, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Harold Aling ge...@sait.nl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:42, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:35:40 +0100
Harold Aling ge...@sait.nl wrote:
Just had a
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 22:57, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 01/13/2012 03:31 AM, Lex Trotman wrote:
[...]
What if we deprecate the old project create/confirm API altogether, add
the
project preferences
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 01:05, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 12/26/2011 01:37 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing a bug where the project properties dialog is empty
when opened for the second time. Steps to reproduce:
1. Open project properties dialog.
2. Close
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 18:00, Eugene Arshinov earshi...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that everything went fine.
My personal fork is https://github.com/earshinov/geany/, and the new
home for sm branch is https://github.com/earshinov/geany/tree/sm.
Jiří,
I suppose you can safely remove your
Hi,
I'm experiencing a bug where the project properties dialog is empty
when opened for the second time. Steps to reproduce:
1. Open project properties dialog.
2. Close it.
3. Open it for the second time.
Result: the project properties dialog is much smaller and it's empty.
I suspect it's
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 19:01, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 12.12.2011 14:54, schrieb Frank Lanitz:
Hi folks,
Just I case you missed the news inside the threads: the new git repo for
geany-plugins is online and can be found at
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 14:54, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi folks,
Just I case you missed the news inside the threads: the new git repo for
geany-plugins is online and can be found at
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins
Hi Frank,
it looks you have forgotten to push the
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 00:05, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 07/12/2011 22:54, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
I've completed the conversion of geany-plugins to git, the repository
can be found here:
https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins
As with Geany's repository
Hi,
I'm about to start the geany-plugins git conversion so please stop
committing to the SVN repository.
Cheers,
Jiri
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
Hi,
I've completed the conversion of geany-plugins to git, the repository
can be found here:
https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins
As with Geany's repository conversion, please have a look at it and
don't use/fork it until more people check everything is alright and
the repository is moved to
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 07:20, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
First, note that I wasn't able to find the patch, so I'm only guessing
from reading the thread and from my own (much less complete) attempt.
I'm afraid that if I had the patch it is on my broken hard drive :-S
And
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 08:27, Nathan Broadbent nathan@gmail.com wrote:
1. calculate the indent each change, and then ripple that through the file
2. calculate the indent each change and only apply it to this line
3. calculate and apply the indent to lines N and N-1 only on new line
or user
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 21:56, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Maybe I don't understand it correctly but does this mean that if you
open an existing file, you'd re-indent it completely based on the
regexes? I don't think this is a good idea because this could lead to
whitespace
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 19:30, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi,
I know this is a more than one year old discussion, but I was messing
with a very similar thing a few minutes ago when wanting to add
autoindent support for SH.
Le 16/09/2010 22:17, Jiří Techet a écrit
Hi Harold,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 16:35, Harold Aling ge...@sait.nl wrote:
Dear Geany Devs,
I recently switched from GeanyPRJ to Gproject. Since Gproject doesn't
support multiple open projects I have to switch between projects, but
it takes up to 4 minutes to close one project and open
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 00:47, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Your sm-branch repository referenced here
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.editors.geany.devel/5576/match=sm+branch
does not seem to contain any sm code?
Hi Lex,
it's under the sm branch of the repository - the rest is
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11/02/2011 08:17 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 15:43, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-11-01 06:11 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 23:25, Matthew Brushmbr
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 15:43, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-11-01 06:11 AM, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 23:25, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-30 03:03 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700
Matthew Brushmbr
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 23:25, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-30 03:03 PM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:15:33 -0700
Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
I haven't heard too much about the Git conversion of Geany Plugins,
but I wanted to offer a
Hi,
I've created a repository for testing geany-plugins conversion from
svn to git here:
https://github.com/techee/geany-plugins
After consultation with Frank, it converts only the combined
geany-plugins repository, not the individual plugins so the history
starts 11.6.2009. This is the command
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:15, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
I haven't heard too much about the Git conversion of Geany Plugins, but I
wanted to offer a suggestion that might improve the commit messages compared
to Geany's. In the Geany's Git repository there's links back to
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 08:09, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 October 2011 16:41, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi all,
Is anybody opposed to removing the geany and Geany prefix from the
plugins in Geany-Plugins. I mean at least for the directory name in the
source
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:30, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 06.10.2011 11:01, schrieb Jiří Techet:
Yeah, I have my .gitignore too. Anyway, I don't plan to make any
real commits during the conversion so it's easier to verify the
sources are in the same state
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 04:57, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 10/08/2011 05:13 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
Please have a good look at it. It's no problem to change it now but it
will be hard once people start using it. For this reason please resist
the temptation and don't update your
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 09/10/2011 02:13, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
I've completed the conversion to git
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 17:59, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 09/10/2011 16:49, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 15:38, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 09/10/2011 14:36, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 13:55, Colomban
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 17:28, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi all,
For the tl;dr crowd: https://github.com/geany
And now for the long version :)
I've setup Geany as an organization on Github.com[1]. I've also setup an
empty repository[2] for when the SVN conversion is ready
Hi everyone,
I'm just about to start the import from SVN into git so please stop
using SVN from now otherwise you'll have to re-apply your commits into
git afterwards.
Cheers,
Jiri
___
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
Hi,
I've completed the conversion to git. It went quite smoothly because I
did it already before and fortunately the checksums remained the same
so I could reuse the grafts files I already had (to be sure, I checked
all the entries one by one).
The repository is here:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 01:23, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 03/10/2011 23:02, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:28:14 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Hi all,
Now the release is out, it's time for the real migration. There's
things to do then, and perhaps a few
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 01:02, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-04 02:37 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are
Hi Jiri,
I know it's a very small part of what you're doing but I've attached the
.gitignore file I
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 22:55, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 06/10/2011 22:45, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:50:06 +0200, Colomban wrote:
Le 04/10/2011 23:37, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 02:19, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Even in the case of single-commit features? I completely agree with
more-than-one-commit features because otherwise you don't know where
the feature implementation starts and ends but having it for minor
one-commit
Hi,
I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are
still a few points unresolved:
I have a few comments (and questions) myself:
1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because
they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing git
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 17:35, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:28:14 +0200
Colomban Wendling lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
@all: We will switch to Git, and we need to choose basically between
GitHub and Gitorious.
I'd vote for trying GitHub, just because
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 17:28, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi all,
Now the release is out, it's time for the real migration. There's
things to do then, and perhaps a few we still need to agree on.
Le 05/09/2011 23:05, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...]
End of the long
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 19:00, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:20:35 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
1. The split between master and develop is completely unnecessary. I
don't see a reason why there should be a separate branch for releases
(i.e
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 13:44, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 11-10-01 03:05 AM, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:21:59 -0700, Matthew wrote:
So I was just curious *specifically* what distro(s) and version(s)
sets the oldest version of GTK+ that Geany should support?
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 15:36, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:52:19 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, there's a bug in the MRU code.
1. Open Geany with say 3 files,
2. ctrl-tab until you reach the very same file you have currently
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:07, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 September 2011 06:52, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:03, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 09:57, schrieb Jacques du Rand:
BottomLIne:
Almost like
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 23:59, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 20/09/2011 12:07, Jiří Techet a écrit :
Hi,
Hey,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? This would be
just numbering
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:03, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 29.09.2011 09:57, schrieb Jacques du Rand:
BottomLIne:
Almost like a MRU(Most Recently Use) Cache for the Open Document list
a which highlight/icon'ify the top 3-6 Documents in order ?
Your
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 14:17, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 26/09/2011 23:00, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 26/09/2011 13:48, Nick Treleaven a écrit :
I'm reduced to using Windows. I guess the reason is the regex code that
is really old which is used for Windows
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 13:08, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I'm really happy about this change. First we get rid of the horrible
old glade editor and second it's the most important step towards
making Geany compile under GTK 3. Thanks for your work!
Hi Jiri,
And I'm responding
Hi Matthew,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:53, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to let everyone who I haven't bothered on IRC know that I'm
working on converting the old Geany Glade 2 generated user-interface code to
Glade 3 using GtkBuilder.
I'm really happy about
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 13:02, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 September 2011 20:14, Jon Senior j...@restlesslemon.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:07:23 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of
the 0
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 15:34, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 15:28, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Le 20/09/2011 23:26, Enrico Tröger a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:10:34 +0300, Yura wrote:
Hi
But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.*
KDE 4.*
Scite 2.*
What about Geany 3000?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 08:15, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi folks,
Another episode from topic improving plugins by Frank ;)
In last time I saw a lot of changes going in into plugins without having
a ChageLog entry set.
Its not always useful in every case but its a nice thing
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 05:29, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Great job, thanks. Its going to take a while to inspect, but a couple
of comments below (I'm only looking at the final rewrite-history
version).
Note I don't think we need perfection for its own sake, we need to be
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 18:41, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 31/08/2011 18:18, Frank Lanitz a écrit :
Am 31.08.2011 17:21, schrieb Colomban Wendling:
3) We won't probably be able to create Git tags from the SVN tags
because they (at least Geany-0_18 do) don't all tag a
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 17:21, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hey,
Le 31/08/2011 00:01, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:17, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 28.08.2011 23:33, schrieb Jiří Techet:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 20
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:48, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:56:52 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not perfect - the branches aren't glued to the trunk in merge
points and the tags are squashed with the previous commits which I
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:15, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
We could also use the SVN import on GitHub. It's offered as an option when
you create a new repository. I have no idea if it suffers from the same
limitations you mentioned.
My feeling is they use svn2git internally.
:
Le 22/08/2011 00:27, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...]
Well, in my opinion the whole topic of git transition is
over-discussed.
Looks the same for me, and I didn't see much new POV or useful
infos since a bunch of emails.
The reason why I haven't been very active on Geany's
mailing
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 02:47, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 08/25/2011 03:27 AM, Frank Lanitz wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:51:24 +1000
Lex Trotmanele...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, with DVCS each plugin can have its own repository and the Geany
project only needs to manage the
Hi Lex,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:21, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Some mixed comments.
@Jiri I would have thought that the process for creating the Git repo
was to check the existing readonly mirror then move it to the chosen
host and setup access. Or do you know of some
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 19:07, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 06/28/11 10:28, Stephan Beal wrote:
Is there an option to enable the use of relative paths in the project
files?
I haven't checked it out yet myself, but I wonder if Jiri's GProject[1]
plugin handles this a little
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 19:52, Dimitar Zhekov dimitar.zhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:28:12 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is there an option to enable the use of relative paths in the project files?
From the look of get_session_file_string(), no.
I remember
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 00:35, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
Hi folks,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:30:57 +
tec...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
-#include geanyplugin.h
+#include geany/geanyplugin.h
I'm not 100% sure, but is this really correct?
No, thanks for noticing, got there
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 22:16, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/25/11 09:03, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 17:29, Matthew Brushmbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
parsing the open source files. Dumping the list of tags parsed to a
plain-text (Ctags format) file seems
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:35, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/10/11 15:11, Jiří Techet wrote:
Yes, tagmanager was based on some pre- ctags 5.1 version which is more
9 years old now. I have a branch here
http://gitorious.org/~techy/geany/gproject-geany/commits/tm_cleanup2
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:29, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
Hi,
I started working on support for reading Exuberant Ctags files. The commit
message sums up most of the details I hope. If anyone wants to try it out
and/or review the code, that would be much appreciated.
The
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 17:29, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/25/11 06:37, Jiří Techet wrote:
as this is something I wanted to do myself, I really like it! I've
been looking at the code only so far; I'll test it once I have access
to my computer in the evening. A few
2011/5/23 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:52:49 +0200, Jiří wrote:
2011/5/22 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:04:40 +0200, Jiří wrote:
Hi,
I've finally found some time to integrate my GProject plugin into
geany-plugins; for those who
2011/5/22 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:04:40 +0200, Jiří wrote:
Hi,
I've finally found some time to integrate my GProject plugin into
geany-plugins; for those who like git, the result is here:
https://gitorious.org/geany-plugins-gproject/geany-plugins-gproject
Hi,
I've finally found some time to integrate my GProject plugin into
geany-plugins; for those who like git, the result is here:
https://gitorious.org/geany-plugins-gproject/geany-plugins-gproject
For those who dislike it, the patch is here:
http://db.tt/esDNpPw
I hope I've updated all the
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 00:29, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 05/10/11 15:11, Jiří Techet wrote:
version of ctags as possible. I updated only the core parts of ctags,
not the parsers, because I know there have been many tunings made by
Geany to some of them. Recently I've
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 20:12, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 09/05/2011 19:35, Jiří Techet a écrit :
I'd say that VCS migration and bug tracking system migration should be
done separately and independently. Migration of the bug tracker is a
lot of work while migration
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:05, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi,
Some fast and partial answers:
Le 10/05/2011 00:39, Eugenio Rustico a écrit :
* maybe an import project function would be useful, scanning a
directory (recursively?) and opening/adding to project every
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:22, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 May 2011 08:39, Eugenio Rustico jfruscia...@tiscali.it wrote:
* why don't you use a standard tag format (e.g. exubertant-ctags)?
there could be plenty of tags ready to use, made with a more flexible
tool
IIUC
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 16:16, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Cons from the previous thread:
- It's more social
I have some cons against social networks, but there are pros here, so...
- Not plain enough (I guess too Web 2.0/feature-full/cluttered)
I don't personally
2011/5/8 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
Hi Enrico,
in principle you have to put something like
git push --mirror your_github_repository
under .git/hooks/post-receive (in the local geany repository). When
creating the github repository, you should create a new public/private
key pair and
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 00:44, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 04/05/2011 23:40, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...] Last time I was using Glade 2 I had to
modify some system header files because Glade was using some obsolete
interfaces that apparently nobody else used/tested
2011/5/4 Enrico Tröger enrico.troe...@uvena.de:
Hi,
any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany to
GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)?
This would make quite some code obsolete and so could be removed.
Also, it would make it easier to migrate to using Glade 3 with
GtkBuilder
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 18:46, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 02/05/2011 00:03, Jiří Techet a écrit :
I'll need one more thing - to bump the plugin API version number. Even
though the API hasn't changed, people shouldn't use my plugin with
previous versions of geany
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 16:33, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 02.05.2011 00:18, schrieb Jiří Techet:
Yes, I would also prefer if there was a proper and complete git switch
(it would greatly save maintainer's work IMO) but I haven't seen much
enthusiasm from
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 23:57, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 28/04/2011 22:58, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:46, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 28/04/2011 01:49, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Le 10/04/2011 15:03, Jiří Techet
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 23:46, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
Am 30.04.2011 11:48, schrieb Matthew Brush:
I think the more important part is, are the core developers going to
accept pull/merge requests on github/gitorious, apply commits/patches from
there, etc.? If
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:46, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 28/04/2011 01:49, Colomban Wendling a écrit :
Le 10/04/2011 15:03, Jiří Techet a écrit :
[...]
2edb068b81cb6d541d667efecd0ec4c346f0df51 Open the file in the
msgwindow even if no linenumber is specified
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:52, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 28/04/2011 02:06, Lex Trotman a écrit :
I understand that if your plugin makes use of some file patterns, it
then makes sense to show them in the FIF dialog. But Geany don't use
project patterns, and adding
Hi Matthew,
you couldn't express my feelings better.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 07:01, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 04/27/11 21:01, Lex Trotman wrote:
- No need to maintain changelog and authors files
Changelog and authors are still needed for tarballs, but maybe they
can be
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 02:58, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 04/26/11 11:45, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:18:16 +0200
Jiří Techettec...@gmail.com wrote:
more than two weeks have passed without any response and I fear it
will end the same way as many times
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 15:03, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
first sorry for disappearing for such a long time - I didn't have much
free time left in the past months and from the time I had I dedicated
most of it to the libchamplain library I maintain to make some bigger
changes
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:30, Frank Lanitz fr...@frank.uvena.de wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:18:16 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 15:03, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
first sorry for disappearing for such a long time - I didn't have
much
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 14:30, Matthew Brush mbr...@codebrainz.ca wrote:
On 04/26/11 02:18, Jiří Techet wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 15:03, Jiří Techettec...@gmail.com wrote:
more than two weeks have passed without any response and I fear it
will end the same way as many times before
Hi,
first sorry for disappearing for such a long time - I didn't have much
free time left in the past months and from the time I had I dedicated
most of it to the libchamplain library I maintain to make some bigger
changes and adapt it to GTK 3 in time for Gnome 3. The good news is
that I didn't
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 14:24, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:30:00 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached you'll find a patch that updates the regex library to the
latest version from glibc. This removes the warnings Lex
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 17:03, Nick Treleaven
nick.trelea...@btinternet.com wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:47:08 +0200
Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached you'll find a patch that updates the regex library to the
latest version from glibc. This removes the warnings Lex
Hi Lex,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:41, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Got it working, I'd put the regexes in the filetypes in the wrong
prefix, my mistake :-D
But it doesn't seem to be working as expected.
Using only the first two of your regexes the following gets:
class
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:10, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Got it working, I'd put the regexes in the filetypes in the wrong
prefix, my mistake :-D
But it doesn't seem to be working as expected.
Using only the first two of your regexes the following gets:
class foo {
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:34, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Le 22/09/2010 02:20, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
Nick Treleaven wrote:
So closing the last new document doesn't create a new document straight
away?
Correct.
Are you sure you're running current SVN?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:47, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 September 2010 20:47, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lex,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:41, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Got it working, I'd put the regexes in the filetypes in the wrong
prefix
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 14:06, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome to the per project per filetype build command configuration
problem :-D
Exactly what I want to avoid ;-).
Ditto :-)
The build system solution of using the current file to select the
filetype is, as you have
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:23, Lex Trotman ele...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 September 2010 06:17, Jiří Techet tec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 19:27, Thomas Martitz
thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de wrote:
On 16.09.2010 02:23, Lex Trotman wrote:
Hi Jiri,
I couldn't get
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:15, Colomban Wendling
lists@herbesfolles.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 16/08/2010 02:51, Erik de Castro Lopo a écrit :
Jiří Techet wrote:
When reloading a file with ctrl+R don't display the warning dialog
that the unsaved changes might be lost when the file has not been
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
