Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 19:05:25 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:32:55 -0700 > Willie M wrote: > > > I am sure you can use the FEATURES to ignore collisions. It has been > > awhile but I am sure it is still there. > > Disabling

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I turn off ansi (colour) codes in ... script output

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:12 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Mick wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Walter had posted a message about ANSI codes showing up in portage output. I >> am getting the same when I run /usr/bin/script and examine

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I turn off ansi (colour) codes in ... script output

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > Walter had posted a message about ANSI codes showing up in portage output. I > am getting the same when I run /usr/bin/script and examine the contents of the > resultant file with a text editor; e.g. in Vim I

[gentoo-user] How do I turn off ansi (colour) codes in ... script output

Hi All, Walter had posted a message about ANSI codes showing up in portage output. I am getting the same when I run /usr/bin/script and examine the contents of the resultant file with a text editor; e.g. in Vim I get: ^[[0;32m~ ^[[35m$ ^[[0mtest^H^[[K^H^[[K^H^[[K^H^[[Kecho

[gentoo-user] app-office/taskcoach-1.4.3-r1 fails to launch

I seem to be having a deja vu with this application. It won't launch and when started from a terminal it spews out this lot: == Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python2.7/taskcoach.py", line 72, in start() File

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On June 2, 2017 9:07:57 AM GMT+02:00, Kent Fredric wrote: >On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:23:22 +0200 >Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Or you could use Ubuntu. > >Can you please refrain from such phrases. Based on the history of emails from the OP, this is quite

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On 03/06/17 00:39, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: >> On 02/06/17 23:09, Rich Freeman wrote: >>> The stage3 make.conf shouldn't include this. Now, if you copied your >>> make.conf from some other source like a LiveCD then that could

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > On 02/06/17 23:09, Rich Freeman wrote: >> The stage3 make.conf shouldn't include this. Now, if you copied your >> make.conf from some other source like a LiveCD then that could explain >> where it came from. The flag was

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

I create my make.conf, it's not a copy. (It's make the error more stupid, ^^, so be it). Thank you ! Hogren On 02/06/2017 15:17, Sam Jorna wrote: > On 02/06/17 23:09, Rich Freeman wrote: >> The stage3 make.conf shouldn't include this. Now, if you copied your >> make.conf from some other

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On 02/06/17 23:09, Rich Freeman wrote: > The stage3 make.conf shouldn't include this. Now, if you copied your > make.conf from some other source like a LiveCD then that could explain > where it came from. The flag was actually invented mainly for things > like LiveCDs, and these are all built

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 06/02/2017 03:08 AM, Hogren wrote: >> Thank you all for the help. >> >> I saw a "bindist" in my global USE flag ! >> >> I really don't remember when I had that. May be when I saw it for the >> first time, I said to me "Hey

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On 06/02/2017 03:08 AM, Hogren wrote: > Thank you all for the help. > > I saw a "bindist" in my global USE flag ! > > I really don't remember when I had that. May be when I saw it for the > first time, I said to me "Hey a weak protocol (EC)? disable it !" … > > For the moment, no more problem !

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

Thank you all for the help. I saw a "bindist" in my global USE flag ! I really don't remember when I had that. May be when I saw it for the first time, I said to me "Hey a weak protocol (EC)? disable it !" … For the moment, no more problem ! Thank you On 02/06/2017 11:34, Kent Fredric

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:55:51 +0200 Hogren wrote: > dev-libs/openssl:0 > > (dev-libs/openssl-1.0.2k:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > pulled in by > dev-libs/openssl:0[bindist=] required by > (dev-qt/qtnetwork-5.6.2:5/5.6::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:59:51 +0200, Hogren wrote: > Sorry for the lack of courtesy !! > > I hope that someone can help me. You've already been given a useful pointer, disable bindist globally. Unless you are building a distro for redistribution, there is no need for this flag to be on globally.

Re: [gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

Sorry for the lack of courtesy !! I hope that someone can help me. Thank you very very much for your help !! Hogren On 02/06/2017 10:55, Hogren wrote: > Hello list, > > > It's me again about conflicts. > > > I don't understand this conflict, the two needed openssl are the same. > Actually,

[gentoo-user] conflict with same package, same USE

Hello list, It's me again about conflicts. I don't understand this conflict, the two needed openssl are the same. Actually, I don't see the difference. gnugnu # emerge --verbose-conflict @preserved-rebuild Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R] dev-libs/openssl-1.0.2k

Re: [gentoo-user] nodejs and qtnetwork = conflict on bindist openssl USE flag

On 02/06/2017 07:49, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Hogren wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> When I try to update my system, I have many conflicts. >> >> A first conflict which about I need help is this: >> >> dev-libs/openssl:0 >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:23:44 -0400 Alan Grimes wrote: > without spending all day and all night cut-pasting filenames into > another terminal and running rm on them... Looking at the candidate you showed: k3b: version=2.0.3-r5 slot=4 stable version=17.04.1 slot=5

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 08:23:22 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Or you could use Ubuntu. Can you please refrain from such phrases. pgp4LI4dYrEo7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:32:55 -0700 Willie M wrote: > I am sure you can use the FEATURES to ignore collisions. It has been > awhile but I am sure it is still there. Disabling collisions detections is not really good advice, as it can lead to real problems and break

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 02:23:44 -0400 Alan Grimes wrote: > I'm trying to emptytree my system because GCC update because I need to > reboot because Nvidia-drivers segfaulted and broke a 2-month endurance > run on my new mobo of my number theory code, set to use 15 > hyperthreads

Re: [gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

On 02/06/2017 08:23, Alan Grimes wrote: > I'm trying to emptytree my system because GCC update because I need to > reboot because Nvidia-drivers segfaulted and broke a 2-month endurance > run on my new mobo of my number theory code, set to use 15 hyperthreads > and 25gb of ram... > > > I'm

[gentoo-user] What gives with all these file collisions?

I'm trying to emptytree my system because GCC update because I need to reboot because Nvidia-drivers segfaulted and broke a 2-month endurance run on my new mobo of my number theory code, set to use 15 hyperthreads and 25gb of ram... I'm getting lots of package failures due to file collisions and