On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:09:16AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:36:06 -0500
Canek Pel?ez Vald?s can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:16, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com:
I use the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
What's the difference (in performance) between fglrx and xf86-video-ati ?
My experience with my first and only ATI video card (a Mobility Radeon
9700), is that the opensource drivers for my chipset are basically
Just being curious:
I use my main workstation primarily for work.
Ok, gnome3 needs some graphic acceleration, aside from that I can only
think of the occasional mythfrontend running on my desktop.
I consider to chose nouveau drivers instead of the nvidia-drivers-package.
What are your
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:38:50PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Just being curious:
I use my main workstation primarily for work.
Ok, gnome3 needs some graphic acceleration, aside from that I can only
think of the occasional mythfrontend running on my desktop.
I consider to
The only reason I really use nvidia-drivers is because of VDPAU. Otherwise
I can't watch HD videos on my media center. VDPAU works great, and I hope
nouveau supports it or something equivalent eventually. Mythtv probably
uses it, though that's just a guess.
Alecks Gates, sent from Android on
Am 11.04.2012 23:16, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com:
I use the nouveau drivers because they update themselves when you update the
kernel, and there's less work involved in keeping everything up to date. But
I can't comment on the nvidia drivers since I've never tried them. Nouveau
works well enough
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 11.04.2012 23:16, schrieb ny6...@gmail.com:
I use the nouveau drivers because they update themselves when you update the
kernel, and there's less work involved in keeping everything up to date. But
I can't comment
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
For my MSI GT430 (nvidia) graphics card I am using
the x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29.
But there seems to be something wrong:
When playing videos with faster movements
I see heavy distortions around these parts
of the screen.
Previously I fixed this for
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [10-12-18 09:52]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
For my MSI GT430 (nvidia) graphics card I am using
the x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29.
But there seems to be something wrong:
When playing videos with faster movements
I see heavy distortions around these
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Dale,
thank you for your in deep explanations ! :)
The distortions I saw on my screen look identical to
those I recognizeed with my old nvidia card before using
the sync settings...so i /thought/ (read: dont know for sure ;) )
it would by a syncing problem again.
Hi,
For my MSI GT430 (nvidia) graphics card I am using
the x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-260.19.29.
But there seems to be something wrong:
When playing videos with faster movements
I see heavy distortions around these parts
of the screen.
Previously I fixed this for another nvidia
card by
On Saturday 24 April 2010 12:56:13 Peter Humphrey wrote:
Let's hope the upgrade is a simple one for the Gentoo devs to
incorporate into an ebuild. With any luck we'll have it in the next
week.
Indeed, it has appeared today:
$ equery l nvidia-drivers
* Searching for nvidiadrivers ...
[IP-] [
On Saturday 24 April 2010 01:22:53 Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Saturday 24 April 2010 00:08:46 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
before getting into too much trouble better I aask:
While updateing I got the following message:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-base/xorg-server-1.8.0', 'merge')
On Saturday 24 April 2010 10:46:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
The happy news is that nvidia released a driver with xorg-1.8 support
on 23 Apr:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=150325
Good news! Let's hope the upgrade is a simple one for the Gentoo devs to
incorporate into an
Hi,
before getting into too much trouble better I aask:
While updateing I got the following message:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-base/xorg-server-1.8.0', 'merge') conflicts with
x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.99 required by ('installed', '/',
'x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-195.36.15',
On Saturday 24 April 2010 01:08:46 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
before getting into too much trouble better I aask:
While updateing I got the following message:
('ebuild', '/', 'x11-base/xorg-server-1.8.0', 'merge') conflicts
with x11-base/xorg-server-1.7.99 required by
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:29:09 +0930
Iain Buchanan wrote:
Hi,
In my experience, various nvidia-drivers just seem to not work with
my system, no matter how many times I rebuild and recheck things. I
have a whole bunch of versions masked. Looking back, I never seemed
to have a problem with
Hi all,
I've rebuild my xorg-server with no hal support, I've upgraded my kernel
to 2.6.30-r8 and rebuild all xf86 drivers/libs/proto packages:
# eix xf86|grep ^\[I\]
[I] x11-apps/xf86dga
[I] x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev
[I] x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard
[I] x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse
[I]
Arnau Bria writes:
I've rebuild my xorg-server with no hal support, I've upgraded my
kernel to 2.6.30-r8 and rebuild all xf86 drivers/libs/proto
packages:
[...]
Then, I use nvidia-xconf for geenrating my xorg.conf file and looks
like:
[...]
Section Device
Identifier VGA
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:34:00 Arnau Bria wrote:
Hi all,
I've rebuild my xorg-server with no hal support, I've upgraded my kernel
to 2.6.30-r8 and rebuild all xf86 drivers/libs/proto packages:
# eix xf86|grep ^\[I\]
[I] x11-apps/xf86dga
[I] x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev
[I]
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:33:22 Alex Schuster wrote:
# grep EE Xorg.0.log
to load module freetype (module does not exist, 0)
to load module dri (module does not exist, 0)
to load module dri2 (module does not exist, 0)
I read something here about dri and dri2 some days ago, but
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:33:22 +0100
Alex Schuster wrote:
Arnau Bria writes:
[...]
Section Device
Identifier VGA
Driver nvidia
VendorName Unknown
BoardName Unknown
EndSection
I would expect vesa to be quite slow. I don't know about nvidia-xconf
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:57:28 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:33:22 Alex Schuster wrote:
# grep EE Xorg.0.log
to load module freetype (module does not exist, 0)
to load module dri (module does not exist, 0)
to load module dri2 (module does not exist, 0)
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:56:08 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
According to this, you did not rebuild nvidia-drivers. Either
I did, but did not mention... sorry.
emerge nvidia-drivers
module-rebuild rebuild
it only rebuilds nvidia-driver:
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.60
Cheers,
--
Arnau Bria
On Thursday 12 November 2009 16:25:20 Arnau Bria wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:57:28 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 14:33:22 Alex Schuster wrote:
# grep EE Xorg.0.log
to load module freetype (module does not exist, 0)
to load module dri (module does not
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:37:21 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
[...]
The ebuild outputs this elog:
echo
elog You must be in the video group to use the NVIDIA device
elog For more info, read the docs at
elog
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:44:48 +0100
Arnau Bria wrote:
[...]
will read guide again, maybe I missed some step..
nop, no missed steps. :-(
--
Arnau Bria
http://blog.emergetux.net
Bombing for peace is like fucking for virginity
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:54 +0100, Arnau Bria wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:44:48 +0100
Arnau Bria wrote:
[...]
will read guide again, maybe I missed some step..
nop, no missed steps. :-(
In my experience, various nvidia-drivers just seem to not work with my
system, no matter how many
Greets,
I don't get it:
I was running tuxonice-sources-2.6.31 (amd64) for a while now and had
unmasked nvidia-drivers at kernel-change to get nvidia-drivers-190.36
back then. That worked fine so far.
At that time I had gcc-4.4.1, btw.
2 days ago I did some changes, got gcc-4.4.2 and also new
On Monday 19 October 2009 10:18:28 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Greets,
I don't get it:
I was running tuxonice-sources-2.6.31 (amd64) for a while now and had
unmasked nvidia-drivers at kernel-change to get nvidia-drivers-190.36
back then. That worked fine so far.
At that time I had
Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb:
Greets,
I don't get it:
I was running tuxonice-sources-2.6.31 (amd64) for a while now and had
unmasked nvidia-drivers at kernel-change to get nvidia-drivers-190.36
back then. That worked fine so far.
At that time I had gcc-4.4.1, btw.
2 days ago I did some
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
Rebuild your kernel and the nvidia modules with the same compiler.
You are using a kernel built with an older compiler and nvidia modules built
with a newer compiler. nvidia doesn't like that.
Thanks, Alan (and Steffen with the same hint):
Rebuilt both with
Thanks a lot Volker. I can emerge nvidia-drivers after resync.
Hung
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Donnerstag 08 Oktober 2009, Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all,
I updated my system yesterday today and find out that the latest
nvidia-drivers requires old glbc version 2.5. I have goggled for a
Hi all,
I updated my system yesterday today and find out that the latest
nvidia-drivers requires old glbc version 2.5. I have goggled for a while
and have not found out the solution. Below is the output of emerge command
emerge -pv nvidia-drivers
These are the packages that would be merged, in
On Donnerstag 08 Oktober 2009, Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all,
I updated my system yesterday today and find out that the latest
nvidia-drivers requires old glbc version 2.5. I have goggled for a while
and have not found out the solution. Below is the output of emerge command
emerge -pv
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:04:13 +0200, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 23:45:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS=-j1 to see what make
command is launched.
Try
On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:43:20 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the MAKEOPTS was not the problem, but only the make prepare... I
remember to see before that sometimes, the kernel source tree is no
more up-to-date with the last kernel build, so when i see that problems,
the first thing to do
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:34:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 08:49:19 Xavier Parizet wrote:
In fact you're right, it seems that my webmail (Roundcube) add the
skins/default part i saw earlier in your first post... Looking at the
mail source and there is no skins/default part.
Apologize :)
Thanks. You had me worried for a
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:34:34 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS=-j1 to see what make
command is launched.
Try also to run make prepare in your kernel source tree before.
# cd /usr/src/linux
# make prepare
# MAKEOPTS=-j1 emerge nvidia-drivers
This time it
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 23:45:19 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:30:27 Xavier Parizet wrote:
Can you repost emerge output using MAKEOPTS=-j1 to see what make
command is launched.
Try also to run make prepare in your kernel source tree before.
# cd /usr/src/linux
#
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
Compiling source
in
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
...
* Preparing nvidia module
make -j3 -s HOSTCC=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:48:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
Compiling source
in
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
...
*
Xavier Parizet schrieb:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Peter Humphrey schrieb:
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
Compiling source
in
Peter Humphrey schrieb:
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
Compiling source
in
/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-180.51/work/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.51-pkg2
...
* Preparing nvidia module
make -j3 -s
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Peter Humphrey schrieb:
Hello list,
My box is trying to upgrade nvidia-drivers to version 180.51, but I get
this:
Compiling source
in
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
skins/default/usr/src/linux, which seems to be invalid.
Where did you get the skins part of that? It isn't in what I posted.
Maybe you can check to your environment
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 12:21:52 Justin wrote:
Xavier Parizet schrieb:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:57:04 +0200, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Which kernel du you use?
It seems to be 2.6.29-r1 according to SYSOUT content in the portage
output...
Yeah that why I am asking, I had an
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
skins/default/usr/src/linux, which seems to be invalid.
Where did you get the
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 16:23:34 Xavier Parizet wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:02 +0100, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 10:56:25 Xavier Parizet wrote:
I think the problem is from the SYSSRC make paremeter which is set to
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
I've read the post backwards and forwards, and I've had kmail search
case-insensitively for skin, and it isn't there. It wasn't there when I
sent it, anyway, and grep says it isn't in the files I've attached this
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
I've read the post backwards and forwards, and I've had kmail search
case-insensitively for skin, and it isn't there. It wasn't there when I
sent it, anyway, and grep says it isn't in the
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hi Dale,
currently I am runnning nvidia-drivers-173.14.15 for my FX-5600 and
kernel version x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
I don't know, if the driver 173.14.15 works for you, but if it does,
than kernel 2.6.27 might me a solution.
kind regards,
der Max
I was
Dale wrote:
zhen wrote:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Do you, or anyone, know if this is a kernel thing or
zhen wrote:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Do you, or anyone, know if this is a kernel thing or is this a nvidia
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel, namely
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hi Dale,
currently I am runnning nvidia-drivers-173.14.15 for my FX-5600 and
kernel version x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
I don't know, if the driver 173.14.15 works for you, but if it does,
than kernel 2.6.27 might me a solution.
kind regards,
der Max
OK.
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 05:34 -0500 schrieb Dale:
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
Hi Dale,
currently I am
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Well, I copied my old config over and ran make oldconfig. I did try to
boot it
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
I double checked my config with the guide and it appears everything is
correct.
zhen schrieb:
Hi,
5200 is also my card and I have recently tested it with latest nvidia
driver - it doesn't work with latest stable kernel 2.6.27-r8. I've had
to roll back to my old nv driver.
Best regards,
Evgeniy B.
Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel,
Maximilian Bräutigam schrieb:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 05:34 -0500 schrieb Dale:
Maximilian Bräutigam
Maximilian Bräutigam wrote:
hi,
are you sure that you have configured your kernel correctly according to
the Gentoo Linux nVidia Guide?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
kind regards,
der Max
Thank you for the reference! I've read the guide and now my combination
(nvidia
Hi folks,
I'm trying to upgrade to the newer kernel, namely
gentoo-sources-2.6.29. It seems the drivers won't build against that
kernel or the drivers that do build won't let X come up. How do I find
out what drivers are compatible with what kernels and my old card?
Currently, I am using
Hi Dale,
currently I am runnning nvidia-drivers-173.14.15 for my FX-5600 and
kernel version x86_64-2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
I don't know, if the driver 173.14.15 works for you, but if it does,
than kernel 2.6.27 might me a solution.
kind regards,
der Max
Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 00:15 -0500
hello,
I have a couple of old 32bit amd athlon XP systems:
They have very old, no longer supported nvidia cards:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
All ebuilds that could satisfy
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers have been masked
These systems are used to run jffnms, postgresql
Did you try the nv and nouveau drivers for your current card?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Sent: terça-feira, 1 de abril de 2008 16:11
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Nvidia drivers
hello,
I have a couple of old 32bit
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:10:48PM +, James wrote:
These cards were supported by the Nvidia legacy driver
but now that's gone there is no support for these cards.
So I guess I'd like to replace them with something that
is open source on the driver, so as to keep support a long time.
On Dienstag, 1. April 2008, James wrote:
hello,
I have a couple of old 32bit amd athlon XP systems:
They have very old, no longer supported nvidia cards:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
that is not true. Both cards are still supported by nvidia drivers.
The Gf2 based
James wrote:
hello,
I have a couple of old 32bit amd athlon XP systems:
They have very old, no longer supported nvidia cards:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
All ebuilds that could satisfy
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers have been masked
These systems are used to run jffnms,
James wrote:
They have very old, no longer supported nvidia cards:
NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] NV34 [GeForce FX 5200]
Utterly wrong. ;) The GeForce2 is supported by the 96.43.xx series of
drivers and the FX5200 is still supported by the unified driver. :)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
This
Hello,
In addition to what the people already said in this thread:
Note that, even if a card doesn't work with the latest driver,
it doesn't mean it's discontinued and/or unsupported. That's a
complete misunderstanding.
Nvidia continues developing and fixing bugs in the previous
branches when
-
From: John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 19 februari 2008 12:28
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] nvidia drivers don't compile under kernel 2.6.24
Hi. I tried using kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 -- however the nvidia
drivers version 100.14.19 complains that it is unable
kernel version.
You can do this with eselect kernel list and then eselect kernel set
-Original Message-
From: John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 19 februari 2008 12:28
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] nvidia drivers don't compile under kernel
Hi. I tried using kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 -- however the nvidia
drivers version 100.14.19 complains that it is unable to determine
the kernel version. I did some googling, but saw no solution to this
problem, but it seems others are having difficulties with this also.
Any assistance would be
Subject: [gentoo-user] nvidia drivers don't compile under kernel
2.6.24
Hi. I tried using kernel 2.6.24-gentoo-r2 -- however the nvidia
drivers version 100.14.19 complains that it is unable to determine
the kernel version. I did some googling, but saw no solution
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:32:04 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
You forgot to reboot to run the new kernel
That shouldn't be necessary. You can install and compile a new kernel
then re-emerge nvidia-drivers before rebooting. The drivers are built for
the kernel linked from /usr/src/linux, not the
On Monday 11 February 2008, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
I wonder what's happening...Is there something
that I could have missed?
You forgot to reboot to run the new kernel
I did reboot...more than once. Made sure uname -a corresponded to
the kernel in /boot/ and to the symlink
-Original Message-
From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:32 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers failing to install because
kernel tree not found
On Monday 11 February 2008, Marzan, Richard non
On Monday 11 February 2008, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
I recently read an article at planet.gentoo.org about a 2 serious
bugs in the kernel that could lead to someone crashing or rooting a
system with linux kernels prior to gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r2. So being
the paranoid one that I am,
I recently read an article at planet.gentoo.org about a 2 serious bugs
in the kernel that could lead to someone crashing or rooting a system
with linux kernels prior to gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r2. So being the
paranoid one that I am, I unmasked this ebuild and installed it. I
performed a `make
On Montag, 6. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
On Sunday 05 August 2007, a tiny voice compelled Volker Armin Hemmann to
write:
NO! The newer drivers build but warn of MTRR support lacking on my
card.
and you have checked that you have mtrr support in the kernel?
first thing
;)
A few days ago I ran my updates and nvidia-settings was updated to
1.0.20070302 All was good until last night. I openen konqueror to browse my
home dir and I got a mime-type error and no files displayed. Trying to do
konqueror /home/ernie gave me errors that I can't quote but mime types was
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
A few days ago I ran my updates and nvidia-settings was updated to
1.0.20070302 All was good until last night. I openen konqueror to browse my
home dir and I got a mime-type error and no files displayed. Trying to do
konqueror /home/ernie gave
On Sunday 05 August 2007, a tiny voice compelled Volker Armin Hemmann to
write:
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
A few days ago I ran my updates and nvidia-settings was updated to
1.0.20070302 All was good until last night. I openen konqueror to browse
my home dir and I
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
On Sunday 05 August 2007, a tiny voice compelled Volker Armin Hemmann to
write:
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
A few days ago I ran my updates and nvidia-settings was updated to
1.0.20070302 All was good until last
On Sunday 05 August 2007, a tiny voice compelled Volker Armin Hemmann to
write:
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
On Sunday 05 August 2007, a tiny voice compelled Volker Armin Hemmann to
write:
On Sonntag, 5. August 2007, Ernie Schroder wrote:
A few days ago I ran my
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
You can try to rename the ebuild according to the new version and add it
to your overlay, maybe it just works.
I'll try it.
A minor change to the ebuild to reflect the different numbering scheme
of the beta driver's package was necessary.
Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
I did something rather dirty today. I downloaded the newest Nvidia Beta
Drivers and copied it over to /usr/portage/distfiles under the same
name the in-portage driver had. So while portage thinks the old drivers
are installed - that's not the case :)
Oh yes,
I did something rather dirty today. I downloaded the newest Nvidia Beta
Drivers and copied it over to /usr/portage/distfiles under the same
name the in-portage driver had. So while portage thinks the old drivers
are installed - that's not the case :)
Oh yes, dirty ;-)
I assume you did also
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
The result is the same, but creating an ebuild and putting it an overlay
is a much more cleaner way of doing it.
ACK. I did it that way. I didn't mention in my previous post that I did
put the new ebuild into an overlay, though.
Regards
mks
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello!
Today I bought a graphics card with Nvidia 8600 GT chipset without
taking into account that there might be no official nvidia drivers
supporting this card yet. There are beta drivers (v. 100.14.03)
available on nzone, though, that should get that card working, but
there's no ebuild for
Today I bought a graphics card with Nvidia 8600 GT chipset without
taking into account that there might be no official nvidia drivers
supporting this card yet. There are beta drivers (v. 100.14.03)
available on nzone, though, that should get that card working, but
there's no ebuild for them
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
I don't think that there is an overlay for those drivers.
Take a look at this bugs [1][2] which are dealing with the new drivers.
Maybe they will be added to the tree soon.
Thanks for the pointers.
You can try to rename the ebuild according to the new version and add
On Sun, 13 May 2007 00:30:50 +0200
Markus Schönhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
I don't think that there is an overlay for those drivers.
Take a look at this bugs [1][2] which are dealing with the new
drivers. Maybe they will be added to the tree soon.
Thanks for
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
I saw it listed in _one_ nvidia-drivers package (on the nvidia website)
as supported, but it
Good day,
What kernel have you?, what version of xorg?
:D
On 5/10/07, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:10:25 +0930
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
Unless the
On 5/10/07, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
I saw it listed in _one_ nvidia-drivers
101 - 200 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
