As the subject says, here's what I get:
/bin/sh: line 3: 10089 Abandon
../../coreconf/nsinstall/Linux2.6_x86_64_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc_glibc_PTH_64_OPT.OBJ/nsinstall
-D ../../dist/public/dbm
make[1]: *** [../../dist/public/dbm] Erreur 134
make[1]: quittant le répertoire «
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:21 on Tuesday 09 November 2010,
alain.didierj...@free.fr did opine thusly:
As the subject says, here's what I get:
What's the output just before the section you posted?
/bin/sh: line 3: 10089 Abandon
Hi everybody,
I managed to get it running as I wished. The only thing, that I couldn't
solve in a nice way was using fluxbox instead of Xfce upon login in xdm, but
a little hack did the trick.
I left my setup as described and added an init-script /etc/init.d/xdm2 which
is mostly copy and paste
I don't know how to solve this, but I hope the following messages may help
you.
Messages generated by process 14982 on 2010-10-18 23:54:00 CST for
package
sys-auth/polkit-0.96-r1:
WARN: postinst
If you don't use GDM or KDM for logging in,
you must start your desktop environment (DE) as follows:
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:04 on Tuesday 09 November 2010, Benyamin
Dvoskin did opine thusly:
Hi Everyone ,
I am actually quite new to Gentoo , so give me a break if my question is a
newbie one.
anyway , while installing Gentoo , I got to the point where I want to
compile the kernel
On 11/09/2010 06:04 AM, Benyamin Dvoskin wrote:
Hi Everyone ,
I am actually quite new to Gentoo , so give me a break if my question is
a newbie one.
anyway , while installing Gentoo , I got to the point where I want to
compile the kernel , and for that I've done the following :
emerge
Benyamin Dvoskin writes:
Hi Everyone ,
I am actually quite new to Gentoo , so give me a break if my question
is a newbie one.
Welcome :)
anyway , while installing Gentoo , I got to the point where I want to
compile the kernel , and for that I've done the following :
emerge --sync
it
On 2010-11-09, Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net wrote:
Am 09.11.2010 05:52, schrieb Grant:
This is OT, but you guys have proven extremely insightful over the
years and I would love to hear what you think.
I've been working on a particular software project for a long time.
I'd
Hi Everyone ,
I am actually quite new to Gentoo , so give me a break if my question is a
newbie one.
anyway , while installing Gentoo , I got to the point where I want to
compile the kernel , and for that I've done the following :
emerge --sync
it did the sync , but stated at the end that I must
Hi ,
Thanks for the suggestions.
In the proccess of trying to understand my possible mistake
I'm wondering ,
which stage3 file should I use ? the i686 or the i486 ?
I'm trying to install it on an Asus EEEPC 1005ha netbook
which stage should I use ? ( and I suppose i'll have to use the same with
Hi All,
I've had at least 3 fs corruptions on a Reiser4 fs, in as many months.
I understand that the fs type is experimental, but am wondering if it
is the fs at fault here or Dell's hard drive:
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Seagate Momentus 7200.4 series
Device Model:
Hi all,
Anyone out there that has installed Openconnect and has it connecting
to a VPN? I need to get into my Uni's vpn, and being on linux, the Cisco
thingy is useless. I'm attempting to use openconnect, which I've got
from an overlay. I've installed it and when I try to start it up, as
Benyamin Dvoskin writes:
In the proccess of trying to understand my possible mistake
I'm wondering ,
which stage3 file should I use ? the i686 or the i486 ?
I'm trying to install it on an Asus EEEPC 1005ha netbook
i686 if you want a 32 bit OS, x86_64 for 64 bit.
which stage should I use ?
Mick writes:
I've had at least 3 fs corruptions on a Reiser4 fs, in as many months.
I understand that the fs type is experimental, but am wondering if it
is the fs at fault here or Dell's hard drive:
[...]
I've run a short and long test with smartmontools and it passed both.
You could also
whats the i468 for ?
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Benyamin Dvoskin writes:
In the proccess of trying to understand my possible mistake
I'm wondering ,
which stage3 file should I use ? the i686 or the i486 ?
I'm trying to install it on an
2010/11/9 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
I've had at least 3 fs corruptions on a Reiser4 fs, in as many months.
I understand that the fs type is experimental, but am wondering if it
is the fs at fault here or Dell's hard drive:
Check your RAM using memtest86.
--
Maciej Grela
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:00:01 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
I'm trying to install it on an Asus EEEPC 1005ha netbook
i686 if you want a 32 bit OS, x86_64 for 64 bit.
The 1005HA has a 32 bit CPU.
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=prescott -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
Read the OP again. He wants to obsfuscate the code to make it
unreadable for the people he's hiring to work on it.
It would be simpler and cheaper to hire developers who don't
understand programming language in question, computers, programming in
general, or even english.
Then don't let
On 9 November 2010 09:14, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Theoretically, a modularized software project will be more easily
assembled by large teams, since no team members are creating the whole
system, or even need to know about the system as a whole. They can
focus just on the assigned
Hi,
it is possible to run a 32-bit binary executable on a 64-bit system
(AMD64).
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
Thank you very much for any help in advance!
Best regards,
mcc
On 9. 11. 2010 18:25, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
I think that is what cross-compilation is good for...
Jarry
--
2010/11/9 meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
it is possible to run a 32-bit binary executable on a 64-bit system
(AMD64).
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
gr...@kraken ~ $ cat test.c
void main() {}
Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com [10-11-09 18:36]:
On 9. 11. 2010 18:25, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
I think that is what cross-compilation is good for...
Jarry
--
Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com [10-11-09 18:40]:
2010/11/9 meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
it is possible to run a 32-bit binary executable on a 64-bit system
(AMD64).
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if
Maciej Grela maciej.gr...@gmail.com [10-11-09 18:40]:
2010/11/9 meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
it is possible to run a 32-bit binary executable on a 64-bit system
(AMD64).
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if
Crosstools
On Nov 9, 2010 12:39 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com [10-11-09 18:36]:
On 9. 11. 2010 18:25, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
I
Selon Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:21 on Tuesday 09 November 2010,
alain.didierj...@free.fr did opine thusly:
As the subject says, here's what I get:
What's the output just before the section you posted?
Here you are :
make[1]: quittant le
Theoretically, a modularized software project will be more easily
assembled by large teams, since no team members are creating the whole
system, or even need to know about the system as a whole. They can
focus just on the assigned smaller task.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Read the OP again. He wants to obsfuscate the code to make it
unreadable for the people he's hiring to work on it.
It would be simpler and cheaper to hire developers who don't
understand programming language in question,
Only expose the teams to what they need, give them prototypes and
discriptions to the other parts. Like a man page.
On Nov 9, 2010 12:16 PM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Read the OP again. He wants to obsfuscate the code to make it
unreadable for the people he's hiring to work on it.
It
On 9 November 2010 10:08, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like I'm really going against the grain here. Is it
standard practice to hire a developer on the internet from any given
country, never meet him or her, have them fax a signed NDA, and turn
over your biggest asset to them?
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Selon Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:21 on Tuesday 09 November 2010,
alain.didierj...@free.fr did opine thusly:
As the subject says, here's what I get:
What's the output just before the section you
Apparently, though unproven, at 18:10 on Tuesday 09 November 2010, Benyamin
Dvoskin did opine thusly:
whats the i468 for ?
For any cpu that's less capable than a genuine 686
In other words, it's for ancient machines. It's not supposed to be used lots.
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Alex
The language of this list is English. You might be lucky and find someone who
understands French and knows the answer to your problem, but the odds are not
good. I don't speak French at all, I can't even make jokes about le BigMac
and get it right, so I can't help you much :-)
I suggest you
Apparently, though unproven, at 20:08 on Tuesday 09 November 2010, Grant did
opine thusly:
It sounds like I'm really going against the grain here. Is it
standard practice to hire a developer on the internet from any given
country, never meet him or her, have them fax a signed NDA, and turn
Am 09.11.2010 19:08, schrieb Grant:
Theoretically, a modularized software project will be more easily
assembled by large teams, since no team members are creating the whole
system, or even need to know about the system as a whole. They can
focus just on the assigned smaller task.
Googling your error messages give Bug #339157 and some forums threads, one
of which is in french. The bug still open but there is a patch claimed to be
working. Give it a shot after trying Dale's sandbox trick.
bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339157
--
Fatih
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:56,
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:05, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The language of this list is English. You might be lucky and find someone
who
understands French and knows the answer to your problem, but the odds are
not
good. I don't speak French at all, I can't even make jokes
2010/11/9 Fatih Tümen fthtmn+gen...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:05, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The language of this list is English. You might be lucky and find someone who
understands French and knows the answer to your problem, but the odds are not
good. I don't
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 08:45, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
OK so vm.swappiness seemed to help a bit but today I notice that swap
usage is up again. It's firefox:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
14072 iain 20 0 1369m 897m 15m S 3
After fixinf fs errors with fsck emerge stopped working so i fixed
with http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml
Then downloaded a stage3, chrooted, compiled gcc, created a binpkg and
emerged it on the broken system with emerge -K
Now i'm rebuilding the whole system.
On 11/9/10, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been working on a particular software project for a long time.
I'd like to hire a team of developers to take over the project, but I
consider the code to be valuable and I'd like to keep the whole of it
secure, even from my own developers. I
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 22:05:36 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I suggest you find and post to a French speaking list, or translate the
French error messages to English.
LANG=en emerge foo...
should have GCC spit out English error messages.
--
Neil Bothwick
The best things in life are free, but
Hi,
I have a laptop running Gentoo (with dual-boot to Windows XP). It was
manufactured in 2004 and battery life have been consistent for all
those years. However, it sat dormant for almost a year, after which I
did a few days worth of updating to bring it up to current kernel and
~amd64 package
2010/11/9 Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have a laptop running Gentoo (with dual-boot to Windows XP). It was
manufactured in 2004 and battery life have been consistent for all
those years. However, it sat dormant for almost a year, after which I
did a few days worth of
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:56 AM, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Selon Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com:
Apparently, though unproven, at 10:21 on Tuesday 09 November 2010,
alain.didierj...@free.fr did opine thusly:
As the subject says, here's what I get:
What's the output just
On 9/11/2010, at 9:03pm, Fatih Tümen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:05, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The language of this list is English. You might be lucky and find
someonewhounderstands French and knows the answer to your problem, but the
odds arenotgood. I don't
On 9/11/2010, at 4:04pm, Alex Schuster wrote:
...
I need to mention here that the machine is a laptop which I use
regularly on train journeys (bumpy ride). The drive has a Seagate
G-Force Protection™ which is meant to park the head in case of a fall.
Which probably would not help in the
Hey guys,
I've been trying to install Maya 2011 for some time now. I get the rpms
unpacked
(http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112id=15770983linkID=9242259)
with no major difficulties.
The dynamic linking needed is in place (ebuild I'm writing to make life easier
for
On 11/9/2010 6:45 PM, Stroller wrote:
On 9/11/2010, at 9:03pm, Fatih Tümen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:05, Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The language of this list is English. You might be lucky and find someonewhounderstands
French and knows the answer to your problem,
On 2010-11-09, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
So is your question really how do I modularize my code?
I'm most interested in the part about developers not knowing about
the system as a whole. I'd like developers to work on my code, but
prevent them from selling the code or using it
On 2010-11-09, Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net wrote:
Well, there are two ways to go here:
1. Modularize what you have. Give every developer only the source he
is supposed to work on and binary interfaces (libs + header files
for C/C++) and documentation for everything
On 2010-11-09, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mind system administration but I don't want to be a programmer
any more. ??I'd like to hire programmers to work in the manner
described above. ??They would each work on modules and not know about
the system as a whole. ??How can
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
it is possible to run a 32-bit binary executable on a 64-bit system
(AMD64).
But: Is it possible to compile source code on a 64-bit system and get
an 32-bit executable a the result ??? And if 'yes'...how???
Thank you very much for any help in advance!
Best
54 matches
Mail list logo
