Re: [gentoo-user] mounting samsung galaxy S III (android ics)

2012-07-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:18:36 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:

  Oh, make sure you config the phone to be connected to a puter.  I
  always forget that with my phone and it makes me scratch my head for
  a while  
 
 That is like my previous phone an htc incredible.  This one doesn't
 offer that choice (or at least I can't find it).

There is a package you can install to enable USB mass storage, but it's
not in the market. Bear in mind though that this can cause problems,
because the S3 doesn't expect the memory to suddenly become unavailable,
the whole reason for using MTP is that you don't have to unmount the
storage and stop any applications that are using it to transfer a few
files.

However, I've also found all the mtp options in portage to be unreliable,
so I run QuickSSHd on the phone and transfer files with scp or mount the
phone with sshfs.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Things which must be shipped together as a set, aren't.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 18/07/12 00:14, Alecks Gates wrote:

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:

64-bit Wine cannot run 32-bit Windows applications.  You need a 32-bit Wine
for that.  And since in 99.9% of Windows software is 32-bit... well, you get
the point :-)



Sure, but 64-bit wine can run either a win32 or a win64 config, and
you have to enable win64 with the win64 USE flag.  I believe this
makes the win64 config default and you have to set WINEARCH=win32 if
you want only 32-bit.


Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's certainly news 
to me :-)





Re: [gentoo-user] 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:34 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:

 On Tue, July 17, 2012 8:49 pm, Mark Knecht wrote:

 SNIPPED

 ==
 Requested video codec family [wmsdmod] (vfm=dmo) not available.
 Enable it at compilation.
 Requested video codec family [wms10dmod] (vfm=dmo) not available.
 Enable it at compilation.
 Cannot find codec matching selected -vo and video format 0x3253534D.
 ==

 I don't have a linux box at hand right now, but the above comments make me
 think there might be a compile-time option to enable support?


 --
 Joost


There is, and it works, but it only works in 32-bit which, following
Volker's comments, is the only reason I made the post in the first
place.

- Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 18/07/12 00:14, Alecks Gates wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 64-bit Wine cannot run 32-bit Windows applications.  You need a 32-bit
 Wine
 for that.  And since in 99.9% of Windows software is 32-bit... well, you
 get
 the point :-)


 Sure, but 64-bit wine can run either a win32 or a win64 config, and
 you have to enable win64 with the win64 USE flag.  I believe this
 makes the win64 config default and you have to set WINEARCH=win32 if
 you want only 32-bit.


 Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's certainly news to
 me :-)

Not really surprising. There's an IsWow64Process() in the Windows API
to allow processes to detect the nature of the environment they're
running on, since sometimes that's something you need to know. :)

-- 
:wq



[gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 19/07/12 16:03, Michael Mol wrote:

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:

Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's certainly news to
me :-)


Not really surprising. There's an IsWow64Process() in the Windows API
to allow processes to detect the nature of the environment they're
running on, since sometimes that's something you need to know. :)


WOW64 relies on 32-bit libraries to do it's job though.  It's well known 
that 32-bit code cannot link against 64-bit libraries.  If building a 
64-bit only version of Wine (since you cannot build any 32-bit code on 
non-multilib Gentoo), the question arises on how Wine is doing it.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:31:42 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 19/07/12 16:03, Michael Mol wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
  rea...@gmail.com wrote:
  Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's
  certainly news to me :-)
 
  Not really surprising. There's an IsWow64Process() in the Windows
  API to allow processes to detect the nature of the environment
  they're running on, since sometimes that's something you need to
  know. :)
 
 WOW64 relies on 32-bit libraries to do it's job though.  It's well
 known that 32-bit code cannot link against 64-bit libraries.  If
 building a 64-bit only version of Wine (since you cannot build any
 32-bit code on non-multilib Gentoo), the question arises on how Wine
 is doing it.
 
 

Stupid question incoming:

What's the WOW in WOW64?

The more I read it as World of Warcraft the more I see that it doesn't
actually fit :-)



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Hampicke
 Stupid question incoming:
 
 What's the WOW in WOW64?
 
 The more I read it as World of Warcraft the more I see that it doesn't
 actually fit :-)

WOW = Windows-on-Windows



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:31:42 +0300
 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 19/07/12 16:03, Michael Mol wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
  rea...@gmail.com wrote:
  Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's
  certainly news to me :-)
 
  Not really surprising. There's an IsWow64Process() in the Windows
  API to allow processes to detect the nature of the environment
  they're running on, since sometimes that's something you need to
  know. :)

 WOW64 relies on 32-bit libraries to do it's job though.  It's well
 known that 32-bit code cannot link against 64-bit libraries.  If
 building a 64-bit only version of Wine (since you cannot build any
 32-bit code on non-multilib Gentoo), the question arises on how Wine
 is doing it.



 Stupid question incoming:

 What's the WOW in WOW64?

 The more I read it as World of Warcraft the more I see that it doesn't
 actually fit :-)

WOW64 is Windows On Windows 64-bit. It's how 32-bit Windows
applications run on 64-bit Windows.

By and large, the way 32-bit and 64-bit applications and libraries can
communicate with each other are very limited. 64-bit programs can't
load 32-bit libraries, and vice versa. Some environment variables
containing path information are switched out depending on if the
program is 32-bit or 64-bit. Accesses to some registry paths are
shunted to one place or another, depending on if the program is 32-bit
or 64-bit.
For system libraries, 64-bit windows provides both 32-bit and 64-bit
versions of supported libraries, rather like multilib environments on
Linux.

In essence, if you get 64-bit Windows, you're getting two copies of
Windows, a 64-bit version and a 32-bit version, and the kernel shunts
32-bit programs into the 32-bit version while maintaining a reasonably
high degree of interoperability; it's not a complete sandbox.

32-bit and 64-bit processes can still communicate with each other.
mmap()'d files still work the same way, as the filesystem paths don't
change. Named objects such as pipes, events, mutexes...all of those
are handled by the kernel, which has mapping code to allow 32-bit and
64-bit processes to independently gain handles on the same named
objects. (Subject to security attributes and restrictions, of course.)

But, yeah. That's Windows, on Windows 64-bit, or WOW64.

(P.S. For the Horde!)
-- 
:wq



[gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 19/07/12 17:06, Michael Mol wrote:

For system libraries, 64-bit windows provides both 32-bit and 64-bit
versions of supported libraries, rather like multilib environments on
Linux.


So how does Wine run 32-bit Windows programs on a non-multilib Gentoo? 
Doesn't it need 32-bit *.dll.so files?





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 19/07/12 17:06, Michael Mol wrote:

 For system libraries, 64-bit windows provides both 32-bit and 64-bit
 versions of supported libraries, rather like multilib environments on
 Linux.


 So how does Wine run 32-bit Windows programs on a non-multilib Gentoo?
 Doesn't it need 32-bit *.dll.so files?

WINE is an attempt at a bug-for-bug implementation of the Windows API.
I really don't know how it operates internally. It's something I've
been meaning to get into; I missed out on playing The Old Republic
with my wife.

-- 
:wq



Re: [gentoo-user] 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Am Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2012, 05:57:51 schrieb Mark Knecht:
 On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:34 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
  On Tue, July 17, 2012 8:49 pm, Mark Knecht wrote:
  
  SNIPPED
  
  =
  =
  Requested video codec family [wmsdmod] (vfm=dmo) not available.
  Enable it at compilation.
  Requested video codec family [wms10dmod] (vfm=dmo) not available.
  Enable it at compilation.
  Cannot find codec matching selected -vo and video format 0x3253534D.
  =
  =
  
  I don't have a linux box at hand right now, but the above comments make me
  think there might be a compile-time option to enable support?
  
  
  --
  Joost
 
 There is, and it works, but it only works in 32-bit which, following
 Volker's comments, is the only reason I made the post in the first
 place.
 
 - Mark

and I have never stumbled on such a file in all those years - and I have a lot 
of wmv files on my hard disks. Hm.
-- 
#163933



[gentoo-user] VFAT problem

2012-07-19 Thread Helmut Jarausch

Hi,

I have a Garmin GPS with a 32GB SD card.
If I attach my device to the USB port, a directory listing looks  
totally scrambled.

A listing of the smaller (2GB) 'internal' storage device is just fine.
And I am sure the listing of the bigger SD card has been fine earlier
when less storage was used.

The funny thing, looking at the same SD card from Windows7 (running in  
VirtualBox)

gives a perfect listing (about 28 GB are used).

What am I missing?

Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.



Re: [gentoo-user] mounting samsung galaxy S III (android ics)

2012-07-19 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Thu, Jul 19 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote:

 However, I've also found all the mtp options in portage to be unreliable,
 so I run QuickSSHd on the phone and transfer files with scp or mount the
 phone with sshfs.

First let me thank everyone for all the great suggestions.  I will be
trying them out.

I started with quicksshd since (I like to believe) I understand ssh.

I have moved a picture and some songs from my laptop to the appropriate
directories on the phone.  Currently after I do the sftp using the gnome
file manager (I will try straight scp soon), the picture and songs
didn't appear until I reboot the phone.  Is there a better way?

thanks again to all.
allan




Re: [gentoo-user] VFAT problem

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a Garmin GPS with a 32GB SD card.
 If I attach my device to the USB port, a directory listing looks totally
 scrambled.
 A listing of the smaller (2GB) 'internal' storage device is just fine.
 And I am sure the listing of the bigger SD card has been fine earlier
 when less storage was used.

 The funny thing, looking at the same SD card from Windows7 (running in
 VirtualBox)
 gives a perfect listing (about 28 GB are used).

 What am I missing?

 Many thanks for a hint,
 Helmut.

My first guess is FAT corruption (maybe windows reads second copy of
FAT?). Maybe try to do chkdsk from windows, or make a backup first
from there anyway. :)

My second guess is character encoding differences, but usually it
would not be so extreme. I mount vfat with options
codepage=437,iocharset=utf8 and it seems to usually give me proper
results for international filenames (although mount warns me every
time that this is unwise).



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Installation, Kernel Panic

2012-07-19 Thread Randolph Maaßen
2012/7/19 Andrejs Igumenovs andrejs.igumen...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 After going over the installation instructions and performing the standard
 operations (genkernel etc.), the Kernel halts during the boot.
 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1

 I'm attaching the screenshot of what happens…

 I'm not the Linux expert, so don't know how to fix.

 - Andrejs



Hi,

looks like the kernel can't find your root partition. (VFS: Cannot open
root device sda3 or unknowen block(0,0)).

Please make sure that you configured your grub correctly (which version do
you use?).

On grub legacy (0.9)  edit the file /boot/grub/menu.lst and add the
root=your root partiton parameter

it should look like this
title Gentoo
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/kernel* root=/dev/sda2

When you need further help, please post your partitioning and grub menu
entry, grub device names can be verry confusing for beginners.

The more complex idea in my mind is that your kernel is missing some device
drivers for the ide/sata controler.
This should not happen, because you used genkernel.

Randolph


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Installation, Kernel Panic

2012-07-19 Thread Oli Schmidt

On 2012-07-19 21:32, Randolph Maaßen wrote:

2012/7/19 Andrejs Igumenovs andrejs.igumen...@gmail.com [2]


Hi,

After going over the installation instructions and performing the
standard operations (genkernel etc.), the Kernel halts during the
boot.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1 [1]

Im attaching the screenshot of what happens…

Im not the Linux expert, so dont know how to fix.

- Andrejs


Hi,

looks like the kernel cant find your root partition. (VFS: Cannot 
open

root device sda3 or unknowen block(0,0)).

Please make sure that you configured your grub correctly (which
version do you use?).

On grub legacy (0.9)  edit the file /boot/grub/menu.lst and add the
root=your root partiton parameter

it should look like this
title Gentoo
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/kernel* root=/dev/sda2

When you need further help, please post your partitioning and grub
menu entry, grub device names can be verry confusing for beginners.

The more complex idea in my mind is that your kernel is missing some
device drivers for the ide/sata controler.
This should not happen, because you used genkernel.

 Randolph

Links:
--
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1
[2] mailto:andrejs.igumen...@gmail.com






Make sure the filesystem support is correct. What fs do you use - did 
you enable it in the kernel config ?



regards
Oli




Re: [gentoo-user] VFAT problem

2012-07-19 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a Garmin GPS with a 32GB SD card.
 If I attach my device to the USB port, a directory listing looks totally
 scrambled.
 A listing of the smaller (2GB) 'internal' storage device is just fine.
 And I am sure the listing of the bigger SD card has been fine earlier
 when less storage was used.

 The funny thing, looking at the same SD card from Windows7 (running in
 VirtualBox)
 gives a perfect listing (about 28 GB are used).

 What am I missing?

 Many thanks for a hint,
 Helmut.


Hi Helmut,
   Sorry for the problems. No real good ideas here, but assuming the
Win 7 VM is on the same Gentoo machine then it appears to be something
missing from Gentoo. I'd start by using the Win 7 disk tools:

Control Panel - System  Security - Create  format hard disk partitions

and look to see what Win 7 believes it's talking to.

   Also, make sure if you have the VM running that it isn't
automatically mounting the Garmin which would make the SD unavailable
to Linux. Handle that in the Virtualbox-Device menu.

   Best of luck. Sounds like an interesting problem, if that's possible.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Installation, Kernel Panic

2012-07-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:09:31 +0300
Andrejs Igumenovs andrejs.igumen...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 
 After going over the installation instructions and performing the
 standard operations (genkernel etc.), the Kernel halts during the
 boot. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=1
 
 I'm attaching the screenshot of what happens…
 
 I'm not the Linux expert, so don't know how to fix.

The main error is cannot open root device sda3

sda3 is the 3rd partition of the first hard disk (on a Windows machine
it would probably be E:\)

Two things will cause that error:

The first disk doesn't have a third partition on it. Please describe
how your disks are laid out and where you unpacked the gentoo tarball
too. You can get this info by booting off a Live CD just like the first
part of the install and running fdisk -l as root in a terminal. Paste
the entire output in a mail reply and we'll take a look for you.

The second cause is your kernel doesn't have drivers for your
motherboard's chipset. These cannot be kernel modules, they must be
compiled in (unless you are building an initrd - but that's complicated
so I don't think you'll be going that route on the first try). Just
like the in first cause you can get good info from running

lspci
plus the entire content of one file - the kernel config. It's hard to
describe where it will be, but if you follow along in the install
guide, you boot off a LiveCD, chroot into the gentoo install
at /mnt/gentoo, then inside there you will find a
directory /usr/src/linux - you went there the first time to configure
the kernel. In that directory is a file called .config. We need that
entire file to see if you configured the kernel with the minimum
requirements.

Also mention what filesystem you chose for the root partition: ext3,
ext4, reiser or maybe something else (but it's probably ext4)

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: 32bit or 64bit

2012-07-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:06:18 -0400
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:31:42 +0300
  Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On 19/07/12 16:03, Michael Mol wrote:
   On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
   rea...@gmail.com wrote:
   Interesting that Wine aims to do the WOW64 thing.  That's
   certainly news to me :-)
  
   Not really surprising. There's an IsWow64Process() in the Windows
   API to allow processes to detect the nature of the environment
   they're running on, since sometimes that's something you need to
   know. :)
 
  WOW64 relies on 32-bit libraries to do it's job though.  It's well
  known that 32-bit code cannot link against 64-bit libraries.  If
  building a 64-bit only version of Wine (since you cannot build any
  32-bit code on non-multilib Gentoo), the question arises on how
  Wine is doing it.
 
 
 
  Stupid question incoming:
 
  What's the WOW in WOW64?
 
  The more I read it as World of Warcraft the more I see that it
  doesn't actually fit :-)
 
 WOW64 is Windows On Windows 64-bit. It's how 32-bit Windows
 applications run on 64-bit Windows.
 
 By and large, the way 32-bit and 64-bit applications and libraries can
 communicate with each other are very limited. 64-bit programs can't
 load 32-bit libraries, and vice versa. Some environment variables
 containing path information are switched out depending on if the
 program is 32-bit or 64-bit. Accesses to some registry paths are
 shunted to one place or another, depending on if the program is 32-bit
 or 64-bit.
 For system libraries, 64-bit windows provides both 32-bit and 64-bit
 versions of supported libraries, rather like multilib environments on
 Linux.
 
 In essence, if you get 64-bit Windows, you're getting two copies of
 Windows, a 64-bit version and a 32-bit version, and the kernel shunts
 32-bit programs into the 32-bit version while maintaining a reasonably
 high degree of interoperability; it's not a complete sandbox.
 
 32-bit and 64-bit processes can still communicate with each other.
 mmap()'d files still work the same way, as the filesystem paths don't
 change. Named objects such as pipes, events, mutexes...all of those
 are handled by the kernel, which has mapping code to allow 32-bit and
 64-bit processes to independently gain handles on the same named
 objects. (Subject to security attributes and restrictions, of course.)
 
 But, yeah. That's Windows, on Windows 64-bit, or WOW64.

thanks, that makes sense

 
 (P.S. For the Horde!)

:-)

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] mounting samsung galaxy S III (android ics)

2012-07-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:12:38 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:

 I have moved a picture and some songs from my laptop to the appropriate
 directories on the phone.  Currently after I do the sftp using the gnome
 file manager (I will try straight scp soon), the picture and songs
 didn't appear until I reboot the phone.  Is there a better way?

You need to force a rescan of the media. I'm sure I've seen an option for
this somewhere, but can't find it right now.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
 and I'm not sure about the the universe.
 (Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Installation, Kernel Panic

2012-07-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:09:31 +0300, Andrejs Igumenovs wrote:

 I'm attaching the screenshot of what happens…

Why have you zipped a JPEG file? It makes it far more work for anyone to
view.

You probably haven't compiled the driver for your disk controller into
the kernel (not ass a module).


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Who messed with my anti-paranoia shot?


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] mounting samsung galaxy S III (android ics)

2012-07-19 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Jul 20, 2012 4:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:12:38 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:

  I have moved a picture and some songs from my laptop to the appropriate
  directories on the phone.  Currently after I do the sftp using the gnome
  file manager (I will try straight scp soon), the picture and songs
  didn't appear until I reboot the phone.  Is there a better way?

 You need to force a rescan of the media. I'm sure I've seen an option for
 this somewhere, but can't find it right now.


If you install Widgetsoid, one of its myriad of buttons is a button that
conveniently triggers the Media Scanner.

Rgds,


Re: [gentoo-user] mounting samsung galaxy S III (android ics)

2012-07-19 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Thu, Jul 19 2012, Pandu Poluan wrote:

 On Jul 20, 2012 4:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:12:38 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:

  I have moved a picture and some songs from my laptop to the appropriate
  directories on the phone.  Currently after I do the sftp using the gnome
  file manager (I will try straight scp soon), the picture and songs
  didn't appear until I reboot the phone.  Is there a better way?

 You need to force a rescan of the media. I'm sure I've seen an option for
 this somewhere, but can't find it right now.


 If you install Widgetsoid, one of its myriad of buttons is a button that
 conveniently triggers the Media Scanner.

Thank you.
allan



[gentoo-user] eix output and libpng

2012-07-19 Thread meino . cramer
Hi,

Blender wants libpng-1.2 and libpng-1.5 seems to be more recent. I
forced the installation of version 1.2.49 for test purposes.

If I do a 

eix libpng 

I get (beside other things):

[I] media-libs/libpng
Available versions:  
(1.2)   1.2.49 ~1.2.50
(0) 1.5.10 ~1.5.11 ~1.5.12
{apng neon static-libs}
Installed versions:  1.2.49(1.2)(04:53:36 07/20/12) 1.5.10(01:18:39 
04/09/12)(apng -neon -static-libs)
Homepage:http://www.libpng.org/
Description: Portable Network Graphics library

What is the meaning of
(1.2)   1.2.49 ~1.2.50
(0) 1.5.10 ~1.5.11 ~1.5.12

in the above output (specifically the '(1.2)' and (0)')?


Thank you very much in advance for any help!

Best regards,
mcc







Re: [gentoo-user] eix output and libpng

2012-07-19 Thread Philip Webb
120720 meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 If I do a 'eix libpng ' I get:
   [I] media-libs/libpng
   Available versions:  
   (1.2)   1.2.49 ~1.2.50
   (0) 1.5.10 ~1.5.11 ~1.5.12
   {apng neon static-libs}
   Installed versions:  1.2.49(1.2)(04:53:36 07/20/12) 1.5.10(01:18:39 
 04/09/12)(apng -neon -static-libs)
 
 What is the meaning of '(1.2)' and '(0)' in
   (1.2)   1.2.49 ~1.2.50
   (0) 1.5.10 ~1.5.11 ~1.5.12

They're slots, so you can install eg 1.2.49  1.5.10 simultaneously.
To install the former do 'emerge libpng:1.2',
for the latter 'emerge libpng:0'.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca