Buenas,
intenta ejecutar un mac-fdisk -l para ver que discos tienes.
Seguramente no sea /dev/sda (eso es para scsi). Prueba con /dev/hda.
Saludos
On 27/05/06, Dpto. Sistemas - Fyg Publicitarios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello pls any talk spanish?
Buenas tardes , tengo una mac powerpc 7300/200
Ais, siento el error, si que tienes disco scsi, prueba a hacer el
listado con mac-fdisk -l aver si reconoces tú disco.
Saludos
On 27/05/06, Javier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buenas,
intenta ejecutar un mac-fdisk -l para ver que discos tienes.
Seguramente no sea /dev/sda (eso es para scsi).
Gracias por responder , al hacer mac-fdisk -l no me sale nada solo me vuelve al promtlivecd root #pero creo que cuando hago dev/sda esto lo que hace es buscar pero dentro del livecd no?pero lo que deberia de tratar es ubicar esa ubicacion dentro de mi disco duro.
Alguna otra sugerencia por
I am running gentoo on a 15 aluminum powerbook. I am using the
2.6.16.r5 kernel and pbbuttonsd 0.7.4. I have been going over the man
pages online documentation but cannot figure out how to get the
illuminated keyboard working. pbbuttonsd does not error during load.
The pbbuttonsd.conf
Hello
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0400, Eric Robertson wrote:
I am running gentoo on a 15 aluminum powerbook.
Which exact model? grep machine /proc/cpuinfo
Depending on that, you've the LMU behind the PMU or on I²C.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Gentoo Linux developer, http://hansmi.ch/,
JimD wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now.
Wrong. How do you get this idea?
However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
Or by going directly to
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
using gcc-config.
Wrong. An
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but
On 5/26/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
You don't need to unmerge 3.4 _first_. You can do it after you have
merged 3.5, although even then it is
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/26/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
You don't need to unmerge 3.4 _first_. You can do it after you have
merged 3.5,
Alexander Skwar wrote:
JimD wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now.
Wrong. How do you get this idea?
However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
Or by going directly to
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
It works now, but not in the beginning.
Okay.
When the first news arrived, I couldn't get access to it unless through
a translated page. You can see the same problems being discussed at OSN.
The reason can be anything, but fact is, we couldn't get access in the
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
and KDE continued to
work.
Not here.
I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror
when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next try.
Maybe i've not run one of the affected
On Fri, 26 May 2006 23:04:12 -0500, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade
to it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first.
The whole point of slotting is that you *don't* have to unmerge 3.4
first. You can continue to use
On Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:02 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
Nah, it's 5 to 5, so eix-sync is NOT longer than esync...
I really think you guys should read this page :)
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cron-guide.xml
--
Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
It works now, but not in the beginning.
Okay.
When the first news arrived, I couldn't get access to it unless through
a translated page. You can see the same problems being discussed at OSN.
The reason can
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
and KDE continued to
work.
Not here.
I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror
when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next
On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:05:34 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v ^#
USE=berkdb innodb
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
$ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults
USE=alsa apm arts avi bitmap-fonts cups eds emboss encode fortran
foomaticdb gdbm
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:02 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
Nah, it's 5 to 5, so eix-sync is NOT longer than esync...
I really think you guys should read this page :)
Steven Susbauer wrote:
Did I at some point screw up my system, or is /var/tmp no longer a link to
/tmp by default anymore?
On my systems, /var/tmp has never been a link to /tmp.
Alexander Skwar
--
And now for something completely the same.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Steven Susbauer wrote:
Long story short, sudo echo emerge --sync 1/dev/null 21
/etc/cron.daily/portsync, sudo chmod 755 /etc/cron.daily/portsync
How will this update either the eix or the esearch databases?
Alexander Skwar
--
I haven't been married in over six years, but we had sexual
Hi all,
This is a bit OT but I have a netgear router DG834 ADSL firewall router. I
have restricted my incoming services with ...
Enable Service Name Action LAN Server IP address WAN Users Log
on bit torrent ALLOW always 192.168.0.5 Any Always
Default Yes Any BLOCK always Any
Hi!
It isn't a secret, some apps don't take place inside the protage :-)
And some of them use QT3 with 'configure make make install' way.
Now I have (at ~x86) slotted QT installd - both 3 and 4 versions,
and autotools-building has these ot those errors.
Is there legal/Gentoo way to make these
On 5/24/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well yes, he needs a -rsomething,
I've installed vmware-workstation-5.5.1.19175-r3.
But it seemed I had some old versions of vmware-files
in various locations. So I cleaned that up, and now I
can configure.
But when I attempt to actually *run*
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:23 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many
improvements: $ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86
/etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage
Just a question, but
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:25 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Also, unless this have changed dramatically, eix's database update is
*much* faster than that of esearch - seconds vs. minutes.
I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see
that behaviour - esearch only takes
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:11 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Hello. In an office we helped set up, there are a lot of X terminals for the
clerks. (These X terminals are the old computers from school's lab,
installed simple Gentoo Linux only to start X). Now they need VIOP, is it
possible? I mean, is
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:56 +0200, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
JimD wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
404 Error Not found !
It works now, but not in the beginning.
haha. maybe it was gentoo-user-ed (although I doubt there are enough
readers here to flood google :)
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote:
Holas,
Two days ago I updated the nvidia drivers, so I killed gdm and restarted xdm
to reload the newer modules.
Problem is, it looks like xdm never restarted.
root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm status
* status: stopping
root ~ $
Hi folks,
after an emerge ---sync and during an emerge --update world, qt-3.3.6
doesn't compile anymore because it can't find libexpat.so.0. So I did
an emerge --oneshot expat which tells me at the end that I should do
a revdep-rebuild --library libexpat.so.0.
That gives me a *huge* list of
On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:47, Uwe Thiem wrote:
That gives me a *huge* list of packages which would be rebuilt. Most
of them are kde-3.5 stuff. Since I am upgrading from kde-3.5.1 to
kde-3.5.2 in the same process, I am not interested in rebuilding the
old kde-3.5.1 stuff because it will be
Hi all,
For some time now I have been getting errors on boot.
1. This happens a number of times:-
udev-event [1777]:find_free_number: %e is deprecated, will be removed and is
unlikely to work correctly. Don't use it
What does this mean and how do I fix it?
1. etc/modules.devfs not
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:25 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Also, unless this have changed dramatically, eix's database update is
*much* faster than that of esearch - seconds vs. minutes.
I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see
that behaviour -
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 03:45 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:04 -0700, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with
Saturday 27 May 2006 13:42 skrev Iain Buchanan:
I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see
that behaviour - esearch only takes seconds for me...
It's not the esearch binary versus the eix binary where there is a big
difference. It's eupdatedb which takes a very long
Am Samstag 27 Mai 2006 13.54 schrieb Iain Buchanan:
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:56 +0200, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
JimD wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
404 Error Not found !
It works now, but not in the beginning.
haha. maybe it was gentoo-user-ed (although I
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 14:00 +0100, Paul Stear wrote:
Hi all,
For some time now I have been getting errors on boot.
1.This happens a number of times:-
udev-event [1777]:find_free_number: %e is deprecated, will be removed and is
unlikely to work correctly. Don't use it
What does this mean
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:56, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote:
Holas,
Everything *seems* to work fine, but then there's that silly 'stopping'
comment that doesn't google very well. Anyone seen this, or have an
idea?
dunno, maybe the init
On Saturday 27 May 2006 08:03, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I
On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
True. But why keep 3.4?
because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate
this bugs than others.
I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 ebuilds since they entered the
tree many months) on two systems.
Hi guys, I'm having a problem during initialization. It happens that
50% of the time that I boot my desktop, when Calculating module
dependencies says Failed to load modules dependencies (with the
corresponding red exclamation marks) and when it gets to the loggin
message it never loads kdm, and
Oh, just in case...I'm running Gentoo 2005.1 for AMD64
On 5/27/06, El TuZa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys, I'm having a problem during initialization. It happens that
50% of the time that I boot my desktop, when Calculating module
dependencies says Failed to load modules dependencies (with
List,
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the
sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think
would be related to GCC, but then again:
app-admin/perl-cleaner
x11-proto/xextproto
Jason Weisberger wrote:
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG.
Yes, very much so. See my Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?
thread.
These packages quit on me after telling me that the reported filesize
by the ebuild wasn't equal to
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jason Weisberger wrote:
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG.
Yes, very much so. See my Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?
thread.
Yea, since the soname was the same, I was under the
On 5/27/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Password: debug1: packet_send2: adding 32 (len 25 padlen 7 extra_pad 64) debug2: input_userauth_info_req debug2: input_userauth_info_req: num_prompts 0 debug1: packet_send2: adding 48 (len 10 padlen 6 extra_pad 64)
debug1: ssh-userauth2 successful:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 19:40:06 +0400, Jason Weisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
app-admin/perl-cleaner
These packages quit on me after telling me that the reported filesize
by the ebuild wasn't equal to the downloaded filesize. This only
happened with gcc-config 6 (4.1.1). When I switched
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :(
Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining.
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Well, fact is, that we can now get access to the page. And
I wonder, why JimD posted, after it's been discovered that
this fact is outdated (the post from Raymond Lewis and
the replies have been sent before JimD sent his reply).
Alexander Skwar
Dude, get over it!
I did some googleing, and need a kreetingkard ebuild, anyone know if there are
any around??
Mike
--
Michael W. Holdeman
Powered by Gentoo Linux www.gentoo.org |
Kernel 2.6.15-ck2 |
VMWare Workstation 5.5.1 vmware.com |
On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:01, fire-eyes wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
True. But why keep 3.4?
because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate
this bugs than others.
I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 ebuilds since
Okay, I set LogLevel=DEBUG3 and reloaded sshd, but I got no more
output than usual:
May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[11739]: Received SIGHUP; restarting.
May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[2352]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.
May 27 09:15:31 treat sshd[2356]: Connection from 64.166.164.53
port 32776
On 27 May 2006 14:00, Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:47, Uwe Thiem wrote:
That gives me a *huge* list of packages which would be rebuilt. Most
of them are kde-3.5 stuff. Since I am upgrading from kde-3.5.1 to
kde-3.5.2 in the same process, I am not interested in
On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:40, Jason Weisberger wrote:
List,
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the
sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think
would be related to GCC,
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :(
Stop using ~arch packages,
To clear this up, I will send the .tar.gz file to anyone who asks for
it. Just beware: it's over 20 megs, so I'm going to have to slice it
into many files so that you can re-assemble it. My email won't send
over ten megs. But if you're having trouble, I'll send it. Just
contact me (preferably
On 5/27/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saturday 27 May 2006 13:42 skrev Iain Buchanan:
I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see
that behaviour - esearch only takes seconds for me...
It's not the esearch binary versus the eix binary where there is
Peter Kelly wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:56, Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote:
Holas,
Everything *seems* to work fine, but then there's that silly 'stopping'
comment that doesn't google very well. Anyone seen this, or have an
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack
Saturday 27 May 2006 16:16 skrev Peter Kelly:
That did it. I never knew about the 'zap' command.
Anyhow, everything is 'started' again.
You people really should read the Gentoo handbook. Not just the installation
related part but also part 2-4. It's really good. E.g. the 'zap' command is
On 5/27/06, Jason Weisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List,
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the
sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think
would be related to GCC, but
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Saturday 27 May 2006 16:16 skrev Peter Kelly:
That did it. I never knew about the 'zap' command.
Anyhow, everything is 'started' again.
You people really should read the Gentoo handbook. Not just the installation
related part but also part 2-4. It's really
On 5/27/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so run ebuild blabla.ebuild digest
wow, that is hard...
Probably better to just delete the distfiles and let them be
downloaded again though...
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining.
No, I won't do neither. The GWN and the upgrade doc used to say,
that an upgrade is (basically) riskless.
Well I can't force you to do anything. You found a problem, reported
a bug, and got the
I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but:
Now let's rebuild toolchain and then world so we will make use of the new
compiler.
Code Listing 2.2: Rebuilding system
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
and glibc is part of the system.
Which part of the upgrade guide did you
List,
I suppose that I just found it odd that it popped up after I switched
to GCC 4.1.1. Maybe coincidence. I'll delete all my digest files and
let them download again, because this is popping up on quite a few
packages. Maybe a bad mirror.
I will be going on vacation for about a week, and
On 5/27/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Did you try to compile glib? No? Then I guess you've done no testing.
if he does not have glib?
To be fair, I did mention mozilla, so it is safe to assume that I have
gtk and glib
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements
which turn out to be wrong. If it says no problems expected, then
that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And
the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated,
Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58 skrev Alexander Skwar:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
What exactly do you intend to achieve by flaming the devs?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really
On 5/27/06, Jason Weisberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read a few things about 4.1.1 not playing well with GTK packages
on the forums, however, and that still appears to be the case. I'll
get exact error messages when I return and bring this thread up again.
Cool. Hopefully any problems
Saturday 27 May 2006 23:22 skrev Jason Weisberger:
I will be going on vacation for about a week, and when I get back I'll
try to do all this again, hell, maybe even from a fresh install. I
hear the benefits are worth it.
What benefits?
--
Bo Andresen
pgpt3NNfGxdh5.pgp
Description: PGP
Without more info I can't be much help. But here's a pointer, just in case :
The modules init script launches modules-update, which can be launched at the
command line. The error you have is consistent (and, looking at the code of
the scrip can only be caused by) modules-update failing.
You
Jason Weisberger wrote:
List,
I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain,
right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the
sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think
would be related to GCC, but then again:
Le Samedi 27 Mai 2006 11:40, Dave S a écrit :
Hi all,
This is a bit OT but I have a netgear router DG834 ADSL firewall router. I
have restricted my incoming services with ...
Enable Service Name Action LAN Server IP address WAN Users Log
on bit torrent ALLOW always 192.168.0.5 Any
Martin Larsson wrote:
On 5/24/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well yes, he needs a -rsomething,
I've installed vmware-workstation-5.5.1.19175-r3.
But it seemed I had some old versions of vmware-files
in various locations. So I cleaned that up, and now I
can configure.
But when
Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x?
I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a
gnome guy and want to give kde a look).
The requirement page on the klibido site state gcc 3.x. Would I be able
to emerge gcc 3.x and compile klibido with that? I compiled
On 5/27/6, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I set LogLevel=DEBUG3 and reloaded sshd, but I got no more output than usual: May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[11739]: Received SIGHUP; restarting. May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[2352]: Server listening on
0.0.0.0 port 22. May 27 09:15:31 treat
That was the hint I needed. It's /bin/bash, which reminded me I
just changed something
in .bashrc which outputs a message and does some other stuff which
must be
confusing scp. In fact, I just confirmed that by commenting it
out. Now scp works too.
So: PROBLEM SOLVED.
Now I just have
On 5/27/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x?
Doesn't look promising. I just tried it, and I get this bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133535
I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a
gnome guy and want
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 15:47 +0200, Gian Domeni Calgeer wrote:
Am Samstag 27 Mai 2006 13.54 schrieb Iain Buchanan:
anyway, does it upload anything to google? I don't like the thought of
a gmail-for-pictures sort of app on my PC.
On http://picasa.google.com/linux/download.html they write:
On 5/27/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was the hint I needed.It's /bin/bash, which reminded me I just changed something in .bashrc which outputs a message and does some other stuff which must be confusing scp.In fact, I just confirmed that by commenting it
out.Now scp works too.
Richard Fish wrote:
I would suggest to either use 3.4.x and rebuild all C++ programs with
that (using revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.6), or wait for the
above bug to get fixed. Rebuilding all C++ programs could include
openoffice.org, mozilla, and other long-compiling packages...
Iain Buchanan wrote:
I'm not saying it _does_ these things, but where does it say it
_doesn't_?
Hey, Google has a corporate slogan of do no evil. We can trust big
corps right? :-)
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Richard Fish wrote:
I would suggest to either use 3.4.x and rebuild all C++ programs with
that (using revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.6), or wait for the
above bug to get fixed. Rebuilding all C++ programs could include
openoffice.org, mozilla, and other long-compiling packages...
By
That does not work for ssh/scp sessions. I usually test $PS1 to tell
if it's really a shell -- the variable does not even exist for an
scp session,
although .bashrc gets called.
can you give us an example of what your .bashrc looks like?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x?
I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a
gnome guy and want to give kde a look).
The requirement page on the klibido site state gcc 3.x. Would I be able
to emerge gcc 3.x and compile klibido with that? I compiled
JimD wrote:
By the way, do you know if Gentoo considers an ebuild with an -rX on the
end to be newer? For example which would emerge choose:
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6
or
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1
s/Gentoo/portage ;)
Yes, it does. Revision bumps are generally to correct a bug or typo in
an ebuild,
JimD wrote:
If the above is not doable, does anyone know of a good binary news
reader for Linux?
What's wrong with Thunderbird?
GrabIt is simple, fast and stable. Though it
is closed source and only runs on WinXP which doesn't help me now :-(
Wine ;)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Ryan Tandy wrote:
JimD wrote:
If the above is not doable, does anyone know of a good binary news
reader for Linux?
What's wrong with Thunderbird?
For binary news groups? I could give it a shot. However, Thunderbird
sucks up tons of memory for text-only news groups with a few hundred
Ryan Tandy wrote:
JimD wrote:
By the way, do you know if Gentoo considers an ebuild with an -rX on the
end to be newer? For example which would emerge choose:
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6
or
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1
s/Gentoo/portage ;)
Ahh, yes, I had a brain freeze.
Yay, random portage trivia!
subscribe
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an
upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz
!!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded size
I'm sorry to
David Relson wrote:
subscribe
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/27/06, Colleen Beamer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz
!!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded size
You should check the mail-list archives here...it has come up a couple
of times in the last day or so.
On 5/27/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Part of me wanting to try kde again was because of the nice speed
increase with startup times and gcc 4.1. However, I don't know if this
is try from experience. Is kde 3.5 noticeably faster when compiled with
gcc 4.1?
I'll let you know in a week or
Colleen Beamer wrote:
Hi,
I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an
upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz
!!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded
On 5/27/06, Kenneth Hopping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem appears to be that /sys/class/net/eth0 does not exist.
This is a pseudo-filesystem like proc that I cannot manipulate.
Is there some configuration file that needs initialization or a package
that I need to install?
No, you just
Colleen Beamer wrote:
Hi,
I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an
upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz
!!! Readon: Filesize does not match
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
