Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Friday, July 22 at 18:42 (-0500), Dale said:
I sort of hate to hear there are no major changes. I was hoping for
a
fix on my kernel panic problem. Oh well. I'll upgrade anyway.
Maybe
it will help.
Fixing a kernel bug is not considered a major change. A
On 7/22/2011 9:53 PM, CJoeB wrote:
Because this will be a new computer and I may essentially void the
warranty if I alter the pre-configuration, I seriously thought about
leaving the status quo and putting up with Windows 7. However, I would
lose practically as much as losing my first born! I
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:10:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
I was hoping since it was a whole different numbering scheme that it
was a major change. That was the reason for my question. I didn't
know if this was major or a normal update or something else. I was
hoping for something like when
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:10:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
I was hoping since it was a whole different numbering scheme that it
was a major change. That was the reason for my question. I didn't
know if this was major or a normal update or something else. I was
hoping for
. I was *hoping*
3.0 was going to be a whole new thing but it appears that is not. If, big
if there, it was a major change, I was hoping for a fix. Since it is not a
major change, I'm not so hopeful now.
Bugs are fixed all the time without major changes. If you enlist the
google's help, you
Am 22.07.2011 21:20, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
Maybe because you did not enable compositing in xfce4, but use it with kde4?
No, disabling composition is the first thing I do.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday 22 Jul 2011 20:20:47 Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
On Friday 22 July 2011 18:41:26 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 22.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
It may look like KDE is the likely culprit based on just the
information you provide, but I would be more inclined to look at
Adam Carter wrote:
. I was *hoping*
3.0 was going to be a whole new thing but it appears that is not. If, big
if there, it was a major change, I was hoping for a fix. Since it is not a
major change, I'm not so hopeful now.
Bugs are fixed all the time without major changes. If you
Dale wrote:
Does anyone remember the Seamonkey or Firefox upgrades or am I the
only one that does? I know fixes are done all the time. I was just
*hoping* that since this was a huge number change, like Seamonkey
going from Seamonkey 1 to Seamonkey 2, that there would be some major
On Saturday, July 23 at 01:10 (-0500), Dale said:
I was hoping since it was a whole different numbering scheme that it
was
a major change. That was the reason for my question. I didn't know
if
this was major or a normal update or something else. I was hoping
for
something like
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Saturday, July 23 at 01:10 (-0500), Dale said:
I was hoping since it was a whole different numbering scheme that it
was
a major change. That was the reason for my question. I didn't know
if
this was major or a normal update or something else. I was hoping
for
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:22:32PM -0500, Dale wrote:
...
using either. I clicked on the link to download and the window
popped up to ask me whether to open it or save it. I selected to
save it as I have done countless times before. As soon as I clicked
that, the window popped up asking
On Saturday, July 23 at 05:33 (-0500), Dale said:
But sometimes major changes can fix things and do things completely
different which can lead to other issues being fixed. Seamonkey did
the
same when they did their major redo.
Bad thing is, the kernel panics are at it again. I had a
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 07:25:42 Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 7/22/2011 9:53 PM, CJoeB wrote:
Because this will be a new computer and I may essentially void the
warranty if I alter the pre-configuration, I seriously thought about
leaving the status quo and putting up with Windows 7. However, I
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 03:53:44 Jeff Cranmer wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 22:39 -0400, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 10:18 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 22:00 -0400, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
Hi All,
I recently ran an emerge -NDuav on my system and
You've had some very good advice from Mike + Mick,
but you can have a bit more re-assurance from me.
You shouldn't have a warranty problem if you keep Windows 7 installed.
For that, you can easily install Gentoo alongside it.
I did that with my Asus netbook, which came with XP :
I got XP to tell
On 07/22/11 23:07, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:53 PM, CJoeB colleen.bea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Because this will be a new computer and I may essentially void the
warranty if I alter the pre-configuration, I seriously thought about
leaving the status quo and
On 21 July 2011, at 00:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
I really do not care about your esteem for me. Or what anybody else on this
list think about me.
If you don't care that you offend people here on a regular basis, then you have
no right to be offended by others.
So just shut up.
On 22 July 2011, at 07:45, Florian Philipp wrote:
Every native setting is just resolved by gcc at compile time to some
concrete setting like core2.
Perfectly correct.
On 21 July 2011, at 15:05, Florian Philipp wrote:
...
(unless, of course, if the GCC guys get their switch-case logic
On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
...
I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That hasn't
failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and DOUBLE check the PID
after typing it in.
I believe that `kill -9` is bad practice - doesn't it leave memory allocated
* Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk [110723 09:21]:
On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
...
I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That hasn't
failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and DOUBLE check the PID
after typing it in.
I believe
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Saturday, July 23 at 05:33 (-0500), Dale said:
But sometimes major changes can fix things and do things completely
different which can lead to other issues being fixed. Seamonkey did
the
same when they did their major redo.
Bad thing is, the kernel panics are at
YoYo Siska wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:22:32PM -0500, Dale wrote:
...
using either. I clicked on the link to download and the window
popped up to ask me whether to open it or save it. I selected to
save it as I have done countless times before. As soon as I clicked
that, the window
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 14:31:23 Todd Goodman wrote:
* Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk [110723 09:21]:
On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
...
I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That
hasn't failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and
On 7/23/2011 7:47 AM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 07:25:42 Mike Edenfield wrote:
I seem to recall a case where a user wiped their drive clean and installed
Ubuntu or some such. The laptop went faulty and the person asked for it to be
repaired/replaced under warranty, only to be told
* Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com [110723 10:20]:
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 14:31:23 Todd Goodman wrote:
* Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk [110723 09:21]:
On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
...
I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That
hasn't
On Fri, Jul 22 2011, CJoeB wrote:
Because this will be a new computer and I may essentially void the
warranty if I alter the pre-configuration, I seriously thought about
leaving the status quo and putting up with Windows 7.
You have already received much good advice. I would add that dell
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 14:28:32 CJoeB wrote:
The thing is, I don't want Windows on the computer at all. My laptop is
4 years old and it was booted into Windows once and that was only
because I didn't hit the F2 key fast enough to get into the bios to
change the boot order. Then, Windows
OK. New theory here. This came about in another thread about the
shiney new kernel, that isn't new by the way. Anyway, look at this crap:
root@fireball / # ls -al /home/dale/
total 640
drwxr-xr-x 61 dale users 2672 Jul 23 10:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 208 Jun 17 03:01 ..
drwx--
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. New theory here. This came about in another thread about the shiney
new kernel, that isn't new by the way. Anyway, look at this crap:
root@fireball / # ls -al /home/dale/
total 640
drwxr-xr-x 61 dale users 2672 Jul
Dale writes:
OK. New theory here. This came about in another thread about the
shiney new kernel, that isn't new by the way. Anyway, look at this crap:
root@fireball / # ls -al /home/dale/
total 640
drwxr-xr-x 61 dale users 2672 Jul 23 10:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 208 Jun 17
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
OK. New theory here. This came about in another thread about the
shiney new kernel, that isn't new by the way. Anyway, look at this crap:
root@fireball / # ls -al /home/dale/
total 640
drwxr-xr-x 61 dale users 2672 Jul 23 10:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:55:11 -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
I'm actually speaking from experience here: the first thing
I did on my Inspiron was wipe the HD and install Gentoo,
only to learn that the wireless card was faulty. And since I
could not run the standard Windows diagnostics they
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 17:49:53 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:55:11 -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
I'm actually speaking from experience here: the first thing
I did on my Inspiron was wipe the HD and install Gentoo,
only to learn that the wireless card was faulty. And since I
I think I typed in something wrong and sort of made a mess of it. I had
to copy a backup file for group and passwd to get things working again.
Here is what I have right now:
root@fireball / # cat /etc/passwd
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:/bin/false
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
I guess it starts to download it to a temp file, than moves it to the
file you choose (never looked into it)... so the problem would be most
likely in that operation..
I just find it downright odd that a browser causes a
On Saturday 23 July 2011 09:28:43 Mick wrote:
Well, have a look at http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-
b...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1483058.html for an example how the open source
atidrivers can hang X with firefox. Note that compositing was enabled
here (compiz). And here's another one:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 10:24:17 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 22.07.2011 21:20, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
Maybe because you did not enable compositing in xfce4, but use it with
kde4?
No, disabling composition is the first thing I do.
Ah, thanks.
Without a backtrace it's hard to tell
On Saturday, July 23 at 09:35 (-0500), Dale said:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
[...]
Anyway, here's something... did you actually report a bug? If a tree
falls in the forest...
I haven't filed a bug because at the moment we have not been able to
figure out exactly what is causing
Willie Wong wrote:
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Dale wrote:
YoYo Siska wrote:
I guess it starts to download it to a temp file, than moves it to the
file you choose (never looked into it)... so the problem would be most
likely in that operation..
I just find
On 7/23/2011 12:49 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:55:11 -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
I'm actually speaking from experience here: the first thing
I did on my Inspiron was wipe the HD and install Gentoo,
only to learn that the wireless card was faulty. And since I
could not run
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Saturday, July 23 at 09:35 (-0500), Dale said:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
[...]
Anyway, here's something... did you actually report a bug? If a tree
falls in the forest...
I haven't filed a bug because at the moment we have not been able to
On Saturday 23 July 2011 19:45:50 Dale wrote:
I have tested all sorts of things including running memtest.
Which version? The latest in Gentoo predates the introduction of support
(whatever that is) for the i-5 and i-7 CPUs. That was version 4.19 if I
remember aright. You can get the latest
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 19:45:50 Dale wrote:
I have tested all sorts of things including running memtest.
Which version? The latest in Gentoo predates the introduction of support
(whatever that is) for the i-5 and i-7 CPUs. That was version 4.19 if I
remember
On Saturday 23 July 2011 20:46:41 Dale wrote:
I have a AMD CPU. Just not a Intel guy.
Oh, sorry. My mistake.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter number 5290
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 20:46:41 Dale wrote:
I have a AMD CPU. Just not a Intel guy.
Oh, sorry. My mistake.
No problem. If you hadn't mentioned it, I would have been sitting on
one that the test don't work on. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
On 2011-07-23, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
If things break you'll have to replace components yourself - to be
honest unless a CPU/MoBo goes bad on you it is relatively cheap to by
a drive or PSU these days.
If something breaks (aside from the hard drive), send it in for repair
This will affect (I think) only ~arch users.
If you are running the new linux kernel version 3.0, you will
find that today's update of python will fail with the error
plat-linux2 not found.
That's because the python configure scripts will detect the
version 3 kernel and will try to use
walt wrote:
This will affect (I think) only ~arch users.
If you are running the new linux kernel version 3.0, you will
find that today's update of python will fail with the error
plat-linux2 not found.
That's because the python configure scripts will detect the
version 3 kernel and will try to
...
Next I'd look at tuning your Mysql config. If you've never touched
my.cnf, by default it's set to use 64MB IIRC. You may need to raise this to
get better performance. key_buffer and innodb_buffer_pool_size are the only
two I'd modify without knowing more.
kashani
I'm running
On Saturday 23 July 2011 16:32:39 Dale did opine thusly:
walt wrote:
This will affect (I think) only ~arch users.
If you are running the new linux kernel version 3.0, you will
find that today's update of python will fail with the error
plat-linux2 not found.
That's because the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 16:32:39 Dale did opine thusly:
walt wrote:
This will affect (I think) only ~arch users.
If you are running the new linux kernel version 3.0, you will
find that today's update of python will fail with the error
plat-linux2 not found.
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:01:31 +0200
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thursday 21 July 2011 10:01:10 j...@jdm.myzen.co.uk wrote:
A little advice please? I am about to build a new box going from
athlon dual core to phenom six core. Including new sata drives and
On Saturday 23 July 2011 16:11:20 Mick did opine thusly:
So, if I choose the amd64 iso and Stage 3, it doesn't have to be
on an AMD machine?
Correct, you will use this iso (or systemrescueCD or Knoppix) and a
Staqe 3 equivalent to build a system on an Intel 64bit CPU.
Just to flesh it
On Saturday 23 July 2011 18:35:20 Mick did opine thusly:
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 17:49:53 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:55:11 -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
I'm actually speaking from experience here: the first thing
I did on my Inspiron was wipe the HD and install Gentoo,
On 07/23/2011 02:09 PM, walt wrote:
To finish today's update of python2 and python3, just boot
with any kernel-2.6.x and repeat the python update.
Well, not just any kernel-2.6.x. Python needs the kernel sources
for your 2.6.x kernel to be installed and configured. And (maybe)
needs the
On 07/23/11 18:24, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 23 July 2011 16:11:20 Mick did opine thusly:
So, if I choose the amd64 iso and Stage 3, it doesn't have to be
on an AMD machine?
Correct, you will use this iso (or systemrescueCD or Knoppix) and a
Staqe 3 equivalent to build a system on an
Hello,
Just emerged freemind package and installation was fine, but when I try to
run freemind it gives me the error as follows:
$ freemind
Looking for user properties:
/home/akio/.freemind/user.properties
User properties found.
Default (System) Look Feel:
Summary;
Copied / from sda3 to sdb3
Updated the fstab in the new disk (/dev/sdb3 /
btrfs noatime,compress=lzo0 0)
Updated the kernel line's root=/dev/sda3 to /dev/sdb3 in grub.conf,
but left the root (hd0,0) as it is. So, kernel is loaded from sda but
init should run from sdb.
...
If my main rig starts using swap a lot, I'm going to be very curious. I
even used 8Gbs to put portages work directory on tmpfs. I still didn't use
any swap. By the way, that doesn't seem to make the compiles any faster.
o_O
CPU bottleneck?
- Grant
...
That all makes perfect sense. So the reason a swap larger than maybe
1GB is not usually implemented is because idle processes don't
normally have more than a few hundred MB of pages in memory?
That's not entirely true, either. For example, My laptop has 4GB of
swap. Why? Well, because
It looks like freemind looks for Look and Feel properties in
/home/akio/.freemind/user.properties.
user.properties is set to use java swing GTK library (GTK.LookAndFeel). Not
sure how exactly that works but that is my guess. You might want to backup
user.properties file and try to edit it
Hi Srdjan,
Thank you, but *user.**properties* has all lines commented so I believe it
is not the cause of this issue...
USE=-gtk does not make any difference as well.
Anyway I will keep trying to find out what is wrong...
Regards,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Srdjan Rakic srk...@gmail.com
* Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
However, what you want can still be done without touching the ebuilds
because it would really just be an alias for `emerge --one-shot
new_alternative emerge --depclean old_alternative
revdep-rebuild` (in the easiest, non-blocking case).
No,
64 matches
Mail list logo
