On Tuesday 03 Mar 2015 04:48:11 German wrote:
> Now when my system is finally booted, I would like someone walk me through
> the kernel config menu ( I couldn't locate the modules during install).
> Aformentioned modules are in the subject line.
>
> Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just wan
Now when my system is finally booted, I would like someone walk me through the
kernel config menu ( I couldn't locate the modules during install).
Aformentioned modules are in the subject line.
Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just want to make sure.
modules_2_6="3c59x"
And finally, I'd
150303 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> If you look at your world file, you should for each line
> be able to immediately say "yes I know what this is and I need it".
> Where "I need it" means "I need it directly"
> and *not* "I need it because some other package needs it".
> In most cases this means t
On Mon, 2 March 2015, at 1:36 am, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
>> ...
>> Don't forget to file a bug so we can track your issue.
>
> Should I file one with gentoo even if it's an upstream bug?
Yes.
Usually what I do in this case is go to the upstream mailing list, and see if I
get any quick ans
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:14:54 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
> > received.
>
> Yes, and you've been around the internet long enough to know that there
> are always exceptoions to the rules.
>
> Sending a general 'Thanks', without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 15:29:15 schrieb Tanstaafl:
> Hi all,
>
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in y
On Monday 02 Mar 2015 22:13:05 Petric Frank wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 21:01:48 schrieb Mick:
> The homepage on vpnc in chapter TODO tells:
> "phase2-rekeying is now supported as of svn revision 126!"
>
> Changelog states for 0.5.2:
> "Fix Phase 2 rekeying, by various autho
Hello,
Am Montag, 2. März 2015, 21:01:48 schrieb Mick:
> On Monday 02 Mar 2015 18:07:45 Petric Frank wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
> >
> > Runninng KDE + Networkmanager
> > (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101) together w
On Monday 02 Mar 2015 18:07:45 Petric Frank wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
>
> Runninng KDE + Networkmanager
> (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101) together with vpnc plugin
> (net-misc/networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.10.0).
>
> I have
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Saturday, February 28, 2015 12:50:37 PM Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Efibootmgr is not a boot manager, it's an utility to interface with the EFI
>>> firmware on the motherboard
http://archives.gentoo.org/lists
Thankyou, Thankyou, Thankyou!
James
Hello,
this is not a Gentoo problem per se, but i'm getting it under Gentoo.
Runninng KDE + Networkmanager (net-misc/networkmanager-0.9.10.1_pre20141101)
together with vpnc plugin (net-misc/networkmanager-vpnc-0.9.10.0).
I have set up a VPN connection to a AVM FritzBox (which is using - as far
Many thanks to all for the responses, will work on cleaning this up next
weekend (don't like doing things like this on a production server during
the week)...
On 3/2/2015 9:53 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>>> Yes, you shouldn't really have any
On 3/2/2015 10:11 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:05:16 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
> received.
Yes, and you've been around the internet long enough to know that there
are always exceptoions to the rules.
Send
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:26:34 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> > In this specific case, all except two files come from emul-linux 32
> > bit and they are all safe to delete (even the two except ones). But
> > do note I know this becuase I've been here before and figured it
> > out, not becuase of some mag
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:05:16 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
You've been on the list long enough to know how well top-posting is
received.
> Many thanks to all for the responses, will work on cleaning this up next
> weekend (don't like doing things like this on a production server during
> the week)...
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:47:28 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> It could be that all those libs have found their way into world by
> accident, presumably by you forgetting to include -1 when updating them.
Most likely. Another way of overfilling world is by installing aoftware
to try it out than for
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulle
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:29:15 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulled in as dependencies.
>
> Is this in fact true?
Yes. The world file is for the software you want installed. Portage will
take care of its dependenc
On Monday 02 March 2015 09:29:15 Tanstaafl wrote:
> Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
> ran across this post:
>
> On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> > Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> > required would be pulled in as dependenci
2015-03-02 8:29 GMT-06:00 Tanstaafl :
> So, should I delete all of these? Even glib and glibc?
>
Ideally you only want the applications you actually use directly in
your world file, and let portage solve the dependencies for those. If
you really need to emerge a library installed by hand use 'eme
Hi all,
Googling on a minor issue with perl-cleaner after the 5.20 upgrade, I
ran across this post:
On 2/14/2015 7:39 AM, Mick wrote:
> Yes, you shouldn't really have any libs in your world file. Any
> required would be pulled in as dependencies.
Is this in fact true?
I checked mine, and foun
On 3/2/2015 9:25 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:14:41 -0500
> Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
* Finding left over modules
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 08:14:41 -0500
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> >> 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
> >>
> >> * Finding left over modules and header
> >>
> >> * The following files remain
On 2/14/2015 6:37 AM, bitlord wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:13:25 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>> 'perl-cleaner --all' generated the following output.
>>
>> * Finding left over modules and header
>>
>> * The following files remain. These were either installed by hand
>> * or edited. This script c
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:36:42AM -0800, Daniel Frey wrote
> I got my HDHomerun tuner around then too, but I decided back then
> (without reading the manual) that I didn't want it on my "main" NIC, so
> I bought an Intel pci-e NIC and dedicated the Homerun to it.
>
> Every once in a while I move
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:31:27 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:27 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > >
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:27 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Germ
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:18 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Germ
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> > Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
> Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> > >
> > > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
> > files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx6
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
> files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
> /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember
33 matches
Mail list logo
