On Thursday 21 September 2006 05:06, Drew wrote:
You need a 64 bit kernel with CONFIG_IA32_EMUL enabled.
Uh no. A 32bit chroot can be run on a 64bit kernel with IA32_EMUL
enabled however a 64bit chroot can *NOT* be run from a 32bit kernel.
Err..., which differs from what I stated exactly
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 06:29, Kumar Golap wrote:
libsdl seems to fail checksum...and i don't seem to be able to make it
take the package from another mirror despite having different mirrors
in make.conf ...it keeps going to
http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-1.2.11.tar.gz
Next time
On Saturday 16 September 2006 18:52, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
That's good to head. I can't get the ATI module compiled in. I thought I
was doing the right thing following the howto when I put this in
/etc/make.conf, but it gets ignored:
VIDEO_CARDS=vga vesa fbdev ati
I get the first three,
On Sunday 17 September 2006 08:18, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I just switched to modular X, and got to the point where the system
comes up okay.
I have a few remaining puzzles and problems. Here's one:
When I do emerge -aDvu world, it wants to emerge
[ebuild N] virtual/x11-7.0-r2 USE=dri 0
On Friday 15 September 2006 07:52, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Just a sidenote here, if knowing you'll have to rebuild after expat
downgrade you could run revdep-rebuild --library libexpat.so.1 before
and save the order/list of packages.
Of course, however, revdep-rebuild still don't have a clue about
On Thursday 14 September 2006 18:46, Dan Johansson wrote:
Today I did the mistake of re-emerging
(emerge --update --deep --verbose --newuse world --pretend
) x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r8 as a result of a changed USE-flag
(GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE). Now when I try to do a new
emerge --update --deep
On Friday 15 September 2006 01:08, David Grant wrote:
Is anyone else getting:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
every time they send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 15 September 2006 12:47, Mick wrote:
Don't mean to hijack this thread, but my situation is probably similar to
the OP.
On Friday 15 September 2006 02:57, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Iain Buchanan wrote:
Finally, if it still doesn't work, post what you see from
tail -f
On Thursday 14 September 2006 07:03, Richard Fish wrote:
2. Remove ~amd64 from keywords, and basically follow the gcc upgrade
guide, since you probably need to udpate to gcc 4.1 anyway.
Advantages:
- It's relatively easy to see what things are going to be downgraded,
so you can decide what
On Thursday 14 September 2006 14:34, Frank Baumeister wrote:
whenever I run emerge it aborts with the following error message:
[SNIP]
pTraceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 4049, in ?
emerge_main()
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 3770, in emerge_main
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 04:56, Richard Fish wrote:
echo ~x11-libs/fox-1.2.18 ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
Replace ~x86 with ~amd64 if you are on the amd64 arch.
Or just remove it all together:
echo ~x11-libs/fox-1.2.18 /etc/portage/package.keywords
If nothing is specified it
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 05:14, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
to not include my system specifications in any of the compile failure
mails I will summarize it in separate mail:
Oh, ffs! Was it really necessary to clutter this list with 7 independent
threads out of which 6 requires the
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 08:17, Wolfgang Liebich wrote:
I've set up a new computer w/ gentoo which uses a newer graphics card
than my old one (an Intel 945 on board card). I installed modular xorg,
and AFAIK the drivers which are getting installed are determined by the
VIDEO_CARDS flag
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 15:34, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
Looking at the shell initialization files, seems that the only script
which checks the contents of /etc/profile.d and sources some files from
there is /etc/csh.cshrc (unless I missed some).
You are missing /etc/profile. Only thing this
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 18:24, David Grant wrote:
revdep-rebuild keeps wanting to re-emerge gcc-4.1.1 over and over again. Is
anyone else seeing this?
So why don't you show us the output of
# revdep-rebuild -i -vp
? That way we would be able to give a qualified answer instead of
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:36, James wrote:
The more minimized the global flags are, the more secure the server.
Were I the only one who wasn't quite convinced by that statement?
--
Bo Andresen
pgp90yjwqq0Ib.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 19:53, David Grant wrote:
I didn't include it originally because it is long. :-)
If you think it's too long compress it. If you still think it's too long don't
send the mail at all... Just omitting it leaving us to guess at the issues is
simply pointless.
I've
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 09:37, Richard Fish wrote:
That said, arts is still useful for KDE 3.5 if you want sound
notifications for error popups, login/logout events, etc, as it makes
notifications perform much much better IME.
As in compiling kdelibs with the arts use flag and then
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 11:14, Richard Fish wrote:
As in compiling kdelibs with the arts use flag and then disabling arts in
kcontrol? Or as in actually enabling the arts use flag globally and using
arts? :O
The latter...
I'll have to say I'm a bit curious about how you get to the
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 13:01, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I decided to purge Gnome from my system as I seldom run it. A
quick look in the gnome ebuild shows that it's a
ginormous -meta package, meaning I have some work ahead of me.
First I updated USE and removed gnome, gstreamer and other
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 13:50, Philip Webb wrote:
I also get
equery depends evolution-data-server
[ Searching for packages depending on evolution-data-server... ]
app-office/openoffice-2.0.3
So it looks as if OO may have its own reasons for demanding e-d-s .
No, it just looks
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 14:48, Alan McKinnon wrote:
wireshark won't compile, saying that perl is built with the
minimal use flag. Only, it isn't.
The wireshark failure:
!!! ERROR: net-analyzer/wireshark-0.99.3 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1562: Called dyn_setup
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:09, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Why would portage want to install ati-drivers when it is not on my
system, not in my package.keywords file and not in my world file?
Because VIDEO_CARDS in /etc/make.conf includes fglrx? If you are still
confused please post the output
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:41, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:09, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Why would portage want to install ati-drivers when it is not on my
system, not in my package.keywords file and not in my world file?
Because
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:37, Philip Webb wrote:
No, it just looks like equery is broken.
It doesn't care about your use flags...
Equery is broken ?? Have you filed a bug ... (raises eyebrows) ?
No, I usually don't file duplicates on purpose. Is it really so hard to search
bugzilla?
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 15:34, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Anyone seen this before? Am I being stupid (again) or is it
a bug? And if so, where might the bug be - perl, wireshark,
or the portage scripts?
It's a bug in the wireshark ebuild. It hasn't been noticed
until now because it
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 16:12, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Nope, not the reason either. :-) VIDEO_CARDS in make.conf
set to radeon only.
Perhaps you have google-earth installed, or some other app that
requires hardware 3D. That's what happened to me:
gentoo ~ # equery depends ati-drivers
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 03:39, Dale wrote:
[SNIP]
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/util-macros-1.1.0.tar.bz2
!!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification
!!! Got: 8bad98dd55d18d6ec69f444e86d0f934
!!! Expected: bc06eebd94b6e65405c2d5b1e479fea8
[SNIP]
I have
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 03:58, Dale wrote:
!!! Digest verification failed:
!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/util-macros-1.1.0.tar.bz2
!!! Reason: Failed on MD5 verification
!!! Got: 8bad98dd55d18d6ec69f444e86d0f934
!!! Expected: bc06eebd94b6e65405c2d5b1e479fea8
I have re-synced a
On Monday 11 September 2006 23:32, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:15:09 -0500, Dale wrote:
So basically if I mess with a file and then unmerge the program it
belongs to, I have to remember which ones I messed with and delete them
myself?
Yes, because the file is no longer the
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 05:28, Dale wrote:
I copied it there because I did a rm -rfv
/mnt/gentoo/usr/portage/distfiles/util-* first.
/mnt/gentoo/usr/portage/distfiles == /usr/portage/distfiles ?
--
Bo Andresen
pgpM04hDm9nwq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 10 September 2006 13:18, Peter wrote:
For over two years, I took LC_* for granted. Never touched it, never
looked at it (snobbery of being en_US I suppose!). Now, with the 2006.1
profile, I am forced to learn an essential part of Linux. So now, I am set
with en_US and ISO8895-15
On Sunday 10 September 2006 17:46, Peter wrote:
This is not connected to your profile or gcc upgrade. It's your glibc
upgrade. glibc-2.4.x is stricter when it comes to syntax than
glibc-2.3.x. Please show the output of:
I did not upgrade glibc. I recompiled it with the gcc-4.1.1 upgrade.
On Sunday 10 September 2006 01:26, Mick wrote:
How do I overcome this (other than try again in the morning)?
You don't! Wait a few hours. sync and try again...
--
Bo Andresen
pgpOxcf4DS6M8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 10 September 2006 20:21, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I was 8 hours through the emerge -eav world part of upgrading gcc
when it hit the pysol package it's not happy with. The messages are
telling me I need to recompile python with Tkinter support and asked
me to add dev/lang/python X
On Sunday 10 September 2006 21:19, Dale wrote:
For future reference, you can preserve the resume in two ways.
1: Rename /var/log/emerge.log to something else then go do what you
want and restore it after you are done. I have done that a couple times.
2: Open /var/log/emerge.log and put
On Sunday 10 September 2006 21:52, Dale wrote:
Nope. Just edit the /var/log/emerge.log file from what I have read. I
have read it on the forums and read it here a few days ago. I have
never tried it but others say it works.
Well, I assure you it is complete nonsense. According to portage
On Sunday 10 September 2006 22:20, Dale wrote:
Well, I assure you it is complete nonsense. According to portage devs,
indeed... /var/log/emerge.log is just a log file. /var/cache/edb/mtimedb
contains the resume data.
Could that be renamed in a similar fashion and that work? It looks like
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:37, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Did anyone else notice this?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147010
--
Bo Andresen
pgpUu3HetkXh4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 10 September 2006 21:35, Jerry McBride wrote:
Is there ANY good torrent source for the live dvd 2006.1 ISO???
This is really horrible.
Not really sure what you mean. Please provide more details in the future.
What's wrong with http://torrents.gentoo.org ?
--
Bo Andresen
On Sunday 10 September 2006 07:53, Stephen Liu wrote:
Did you set the following USE flags
USE=gtk gtk2 gnome hal avahi
[SNIP]
I left out hal avahi because I have no idea what they are for.
Neither I need them.
Well, you at least shouldn't be surprised that the guide fails if you don't
On Saturday 09 September 2006 10:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
here's an odd situation: I finished upgrading to GCC4 and decided to switch
my profile to 2006.1. instructions say:
rm /etc/make.profile
ln -s ../usr/portage/profiles/2006.1 /etc/make.profile
Others have told you the correct
On Saturday 09 September 2006 14:38, Mick wrote:
Openssl-0.9.8c came up with this message so I started a revdep-rebuild, but
it soon failed like is shown further below:
openssl-0.9.8c
[SNIP]
!!! ERROR: app-crypt/qca-tls-1.0-r2 failed.
Call stack:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 16:43, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
OK, I did an
export USE=X; emerg cairo
...and forgot to
unset USE
afterwards.
# unset USE
# emerge -vNDp world
--
Bo Andresen
pgpEQE3o5pvhI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 09 September 2006 17:58, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
In the doc, which link you mentioned firs there is in Listing 5
mentioned:
USE=-java emerge mozilla
...a previous mail mentioned, that is a bad thing to do.
?
Still slightly confused,
Instead do:
# echo
On Saturday 09 September 2006 10:05, Stephen Liu wrote:
I followed The GNOME Configuration HOWTO
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnome-config.xml
[SNIP]
Please advise;
1)
Do I need to reinstall Gnome?
(remark: installed gnome-light)
If YES how to remove Gnome, the unfinished package?
Did you
On Saturday 09 September 2006 18:21, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 17:58, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
In the doc, which link you mentioned firs there is in Listing 5
mentioned:
USE=-java emerge mozilla
[SNIP]
Instead do:
# echo
On Saturday 09 September 2006 18:54, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Hi folks:
[SNIP]
Replying to another thread and changed the subject like this is referred to as
hijacking a thread. Please don't do that. Instead post a new email to this
list with the new subject. New mail rather than reply...
On Sunday 10 September 2006 02:21, Richard Fish wrote:
The only one of your entries that gives me pause is the evdev driver,
which would be useful for multi-button USB mice or joysticks. If you
use a /dev/input/eventX device in your xorg.conf, you should keep this
around.
Just wanted to add
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:12, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Most of my problems came in the stage of the revdep-rebuild things
simply wouldn't build. I finally solved it by un-installing as many of
the offending packages as I could, multiple emerge --sync and about 10
attempts at
On Friday 08 September 2006 18:29, Dan Johansson wrote:
After upgrading OpenSSL to 0.9.8c my Apache-2.0.58-r2 will not start with
SSL.
Did you follow those steps?
[portage] ebuild log for dev-libs/openssl-0.9.8c
WARN: postinst
You must re-compile all packages that are linked against
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
indicated -
That
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:07, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
On Friday 08 September 2006 15:00, Dale wrote:
I'm not sure if it is just me or what but every time I
run revdep-rebuild it wants to emerge gcc again. It did the same thing
before the gcc upgrade.
It is bug #125728 [1]? Otherwise if it continues consider posting the output
of:
#
On Saturday 09 September 2006 03:53, Dale wrote:
I did my emerge --sync andthen did a emerge -uvDp world. This is what I
got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -uvDp world
Add --tree to this command in order to see what is pulling it in.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
On Saturday 09 September 2006 04:25, Dale wrote:
Yea, I know about aim being gone. My wife uses this once in a blue moon
and she !HAS! to have aim.
Well, if you don't care about that it is no longer supported you can always
download the ebuild from cvs [1] or copy it from
On Saturday 09 September 2006 06:24, b.n. wrote:
Calculating world dependencies \
!!! Ebuilds for the following packages are either all
!!! masked or don't exist:
net-im/aim
You really should do something when you see warnings like this.
net-im/aim was masked for removal more than
On Saturday 09 September 2006 05:33, Dale wrote:
What would be a good way of finding files that were not deleted when
something was upgraded/unmerged? I thought depclean was different from
what I wanted to say but it got the ball rolling.
Depclean is to remove packages that are no longer in
On Thursday 07 September 2006 11:55, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
So what should I set as the CHOST for an amd-K6 arch machine?
I've set it to i586...
Just realised that there is a stage3-i586-...tar.bz2. For new installs on amd
K6 I assume that would be more appropriate than stage3-x86... For
Which 2006.1 iso or bz2 file do I use?
I already tried this and it hung:
install-x86-minimal-2006.1.iso
Consider filing a bug if noone did before.
google turns up empty looking for:
stage3-i586-2006.1.tar.bz2
Yeah, sorry I was looking at 2006.0.
--
Bo Andresen
pgpEdu6yQjegj.pgp
On Thursday 07 September 2006 16:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there some possibility to get somewhere an old ebuild,
which has been removed from the portage tree and replaced
by an ebuild of the newer version of the given app ?
http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/?hideattic=0
On Thursday 07 September 2006 17:30, Jarry wrote:
OMG, again portage wants to re-emerge dietlibc-0.28! Why?
Can I somehow start emerge --resume but without the first
package which previously caused error
(in this case dietlibc-0.28)? I do not want to go over
the whole thing again again, it
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 07:59, Mick wrote:
Thanks Bo. I saw your message but not Richard's. I think Gmail is playing
up again?
From Richards email:
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 00:48, Richard Fish wrote:
On 9/5/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, to recapitulate: I've emerged
On Thursday 07 September 2006 00:35, Richard Fish wrote:
However, for the next gcc-upgrade cycle, I plan to ask (as a userrep)
that the gcc compilation bugs not be closed until the fixes actually
make it to stable. That way at least the stabilization bug will
continue to reflect just how
On Thursday 07 September 2006 01:48, Richard Fish wrote:
I'm assuming of course that had the gcc team and
others known how much things would break by stabilizing 4.1 that a
bigger push would have been made to clean things up before-hand.
I believe the reason why gcc-4.1.1 was stabilized
On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:26, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
The cost was that some users of stable who chose to upgrade
as soon as gcc-4.1.1 was stabilized had some extra hazzle with recompiling
the system and those who find themselves unable to search bugzilla filed a
lot of dupes.
One
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 03:29, Dale wrote:
Here is my USE flags from make.conf:
[SNIP]
Is there a tool in genutils or something that will tell me what USE
flags are no longer used? I'm sure there are a few in there that are
outdated to say the least. I have been running this for about
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 00:12, Mick wrote:
So, to recapitulate: I've emerged gcc, remerged the system, remerged
world, revedep-rebuild --library libstdc++.so.6 and I ended up with an
awfully ugly Fluxbox and KDE applications:
Did you run revdep-rebuild --library libstdc++.so.6 after
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 00:03, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Any assistance would be appreciated.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146335
--
Bo Andresen
pgppf618zk2gc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 02:21, Colleen Beamer wrote:
Well, despite the fact that libvisual-0.4.0 installed fine on my system,
I still can't install amarok 'cause it wants only libvisual-0.2.0., so
I'm back at square 1. :-(
AmaroK 1.4.1 requires libvisual 0.4*.
--
Bo Andresen
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 07:18, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
Did you try to find kdestart?
Richard and I have already stated that there is no kdestart. There never was.
What you are looking for is:
# equery belongs startkde
[ Searching for file(s) startkde in *... ]
On Sunday 03 September 2006 15:27, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[ebuild U ] media-video/dvdrip-0.98.1 [0.97.10] USE=(-cdr%) fping%*
(-gnome%*) hal%* (-minimal%) mplayer ogg (-rar%*) -subtitles -vcd% vorbis%*
-xine% xvid 0 kB
Why are some of those USE flags, like cdr or gnome, set in brackets,
On Saturday 02 September 2006 10:58, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
So, is it correct / necessary in my case to do the following for
upgrading to gcc-4.1:
Correct the CHOST fault
emerge -e world
emerge glibc
emerge -e world
emerge gcc
emerge -e world
...?.
I guess you didn't
On Saturday 02 September 2006 16:04, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Everytime when gentoo introduces a new profile as now 2006.1 there are
some use flag changes. After i switch to the new profile and do an
emerge -uND world there are several packages affected by this changes.
So i normally go through
On Saturday 02 September 2006 17:38, Collins Richey wrote:
please note that this is an english language list. If you cannot even
make an attempt to speak english then go away.
That's the dumbest, sickest, most worthless comment I've seen on a
list in a long time. You should truly be
On Saturday 02 September 2006 19:25, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
x11-misc/entrance-0.9.0.007 ~x86
x11-libs/evas-0.9.9.030 ~x86
x11-libs/ecore-0.9.9.030 ~x86
media-libs/edje-0.5.0.030 ~x86
x11-libs/esmart-0.9.0.007 ~x86
Add a '~' charater in front of those (because you are
On Saturday 02 September 2006 19:41, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
Sorry for the question but thank you for the answer!
Heh, not a problem. But please in the future reply to the list only.. ;)
--
Bo Andresen
pgpkmbuIgwAUr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 02 September 2006 23:05, b.n. wrote:
I personally don't understand at all why is not an official document
posted, just like the GCC or Xorg upgrade guides.
There should be an official Upgrade to profile 2006.1 guide, period. I
would love to write it, but not being a dev I can't.
On Saturday 02 September 2006 23:33, Dale wrote:
I still didn't see where they were telling us what USE flags were being
replaced by what.
I have already stated that I don't think that such a thing exists. Now what I
do is to not change my profile before
# emerge -uvpDNt
doesn't what to
On Saturday 02 September 2006 01:05, Mick wrote:
I moved onto 2006.1 profile, updated gcc, remerged system and now as I am
getting ready to remerge world, suddenly I noticed:
Consider switching to the newly introduced desktop profile (2006.1/desktop).
There is a server profile too but that
On Saturday 02 September 2006 07:17, Daniel Iliev wrote:
Of course its gentoo and therefore there is yet another approach:
USE=-* kde qt 'all flags that you want'
This way release changes wouldn't affect your USE flags.
Or simply don't upgrade your profile until the old profile gets
On Sunday 27 August 2006 16:09, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
Well, I'll see if there aren't any settings I need to muck around with. A
15 minute delay is pretty bad, as I need most of my email to be in my inbox
pronto.
I am not entirely sure as I haven't used Thunderbird for the last 9 months but
I
On Thursday 24 August 2006 15:49, Philipp Tölke wrote:
/var/tmp/portage/portage-2.1-r2/work/portage-2.1-r2 ...
/zeug/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1-r2.ebuild: line 63: tc-getCC:
command not found
/zeug/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1-r2.ebuild: line 63:
-march=athlon64: command not
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 09:43, Alan Mckinnon wrote:
I believe the gcc ebuild does do a bootstrap compile, which does imply
that emerge -e system is redundant.
But, we had a huge long rambling thread on this point recently which I'd
rather not rehash again :-) and IIRC the general
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 16:30, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
(Does awk parse the file once or multiple times, that is if I were to
rewrite the below entirely in awk language)
awk parses the file only once. One line at a time. Of course that goes for
every invocation of awk... ;)
finaltpi=`cat $1
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:22, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
toolchain.eclass.
Since the OP wanted -Os, the question remains:
How, if at all, can he get -Os
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 05:18, Richard Fish wrote:
Actually there is. You can find all packages not compiled with -Os
and rebuild them with something like:
cd /var/db/pkg
for pkg in */* ; do
grep -v -- -Os $pkg/CFLAGS /dev/null
test $? -eq 0 emerge --oneshot =$pkg
done
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:48, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Oh, and BTW, on gentoo your optimization choices for gcc are -O, -O2
note 'choices for gcc' above ^
or nothing, because all other -O options are replaced with -O2 by
toolchain.eclass.
On Thursday 24 August 2006 00:21, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
will either have to look at the ebuilds and any eclasses that they append
s/append/inherit/
--
Bo Andresen
pgpJ5logQmBhQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 05:18, Richard Fish wrote:
I see the point in this. (AFAIK there is no way to break up emerge -e
xy into smaller pieces, something to do in several separated steps.
Actually there is. You can find all packages not compiled with -Os
and rebuild them with something
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 21:30, Richard Fish wrote:
revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.6
emerge --prune gcc
emerge -e world
Am I correct that the revdep-rebuild step is redundant if you don't need any
C++ apps for the next 48 hours (assuming the emerge -e world completes
successfully)?
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 23:04, Richard Fish wrote:
On 8/22/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I correct that the revdep-rebuild step is redundant if you don't
need any C++ apps for the next 48 hours (assuming the emerge
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 23:50, Richard Fish wrote:
Now I'm confused.. ;) Would pruning the old gcc before running emerge -e
world break anything that's isn't a C++ app?
Well, technically, no. But considering that some python modules are
implemented in C++ and link against libstdc++
On Tuesday 15 August 2006 13:27, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
Everything that might be interessting for you is in
the ebuild, in the 'einfo' block.
Or 'ewarn' or 'eerror' or 'elog'. And in the case of an eerror the emerge will
die too. All of those four have an asterisk '*' in front of it when
On Wednesday 16 August 2006 01:32, darren kirby wrote:
I just realized my Gentoo has no 'at'
I searched but couldn't find as google will not consider less than 3 char
words and equery only works on installed apps. Web interface to portage
didn't reveal it either.
Where the heck is at at?
On Monday 14 August 2006 16:52, James wrote:
Some time ago, I upgraded several systems I manage.
First was the (painful) upgrade of kde-monolith
to kde-meta. [1]
Then the easier of the two xorg 6.8 to xorg 7.0. [2]
I have kept these pacakges masked for a while on other systems,
some of
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know if something is available in version 3.0.23b?
You can just rename the ebuild and put it into your overlay until the
gentoo samba developers get to it.
On Saturday 12 August 2006 17:40, Mike Williams wrote:
Either the rsync mirror you're using have screwed it up, or a developer
made an error.
A developer did make an error. It is the result of a cvs conflict and it was
corrected in the cvs 90 minutes ago. Just wait up to 30 minutes and sync
On Saturday 12 August 2006 17:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following occurs when running an update world following a sync today.
--- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: 1.5723
--- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: ===
--- Invalid atom in
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 22:28, frank wrote:
Booting from the Gentoo liveCD 2006 puts my clock back for 2 hours.
How did you determine that? What time zone does your system run? Did you
select a time zone on the LiveCD after booting?
--
Bo Andresen
pgp3slexd6NX0.pgp
Description: PGP
801 - 900 of 1096 matches
Mail list logo
