On 5/29/21 12:26 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Looking through them is "interesting". There seem to be a lot of
/etc/ssl/certs/.0 files, where "?" is either a random number
or a lower case letter.
They aren't random at all. They are a fingerprint (hash) of signing (?)
certificates. The
On 5/27/21 4:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
Showing my age... I started using linux on a spare machine with 16
***MEGA***bytes of ram approx year 1999 or 2000, and the ram was
perfectly sufficient.
Yep. I did similar.
Though I think /what/ is done *and* /how/ it is done are significantly
On 5/27/21 3:05 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
All current XPS models seem to have 256G or 512G M.2 PCIe NVMe Solid
State drives in the base configuration. Questions...
* do NVMe drives function well under Gentoo (driver issues, etc)?
I've not had any problems with them. They do show up as a
On 5/5/21 7:33 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
3) All directories and/or files to exclude must be listed as relative
paths to the directory being tarred, i.e. last parameter on the
command line.
This might not be very clearly articulated in the manual et al., but
once you are aware of it, you see
On 4/25/21 4:08 PM, David M. Fellows wrote:
A quick Duckduckgo search for "linux journal" grant edwards yields
https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2880
Thank you for the link Dave.
I'll read that later tonight.
Still available. Reading it takes me back...
:-)
--
Grant. . . .
unix ||
On 4/25/21 12:14 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Nope. Many years ago I used UUCP a number of times for "production"
projects involving data gathering from remote systems via dial-up.
:-)
25+ years ago, I wrote an article about one of those projects for
Linux Journal.
Can you narrow that down any
On 4/25/21 11:39 AM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
I doubt that many are fluen in cu and uucp,
I think that lack of knowledge / dumb / ignorant about something is (or
can be) a relatively easy problem to solve.
As in there is (or was) no knowledge about something and there will be
(or is)
On 4/23/21 7:45 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
Grant:
I think you are conflating me for the OP. Easy to do with the same
first name. ;-)
In that case, your usb-connection (or anything) will probably be a
borderline case to, since that is also a network... But I guess the
thing fobidden is
On 4/22/21 9:25 AM, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
No IP doesn't prohibit ethernet.
I agree technically. Though I suspect it /may/ be problematic with the
spirit behind / motivating the ban on IP.
You could possible use:
raw ethernet frames
Do you have any recommendations of utilities for
On 4/10/21 6:41 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I have: AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with Radeon Vega Graphics and I don't know if
this is the problem with Graphic integrated CPU or Virtualbox-6.1.16-r1
I run Windows 7 in Virtualbox and browsing file manager files in
Windows is very slow. Sometime I
Pre-Script: I'm probably in a bad mental state to reply, but I want to
answer some valid questions before others reply. Please take what I say
and how I say it with a grain of salt. I don't mean anything personally.
I /do/ appreciate the constructive and thought provoking responses that
On 4/6/21 8:09 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I only managed to get it working between off-the-shelve devices,
but would prefer to do it from Linux.
That's where some of my experience is; SOHO routers, 15+ years ago. I
think I did manage to get FreeS/WAN (at the time) to establish a VPN
with one
Hi,
Does anyone have any experience with IPsec? Preferably on Gentoo or
Linux in general?
I'd like to discuss some things (probably off list) while wading into
the IPsec pool. E.g.:
- ip xfrm ...
- strongSwan
- Libraswan
- X.509 certificate based authentication, preferably /mutual/
Hi,
Does anyone have any pointers on where to start on converting a 10-15
year old SysV style init script to OpenRC?
I'm starting to use something that includes an ancient SysV style init
script and trying to get it to work under OpenRC init properly on boot.
It seems as if the SysV init
On 3/20/21 11:35 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
I'm not saying there is a direct relationship, but the exfat-progs
readme states it is for use with the new in-kernel fs while exfat-utils
is from the same devs as the FUSE module.
Okay.
I'll accept what's written on the tin as what the targeted
On 3/20/21 9:52 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Looking at the github readme, it wold appear that exfat-progs is for
use with the new in-kernel exfat fs, while exfat-utils is a companion
to the older FUSE implementation of exfat.
Maybe I need more caffeine, but I can't see the /direct/ relationship
On 3/19/21 5:55 AM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Yes, its two IP's to the same MAC address. Its a raspberry pi 3B
using swclock so time may be an issue though I dont see how, but its
still a different IP for each stage, but the logs are showing the
same MAC address. Google shows its a known
On 3/18/21 12:54 PM, Victor Ivanov wrote:
Yes
Okay.
Generally yes, when changing from one runlevel to another OpenRC will
stop all services from the previous (current) runlevel and start the
services for the next (new) runlevel.
Good.
However, my understanding is that the `boot' and
Hi,
Do services started in the "boot" runlevel continue to run in the
"default" runlevel?
Or do they get stopped as part of transitioning from the "boot" runlevel
to the "default" runlevel? (Or any other runlevel that doesn't include
the service.
I'm wondering about having two things
On 3/17/21 8:59 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Is something changing the MAC address of the Pi after initial
boot? That would explain both the issue of two addresses and the
consistency of them.
Compare packet captures of the various DHCP requests and make sure that
they are the same.
There
On 3/16/21 6:16 AM, Michael wrote:
Yes, I won't argue against this all around rational position.
;-)
Thank you for the CRC / checksum on my logic and possibly even my position.
Fair enough. It is clear to me your proposal won't break things.
Quite the opposite it will eliminate the chance
On 3/12/21 12:04 PM, Michael wrote:
Right. That's the nub of it. Samba, with AD-DC and Kerberos
configuration deserves special attention and the apps devs advise
accordingly.
I see it differently.
There's the sloppy / slipshod way that doesn't negatively effect /most/
things. Then
On 3/11/21 7:37 PM, John Covici wrote:
I would appreciate some assistance.
I would highly recommend that you subscribe to the Mailman Users mailing
list.
I have been subscribed to the MM-Users mailing list for a decade or more
and have always found everybody to be quite helpful. Mark S.
On 3/11/21 12:39 PM, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Hi there,
Hi,
I have a weird harddisk detection problem which rises the questio:
what does the gentoo-kernel make differently than the ubuntu kernel?
Probably multiple things. They probably have configurations that are at
least slightly
On 3/11/21 6:38 AM, Michael wrote:
The syntax is:
IP_address canonical_hostname [aliases...]
The man page for hosts has the following to say:
DESCRIPTION
This manual page describes the format of the /etc/hosts file.
This file is a simple text file that associates IP addresses with
On 3/11/21 6:38 AM, Michael wrote:
I'm losing my thread in this ... thread, but what I'm trying to say
is the AD/ DC and Kerberos way of processing the /etc/hosts entries,
when an /etc/hosts file is used, is different to your run of the mill
Linux box and server.
I disagree.
First, AD/DC ~
On 3/8/21 5:59 PM, antlists wrote:
As I remember, you always had to use eselect to switch versions ... and
witness all the chaos with python at the moment ...
I don't know.
If you leave things "at the default", doesn't that screw you over when
python/kernel/gcc etc upgrade and a depclean
On 3/10/21 10:43 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, agreed, completely. localhost must be turned into an IP address.
:-)
I guess what I was thinking was DNS means Server. If it's a Service
then that's different. I think we're in agreement that if it can find
the name in /etc/hosts, either actively
On 3/10/21 9:38 AM, Michael wrote:
I always thought the localhost class A addresses were from days of old
'inter- network' era. The difference with 127.0.0.1 and a private
LAN address is the 127.0.0.1 does not reach the data link layer,
but loops-back at IP layer 3 and responds to any
On 3/10/21 9:00 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
My undocumented (and unsupported by data) opinion is that this
localhost thing has been around a long, long time - possibly longer
than Linux for all I know. Check out
Yes, very much so.
TL;DR: The "localhost" name is a shortcut to say this host that
On 3/10/21 8:25 AM, Michael wrote:
I think this is relevant to DNS resolution of/with domain controllers
and may depend on the AD/DC topology.
I disagree. Pure Linux in a MIT / Heimdal Kerberos environment has the
same requirements. Hence having nothing specific to do with Active
On 3/10/21 6:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Caveat - not an expert, just my meager understanding:
1) The name 'localhost' is historically for developers who want to
access their own machine _without_ using DNS.
Eh
Using the /name/ "localhost" still uses name resolution. It could use
DNS or
On 2/21/21 3:23 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Will someone please explain why the Gentoo AMD64 Handbook ~> Gentoo (at
large) says to add the local host name to the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1) entry
in the /etc/hosts file? What was the thought process behind that?
Shameless Bump -- I'm still interes
On 3/8/21 7:30 PM, John Covici wrote:
At least I didn't have to change profiles and gcc versions several
times.
I didn't /change/ the profile. As in it was 17.0 when I started and
still is 17.0.
I did have to update the make.profile link to point to the same profile
in the alternate
On 3/8/21 5:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Not if you went up a slot, then the old version would still continue to
be used until you ran gcc-config. However, if you were depcleaning at each
step, that would remove the previous slot and you would stay current.
So my overall method, which included
On 3/8/21 4:16 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
It would have to be done before the first update, when the repo was
set to a date just after the last update.
Yes and no.
It really could have been done at any point along the way.
Also, with the git version of the portage repo, I could switch back to
On 3/8/21 4:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
How do you feel it compares to just installing from scratch while
preserving whatever config and user data you care about? I've done
that quite a few times and it usually takes about 2-3 hours for the
initial install and then overnight to build a desktop
On 3/8/21 3:29 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
With hindsight, removing firefox, thunderbird and libreoffice and
replacing them with their -bin counterparts at the start of the
process would have saved much time. You could switch back to the
source options once the system is up to date.
You're
On 2/25/21 5:31 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
10 have git switch to the next day
20 emerge -aDUN @world
30 assess / deal with masked packages
40 goto 10
It /looks/ like things are working.
*TL;DR*
DenverCoder9: DEAR PEOPLE FROM THE FUTURE ...
This method /does/ work. I have successfully brought
On 3/1/21 3:25 PM, John Blinka wrote:
HI, Gentooers!
Hi,
So, I typed dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd, and despite
hitting ctrl-c quite quickly, zeroed out some portion of the initial
part of a disk. Which did this to my zfs raidz3 array:
OOPS!!!
NAME
Hi,
Is the "Messages for package ..." output from emerge logged somewhere?
I'd like to re-read the "Messages for package ..." output from emerge
after the fact. Is there a concise collection of that somewhere? Or do
I have to pilfer through logs of each and every package to find it?
I'm
On 2/26/21 11:55 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but the ebuild files of the
installed packages are in /var/db/pkg
Hum.
Today I Learned...
The ebuild and what looks like additional metadata files are in the
/var/db/pkg directory tree. But the source files
On 2/26/21 12:50 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Ah yes, I hadn't thought about the mirrors being too up to date.
There's also issue with older packages being installed. E.g. I have an
older kernel source (4.14.127) that I'm keeping around for various
reasons. I've found that the Gentoo repo /
On 2/25/21 5:31 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
10 have git switch to the next day
20 emerge -aDUN @world
30 assess / deal with masked packages
40 goto 10
It /looks/ like things are working.
This method is working.
I have managed to successfully update from 2020-03-24 to 2020-05-29 in
one day
On 2/24/21 9:29 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I'm currently doing an "emerge -DUNe @system" on the restore of
/usr/portage (typical PORTDIR) from prior to messing with things today.
The system is now stable with a full -DUNe @system.
emerge -DUNe @system
reboot
emerge -D
On 2/25/21 2:51 AM, Michael wrote:
It would probably be better even with a lot of customizations. ;-)
Please elaborate on what "better" means in this case. I'm thinking that
you might be meaning "faster" and / or "easier" (as in less effort).
At least it /should/ be better in terms of
On 2/25/21 12:02 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
I don't think that was the question Peter sought to answer, but rather
that 'hostname -i' returns the loopback address either way.
But 'hostname -i' /doesn't/ return the 127.0.0.1 or ::1 if the hostname
isn't on lines with 127.0.0.1 or ::1.
Might
On 2/24/21 9:16 PM, John Covici wrote:
The portdir has to be the one gotten from git, not rsync,
ACK
I'm currently doing an "emerge -DUNe @system" on the restore of
/usr/portage (typical PORTDIR) from prior to messing with things today.
I've got multiple GB of git data. It looks like
On 2/24/21 7:37 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Isn't it a matter of simple logic?
No. It is not. Consider my question to be calling the logic into
question. Or at least asking for what the logic was to be explained.
The loopback address is just that: the machine talking to itself, with
no
On 2/24/21 6:48 PM, John Covici wrote:
What you could try to do, if you are syncing using git, is to roll
it back to those dates by checking out a commit each time and doing
an update. I don't guarantee it would work, but its worth a shot,
otherwise reinstall time.
I hit send too soon.
On 2/24/21 6:48 PM, John Covici wrote:
What you could try to do, if you are syncing using git, is to roll
it back to those dates by checking out a commit each time and doing
an update. I don't guarantee it would work, but its worth a shot,
otherwise reinstall time.
And what if I was still
I need to update a system that hasn't been updated in 337 days (March
24th 2020. -- Life has been ... trying.
What is the best way forward?
It seems as if there have been a lot of changes in the interim; glibc,
Python 2.7 being deprecated, default Python going to 3.7(?), other
breaking
Hi,
I'm reading Kerberos - The Definitive Guide[1] and it makes the
following comment:
And to make matters worse, some Unix systems map their own hostname
to 127.0.0.1 (the loopback IP address).
This makes me think that the local host name /shouldn't/ be included in
the 127.0.0.1 (or ::1)
On 2/14/21 10:51 AM, Jack wrote:
I don't think you can completely get rid of it.
My (long term) desire is to do away with /lib32 and /lib64, ultimately
only using /lib. Likewise for the other library directories in /usr or
wherever they are. I don't see a need for the specific bit variants
On 2/14/21 11:26 AM, Michael wrote:
These are the services using port 445:
445 TCP SMB Fax Service
445 TCP SMB Print Spooler
445 TCP SMB Server
445 TCP SMB Remote Procedure Call Locator
445 TCP SMB Distributed File System Namespaces
On 2/14/21 4:42 AM, Michael wrote:
You are probably right. My knowledge of MSWindows environments has
been on a need to know basis, when I can't avoid it. ;-)
Fair enough.
I've managed to avoid more Windows in the last 10 years than I could in
the previous 10 years.
Active Directory
On 2/13/21 9:38 PM, Dan Egli wrote:
Frankly, I find there's still too many programs that want 32bit
libraries to go full no-multilib.
Are the programs that you're referring to things that are installed
through something other than emerge?
I'd naively assume that anything emerged on a system
On 2/12/21 4:00 AM, Michael wrote:
Samba uses the native MSWindows 'Active Directory Domain Services'
over TCP port 445 to resolve IP addresses when printing over Samba.
I question the veracity of this.
My understanding is that name to ip resolution, particularly in Active
Directory
On 2/5/21 6:57 AM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Use fail2ban to target active abusers using your logs. (recommended)
I've had extremely good luck using Fail2Ban in a distributed
configuration* such that when one of my servers bans an IP, my other
servers also (almost) immediately ban the same
On 2/3/21 2:42 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
I did. Sorry for the misinterpretation. Not familiar with
debootstrap.
No problem. That's why I clarified.
The minimum required is probably just the stage3, plus a kernel package
and a bootloader of some kind.
I'd like to do an old school
On 2/3/21 1:48 PM, tastytea wrote:
You could install Gentoo into a directory without the build tools,
but you would have to install packages and update them from a full
Gentoo installation outside that directory. I've used that technique
in my Docker experiments.[1]
emerge --root=/workdir
On 2/3/21 2:21 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
Probably selecting the "default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd"
profile would get you the closest to start with.
I hit send too soon.
Based on the new information, I suspect I actually want
"default/linux/amd64/17.1". (Or whatever is
On 2/3/21 2:21 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
@system depends on your profile. So depending on what profile you
select, you'll have a different set of implicitly selected packages.
The light bulb is starting to glow.
To answer your original question...
Probably selecting the
On 2/3/21 1:29 PM, Dale wrote:
If I recall correctly, the world file from a stage3 tarball is empty.
It only has the packages you want installed added there.
You and Arve are correct.
Are you thinking about the system packages instead of the world file?
Yes. That's what I meant. Thank
This may be a silly question, but I don't know, so I'm going to ask.
What is the minimal world file to be somewhat conceptually similar to a
debootstrap install of Debian / Ubuntu?
Is the world file that ships with stage3 the smallest it can be? Or are
there things that can safely be
On 1/29/21 6:37 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
My brain knows that. My fingers only partially so.
I *completely* understand.
I now manage to use 'ip addr' instead of ifconfig _most_ of the
time. I still almost always use 'route' instead of of 'ip route'. I
figure in another 20 years, I will have
On 1/28/21 7:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I think that's probably right. I had never used the 'ip route'
command like that and was unaware that route existed.
*nod*
iproute2 has supplanted the venerable net-tools (or whatever it's
called); ifconfig, route, netstat, etc.
I sort of put
On 1/28/21 5:38 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I've just recently realized something about the "lo" interface.
I don't think this is as much about the interface as it is the routes
that are created. (More below.)
You can bind a socket to any 127.0.0.N address, even though only
127.0.0.1/8 is
On 1/17/21 11:32 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
how can I add/make active an interface that's to be part of a
bonded connection without rebooting/restarting the bond?
Does the following work?
ip link set dev eth2 master bond0
That's from memory without much caffeine. So
On 1/13/21 6:25 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Some of the above are shadowed by readline or by bash in emacs mode,
but the tty driver uses more than a few control keys.
Thank you for the clarification / additional information.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 1/13/21 4:06 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I really should try to figure out a control-character that's not used
by emacs or the tty driver
I think there are very few, if any, keys used by the TTY driver.
I suspect you are thinking of the line editor in the shell, e.g. readline.
I can see how
On 1/13/21 2:56 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Grant.
Hi Alan,
Well, there's really not much that can't be done in a terminal
emulator. But it's the manner of the doing that's important.
Okay. I can appreciate and respect that response.
Doing text work in X is s l u g g i s h.
On 1/13/21 11:14 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
This is appalling. I do all my work on the console (apart from web
browsing), and with this development, Linux effectively becomes
unusable to me. I will NOT be bullied into using second rate
alternatives like X-Windows terminals.
Wow. I don't
On 12/10/20 9:20 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
How to prevent PC from shutdown when running when power button is pressed?
Is it a function in a BIOS or OS?
Press and release, in less than four seconds, is the OS. Four seconds
or longer is the BIOS.
Try stopping acpid and seeing if that
P.S. You might also be interested in some of the feeds that Team Cymru
has to offer. I think they are more friendly to scripted querying.
Link - IP to ASN Mapping Service
- https://team-cymru.com/community-services/ip-asn-mapping/
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 12/8/20 9:59 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I'll write a script to check, all the IP's from at text file with
"whois" and write the output out to another file, just to be sure.
I don't know how long will it take, the file contains 26611-entries
(IP addresses).
ProTip: Don't parse the
On 12/8/20 8:50 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Creating ACL based on those internet sources eg.
https://www.countryipblocks.net/acl.php is not reliable. I pulled
a list of Russian and Ukrainian IPs from the above link and checking
some of them, I found these two (and possibly more) are
On 12/8/20 6:17 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
so it might be easier to for apache, am I correct?
Apache vs iptables is somewhat a preference.
Though with Apache, chances are good that you would need to ban in
multiple locations, possibly multiple VHOSTs or server wide. (See more
On 12/8/20 4:44 PM, Steve Wilson wrote:
I use this as the first step to limit ssh access to one of my servers:
`iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -m geoip ! --src-cc GB
-m comment --comment "Drop SSH from outside GB" -j DROP`
Has the geoip match extension been updated to take into
On 12/8/20 3:55 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
What are my options apache blocking access based on country?
Do you want to block connections to /just/ Apache and /nothing/ else on
the system? Or do you want to block connections from specified sources
to anything and everything on the
On 11/26/20 6:56 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
After trying to think of reasons to use sendmail, I beganto wonder if
it still supports bang-routing and UUCP as a transport mechanism. A
bit of googling seems to indicate that it does.
Yes. I have used this a few times in the last 18 months. Mostly
On 11/25/20 9:02 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
O'Reilly's_Sendmail_ 4th Edition (the bat book), has 1312 pages and
weighs four pounds.
There is actually a much smaller book than the quintessential Bat book
that is multiple orders of magnitude. IM(ns)HO the Sendmail
Installation and Operation
On 11/25/20 9:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Ah, that's another devine mystery. I believe that the small size of
a sendmail config file, when compared to the number of malfunctions
it can create violates several basic tenants of information theory. I
think the explanation involves extra
On 11/25/20 9:47 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
That is supported. You will need to set up a map and tell Sendmail how
to use it. It's not difficult. But it's been so long that I don't
remember exactly how to do it. It's another define(...) or feature(...)
line and adding entries to the file
On 11/25/20 6:47 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've always used postifx but I want to try sendmail this time.
I've been using Sendmail for 20 years on multiple Linux and Unixes.
And I have a hard time finding gentoo howto.
Thankfully, much of Sendmail is self contained and isn't much
On 8/28/20 6:10 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I think I see where we're diverging: I'm assuming that the employees of
the VPS provider can hop onto any running system with root privileges.
Perhaps I'm woefully ignorant, but my current working understanding is
that no virtual machine hypervisor
n to other, complementary
experimentation, as long as it is published.
Grant Taylor, do not let it go to your head, but I agree with most
of what you write in Gentoo User.
Me? I'm just an idiot on the Internet with some things to say.
Sometimes they happen to be true. Ideally, you know (or learn) enoug
On 8/28/20 4:26 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:> The contents of the disk
are unencrypted while the server is powered
on, or at least while the server is receiving email (while it's reading
from and writing to that disk). In practice that will be all the time
-- you can't log in and type the
On 8/28/20 3:33 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
TLS only secures the channel; what comes out at the end is a plain-text
message that can be read with minimal effort by the VPS provider,
no skullduggery needed.
I agree that STARTTLS only protects the email while it's in flight
between servers.
On 8/28/20 1:54 PM, Poison BL. wrote:
I'm rather late to the game with this, but at the end of the day,
mail coming *into* a mail server isn't typically encrypted (and even
that is only the body, the headers can still reveal a great deal,
and are necessary for the server to work with it).
On 8/28/20 1:18 PM, antlists wrote:
The main reason other applications use "TCP over HTTP(S)" is because
stupid network operators block everything else!
I agree that filtering is a problem.
I also think that it's something that most people can overcome when they
control the firewall between
On 8/28/20 1:55 PM, james wrote:
I'm proposing, via a small corp I own, to purchase up to (3) dual
Rasp.pi 4 setups of (2) R.Pi.4 8gig ram setups and send them to the
devs WE all decide on.
A few points.
1) I don't think that 8 GB of RAM is required. -- My email server is
a VPS with 2 GB
On 8/27/20 11:55 AM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Well said; thanks for the correction.
Of course. My intention is to positively contribute to and learn from
the community.
Mathematical notation can be seen as a tightly coupled analogue
to this sort of typesetting: the same book that
On 8/27/20 7:00 AM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
but i this way of looking at protocols (despite being common) is wrong.
Why do you think that it is wrong?
What is not factually correct about it?
i also disagree with the network layering proposed by osi or the
other ones commonly published
On 8/27/20 6:07 AM, Victor Ivanov wrote:
I have been quietly following this discussion and I've seen SRS being
mentioned a number of times.
Welcome to an active part in the conversation. :-)
Now, I know what SRS _does_ (perhaps not fully?) to prevent unintended
rejection by a receiving MTA
On 8/26/20 7:07 PM, Ashley Dixon wrote:
I meant (a), in the sense that you should probably write it up
in a more presentable fashion than a GitHub README page. You might
want to nicely typeset it in TeX or something to make it seem more
serious. Just a suggestion...
I'm sure there
On 8/18/20 6:44 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I will have to collect a list and get back to you.
Here are part of some crude notes that I created for myself to use to
build a Gentoo mail server about three years ago. This is the email
specific parts. The rest were for other non-email aspects
On 8/26/20 3:33 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
I would suggest using any reference to Hillary Clinton.
Typo: I would suggest *NOT* using any reference to Hillary Clinton.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
On 8/26/20 2:33 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
as for the name "hillarymail", nothing against her.
I would suggest using any reference to Hillary Clinton. I believe her
name is too politically charged to use it in good faith.
it's just that i heard so much about hillary's mails up to a
On 8/21/20 10:11 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
not a major point but just to clarify a thing.
i think it's unfair to look at SMTP as a single thing that compares
against HTTP*. because while HTTP* is a single-ish thing, SMTP is
several things. i.e. SMTP is at least 2 parts:
Fair point.
101 - 200 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
