I cannot find glibc-2.18 in /usr/portage/profile/package.mask,but
glibc-2.18 is being masked.I would like to know which file masks glibc-2.18.
Hello,
On Thu, 02 Sep 2021, David Haller wrote:
>On Thu, 02 Sep 2021, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>Yes it does, but only on the testing version. If you are running stable,
>>you won't have it.
>
>I beg to differ on that point:
>
>$ cd $(portageq get_repo_path / gentoo)
>$
Hi,
I found this
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/glibc-Dramatische-Sicherheitsluecke-in-Linux-Netzwerkfunktionen-3107621.html
and the daily update contains an update to glibc.
Is this the patch, which fixes that problem?
Best regards,
Meino
Hi,
Emerge is asking to update glibc because old is masked and it'll be removed.
But, how to update glibc?
Gentoo only talk about to update gcc, but my gcc it's up to date.
Thanks
Niki Balov wrote:
Hi there,
i want to ask how to mask versions of glibc above 2.4? I compile my
entire system with gcc3.4.5 and glibc 2.4 and i don't want to upgrade
them. I added the following lines in package.mask
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5
sys-libs/glibc-2.4
sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5
sys-libs/glibc-2.4
he guys. I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with
binutils 2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error
in x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and
glibc-2.19 .
Don't know why . The google bring me a old bug report about
I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils
2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in
x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and
glibc-2.19 .
Don't know why . The google bring me a old bug report about
Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
> checking for python3... python3
> checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains current directory
> configure: error:
> *** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
> *** building glibc
On 10/01/18 19:55, Corbin Bird wrote:
Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
checking for python3... python3
checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains current directory
configure: error:
*** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
*** building
Hi,
I'm trying to update glibc with nptl and nptlonly USE flags, but I'm
getting an error.
The emerge command I'm running is:
emerge --newuse -buD glibc
The error is:
Install glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 into
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/image/ category sys-libs
/usr/portage/sys-libs
kristina clair wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to update glibc with nptl and nptlonly USE flags, but I'm
getting an error.
The emerge command I'm running is:
emerge --newuse -buD glibc
The error is:
Install glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 into
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/image
Hello,
On Thu, 02 Sep 2021, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>Yes it does, but only on the testing version. If you are running stable,
>you won't have it.
I beg to differ on that point:
$ cd $(portageq get_repo_path / gentoo)
$ for f in sys-libs/glibc/glibc-*.ebuild; do \
if grep -q 'KEYW.* amd6
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 18:16:44 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Gentoo.
>
> Would somebody help me here, please.
>
> When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
> crashes out with:
>
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -pipe -march=native
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
like to set the previous glibc with the LD_PATH.
Can I run two different versions
2013/9/5 东方巽雷 dongfangxun...@gmail.com:
I cannot find glibc-2.18 in /usr/portage/profile/package.mask,but glibc-2.18
is being masked.I would like to know which file masks glibc-2.18.
Isn't it KEYWORD=? I noticed its ebuild's KEYWORDS line is commented out.
I've finnally detected the root cause of glibc-2.20 broken my system:
glibc-2.20 start using TLX instruction which is disabled by microcode update.
disabling microcode update brings my system back to live!
so, there is either a bug in CPU , nor glibc has borken CPU feature detection.
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:39:40 -0300
Raphael MD <raph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Emerge is asking to update glibc because old is masked and it'll be
> removed.
>
> But, how to update glibc?
> Gentoo only talk about to update gcc, but my gcc it's up to date.
>
&g
With glibc-2.27 installed I cannot compile anything, since most
packages try to include
which doesn't exit any more.
And downgrading glibc using a binary package doesn't work.
It looks like I have to restore my system from a recent backup,
very annoying!
(I know that glibc-2.27 is masked
On 18/08/2014 19:06, Timur Aydin wrote:
Hi,
I am using a closed source software package on my 64 bit gentoo linux
system. The software package is beyond compare by scooter soft.
Because of the way this package is built, it needs a specially patched
version of glibc. I have patched my existing
hi,
i have a gento on a ~x86 that udpate sucessfully
but on a ~amd64 it failed on emerge...
(the processor is in reality a xeon w emt64 )
here are the last lines of the emerge...
thanx for suggestion...
it's boring cause i m still using the glibc from the stage3 installation... so
it's
There's currently an open bug in amaroK (
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100049 ) where it appears xine
crashs when an assert fails in glibc. I figured that this would only
happen when someone was foolish enough to install a glibc with debug
enabled. However today I talked to a user who had
On Sunday 30 October 2005 13:54, capsel wrote:
is it a bug in glibc or in my code?
Probably not a bug in glibc. I'm 99% sure that there are no bugs that obvious
in printf or strcmp. glibc is absolutely the most tested code in a GNU/Linux
system, aside from the kernel itself, seeing
On Thursday 04 May 2006 19:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
I'd now like to upgrade to glibc 2.4 as well. After having installed glibc
2.4, is it required to have a full emerge -e world run; ie. rebuild the
entire system?
no.
glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild.
Only if you change from gcc
On Thursday 31 August 2006 20:31, tdrueke wrote:
Sorry for capturing the thread. :)
What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4.
Does the same concerning emerge -e world apply here
(e.g. it is recommended to do it) ?
Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4
This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort
programs with a:
*** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid pointer: ... ***
or similar error message. I have no idea which package was updated that
triggered this. I did *not* emerge glibc (qlop confirms that I emerged
Please, report appropriately at bugs.gentoo.com. Remember:
* If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
'=sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r3::gentoo'`,
* the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
'=sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r3::gentoo'`.
* The complete build log is located at
'/var
On 7/7/21 11:16 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Gentoo.
Would somebody help me here, please.
When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
crashes out with:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -pipe -march=native -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
glibc-test.c -o glibc-test
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Gentoo.
>
> Would somebody help me here, please.
>
> When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
> crashes out with:
>
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -pipe -march=native -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
> g
Hello, Gentoo.
Would somebody help me here, please.
When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
crashes out with:
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -pipe -march=native -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
glibc-test.c -o glibc-test
* Checking that IA32 emulation is enabled
On 11/15 06:04, Jan Chren (rindeal) wrote:
> net-libs/libnsl-1.1.0-r1 is blocking sys-libs/glibc versions lower
> than 2.26 and you have sys-libs/glibc-2.25 installed. So try
> installing glibc-2.26 manually first and then libnsl.
>
> On 15 November 2017 at 17:50, <tu...@posteo
Hi,
I'm trying to update a system using binary packages build on another
system. I get this error for glibc:
Emerging binary (1 of 1) sys-libs/glibc-2.19-r1::gentoo
* glibc-2.19-r1.tbz2 MD5 SHA1 size ;-)
... [ ok ]
Extracting info
Failed to emerge sys
net-libs/libnsl-1.1.0-r1 is blocking sys-libs/glibc versions lower
than 2.26 and you have sys-libs/glibc-2.25 installed. So try
installing glibc-2.26 manually first and then libnsl.
On 15 November 2017 at 17:50, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From emerge I g
CJ Keist wrote:
Hello all,
First time user of Gentoo. We're wanting to run Matlab R14 SP2
64bit mode. According to Matlab site they support the Linux kernel
2.6.x and glibc-2.3.2. Non of the current linux distro (i.e. Fedora)
has that old of glibc. So looking at Gentoo thinking I can
Ajai Khattri writes:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Dale wrote:
Try this:
emerge -1av =*glibc*-2.10.1-r1
# emerge -1av =*glibc*-2.10.1-r1
* IMPORTANT: 1 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
* Use eselect news to read news items.
These are the packages that would be merged
Hi,
while compiling glibc I got this:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r3/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/manual/argp-ex1.c.texi
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r3/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/manual/argp-ex2.c.texi
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r3/work
system - emerge -e system, has to be done once
and that
gets everything in the system profile built with gcc 3.4. However, both gcc
and glibc need to
be rebuilt again after the first pass, and anything using glibc needs to be
rebuilt after glibc
has been recompiled, thus the - emerge -e world
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008 schrieb Nicolai Beuermann:
Basic question: Why do I need two versions of glibc?
You don't.
equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 lists about 30 entries
equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 lists 27 entries of which
some are the same some are different
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marc Blumentritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after syncing portage yesterday, an update for glibc from 2.4-r4 to
2.5 is shown. Is there anything special to do after this update? Last
time glibc was updated you had to rebuild world, if I remember
correct.
IIRC, last
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
glibc updates NEVER need a rebuild.
Only if you change from gcc 3.X to 4.Y you have to rebuild.
But not because of a glibc update.
That is not always true. A glibc upgrade *can* require that *some*
packages are re-built. I am not an expert
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reading that thread, it would appear that for this to happen you have to
have installed =linux-headers-2.6.16 but not recompiled glibc. Check the
dates from
genlop glibc
genlop linux-headers
If the former is earlier, re-emerge it.
Doesn't appear
Amarok 1.4.1 adds support for the new libvisual, however only a few of
the visualizations are functioning. When I select most of them, I get
the following at the command prompt:
*** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/amarok_libvisual: munmap_chunk():
invalid pointer: 0x08067f78 ***
*** glibc detected
checking size of long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof
(long double), 77
See `config.log' for more details.
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.6-r4 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1539: Called dyn_compile
ebuild.sh, line 939: Called src_compile
glibc-2.3.6-r4.ebuild, line
Hi,
I am using a closed source software package on my 64 bit gentoo linux
system. The software package is beyond compare by scooter soft.
Because of the way this package is built, it needs a specially patched
version of glibc. I have patched my existing glibc version (2.18) and
have been
Timur Aydin ta at taydin.org writes:
I am using a closed source software package on my 64 bit gentoo linux
system. The software package is beyond compare by scooter soft.
Because of the way this package is built, it needs a specially patched
version of glibc. I have patched my existing
I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64
system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced in
glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try the
build with an older glibc version.
Downgrading the system to glibc to 2.23-r3 means
Hello, Sergei and Gentoo.
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 09:00:59 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 18:16:44 +
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, Gentoo.
> > Would somebody help me here, please.
> > When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very
Hi
I have just changed some USE flag settings, and the resulting emerge -N
asks to rebuild glibc however when I run it, it simply stops and drops
back to the command line with no actual complaint. The output is as below
much is snipped for clarity, if anyone has a suggestion or something I can
I'm trying to update glibc with nptl and nptlonly USE flags, but I'm
getting an error.
The emerge command I'm running is:
emerge --newuse -buD glibc
The error is:
Install glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1 into
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1/image/ category sys-libs
/usr
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 17:59, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Iain Buchanan wrote:
Since my recent upgrade of glibc from glibc-2.3.6-r2 (Jan 18) to
glibc-2.3.6-r3 (Feb 21) I'm getting this error when starting emacs and
doing various other things:
etc/host.conf: line 24: bad command `mdns
Did you recently recompiled glibc? 2 of the files on the log are part
of glibc. Maybe it is that reason. If not, downgrading it may help.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 12 March 2006 05:48, Sven Köhler wrote:
Oh, I just noticed the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -lad /var/db/pkg/*/*glibc*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 864 19. Feb 19:13
/var/db/pkg/sys-libs/glibc-2.3.6-r3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 856 11. Mär
21:49 /var/db/pkg/sys-libs/glibc-2.4
Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
running on it?
Any hurdles to leap?
Thanks in advance, Jerry
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
darren kirby wrote:
Also, I have rebuilt the glibc several times through this ordeal,
and at 5-6 hours per pop it is getting tedious to try new things.
Glibc _was_ built correctly, so is there anyway I can manually
copy the rest of the files from the portage sandbox to the live
filesystem
I noticed my glibc and gcc were updated to 2.3.5 in my last big emerge
world. Should I run an emptytree emerge now?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm trying to upgrade to glibc-2.4-rc3 (in x86 stable) and get the
following error:
Emerging (1 of 2) sys-libs/glibc-2.4-r3 to /
checking glibc-linuxthreads-20060605.tar.bz2 ;-)
checking glibc-powerpc-cpu-addon-v0.01.tgz ;-)
* glibc-2.4 is nptl-only!
* NPTL requires a CHOST of i486
On 03/25/2010 04:09 PM, Crístian Viana wrote:
hi,
when I use valgrind, it shows hundreds of warnings related to glibc.
Rebuild valgrind. This usually fixes this.
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 18:43:27 +0800
microcai micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm having trouble compiling glibc. No matter I tried with binutils
2.23 2.24. or - live version, I got ld internal error in
x86_64_relocation . And the same error repeated with glibc-2.18 and
glibc
On 01/10/2018 01:53 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 10/01/18 19:55, Corbin Bird wrote:
>> Is anyone else having a sys-libs/glibc emerge compile failure?
>>
>>> checking for python3... python3
>>> checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains curre
On 13/04/2019 15:20, Matthias Hanft wrote:
Now "admin-panic" is heavily arising. HELP! What can I do??
See which packages were built against the new glib. Do:
$ qlop -l -d 2days
See which packages were emerged AFTER glibc 2.28. Are they critical
packages? If not, downgrade gl
Hi,Today i got linux-headers-4.19 update.Doesn't it need re-building glibc that currently not triggered on my system?Thanks.
Hello,
After a successful upgrade from profile 2006.1 to 2007.0, I decided to
unmerge some unused packages from world and accidentally had glibc on
the emerge command line from a cut and paste operation.
glibc was unmerged and now I can't use common shell commands such as ls
or cp to list
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 18:49 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
glibc was unmerged and now I can't use common shell commands such as ls
or cp to list and copy files from a backup.
I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Sven Köhler wrote:
My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never
creates such locales.
There's no such flag as userlocales.
Sorry, I cannot help with the issue but I do know there is a userlocales
flag,
No, there *IS* not. There *used
On 8/31/06, tdrueke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4.
Does the same concerning emerge -e world apply here
(e.g. it is recommended to do it) ?
Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4 is
enough ?
When you emerge -e world for the gcc
On 2010-04-30 15:24, Kraus Philipp wrote:
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
like to set the previous glibc with the LD_PATH
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:34 on Monday 07 February 2011, Neil
Bothwick did opine thusly:
Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on my
desktop and home server and broke both.
hehe, I'm
On 11/11/14 05:49, micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I've finnally detected the root cause of glibc-2.20 broken my system:
glibc-2.20 start using TLX instruction which is disabled by microcode update.
disabling microcode update brings my system back to live!
so, there is either a bug
Hi,
While updateing glibc-2.24-r2 failed to install.
These are the last few lines of that process:
al/execinfo.c.texi
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/manual/add.c.texi
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.24-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc
Hi,
>From emerge I got this """info""":
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on the same system.
(sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r9:2.2/2.2::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
>=sys-libs/glibc-2.23[multili
On 2019-03-30, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 17:39:03 - (UTC) Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> glibc 2.27 has an include file "ustat.h" which declares a library
>> function ustat(). glibc 2.28 does not have that include file (nor the
>>
Well,
I was updating a system and gcc got broken somehow, and it doesn't seem
to be possible to fix it.
Problem:
# gcc -v
gcc: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by gcc)
OK, no biggie, I have a binpkg:
# emerge -1Ka glibc pax-utils
These are the packages that would
You can also set the nptlonly flag for glibc, which will avoid using
linuxthreads at all (forces everything to use nptl).
If you look at the OP's message, it appeared that he did have the nptlonly
flag set... There is the message about glibc/gcc masking off some use flags
for stability
Hi,
after syncing portage yesterday, an update for glibc from 2.4-r4 to 2.5
is shown. Is there anything special to do after this update? Last time
glibc was updated you had to rebuild world, if I remember correct.
Thanks in advance
Marc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
This is fixed in glibc-2.3.6-r4 and glibc-2.4-r2 now:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131386
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
is there any of the big distributions like SuSE, Fedora or Debian who
use glibc 2.4 too? And if they do, do they also only include a
nptlonly-glibc?
Just wondering.
Sven
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 23:49:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
hehe, I'm safe :-)
I've hardmasked =glibc-2.12 ever since the blatantly untested cock up
that was the first testing version of glibc-2.12 hit the tree
Now if only you could mask your smugness plugin :P
Just browsed the changelog of glibc-2.15:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-03/msg00836.html
When I read the NEWS section there with all that optimized stuff I
wonder if it makes any sense to rebuild packages here after upgrading glibc?
Stefan
Yes, looks like it is:
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201602-02
--
0x7D964D3361142ACF
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:48, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/glibc-Dramatische-Sicherheitsluecke-in-Linux-Netzwerkfunktionen-
Well, that's yet another problem, this time it's `autofs` package
which depends on glibc having `rpc` USE flag. glibc 2.26 lost this
USE-flag, however. Hopefully you can workaround this by enabling
`libtirpc` USE-flag for `autofs` package.
So the steps should be now:
1. put `net-fs/autofs
Hello,
Routinely upgrading an older Pentium Pro system,
I get this glibc error:
snip
a - elf/framestate.os
a - elf/unwind-pe.os
:
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4-r3/work/build-default-i686-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/
libc_pic.a
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.4
Hello, Dale.
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:57:32PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
> I recently did a upgrade which included glibc. Now both Firefox and
> Seamonkey has problems starting. I have several profiles and some work
> and some don't. Using safe-mode works which ma
Hi,
When I try to emerge -u world, the only package that's going to be updated
is glibc. However the build fails with the following error:
--- snip ---
/var/tmp/portage/glibc-2.3.5/work/build-default-i586-pc-linux-gnu-linuxthrea
ds/linuxthreads/libpthread_pic.a(pthread.os)(.text+0x1cd
system
which will also update everything as well. My problem is glibc and the
locale settings. May be a separate issue or related. Here is the boo
boo.
localhost linux # emerge -v glibc
sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF8)
* IMPORTANT: 5 news items need
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:20 PM, <tu...@posteo.de> wrote:
> On 11/15 06:04, Jan Chren (rindeal) wrote:
>> net-libs/libnsl-1.1.0-r1 is blocking sys-libs/glibc versions lower
>> than 2.26 and you have sys-libs/glibc-2.25 installed. So try
>> installing glibc-2.26 man
de Almeida, Valmor F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am thinking that to fix this I will have to boot from a cd and emerge
glibc.
I do not think it will be that simple. The problem is that once you
chroot to /mnt/gentoo all subsequent commands (including emerge and gcc)
will be looking for /lib
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:05:24 -0500, de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote:
What's wrong with tar xf glibc-2.6.1.tbz2 -C /mnt/gentoo? It's
worked
for me in the past when I upgraded to a broken glibc.
I was not sure what would happen with other files in some of the
existing directories. Just
Hello,
Emerging -u sendmail fails with this message:
checking LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable... contains current directory
configure: error:
*** LD_LIBRARY_PATH shouldn't contain the current directory when
*** building glibc. Please change the environment variable
*** and run configure again
On Sunday 11 February 2007 11:42:29 Marc Blumentritt wrote:
after syncing portage yesterday, an update for glibc from 2.4-r4 to 2.5
is shown. Is there anything special to do after this update? Last time
glibc was updated you had to rebuild world, if I remember correct.
glibc-2.4.x was special
Sven Köhler wrote:
Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then,
I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because
the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
.UTF-8 changed from .utf8?
Yep.
That's not true.
Wrong, it is.
My
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:35:20 +0200
Sven Köhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
is there any of the big distributions like SuSE, Fedora or Debian who
use glibc 2.4 too? And if they do, do they also only include a
nptlonly-glibc?
Just wondering.
AFAIK there is a glibc 2.4 RPM available
On 03/25/2010 08:31 PM, Crístian Viana wrote:
I think --gen-suppressions may be a too complicated solution. valgrind
shouldn't find *any* warnings from the libraries of my system at all.
either valgrind is doing something wrong or there's really some errors
on glibc. in every other system I try
Kraus Philipp philipp.kr...@flashpixx.de writes:
Hello,
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
like to set the previous glibc
Am 01.05.2010 um 12:53 schrieb pk:
On 2010-04-30 15:24, Kraus Philipp wrote:
I must test a software with a older version of the glibc. I run the
2.11.1 now but for one tool I need a previous version (2.6.1).
How can I compile the glibc without changing my system glibc. I would
like to set
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:32:20 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
no, the 2.12.1 binpackage does not know which versions are installed.
It just includes a version check.
If no glibc is installed (and removing
the /var/db/pkg/sys-libs/glibc-2.13 directory = no glibc installed)
then you are free
On 07/02/2011 12:32 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 04:18 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 07/02/2011 03:05 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
This is driving me nuts. Since a few days ago, glibc will abort programs
with a:
*** glibc detected *** program: free(): invalid
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 07:50, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 08/10/2011 04:02 PM, c...@chrekh.se wrote:
There is at least a theoretical benifit if you set NPTL_KERN_VER=2.6.38
in make.conf and recompile glibc. That way glibc could use things not
present in older kernels.
glibc
What would cause this?
bunyip rpm # /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware
*** glibc detected *** /opt/vmware/lib/vmware/bin/vmware: malloc():
memory corruption: 0x09f35e80 ***
^C
bunyip rpm #
Ive tried doing a emerge -ep world
glibc is
* sys-libs/glibc
Latest version available: 2.12.2
On 11/15 06:24, Jan Chren (rindeal) wrote:
> Oh, I missed that the current libnsl has a blocker as well. In that
> case try to do this:
>
> ```
> emerge -C libnsl
> emerge -1 ">=sys-libs/glibc-2.26"
> emerge -1 libnsl
> ```
>
> On 15 November 2017 at 18
Hello, Dan.
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 12:28:35 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 7/7/21 11:16 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, Gentoo.
> > Would somebody help me here, please.
> > When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
> > crashes out w
Hi, Dale.
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 13:23:21 -0500, Dale wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hello, Gentoo.
> > Would somebody help me here, please.
> > When I try to emerge glibc-2.33-r1, the very first phase of the build
> > crashes out with:
> > x86_64-pc-linu
1 - 100 of 3746 matches
Mail list logo
