Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:21:17 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: There is plenty of address space on IPv6. One can set up a tunnel, if ISP doesn't provide it yet. After that, it's as simple as enabling forwarding in kernel and opening a FORWARD chain, and you can have 64+ bits of real addresses behind it, no translation or port forwarding. And teredo (in form of miredo daemon) offers ability to access IPv6 from anywhere (like public hotspots) w/o setting up any tunneling. Of course, it's not much use for public server, but certainly useful for ssh (among over things) to networks behind nat. I can't say I understood what you said, but the majority of ISPs give clients v4 IPs? Mine for example right now (it's dynamic) is 79.123.149.101. That's the only way to reach me from WAN. Not quite what I've meant, but just to illustrate a point... emerge miredo (I think it's ebuild is still in bugzilla) /etc/init.d/miredo start And there you go, now you can access this machine by IPv6 address on teredo interface. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router
Mike Kazantsev wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:21:17 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: I can't say I understood what you said, but the majority of ISPs give clients v4 IPs? Mine for example right now (it's dynamic) is 79.123.149.101. That's the only way to reach me from WAN. Not quite what I've meant, but just to illustrate a point... emerge miredo (I think it's ebuild is still in bugzilla) /etc/init.d/miredo start And there you go, now you can access this machine by IPv6 address on teredo interface. Thanks for the info. I've looked it up on Wikipedia for the details. I guess the catch here though is that I'm unreachable by people with no IPv6 on their operating system?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:36:55 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Since your ISP offers you the option to have two different IP, yes that the best choice. Over here I would have to pay quite some money to get an extra IP. So you're lucky I guess. There is plenty of address space on IPv6. One can set up a tunnel, if ISP doesn't provide it yet. After that, it's as simple as enabling forwarding in kernel and opening a FORWARD chain, and you can have 64+ bits of real addresses behind it, no translation or port forwarding. And teredo (in form of miredo daemon) offers ability to access IPv6 from anywhere (like public hotspots) w/o setting up any tunneling. Of course, it's not much use for public server, but certainly useful for ssh (among over things) to networks behind nat. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Different servers behind the same router
Mike Kazantsev wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:36:55 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: Since your ISP offers you the option to have two different IP, yes that the best choice. Over here I would have to pay quite some money to get an extra IP. So you're lucky I guess. There is plenty of address space on IPv6. One can set up a tunnel, if ISP doesn't provide it yet. After that, it's as simple as enabling forwarding in kernel and opening a FORWARD chain, and you can have 64+ bits of real addresses behind it, no translation or port forwarding. And teredo (in form of miredo daemon) offers ability to access IPv6 from anywhere (like public hotspots) w/o setting up any tunneling. Of course, it's not much use for public server, but certainly useful for ssh (among over things) to networks behind nat. I can't say I understood what you said, but the majority of ISPs give clients v4 IPs? Mine for example right now (it's dynamic) is 79.123.149.101. That's the only way to reach me from WAN.
Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Should I have the USE flag ipv6 enabled or should I leave it off for now? If so, anyone had any trouble with it or is this a trivial change? Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ipv6 before, and you should be good to go from a basics standpoint. After that, you need actual IPv6 service from your ISP (and modem and router), or tunnel over IPv4 through a provider. My cable ISP has a 6RD Border Relay. My DD-WRT router supports IPv6 and I set it up to make the connection to the 6RD, so on my client machines there's no special setup needed, it just magically works without any problems. If your router doesn't support it, you can still establish IPv6 tunnel from your Gentoo box directly, there are several ways to do it. Something like net-misc/miredo is extremely simple to set up if you just want to try it, and to see the dancing turtle on www.kame.net :)
Re: [gentoo-user] IPv6 not ready here; Hmmm
Paul Hartman wrote: Enable the IPv6 stuff in kernel, enable ipv6 USE flag in your make.conf, rebuild any packages that were -ipv6 before, and you should be good to go from a basics standpoint. After that, you need actual IPv6 service from your ISP (and modem and router), or tunnel over IPv4 through a provider. My cable ISP has a 6RD Border Relay. My DD-WRT router supports IPv6 and I set it up to make the connection to the 6RD, so on my client machines there's no special setup needed, it just magically works without any problems. If your router doesn't support it, you can still establish IPv6 tunnel from your Gentoo box directly, there are several ways to do it. Something like net-misc/miredo is extremely simple to set up if you just want to try it, and to see the dancing turtle on www.kame.net :) Now what was I thinking. Oh, wait. I wasn't thinking. There was the problem right there. I hadn't enabled any of the IPv6 stuff in the kernel. Jeeez, what a idiot. I haven't even thought of the kernel settings. sighs Anyway, I enabled a lot of stuff in the kernel and will reboot at some point and test again. I'm not sure when I will be rebooting tho. Dale :-) :-)
