[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server without suid still runs as root?

2020-06-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 25/06/2020 17:24, inasprecali wrote:

How are you starting X in the first place?  Are you using a
display manager?  Are you running startx?

In the former case, this is perfectly normal for many display
managers, including SDDM.  GDM, if I'm not mistaken, can and does
run X as a regular user if possible.  Upstream has been talking
about  adding this functionality to SDDM for a while, but so far
it still hasn't been merged.


Ah, that explains it them. I'm indeed using SDDM (due to its native 
support in Plasma.)





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server

2020-04-16 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:07 AM Ian Zimmerman  wrote:
>
> On 2020-04-14 21:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> > Yes, that seems right. I just added "-elogind" to make.conf and that's
> > it. But I'm really curious about the framebuffer stuff. As for other
> > stuff (mounting USB, etc), doing it by hand it's fine.
>
> One possible implication is that without one of these mystery packages,
> you need the Xorg binary to be setuid root, and with them, you don't.
> Just a hypothesis: I don't use either elogind or ConsoleKit, and my Xorg
> is setuid root. :-(
>
> This also links back to my last question about firefox.  It turned out
> that the rare and random crashes stopped when I shifted from allowing X
> to start on the first unused tty (which is the default) to starting it
> on the tty where I'm already logged in.  I'm thinking this is somehow
> related to my user id and permissions on the tty.  Possibly with one of
> the login managers it is not an issue.

I start Xorg via xinit, on a forced VT. It works fine for me. But yes,
I do have it suid root...

Jorge



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server

2020-04-15 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2020-04-14 21:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:

> Yes, that seems right. I just added "-elogind" to make.conf and that's
> it. But I'm really curious about the framebuffer stuff. As for other
> stuff (mounting USB, etc), doing it by hand it's fine.

One possible implication is that without one of these mystery packages,
you need the Xorg binary to be setuid root, and with them, you don't.
Just a hypothesis: I don't use either elogind or ConsoleKit, and my Xorg
is setuid root. :-(

This also links back to my last question about firefox.  It turned out
that the rare and random crashes stopped when I shifted from allowing X
to start on the first unused tty (which is the default) to starting it
on the tty where I'm already logged in.  I'm thinking this is somehow
related to my user id and permissions on the tty.  Possibly with one of
the login managers it is not an issue.

-- 
Ian



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server crashing, back to log-in screen

2014-01-31 Thread walt
On 01/29/2014 04:20 PM, Joseph wrote:
 After recent upgrade I've noticed my xorg-server is crashing, and sending me 
 back to log-in screen on two of my computers.
 It happens mostly when when I click a tab in firefox or try to log-out.
 
 I'm using firefox-24.1.1

Sometimes /var/log/Xorg.0.log contains valuable hints about X crashes.






[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.11.4 runs havoc

2012-01-31 Thread walt
On 01/31/2012 02:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 having updated xorg-server from 1.11.3 to 1.11.4 my machine runs havoc.
 
 xdm or slim start as usual, but having entered my password I get a 
 blank screen or some colored strips and the only escape is via the 
 famous SysRq sequence.
 
 But, disabling xdm, logging in via a console and using startx,
 Xorg is coming up normally and runs normally.
 
 Of course, I've re-emerged everything in x11-drivers.
 
 Has anybody made a similar experience and has somebody an explanation 
 for this?

Does xdm leave log files in /var/log? (I don't know)  Maybe there is
something old/invalid in /etc/X11 directing xdm to do something stupid.
Did you try re-emerging xdm?  And revdep-rebuild, naturally.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.11.4 runs havoc

2012-01-31 Thread Andrés Becerra Sandoval
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:28 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 01/31/2012 02:53 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
  Hi,
 
  having updated xorg-server from 1.11.3 to 1.11.4 my machine runs havoc.
 
  xdm or slim start as usual, but having entered my password I get a
  blank screen or some colored strips and the only escape is via the
  famous SysRq sequence.
 
  But, disabling xdm, logging in via a console and using startx,
  Xorg is coming up normally and runs normally.
 
  Of course, I've re-emerged everything in x11-drivers.
 
  Has anybody made a similar experience and has somebody an explanation
  for this?

 Does xdm leave log files in /var/log? (I don't know)  Maybe there is
 something old/invalid in /etc/X11 directing xdm to do something stupid.
 Did you try re-emerging xdm?  And revdep-rebuild, naturally.



kdm was crashing on my box after:

eselect qtgraphicssystem set 2   (setting opengl)

After changing it to native, and without rebuilding anything, kdm is
running fine.


-- 
  Andrés Becerra Sandoval


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.10 breaks nvidia-drivers

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 03 April 2011 01:30:24 Elaine C. Sharpe wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
  On 04/02/2011 06:25 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
   On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:32:32 walt wrote:
   I had the same problem with slow bug-fixes for the older chipsets like
   mine.
   
   Is this the moment to upgrade your video card? They seem to be cheap
   enough, even here in UK.
  
  On the other hand, xorg-server 1.9.5 is perfectly fine! ;-)
 
 A lot cheaper than upgrading my video card, too -- they only sell
 the video card I need when you buy the whole laptop!

Oh, well. It was just a thought.

-- 
Rgds
Peter



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.10 breaks nvidia-drivers

2011-04-02 Thread walt

On 04/01/2011 01:23 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:

On Friday 01 Apr 2011 08:39:04 PM walt wrote:

  The good old nv driver still works with 1.10, happily.


have you tried nouveau? works well here.


Yes, a few months ago, but I had the same problem with slow bug-fixes for the
older chipsets like mine.  The drivers worked well about 90% of the time and
were unusable the other 10%.  I reverted to xorg 1.95 and all is good again :)





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.10 breaks nvidia-drivers

2011-04-02 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:32:32 walt wrote:

 I had the same problem with slow bug-fixes for the older chipsets like mine. 

Is this the moment to upgrade your video card? They seem to be cheap enough, 
even here in UK.

-- 
Rgds
Peter



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.10 breaks nvidia-drivers

2011-04-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 04/02/2011 06:25 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:

On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:32:32 walt wrote:


I had the same problem with slow bug-fixes for the older chipsets like mine.


Is this the moment to upgrade your video card? They seem to be cheap enough,
even here in UK.


On the other hand, xorg-server 1.9.5 is perfectly fine! ;-)




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.10 breaks nvidia-drivers

2011-04-02 Thread Elaine C. Sharpe
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
 On 04/02/2011 06:25 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
  On Saturday 02 April 2011 12:32:32 walt wrote:
 
  I had the same problem with slow bug-fixes for the older chipsets like 
  mine.
 
  Is this the moment to upgrade your video card? They seem to be cheap enough,
  even here in UK.
 
 On the other hand, xorg-server 1.9.5 is perfectly fine! ;-)

A lot cheaper than upgrading my video card, too -- they only sell 
the video card I need when you buy the whole laptop!

-- 
caveat utilitor





[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.6 without mouse and keyboard (solved)

2010-07-13 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 07/13/2010 08:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tamer Higazith9...@googlemail.com  wrote:

Hi Mark!
you were entirely right, the problem were the input drivers.

There three packages I remerged:

xf86-input-mouse
xf86-input-keyboard
xf86-input-evdev

and the problem was gone.


Tamer


Glad it worked. Investigate modules-rebuild as it keeps track of these
things and does it for you pretty easily. Here's what's in my list:

c2stable ~ # module-rebuild list
** Packages which I will emerge are:
 =x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.7
 =x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.3.2
 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.13.0
 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.2
 =x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard-1.4.0
 =x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse-1.5.0
 =x11-drivers/xf86-video-vmware-11.0.1
 =media-libs/mesa-7.8.1


All of the above are not kernel modules. Kernel updates don't affect 
them, only xorg-server updates do.




 =app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.26


Only this is affected by kernel updates.




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.6 without mouse and keyboard (solved)

2010-07-13 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 07/13/2010 08:01 PM, Tamer Higazi wrote:

Hi Mark!
you were entirely right, the problem were the input drivers.

There three packages I remerged:

xf86-input-mouse
xf86-input-keyboard
xf86-input-evdev

and the problem was gone.


Portage tells you to do exactly that after updating xorg-server.  It 
might be a good idea to check the messages so that you can read whether 
you are required to do something after emerging/updating something.  You 
can use elogv (pp-portage/elogv) for that.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.6 without mouse and keyboard (solved)

2010-07-13 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 07/13/2010 08:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Tamer Higazith9...@googlemail.com
  wrote:

 Hi Mark!
 you were entirely right, the problem were the input drivers.

 There three packages I remerged:

 xf86-input-mouse
 xf86-input-keyboard
 xf86-input-evdev

 and the problem was gone.


 Tamer

 Glad it worked. Investigate modules-rebuild as it keeps track of these
 things and does it for you pretty easily. Here's what's in my list:

 c2stable ~ # module-rebuild list
 ** Packages which I will emerge are:
         =x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.7
         =x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.3.2
         =x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.13.0
         =x11-drivers/xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.2
         =x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard-1.4.0
         =x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse-1.5.0
         =x11-drivers/xf86-video-vmware-11.0.1
         =media-libs/mesa-7.8.1

 All of the above are not kernel modules. Kernel updates don't affect them,
 only xorg-server updates do.


         =app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.26

 Only this is affected by kernel updates.


No disagreement on that, but frankly it doesn't matter to me. It
works. Takes about 1 minute to rebuild these files. I don't care (as a
user type) why I have to do it. I do it and my machine works. It
covers kernel and xorg updates. That's OK with me.

Or maybe you're just pointing this out to the OP?

I suspect I might have failed with the same problem as the OP myself
this morning had I used not it. There was an xorg-driver update that
didn't update all the input devices in my make.conf file. (evdev
specifically) This command did. Maybe I didn't need to rebuild evdev
after an sorg-driver update but I suspect you'd agree it's safer if I
do.

Sometimes the tools take care of things that are just oversights.
Matters not that I shouldn't have to do it. Matters more that the
machine works.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.6 without mouse and keyboard (solved)

2010-07-13 Thread Dale

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

On 07/13/2010 08:01 PM, Tamer Higazi wrote:

Hi Mark!
you were entirely right, the problem were the input drivers.

There three packages I remerged:

xf86-input-mouse
xf86-input-keyboard
xf86-input-evdev

and the problem was gone.


Portage tells you to do exactly that after updating xorg-server.  It 
might be a good idea to check the messages so that you can read 
whether you are required to do something after emerging/updating 
something.  You can use elogv (pp-portage/elogv) for that.





And if you have a GUI installed, elogviewer is pretty nice too.  I have 
both, just in case the GUI don't start.  ;-)  It happens.


Dale

:-)  :-)



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.8.1 random segfaults

2010-05-16 Thread walt

On 05/16/2010 12:32 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

Does anyone else get random segfaults all the time with xorg-server-1.8.1?

xorg-server-1.8.0 is working just fine. I'm on ~amd64 with 
x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati-6.13.0 (also tried live ebuild from x11 overlay.)


I just upgraded today to 1.8.1 so I have only a few hours of testing, but
no crashes yet.  My video card is nvidia with a different driver, of course,
but my guess would be the ati driver.  I've seen a lot of people complaining
about ati drivers on the Xorg mailing list lately.




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server: Pressing 'down'/'right ctrl' keys yields newline

2010-05-12 Thread walt

On 05/12/2010 05:25 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:

Hi all.
After updating world, xorg-1.5.3-r6 to 1.7.6 among others, I'm now faced with 
a/m issue.
1. left ctrl key works fine, so does the down arrow key on the numpad.
2. Seems like the down key generates a double sequence: both the down event 
and a newline.

This doesn't happen in terminal mode, nor in firefox (3.6.3) or amarok, but does 
occur in konsole, thunderbird-bin, kwrite, oowriter  eclipse-3.5.

Attached is xorg log.

amit0 ~ # qlist -Iv hal
app-misc/hal-info-20090716
sys-apps/hal-0.5.13-r2

I've no idea how to proceed w/this. Any clues would be appreciated.


With every version of X11, the amount of stuff in xorg.conf gets less,
as part of the xorg design.  I can see from your xorg.log that you have
things in xorg.conf that shouldn't be there any longer.  Specifically,
you seem to be using the keyboard and mouse drivers *and* evdev at the
same time, which is wrong --  evdev has replaced the mouse and keyboard
drivers, and you don't need an Input device section for either of them
now.

I suggest you generate a new xorg.conf by running X -configure and
use the result as a good place to add a few custom things like these:
(**) Option xkb_layout en_US,ru
(**) Option xkb_variant ,winkeys
(**) Option xkb_options grp:shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread walt

On 04/25/2010 06:28 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:


[  2806.923] (II) LoadModule: evdev
[  2806.923] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so
[  2806.973] (II) Module evdev: vendor=X.Org Foundation
[  2806.973]compiled for 1.8.0, module version = 2.4.0
[  2806.973]Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
[  2806.973]ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 9.0
[  2806.973] (**) Logitech N48: always reports core events
[  2806.973] (**) Logitech N48: Device: /dev/input/mouse0
[  2806.984] (EE) ioctl EVIOCGNAME failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
[  2807.016] (II) UnloadModule: evdev



Inappropiate ioctl looks like some version mismatch between kernel
interface and ... what?


Notice that the error message appeared between loading evdev and unloading
evdev, so I read that as meaning you need to recompile evdev.

I'm not entirely clear yet about how 1.8 handles input devices, but I think
it uses evdev automatically even if you don't have it in your xorg.conf.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread meino . cramer
walt w41...@gmail.com [10-04-25 17:56]:
 On 04/25/2010 06:28 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 
 [  2806.923] (II) LoadModule: evdev
 [  2806.923] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so
 [  2806.973] (II) Module evdev: vendor=X.Org Foundation
 [  2806.973] compiled for 1.8.0, module version = 2.4.0
 [  2806.973] Module class: X.Org XInput Driver
 [  2806.973] ABI class: X.Org XInput driver, version 9.0
 [  2806.973] (**) Logitech N48: always reports core events
 [  2806.973] (**) Logitech N48: Device: /dev/input/mouse0
 [  2806.984] (EE) ioctl EVIOCGNAME failed: Inappropriate ioctl for 
 device
 [  2807.016] (II) UnloadModule: evdev
 
 
 
 Inappropiate ioctl looks like some version mismatch between kernel
 interface and ... what?
 
 Notice that the error message appeared between loading evdev and 
 unloading
 evdev, so I read that as meaning you need to recompile evdev.
 
 I'm not entirely clear yet about how 1.8 handles input devices, but I 
 think
 it uses evdev automatically even if you don't have it in your 
 xorg.conf.
 
 

That was also my first thought, but evdev was recompiled -- as I wrote
in my initial mail...

What next?



-- 
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread Graham Murray
meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:


 That was also my first thought, but evdev was recompiled -- as I wrote
 in my initial mail...

 What next?

Do you have an InputClass section in your xorg.conf? This is needed for
xorg to use udev to detect input devices.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread meino . cramer
Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk [10-04-25 18:28]:
 meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
 
 
  That was also my first thought, but evdev was recompiled -- as I wrote
  in my initial mail...
 
  What next?
 
 Do you have an InputClass section in your xorg.conf? This is needed for
 xorg to use udev to detect input devices.
 

yes:


Section InputClass
Identifier keyboard-all
Driver evdev
Option XkbLayout de
Option XkbVariant ,qwertz
Option XkbOptions 
grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp:switch,compose:rwin,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp
Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys
MatchIsKeyboard on
EndSection



-- 
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread walt

On 04/25/2010 10:05 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:

Graham Murraygra...@gmurray.org.uk  [10-04-25 18:28]:

meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:



That was also my first thought, but evdev was recompiled -- as I wrote
in my initial mail...

What next?


Do you have an InputClass section in your xorg.conf? This is needed for
xorg to use udev to detect input devices.



yes:


Section InputClass
 Identifier keyboard-all
 Driver evdev
 Option XkbLayout de
 Option XkbVariant ,qwertz
 Option XkbOptions 
grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp:switch,compose:rwin,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp
 Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys
 MatchIsKeyboard on
EndSection


I have no InputClass section at all, but I don't need all the options you
use.  Might be worth commenting the whole section out just as a test.

I built xorg-server with the hal useflag disabled, and udev flag enabled.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server/nvidia/x86-driver updated: No kbd, no mouse

2010-04-25 Thread meino . cramer
walt w41...@gmail.com [10-04-26 03:00]:
 On 04/25/2010 10:05 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 Graham Murraygra...@gmurray.org.uk  [10-04-25 18:28]:
 meino.cra...@gmx.de writes:
 
 
 That was also my first thought, but evdev was recompiled -- as I 
 wrote
 in my initial mail...
 
 What next?
 
 Do you have an InputClass section in your xorg.conf? This is needed 
 for
 xorg to use udev to detect input devices.
 
 
 yes:
 
 
 Section InputClass
  Identifier keyboard-all
  Driver evdev
  Option XkbLayout de
  Option XkbVariant ,qwertz
  Option XkbOptions 
 grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp:switch,compose:rwin,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp
  Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys
  MatchIsKeyboard on
 EndSection
 
 I have no InputClass section at all, but I don't need all the options 
 you
 use.  Might be worth commenting the whole section out just as a test.
 
 I built xorg-server with the hal useflag disabled, and udev flag 
 enabled.
 
 

Sorry guys for not understanding this anymore.
First question after posting my problem was:
Did you read the guides???

Now I included exactly what the guides say and
compiled as the ebuild has configured it (hal off,
udev on) and now I am told to remove the stuff again...

I am going back to xorg-server 1.7.6 and wait until
this becomes more consistent.



-- 
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrade

2010-04-21 Thread Mike Edenfield
On 4/21/2010 1:41 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
 walt w41...@gmail.com writes:
 
 That was true in the past, but no longer.  The recent release of xorg 1.8
 specifically says that hal will not be supported in any future xorg versions,
 so we should all start looking beyond hal.  Don't spend a lot of effort now
 learning about hal because it's on the way out.  (Not many people mourning
 it's impending demise, apparently.)
 
 And if you use udev then you need an (at least minimal) xorg.conf.
 

With the new modular xorg.conf.d setup, you really don't.

I have no xorg.conf and the only thing I'm missing is the mouse wheel
emulation on my touchpad.  The xorg-server package includes
configuration segments that handle the basic input devices for you, and
the server itself is pretty good as figuring out your output devices.

--Mike



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrade

2010-04-20 Thread walt

On 04/20/2010 04:05 PM, john wrote:


Linux/Gentoo appaers to be moving away from xorg.conf and
towards hal/policices...


That was true in the past, but no longer.  The recent release of xorg 1.8
specifically says that hal will not be supported in any future xorg versions,
so we should all start looking beyond hal.  Don't spend a lot of effort now
learning about hal because it's on the way out.  (Not many people mourning
it's impending demise, apparently.)




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrade

2010-04-20 Thread Graham Murray
walt w41...@gmail.com writes:

 That was true in the past, but no longer.  The recent release of xorg 1.8
 specifically says that hal will not be supported in any future xorg versions,
 so we should all start looking beyond hal.  Don't spend a lot of effort now
 learning about hal because it's on the way out.  (Not many people mourning
 it's impending demise, apparently.)

And if you use udev then you need an (at least minimal) xorg.conf.



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.

2010-04-10 Thread walt

On 04/09/2010 10:41 PM, Dale wrote: I searched the logs in /var/log and found 
this:


(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If


#eselect opengl list
Available OpenGL implementations:
  [1]   nvidia *  -- Are you using this one?
  [2]   xorg-x11




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.

2010-04-10 Thread Dale

walt wrote:
On 04/09/2010 10:41 PM, Dale wrote: I searched the logs in /var/log 
and found this:


(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in 
your X

(EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If


#eselect opengl list
Available OpenGL implementations:
  [1]   nvidia * -- Are you using this one?
  [2]   xorg-x11





Yep.  I saw it switch to that during the emerge but I typed it in to 
make sure.  I downgraded back to the old versions and things are working 
now.  I did have to recompile all the input stuff again but at least it 
works.


According to the forums, this is a known problem since xorg is updated 
but apparently nvidia is not yet.


Dale

:-)  :-)



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.

2010-04-10 Thread walt

On 04/10/2010 11:19 AM, Dale wrote:

walt wrote:

On 04/09/2010 10:41 PM, Dale wrote: I searched the logs in /var/log and found 
this:


(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX module. If


#eselect opengl list
Available OpenGL implementations:
[1] nvidia * -- Are you using this one?
[2] xorg-x11





Yep. I saw it switch to that during the emerge but I typed it in to make sure. 
I downgraded back to the old versions and things are working now. I did have to 
recompile all the input stuff again but at least it works.

According to the forums, this is a known problem since xorg is updated but 
apparently nvidia is not yet.


Yes, I see now.  It works for me because I have the ~ version of the nvidia 
driver
unmasked.  I run the most recent kernel from Linus and the stable driver won't 
compile
against his newer kernels.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server 1.7.

2010-04-10 Thread Dale

walt wrote:

On 04/10/2010 11:19 AM, Dale wrote:

walt wrote:
On 04/09/2010 10:41 PM, Dale wrote: I searched the logs in /var/log 
and found this:


(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the GLX module; please check 
in your X

(EE) NVIDIA(0): log file that the GLX module has been loaded in your X
(EE) NVIDIA(0): server, and that the module is the NVIDIA GLX 
module. If


#eselect opengl list
Available OpenGL implementations:
[1] nvidia * -- Are you using this one?
[2] xorg-x11





Yep. I saw it switch to that during the emerge but I typed it in to 
make sure. I downgraded back to the old versions and things are 
working now. I did have to recompile all the input stuff again but at 
least it works.


According to the forums, this is a known problem since xorg is 
updated but apparently nvidia is not yet.


Yes, I see now.  It works for me because I have the ~ version of the 
nvidia driver
unmasked.  I run the most recent kernel from Linus and the stable 
driver won't compile

against his newer kernels.




I think this is a version mismatch thing.  Xorg, nvidia and maybe 
something else just don't like the currently available versions at the 
moment.  I did try that keyworded nvidia driver for my card but it 
wasn't happy with it either.  I think that was why I had a black 
screen.  I dunno.


At least it is working for now and maybe when the next version is 
released all this will be fixed.


Dale

:-)  :-)





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-14 Thread Boy Hartsuiker
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 04:27 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 but interestingly
 
 portageq owners / xextproto
 
 reports
 
 None of the installed packages claim the file(s).

Yes, since you have given it the name of an ebuild, not a file.

You can do what you want by equery files [packagename]





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-14 Thread meino . cramer
Boy Hartsuiker bm.hartsui...@gmx.com [09-12-14 16:56]:
 On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 04:27 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
  but interestingly
  
  portageq owners / xextproto
  
  reports
  
  None of the installed packages claim the file(s).
 
 Yes, since you have given it the name of an ebuild, not a file.
 
 You can do what you want by equery files [packagename]
 
 

I did a
emerge -C libXext xextproto; emerge -1 libXext xextproto; emerge -1 
xorg-server
but the error remains the same.

Now?



-- 
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-14 Thread Boy Hartsuiker
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 17:43 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 I did a
 emerge -C libXext xextproto; emerge -1 libXext xextproto; emerge -1 
 xorg-server
 but the error remains the same.
 
 Now?

Seems like the versions are incompatible with each other. 

Do you have anything X related masked/unmasked or key worded?

You can also try unmerging them both and then emerging xorg-server and
let portage handle the dependencies.

If this is a first install you should emerge x11-base/xorg-x11. I made
the mistake of just emerging the X server once, and that doesn't work.

Maybe run revdep-rebuild two times to be sure everything is in order.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-14 Thread Boy Hartsuiker
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 17:43 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 I did a
 emerge -C libXext xextproto; emerge -1 libXext xextproto; emerge
-1 xorg-server
 but the error remains the same.
 
 Now?

Seems like the versions are incompatible with each other. 

Do you have anything X related masked/unmasked or key worded?

You can also try unmerging them both and then emerging xorg-server and
let portage handle the dependencies.

If this is a first install you should emerge x11-base/xorg-x11. I made
the mistake of just emerging the X server once, and that doesn't work.

Maybe run revdep-rebuild two times to be sure everything is in order.





[gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-14 Thread walt

On 12/13/2009 07:27 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:

  *
  * x11-libs/libXtst-1.1.0== UNSTABLE version



  * Package 'x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5'  = STABLE version


Your portage is trying to mix stable and unstable packages on the
same machine.  You need to figure out why that's happening.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-13 Thread Mick
2009/12/13 walt w41...@gmail.com:
 On 12/12/2009 04:20 PM, Mick wrote:

 ...
 I tried the startx trick.  I recall that this would launch my WM
 (fluxbox), but now all I get is an X session with twm!  Has something
 changed with /etc/rc.conf?  Where should I specify fluxbox?

 That twm session is the default (see end of /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc)
 if you don't specify what you really want.  The xdm display manager
 checks in ~/.xsession for the stuff you want to run (i.e. fluxbox),
 but startx uses the file ~/.xinitrc for the same purpose.  You could
 probably just copy .xsession to .xinitrc for starters.

OK, but I never had set up ~/.xsession or ~/.xinitrc files.  This is a
single user machine.  As far as I can recall I had only set up in
/etc/rc.conf the parameter XSESSION=fluxbox, which looked in
/etc/X11/Sessions/ and ran the fluxbox configuration file that I had
in there.

Looking at /etc/conf.d/xdm I see this:
=
# What display manager do you use ?  [ xdm | gdm | kdm | kdm-4.3 | gpe
| entrance ]
# NOTE: If this is set in /etc/rc.conf, that setting will override this one.
=
In that file I have specified DISPLAYMANAGER=xdm.  Again as far as I
recall this is how I had set things up, so I am not sure what has
changed recently.


Setting a ~/.xinitrc file with 'exec startfluxbox' in it starts
fluxbox nicely if I run startx from the console - but this is not the
same session that I would get which would also include xconsole.  I
found these messages now, but no significant errors:
=
Setting CPU scaling governor performance for CPU 1...
could not open file
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor for writing!
failed setting 'performance' CPUfreq governor!
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxIgnoreIncrement
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableMove
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableResize
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.noFocusWhileTypingDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.tooltipDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.clientMenu.usePixmap
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxIgnoreIncrement
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableMove
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableResize
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.noFocusWhileTypingDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.tooltipDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.clientMenu.usePixmap
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxIgnoreIncrement
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableMove
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.maxDisableResize
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.noFocusWhileTypingDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.tooltipDelay
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.clientMenu.usePixmap
Setting default value
Failed to read: session.screen0.slit.acceptKdeDockapps
Setting default value
=

So, what would be the way to start xdm and have xdm starting fluxbox?
-- 
Regards,
Mick



[gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-13 Thread walt

On 12/13/2009 10:03 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:


Hi,

emerge of xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 fails while in the build process.

Logfile's contents is:



/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:40: error: expected ')' before '*' token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:41: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSGetVersion'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:42: error: expected ')' before '*' token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:43: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSSetTimeouts'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:44: error: expected ')' before '*' token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:45: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSEnable'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:46: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSDisable'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:47: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSForceLevel'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:48: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or 
'__attribute__' before 'DPMSInfo'


That file (dpms.h) is installed by x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5.  Do you have
that version?  I would re-emerge that package even if it look correct.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-13 Thread meino . cramer
walt w41...@gmail.com [09-12-14 01:08]:
 On 12/13/2009 10:03 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 emerge of xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 fails while in the build process.
 
 Logfile's contents is:
 
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:40: error: expected ')' before '*' 
 token
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:41: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSGetVersion'
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:42: error: expected ')' before '*' 
 token
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:43: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSSetTimeouts'
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:44: error: expected ')' before '*' 
 token
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:45: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSEnable'
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:46: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSDisable'
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:47: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSForceLevel'
 /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:48: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 
 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSInfo'
 
 That file (dpms.h) is installed by x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5.  Do you 
 have
 that version?  I would re-emerge that package even if it look correct.
 

Emerge refuses to merge that:

 * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
 * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
 * owners / filename` to identify the installed package that owns a
 * file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
 * NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies at
 * least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s).
 * If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
 * then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
 * information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
 * a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly which
 * two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
 * a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
 *
 * Detected file collision(s):
 *
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XTest.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xag.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xge.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbufstr.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XEVI.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/multibuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/shape.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XLbx.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XShm.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xdbe.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xcup.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xext.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/MITMisc.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/security.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/xtestext1.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbximage.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/extutil.h
 *
 * Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
 *
 * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
 *
 * x11-libs/libXext-1.1.1
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/MITMisc.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XEVI.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XLbx.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XShm.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xag.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xcup.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xdbe.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xext.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xge.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/extutil.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbufstr.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbximage.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/multibuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/security.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/shape.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/xtestext1.h
 *
 * x11-libs/libXtst-1.1.0
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XTest.h
 *
 * Package 'x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5' NOT merged due to file collisions.
 * If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
 * above message.

but interestingly

portageq owners / xextproto

reports

None of the installed packages claim the file(s).

How can I proceed ?





-- 
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-13 Thread Zeerak Waseem
On my system I have libXtst-1.1.0 installed but I'm running with  
xextproto-7.1.1 try unmasking xextproto and see if that helps.


On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:27:11 +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:


walt w41...@gmail.com [09-12-14 01:08]:

On 12/13/2009 10:03 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:

Hi,

emerge of xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 fails while in the build process.

Logfile's contents is:

/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:40: error: expected ')' before '*'
token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:41: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSGetVersion'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:42: error: expected ')' before '*'
token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:43: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSSetTimeouts'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:44: error: expected ')' before '*'
token
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:45: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSEnable'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:46: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSDisable'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:47: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSForceLevel'
/usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h:48: error: expected '=', ',', ';',
'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'DPMSInfo'

That file (dpms.h) is installed by x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5.  Do you
have
that version?  I would re-emerge that package even if it look correct.



Emerge refuses to merge that:

 * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other
 * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
 * owners / filename` to identify the installed package that owns a
 * file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
 * NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies at
 * least two or more packages that are known to install the same file(s).
 * If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came from
 * then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
 * information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
 * a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly which
 * two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
 * a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
 *
 * Detected file collision(s):
 *
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XTest.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xag.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xge.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbufstr.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XEVI.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/multibuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/shape.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XLbx.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XShm.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xdbe.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xcup.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xext.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/MITMisc.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/security.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/xtestext1.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbximage.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/extutil.h
 *
 * Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
 *
 * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
 *
 * x11-libs/libXext-1.1.1
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/MITMisc.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XEVI.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XLbx.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XShm.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xag.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xcup.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xdbe.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xext.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xge.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/dpms.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/extutil.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbxbufstr.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/lbximage.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/multibuf.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/security.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/shape.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/sync.h
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/xtestext1.h
 *
 * x11-libs/libXtst-1.1.0
 *  /usr/include/X11/extensions/XTest.h
 *
 * Package 'x11-proto/xextproto-7.0.5' NOT merged due to file collisions.
 * If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
 * above message.

but interestingly

portageq owners / xextproto

reports

None of the installed packages claim the file(s).

How can I proceed ?








--
Zeerak



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Xorg-server fails to compile

2009-12-13 Thread Boy Hartsuiker
Just unmerge libXext and xextproto and then emerge them again.
It looks like some files have been moved from one to the other.




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Mick
2009/12/11 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
 Hi All,

 I emerged xorg-server-1.6.5-r1, as well as
 x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics-1.2.0,  xf86-input-keyboard-1.4.0,
 xf86-input-mouse-1.5.0 and xf86-input-evdev-2.3.1 and now I can't get
 past the xdm login screen.  It is worth noting that I also emerged a
 load of apps including xkbcomp-1.1.1 and xinit-1.2.0-r3.

 When I enter my passwd at the xdm login it takes a couple of seconds
 and it drops me back into the login screen.

 The xdm.log mentions:
 ===
 X.Org X Server 1.6.5
 Release Date: 2009-10-11
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 i686
 Current Operating System: Linux lappy 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 #1 Fri Nov 27
 07:32:41 GMT 2009 i686
 Build Date: 11 December 2009  11:36:44AM

        Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
        to make sure that you have the latest version.
 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
        (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
        (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
 (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Dec 11 20:10:50 2009
 (==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines)
 (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
 (EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
 NTSC PAL PAL-M
  XRANDR name: VGA-0
  Connector: VGA
  CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1
  DDC reg: 0x60
  XRANDR name: LVDS
  Connector: LVDS
  LCD1: INTERNAL_LVDS
  DDC reg: 0x1a0
  XRANDR name: S-video
  Connector: S-video
  TV1: INTERNAL_DAC2
  DDC reg: 0x0
 finished output detect: 0
 finished output detect: 1
 finished output detect: 2
 finished all detect
 before xf86InitialConfiguration
 after xf86InitialConfiguration
 Entering TV Save
 Save TV timing tables
 saveTimingTables: reading timing tables
 TV Save done
 disable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable LVDS
 disable TV
 disable LVDS
 init memmap
 init common
 init crtc1
 init pll1
 restore memmap
 restore common
 restore crtc1
 restore pll1
 set RMX
 set LVDS
 enable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable TV
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:31:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:32:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:33:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:34:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:35:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:36:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:37:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:38:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server :0.0
      after 117 requests (109 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
 disable LVDS
 finished PLL2
 Entering Restore TV
 Restore TV PLL
 Restore TVHV
 Restore TV Restarts
 Restore Timing Tables
 Restore TV standard
 Leaving Restore TV
 error setting MTRR (base = 0x4800, size = 0x0100, type = 1)
 Invalid argument (22)
 Entering TV Save
 Save TV timing tables
 saveTimingTables: reading timing tables
 TV Save done
 disable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable LVDS
 disable TV
 disable LVDS
 init memmap
 init common
 init crtc1
 init pll1
 restore memmap
 restore common
 restore crtc1
 restore pll1
 set RMX
 set LVDS
 enable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable TV
 (EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from 

[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Mick
2009/12/12 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
 2009/12/11 Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com:
 Hi All,

 I emerged xorg-server-1.6.5-r1, as well as
 x11-drivers/xf86-input-synaptics-1.2.0,  xf86-input-keyboard-1.4.0,
 xf86-input-mouse-1.5.0 and xf86-input-evdev-2.3.1 and now I can't get
 past the xdm login screen.  It is worth noting that I also emerged a
 load of apps including xkbcomp-1.1.1 and xinit-1.2.0-r3.

 When I enter my passwd at the xdm login it takes a couple of seconds
 and it drops me back into the login screen.

 The xdm.log mentions:
 ===
 X.Org X Server 1.6.5
 Release Date: 2009-10-11
 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 i686
 Current Operating System: Linux lappy 2.6.31-gentoo-r6 #1 Fri Nov 27
 07:32:41 GMT 2009 i686
 Build Date: 11 December 2009  11:36:44AM

        Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
        to make sure that you have the latest version.
 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
        (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
        (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
 (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Fri Dec 11 20:10:50 2009
 (==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines)
 (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
 (EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
 NTSC PAL PAL-M
  XRANDR name: VGA-0
  Connector: VGA
  CRT1: INTERNAL_DAC1
  DDC reg: 0x60
  XRANDR name: LVDS
  Connector: LVDS
  LCD1: INTERNAL_LVDS
  DDC reg: 0x1a0
  XRANDR name: S-video
  Connector: S-video
  TV1: INTERNAL_DAC2
  DDC reg: 0x0
 finished output detect: 0
 finished output detect: 1
 finished output detect: 2
 finished all detect
 before xf86InitialConfiguration
 after xf86InitialConfiguration
 Entering TV Save
 Save TV timing tables
 saveTimingTables: reading timing tables
 TV Save done
 disable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable LVDS
 disable TV
 disable LVDS
 init memmap
 init common
 init crtc1
 init pll1
 restore memmap
 restore common
 restore crtc1
 restore pll1
 set RMX
 set LVDS
 enable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable TV
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:31:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:32:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:33:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:34:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:35:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:36:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:37:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources:38:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive #xlogin
 XIO:  fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server :0.0
      after 117 requests (109 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
 disable LVDS
 finished PLL2
 Entering Restore TV
 Restore TV PLL
 Restore TVHV
 Restore TV Restarts
 Restore Timing Tables
 Restore TV standard
 Leaving Restore TV
 error setting MTRR (base = 0x4800, size = 0x0100, type = 1)
 Invalid argument (22)
 Entering TV Save
 Save TV timing tables
 saveTimingTables: reading timing tables
 TV Save done
 disable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable LVDS
 disable TV
 disable LVDS
 init memmap
 init common
 init crtc1
 init pll1
 restore memmap
 restore common
 restore crtc1
 restore pll1
 set RMX
 set LVDS
 enable LVDS
 disable primary dac
 disable TV
 (EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
 Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
 The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
 Warning:          Symbol map for key KPDL redefined
                   Using last definition for conflicting fields
 expected keysym, got 

[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread walt

On 12/12/2009 12:55 AM, Mick wrote:

...
Not sure if it is related but I am getting this:


Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...

/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 is not a symbolic link

What does this mean?  revdep-rebuild does not show anything needing to
be rebuilt.


That must be a very old file. Here's what I have:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41652 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   919 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 2009-12-08 06:31 /usr/lib/libltdl.so - 
libltdl.so.7.2.1*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 2009-12-08 06:31 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7 - 
libltdl.so.7.2.1*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34252 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7.2.1*

If you also have these files then just delete the so.3 version.


Otherwise, I've downgraded xkbcomp with no joy and now I am
downgrading xorg-server to see if this has any effect.


I'm struggling to understand all the keyboard stuff too.  Do you still
use an xorg.conf file?  If you are using evdev then you should not be
using the xf86-input-mouse or xf86-input-keyboard drivers, just the
xf86-input-evdev driver.  I have the entire input section of xorg.conf
commented out and evdev seems to be the default input driver now.

I'll bet xdm is hiding the really helpful error messages, so I would
shut off xdm and use startx to see if you get any better information.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Mick
On 12/12/2009, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/12/2009 12:55 AM, Mick wrote:
 ...
 Not sure if it is related but I am getting this:

 Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
 /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 is not a symbolic link

 What does this mean?  revdep-rebuild does not show anything needing to
 be rebuilt.

 That must be a very old file. Here's what I have:
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41652 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   919 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 2009-12-08 06:31 /usr/lib/libltdl.so -
 libltdl.so.7.2.1*
 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root16 2009-12-08 06:31 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7 -
 libltdl.so.7.2.1*
 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34252 2009-12-08 06:30 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7.2.1*

Mine are slightly different.  I also have /usr/lib/lbltdl.so.0 -
libltdl.so.0.1.2 and also have

libltdl.so.0.1.2
libltdl.so.3
libltdl.so.3.1.0

 If you also have these files then just delete the so.3 version.

Thanks, I'll check for dependencies and then remove them.

 Otherwise, I've downgraded xkbcomp with no joy and now I am
 downgrading xorg-server to see if this has any effect.

 I'm struggling to understand all the keyboard stuff too.  Do you still
 use an xorg.conf file?  If you are using evdev then you should not be
 using the xf86-input-mouse or xf86-input-keyboard drivers, just the
 xf86-input-evdev driver.  I have the entire input section of xorg.conf
 commented out and evdev seems to be the default input driver now.

I have had mouse, keyboard and synaptics along with evdev in my
INPUT_DEVICES and have emerged relative drivers.  I am now going to
remove them and see what gives.

I am not clear which /etc/hal/fdi/policy/* files I should have in
there ... any ideas?

 I'll bet xdm is hiding the really helpful error messages, so I would
 shut off xdm and use startx to see if you get any better information.

Thanks, will try that too.
-- 
Regards,
Mick



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread walt

On 12/12/2009 03:14 PM, Mick wrote:


...
I have had mouse, keyboard and synaptics along with evdev in my
INPUT_DEVICES and have emerged relative drivers.  I am now going to
remove them and see what gives.


I know nothing about the synaptics driver, so be careful about deleting
it.  Maybe rename it instead of deleting it?



I am not clear which /etc/hal/fdi/policy/* files I should have in
there ... any ideas?


That depends on what hardware you have -- a lot of the stuff that once
went into xorg.conf can be put in an fdi file now.

Here is an example:  I have an unusual mouse with four buttons and no
wheel, and I use one extra button to simulate a mouse wheel:

$cat /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-x11-logitech.fdi
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
deviceinfo version=0.2
  device
match key=info.product contains=ImExPS/2
  merge key=input.x11_options.EmulateWheel type=stringtrue/merge
  merge key=input.x11_options.EmulateWheelButton type=string8/merge
/match
  /device
/deviceinfo

The two lines with input.x11_options used to be in my xorg.conf in the
Input section.  Those lines do the same thing now that I've moved them into
an fdi file.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Mick
On 12/12/2009, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/12/2009 03:14 PM, Mick wrote:

 ...
 I have had mouse, keyboard and synaptics along with evdev in my
 INPUT_DEVICES and have emerged relative drivers.  I am now going to
 remove them and see what gives.

 I know nothing about the synaptics driver, so be careful about deleting
 it.  Maybe rename it instead of deleting it?

Nope, unmerged it and deleted it from make.conf, then when I emerged
xf86-video-ati and evdev all other drivers (mouse, keyboard,
synaptics) were brought in as well.


 I am not clear which /etc/hal/fdi/policy/* files I should have in
 there ... any ideas?

 That depends on what hardware you have -- a lot of the stuff that once
 went into xorg.conf can be put in an fdi file now.

 Here is an example:

Thanks for that.

I tried the startx trick.  I recall that this would launch my WM
(fluxbox), but now all I get is an X session with twm!  Has something
changed with /etc/rc.conf?  Where should I specify fluxbox?

No /var/log/xdm.log or other errors were there this time.  Trying to
start xdm and I keep getting the same old errors:

XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server (:0.0)

and

(EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard.

I am running out of things to try now.  I don't have a recent enough
back up otherwise I would roll back this bad experience.
-- 
Regards,
Mick



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread walt

On 12/12/2009 04:20 PM, Mick wrote:

...
I tried the startx trick.  I recall that this would launch my WM
(fluxbox), but now all I get is an X session with twm!  Has something
changed with /etc/rc.conf?  Where should I specify fluxbox?


That twm session is the default (see end of /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc)
if you don't specify what you really want.  The xdm display manager
checks in ~/.xsession for the stuff you want to run (i.e. fluxbox),
but startx uses the file ~/.xinitrc for the same purpose.  You could
probably just copy .xsession to .xinitrc for starters.



No /var/log/xdm.log or other errors were there this time.  Trying to
start xdm and I keep getting the same old errors:

XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server (:0.0)

and

(EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard.

I am running out of things to try now.  I don't have a recent enough
back up otherwise I would roll back this bad experience.


I have these lines in my xorg.conf but I can't remember when or why I
put them there.  I believe it had something to do with evdev, though.

Section ServerFlags
Option AllowEmptyInput true
Option AutoAddDevices true
EndSection




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Dale

Mick wrote:

On 12/12/2009, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
  

On 12/12/2009 03:14 PM, Mick wrote:



...
I have had mouse, keyboard and synaptics along with evdev in my
INPUT_DEVICES and have emerged relative drivers.  I am now going to
remove them and see what gives.
  

I know nothing about the synaptics driver, so be careful about deleting
it.  Maybe rename it instead of deleting it?



Nope, unmerged it and deleted it from make.conf, then when I emerged
xf86-video-ati and evdev all other drivers (mouse, keyboard,
synaptics) were brought in as well.

  

I am not clear which /etc/hal/fdi/policy/* files I should have in
there ... any ideas?
  

That depends on what hardware you have -- a lot of the stuff that once
went into xorg.conf can be put in an fdi file now.

Here is an example:



Thanks for that.

I tried the startx trick.  I recall that this would launch my WM
(fluxbox), but now all I get is an X session with twm!  Has something
changed with /etc/rc.conf?  Where should I specify fluxbox?

No /var/log/xdm.log or other errors were there this time.  Trying to
start xdm and I keep getting the same old errors:

XIO: fatal IO error 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) on X server (:0.0)

and

(EE) XKB: No components provided for device Virtual core keyboard.

I am running out of things to try now.  I don't have a recent enough
back up otherwise I would roll back this bad experience.
  


I haven't been following this thread a whole lot but this may help.  Do 
a emerge -epv world and see if you see any changes there.  It may be a 
USE flag change or it may be something else that you notice.  It's just 
a pretend so it shouldn't take but a few minutes.  May need to use 
'less' or 'more' to scroll through the output easier.


I hope that shows something that will help.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Dale

walt wrote:


I have these lines in my xorg.conf but I can't remember when or why I
put them there.  I believe it had something to do with evdev, though.

Section ServerFlags
Option AllowEmptyInput true
Option AutoAddDevices true
EndSection



If I recall correctly, that disables evdev.  I think the first Option 
disables it.  I'm not real sure about the second one.  I remember 
because I did that when I couldn't get evdev to work.


Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.6.5-r1 'Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap'

2009-12-12 Thread Philip Webb
091213 Mick wrote:
 I tried the startx trick.

It's not a trick ! -- it's the normal sensible way to start X (smile).

 I recall that this would launch Fluxbox,
 but now all I get is an X session with twm !
 Where should I specify fluxbox?

You need a file  ~/.xinitrc .  Mine is

  # PP 091002 : for Fluxbox-1.1.1 + KDE 4
  xscreensaver 
  kdeinit4 
  startfluxbox

It also starts Xscreensaver  the KDE 4 libs, which I want.

I just upgraded to Xorg-server 1.6.5-r1 without any problem
beyond the need to update  82  pkgs in my own labor-intensive fashion.
There was also an update to Hal Lvm2  Util-linux from my weekly 'eix-sync',
which I made sure to get done before tackling X.  HTH.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrading problem

2009-11-14 Thread covici
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:

 
 I already posted how do downgrade to 1.6.5 correctly :P
 

I have a slightly different case, but related -- I tried the upgrade
because I saw a message that the new nvidia drivers would actually work,
but xorg-server 1.7.1 would not compile and so I followed the
instructions in the bug 290739 comments 3 and 6 and xorg-server 1.6.5
and 1.6.4 which is the one I still have -- neither one will compile.  In
the 1.6.5 case I get errors in rensize.c.

Thanks in advance for any ideas on how to fix.

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 cov...@ccs.covici.com



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrading problem

2009-11-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 11/09/2009 11:18 PM, Roy Wright wrote:


On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:

Try to resync and emerge the new eselect-opengl and run eselect
opengl set nvidia again. This could fix it, as I had a similar
problem. The old eselect did something wrong, but I can't remember
exactly because it went somehow long yesterday :)


Good catch, but unfortunately it didn't help. I've downgraded the nvidia
drivers to 185.18.36-r1 which then loaded glx, but still not dri or dri2.

Maybe I need to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.29...

BTW, xorg-server-1.6.5 does work with nv drivers, but I need opengl.

I'm currently trying to downgrade server to 1.6.3, but that's not
compiling. Let's say I'm not very impressed with the xorg ebuild
technique of specifying dependencies using =. xorg ebuilds should be
holistic based on the xorg-server version. Instead I have to figure out
the version masks for each of the dependencies. PITA!


I already posted how do downgrade to 1.6.5 correctly :P




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrading problem

2009-11-09 Thread Roy Wright


On Nov 9, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:


On 11/09/2009 11:18 PM, Roy Wright wrote:


On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Johannes Kimmel wrote:

Try to resync and emerge the new eselect-opengl and run eselect
opengl set nvidia again. This could fix it, as I had a similar
problem. The old eselect did something wrong, but I can't remember
exactly because it went somehow long yesterday :)


Good catch, but unfortunately it didn't help. I've downgraded the  
nvidia
drivers to 185.18.36-r1 which then loaded glx, but still not dri or  
dri2.


Maybe I need to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.29...

BTW, xorg-server-1.6.5 does work with nv drivers, but I need opengl.

I'm currently trying to downgrade server to 1.6.3, but that's not
compiling. Let's say I'm not very impressed with the xorg ebuild
technique of specifying dependencies using =. xorg ebuilds should be
holistic based on the xorg-server version. Instead I have to figure  
out

the version masks for each of the dependencies. PITA!


I already posted how do downgrade to 1.6.5 correctly :P




Sorry, forgot to mention that I did try those instructions.  Didn't  
help.


I'm currently punting, removing all of X from my system, then will  
start over...


Thank you,
Roy




[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server upgrading problem

2009-11-08 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 11/09/2009 02:46 AM, Roy Wright wrote:

Howdy,

I have a home server/htpc (~x86) that I'm finally updating after a few
months and I hit an issue with xorg-server. Here's the background:

Was at xorg-server-1.6.3 and current sync tried to upgrade to 1.7.1,
which failed to compile. In researching on b.g.o., discovered that
nvidia has not released a driver yet that will work with 1.7.1, so
followed the bug report directions and masked out several packages to
prevent 1.7.1 upgrading.


I think the bug about ati-drivers should help:

  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290739

From that bug, follow those two comments *exactly*:

  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290739#c3
  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290739#c6

This should get you to a correctly installed 1.6.5 again.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-11 Thread Keith Dart
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:47:09 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 What gets me is this, I even did a fresh install on another hard
 drive, it don't work there either.  hal and friends were included
 from the very start of the install too.  Either I am missing
 something that is not in the guide or it just don't like my
 hardware.  My mouse is a old P/S2 type mouse.  It's not even as
 complicated as a USB thingy.

Did you add the acpid, hald and dbus to the default runlevel?


-- 
-- 
Keith Dart
ke...@dartworks.biz
===



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-11 Thread Dale
Keith Dart wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:47:09 -0500
 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

   
 What gets me is this, I even did a fresh install on another hard
 drive, it don't work there either.  hal and friends were included
 from the very start of the install too.  Either I am missing
 something that is not in the guide or it just don't like my
 hardware.  My mouse is a old P/S2 type mouse.  It's not even as
 complicated as a USB thingy.
 

 Did you add the acpid, hald and dbus to the default runlevel?


   

acpid, nope.  The rest, yes.  I have never used acpid before either.  It
seems that I tried that a long time ago and it didn't work.  Maybe
something else close to that tho.  It's been a while.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-11 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Keith Dartke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:22 -0700
 Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:

 This is NOT the way for Linux to make progress in the desktop wars,
 folks.

 Works for me. ;-)

 But its true that Xorg is making some rapid progress. There's some
 growing pains.  If you are running Gentoo unstable mask (~X) then
 you are on the bleeding edge of open source development. Therefore
 occasional breakage is to be expected. File a bug, make it better.

 If you want stable, then use Ubuntu LTS release, or CentOS. Stable, but
 boring. ;-)


Thanks for the sermon, pastor.  I guess.

Why did you jump to the conclusion that I am running unstable? I'm
not.  I never have, though I occasionally (like twice in the 7 years
I've been using gentoo) marked a particular package for unstable.  So
by elimination, the term for what I have should be stable.  Why then
try to exile me to a distro I don't want?

I do, however, pretty much need working.  A black screen, dead input
devices, and impossibly esoteric config files just don't cut it.  (The
HAL learning curve is a danger in itself, and is just not worth it to
me.  I don't expect to touch it for years, which means that when it
eventually gets broken I'll have forgotten it completely and have no
idea how to proceed safely).

I got a solution by disabling HAL in gentoo.  And for my broken ubuntu
systems, I did indeed go back to LTS, but not so much because of the
LT, it's just that 8.04 is the last one that worked.  That's the
upside of a binary distro -- my November backup was good enough (i.e.
it worked), and an overnight update brought everything up to speed and
up to snuff. The things that change a lot are all in /home, which was
not affected.

Hopefully, I can now get on with my summer projects.  I'm done with
HAL and X.  Until next time.

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Robin Atwood
On Friday 10 July 2009, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Okay, I'm re-emerging hal.  I was already using gcc-4.1.2.  I still
  have mouse and keyboard emerged, but not mentioned in the xorg.conf.

I am coming late to the party here but I not so long ago did this on an old 
ATI R300 card and and an NVidia FX-5200. All I had to do was to make sure to 
emerge evdev by:

INPUT_DEVICES=keyboard mouse evdev

in /etc/make.conf and then comment out the mouse/keyboard stanzas in my 
existing xorg.conf. And then it worked. 

If you really feel you need a new video card, I recently got a GeForce 9400 
GT. It has 512MB of RAM, is inexpensive and KDE 4.2 performance is very 
acceptable.

HTH
-Robin
-- 
--
Robin Atwood.

Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst,
 Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst
 from Mandalay by Rudyard Kipling
--












Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Philip Webb
090709 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 If all else fails:
 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal
 Is there any other advice?
 A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.

I ran into this twice, first on my frontline machine, then on the stand-by.
The solution was 'USE=-hal emerge xorg-server', then remerge all drivers.
There was a Gentoo help doc re it, which gave this as the simplest option.

'evdev' is a separate matter: you need to include it in your kernel,
than you can simplify your drivers.

HTH

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,  Philip Webb : purs...@chass.utoronto.ca
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban  Community Studies
TRANSIT`-O--O---'  University of Toronto



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Philip Webbpurs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
 090709 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 If all else fails:
 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal
 Is there any other advice?
 A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.

 I ran into this twice, first on my frontline machine, then on the stand-by.
 The solution was 'USE=-hal emerge xorg-server', then remerge all drivers.
 There was a Gentoo help doc re it, which gave this as the simplest option.

 'evdev' is a separate matter: you need to include it in your kernel,
 than you can simplify your drivers.

 HTH

Evdev has been included in my kernels throughout this mess.  It hasn't
helped.  The Gentoo doc on the upgrade was a bit scetchy about
configuring HAL; now that I find that disabling HAL in xorg is the
solution, I suspect that the underlying problem is HAL configuration.
After all, there's nothing at all special about my mouse or keyboard.

Why should we have to configure HAL manually?  Since the stone ages,
Linux installations have determined what keyboard we have and have set
things up for us.  How different can PS/2 or USB mice be?

SO: if anyone succeeded with xorg and HAL, with a USA keyboard and a
wheel mouse,  would please tell me about their HAL config, I'd sure
love to see it.

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Dale
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Philip Webbpurs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
   
 090709 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 If all else fails:
 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal
   
 Is there any other advice?
 
 A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.
   
 I ran into this twice, first on my frontline machine, then on the stand-by.
 The solution was 'USE=-hal emerge xorg-server', then remerge all drivers.
 There was a Gentoo help doc re it, which gave this as the simplest option.

 'evdev' is a separate matter: you need to include it in your kernel,
 than you can simplify your drivers.

 HTH
 

 Evdev has been included in my kernels throughout this mess.  It hasn't
 helped.  The Gentoo doc on the upgrade was a bit scetchy about
 configuring HAL; now that I find that disabling HAL in xorg is the
 solution, I suspect that the underlying problem is HAL configuration.
 After all, there's nothing at all special about my mouse or keyboard.

 Why should we have to configure HAL manually?  Since the stone ages,
 Linux installations have determined what keyboard we have and have set
 things up for us.  How different can PS/2 or USB mice be?

 SO: if anyone succeeded with xorg and HAL, with a USA keyboard and a
 wheel mouse,  would please tell me about their HAL config, I'd sure
 love to see it.

 ++ kevin

   

Same here.  I have a old keyboard that has been around for a lng
time.  It's a Dell Quietkey.  My mouse is a decent Logitech that cost
about $20.00 or so a few years ago.  It worked with Mandrake and Gentoo
all this time then someone comes up with a mouse trap that don't like it.

I'm with you. 

Dale

:-)   :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 10 July 2009 17:43:44 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Philip Webbpurs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
  090709 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
  If all else fails:
  x11-base/xorg-server  -hal
 
  Is there any other advice?
 
  A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.
 
  I ran into this twice, first on my frontline machine, then on the
  stand-by. The solution was 'USE=-hal emerge xorg-server', then remerge
  all drivers. There was a Gentoo help doc re it, which gave this as the
  simplest option.
 
  'evdev' is a separate matter: you need to include it in your kernel,
  than you can simplify your drivers.
 
  HTH

 Evdev has been included in my kernels throughout this mess.  It hasn't
 helped.  The Gentoo doc on the upgrade was a bit scetchy about
 configuring HAL; now that I find that disabling HAL in xorg is the
 solution, I suspect that the underlying problem is HAL configuration.
 After all, there's nothing at all special about my mouse or keyboard.

 Why should we have to configure HAL manually?  Since the stone ages,
 Linux installations have determined what keyboard we have and have set
 things up for us.  How different can PS/2 or USB mice be?

 SO: if anyone succeeded with xorg and HAL, with a USA keyboard and a
 wheel mouse,  would please tell me about their HAL config, I'd sure
 love to see it.

I run latest unstable here with a regular USA layout on a Dell XPS M1530 with 
nvidia driver, hal and evdev. The HAL config is empty apart from a policy file 
for a touch pad, and it's a dual-screen setup. Here's my xorg.conf:

# egrep -v '^$|^#' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Section ServerLayout
Identifier Layout0
Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
EndSection
Section Files
EndSection
Section Module
Load   dbe
Load   extmod
Load   glx
EndSection
Section ServerFlags
Option Xinerama 0
EndSection
Section Monitor
# HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
Identifier Monitor0
VendorName Unknown
ModelName  Samsung SyncMaster
HorizSync   30.0 - 81.0
VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
Option DPMS
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier Device0
Driver nvidia
VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
BoardName  GeForce 8600M GT
EndSection
Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Device0
MonitorMonitor0
DefaultDepth24
Option NoLogo True
Option TwinView 1
Option TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder DFP-0
Option metamodes CRT: nvidia-auto-select @1440x900 +1920+0, 
DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0
SubSection Display
Depth   24
EndSubSection
EndSection

It all JustWorks for me, I assume in my case at least it's working as 
designed.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On Friday 10 July 2009 17:43:44 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
   
 On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Philip Webbpurs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
 
 090709 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
   
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 If all else fails:
 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal
 
 Is there any other advice?
   
 A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.
 
 I ran into this twice, first on my frontline machine, then on the
 stand-by. The solution was 'USE=-hal emerge xorg-server', then remerge
 all drivers. There was a Gentoo help doc re it, which gave this as the
 simplest option.

 'evdev' is a separate matter: you need to include it in your kernel,
 than you can simplify your drivers.

 HTH
   
 Evdev has been included in my kernels throughout this mess.  It hasn't
 helped.  The Gentoo doc on the upgrade was a bit scetchy about
 configuring HAL; now that I find that disabling HAL in xorg is the
 solution, I suspect that the underlying problem is HAL configuration.
 After all, there's nothing at all special about my mouse or keyboard.

 Why should we have to configure HAL manually?  Since the stone ages,
 Linux installations have determined what keyboard we have and have set
 things up for us.  How different can PS/2 or USB mice be?

 SO: if anyone succeeded with xorg and HAL, with a USA keyboard and a
 wheel mouse,  would please tell me about their HAL config, I'd sure
 love to see it.
 

 I run latest unstable here with a regular USA layout on a Dell XPS M1530 with 
 nvidia driver, hal and evdev. The HAL config is empty apart from a policy 
 file 
 for a touch pad, and it's a dual-screen setup. Here's my xorg.conf:

 # egrep -v '^$|^#' /etc/X11/xorg.conf
 Section ServerLayout
 Identifier Layout0
 Screen  0  Screen0 0 0
 EndSection
 Section Files
 EndSection
 Section Module
 Load   dbe
 Load   extmod
 Load   glx
 EndSection
 Section ServerFlags
 Option Xinerama 0
 EndSection
 Section Monitor
 # HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
 Identifier Monitor0
 VendorName Unknown
 ModelName  Samsung SyncMaster
 HorizSync   30.0 - 81.0
 VertRefresh 56.0 - 75.0
 Option DPMS
 EndSection
 Section Device
 Identifier Device0
 Driver nvidia
 VendorName NVIDIA Corporation
 BoardName  GeForce 8600M GT
 EndSection
 Section Screen
 Identifier Screen0
 Device Device0
 MonitorMonitor0
 DefaultDepth24
 Option NoLogo True
 Option TwinView 1
 Option TwinViewXineramaInfoOrder DFP-0
 Option metamodes CRT: nvidia-auto-select @1440x900 +1920+0, 
 DFP: nvidia-auto-select +0+0
 SubSection Display
 Depth   24
 EndSubSection
 EndSection

 It all JustWorks for me, I assume in my case at least it's working as 
 designed.

   

What gets me is this, I even did a fresh install on another hard drive,
it don't work there either.  hal and friends were included from the very
start of the install too.  Either I am missing something that is not in
the guide or it just don't like my hardware.  My mouse is a old P/S2
type mouse.  It's not even as complicated as a USB thingy.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread walt

On 07/10/2009 01:29 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

On  9 Jul, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:

I had tried holding back on xorg-server 1.5, but somewhere in May at
least one package got past my version limits and X broke.  Rather than
to try to revert, I thought surely by now, X would be fixed.  Sigh.

In another thread, after spending 2 months without a working X server,
I got KDM to start.  But without the mouse and keyboard.
The nice folks who got me that far warned and comisserated thus:



I had a similar problem. Finally I added hald to boot


Was hald in 'default' before that?


rc-update add hald boot

and rebooted. From now on Xorg 1.5 and now 1.6 work just fine
with hal. I wonder why this hasn't been done/checked by the
xorg-server ebuild.


Interesting, I never noticed until now that I have hald in 'default'
like Kevin and yet I have no problems with input devices.

I'm using only USB mice but PS/2 keyboard with X+hal and only evdev,
not keyboard or mouse drivers.  No InputDevice sections at all in
xorg.conf.

I'm wondering if this could be related to APCI or BIOS somehow, which
seems to be a major source of different bugs from machine-to-machine.

Dunno, but it's frustrating to watch you guys have so much trouble with
this problem.

Kevin, I have two mice, one very non-standard and the other bog-standard
as the Brits like to say.  The Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse has two
buttons and a wheel, and it works well under evdev except that I like
to use Emulate3Buttons.

My InputDevice sections are gone completely, as I mentioned, so I wrote
a new conf file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-emulate3buttons.fdi:

?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
deviceinfo version=0.2
  device
   match key=info.capabilities contains=input.mouse
merge key=input.x11_options.Emulate3Buttons type=stringtrue/merge
   /match
  /device
/deviceinfo

I just edited the system input file from /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy after
studying the sytax for awhile, and it worked :o)

Basically, anything you'd put in an InputDevice section of xorg.conf is
transformed into the input.x11_options syntax above.  I made another
file for my non-standard mouse adding things like EmulateWheel but the
syntax was identical to above.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread David
Mine is working fine also, I did have to rebuild all the drivers after 
every update, using 1.6.1.901-r5 currently;


This is a desktop, I have nothing in /etc/hal/fdi/policy/

david [02:54 PM] opteron ~ $ ls /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/input/
evdev_drv.so  kbd_drv.so  mouse_drv.so

Here is xorg.conf and Xorg.0.log
http://dwabbott.com/xorg/

I use a wireless usb keyboard/mouse

Both dbus and hald are in runlevel default

I read this over plus the 1.5 guide;
http://dberkholz.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/xorg-server-16-preview-in-x11-overlay/

I feel your pain. hope something can help.

--
Powered by Gentoo GNU/Linux
http://linuxcrazy.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:50 AM, waltw41...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 07/10/2009 01:29 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:

 On  9 Jul, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:

 I had tried holding back on xorg-server 1.5, but somewhere in May at
 least one package got past my version limits and X broke.  Rather than
 to try to revert, I thought surely by now, X would be fixed.  Sigh.

 In another thread, after spending 2 months without a working X server,
 I got KDM to start.  But without the mouse and keyboard.
 The nice folks who got me that far warned and comisserated thus:


 I had a similar problem. Finally I added hald to boot

 Was hald in 'default' before that?

 rc-update add hald boot

 and rebooted. From now on Xorg 1.5 and now 1.6 work just fine
 with hal. I wonder why this hasn't been done/checked by the
 xorg-server ebuild.

 Interesting, I never noticed until now that I have hald in 'default'
 like Kevin and yet I have no problems with input devices.

 I'm using only USB mice but PS/2 keyboard with X+hal and only evdev,
 not keyboard or mouse drivers.  No InputDevice sections at all in
 xorg.conf.

 I'm wondering if this could be related to APCI or BIOS somehow, which
 seems to be a major source of different bugs from machine-to-machine.

 Dunno, but it's frustrating to watch you guys have so much trouble with
 this problem.

 Kevin, I have two mice, one very non-standard and the other bog-standard
 as the Brits like to say.  The Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse has two
 buttons and a wheel, and it works well under evdev except that I like
 to use Emulate3Buttons.

 My InputDevice sections are gone completely, as I mentioned, so I wrote
 a new conf file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10-emulate3buttons.fdi:

 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
 deviceinfo version=0.2
  device
   match key=info.capabilities contains=input.mouse
    merge key=input.x11_options.Emulate3Buttons type=stringtrue/merge
   /match
  /device
 /deviceinfo

 I just edited the system input file from /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy after
 studying the sytax for awhile, and it worked :o)

 Basically, anything you'd put in an InputDevice section of xorg.conf is
 transformed into the input.x11_options syntax above.  I made another
 file for my non-standard mouse adding things like EmulateWheel but the
 syntax was identical to above.

Well, thanks for the commisseration.  I put -hal on xorg-xerver in
packages.use, and all is well.
There's little chance I'm going to throw more time into this
particular hole.  I have to spend it on my Ubuntu system, which was
also hosed by an xorg upgrade: I'm reverting that one to a year-old
LTS install that I can rely on for at least another year.

This is NOT the way for Linux to make progress in the desktop wars, folks.

++ kevin
-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-10 Thread Keith Dart
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:22 -0700
Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote:

 This is NOT the way for Linux to make progress in the desktop wars,
 folks.

Works for me. ;-)

But its true that Xorg is making some rapid progress. There's some
growing pains.  If you are running Gentoo unstable mask (~X) then
you are on the bleeding edge of open source development. Therefore
occasional breakage is to be expected. File a bug, make it better. 

If you want stable, then use Ubuntu LTS release, or CentOS. Stable, but
boring. ;-)



-- 
-- 
Keith Dart
ke...@dartworks.biz
===



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread James
Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:


  'emerge -e1 world' did the trick

 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.

Have you rebuilt HAL?


It might help

I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
borked (many folks have different issues)


hth,

James




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Dale
James wrote:
 Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:


   
 'emerge -e1 world' did the trick
   

   
 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.
 

 Have you rebuilt HAL?


 It might help

 I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

 try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
 upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
 borked (many folks have different issues)


 hth,

 James



   

If all else fails:

x11-base/xorg-server  -hal

Put that in package.use and re-emerge xorg-server.  You may have to
re-emerge mouse and keyboard too. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 James wrote:
 Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:



 'emerge -e1 world' did the trick



 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.


 Have you rebuilt HAL?


 It might help

 I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

 try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
 upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
 borked (many folks have different issues)


 hth,

 James





 If all else fails:

 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal

 Put that in package.use and re-emerge xorg-server.  You may have to
 re-emerge mouse and keyboard too.

 Dale



Okay, I'm re-emerging hal.  I was already using gcc-4.1.2.  I still
have mouse and keyboard emerged, but not mentioned in the xorg.conf.

Crossing my fingers.

Is there any other advice?

Is there any hope?

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Dale
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 James wrote:
 
 Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:



   
 'emerge -e1 world' did the trick

   
   
 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.

 
 Have you rebuilt HAL?


 It might help

 I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

 try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
 upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
 borked (many folks have different issues)


 hth,

 James




   
 If all else fails:

 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal

 Put that in package.use and re-emerge xorg-server.  You may have to
 re-emerge mouse and keyboard too.

 Dale

 


 Okay, I'm re-emerging hal.  I was already using gcc-4.1.2.  I still
 have mouse and keyboard emerged, but not mentioned in the xorg.conf.

 Crossing my fingers.

 Is there any other advice?

 Is there any hope?

 ++ kevin

   

If you find yourself without a keyboard or mouse and can't get back to a
console, press and hold alt + sysreq then hit R and E.  I did this the
other day and it took me back to a console.

Since I have yet to get xorg and hal to work, good luck. 

Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Kevin O'Gormankogor...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 James wrote:
 Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:



 'emerge -e1 world' did the trick



 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.


 Have you rebuilt HAL?


 It might help

 I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

 try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
 upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
 borked (many folks have different issues)


 hth,

 James





 If all else fails:

 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal

 Put that in package.use and re-emerge xorg-server.  You may have to
 re-emerge mouse and keyboard too.

 Dale



 Okay, I'm re-emerging hal.  I was already using gcc-4.1.2.  I still
 have mouse and keyboard emerged, but not mentioned in the xorg.conf.

 Crossing my fingers.

 Is there any other advice?

 Is there any hope?


A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.

Another option occurs to me: get a new video card and stop using the
onboard one.  I've barely paid any attention to the threads about ATI
vs NVIDIA, and don't know if there are any others worth considering.
Care to make a suggestion for someone who rarely (read: almost never)
plays games or does other work that stress a video card, and just
wants the stuff to work?  In current machines, it would be a PCI-X
(not PCI-E) card.

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
 On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 James wrote:

 Kevin O'Gorman kogorman at gmail.com writes:




 'emerge -e1 world' did the trick



 Okay, I was hoping for variable mileage, but maybe no dice.


 Have you rebuilt HAL?


 It might help

 I have rebuilt version hal-0.5.11-r9

 try to get back to what you had before your last (broken)
 upgrade. Make sure you are using gcc-4.1.2, as 4.3.2 is
 borked (many folks have different issues)


 hth,

 James





 If all else fails:

 x11-base/xorg-server  -hal

 Put that in package.use and re-emerge xorg-server.  You may have to
 re-emerge mouse and keyboard too.

 Dale




 Okay, I'm re-emerging hal.  I was already using gcc-4.1.2.  I still
 have mouse and keyboard emerged, but not mentioned in the xorg.conf.

 Crossing my fingers.

 Is there any other advice?

 Is there any hope?

 ++ kevin



 If you find yourself without a keyboard or mouse and can't get back to a
 console, press and hold alt + sysreq then hit R and E.  I did this the
 other day and it took me back to a console.

 Since I have yet to get xorg and hal to work, good luck.

 Dale

Thanks.  Ctl-Alt-BS is still working for me.

I'm now rebuilding xorg-server, xf86-input-mouse and
xf86-input-keyboard with -hal.

++ kevin

-- 
Kevin O'Gorman, PhD



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server mouse and keyboard woes

2009-07-09 Thread Dale
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:


 A new HAL made no difference.  Sigh.

 Another option occurs to me: get a new video card and stop using the
 onboard one.  I've barely paid any attention to the threads about ATI
 vs NVIDIA, and don't know if there are any others worth considering.
 Care to make a suggestion for someone who rarely (read: almost never)
 plays games or does other work that stress a video card, and just
 wants the stuff to work?  In current machines, it would be a PCI-X
 (not PCI-E) card.

 ++ kevin

   

I have a old FX-5200 and it does all right.  I tested KDE 4 the other
day, it is not the fastest thing on that.  I'm not sure if it is a
setting on my part or just needs a better card.  I'm on the old PCI
stuff too. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-25 Thread bn
Mark Knecht ha scritto:

 No, I need a new kernel also. The kernel on this machine is 2 years
 old. Also, I have about a dozen packages masked so I've unmasked those
 and will need to get the whole machine up to date.

There is something I didn't understand at all in this thread. Why did
you need to update the machine at all? Did you badly need some support
for new video formats or performance improvement? Otherwise I really
don't see the point of upgrading it. I see the point of upgrading a
desktop or server system (yet my desktop kernel is 1.5 years old and I'm
fine), but a MythTV box looks like an appliance that once working , you
touch no more.

m.



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-25 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:47 AM, bnbrullonu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Mark Knecht ha scritto:

 No, I need a new kernel also. The kernel on this machine is 2 years
 old. Also, I have about a dozen packages masked so I've unmasked those
 and will need to get the whole machine up to date.

 There is something I didn't understand at all in this thread. Why did
 you need to update the machine at all? Did you badly need some support
 for new video formats or performance improvement? Otherwise I really
 don't see the point of upgrading it. I see the point of upgrading a
 desktop or server system (yet my desktop kernel is 1.5 years old and I'm
 fine), but a MythTV box looks like an appliance that once working , you
 touch no more.

 m.



With the switch to digital TV I had to buy new hardware to record.
Even though this machine is only a frontend it started having trouble
that my other Gentoo desktop PCs were not. I updated everything I
could on this machine without updating the video driver, the kernel
and xorg-x11. Since I couldn't change the kernel or the video driver I
chose to update xorg-x11 and hit the wall.

I don't do these things for fun. It's OK with me if a machine never
gets updated but with MythTV they change data formats, database
formats, communication protocols and break things along the way WRT
remote frontends that haven't been updated, or that's my experience. I
figured that is what happened here.

Anyway, that's all done. The machine is updated and close to clean.
Still have to do a grub update but that can wait.

I'm having a few problems with things like eselect opengl set 1
complaining about libraries and things so I'll have to work on that
before I push forward.

Hope that explains a bit anyway.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:

  You can tell before you perform the update that the old version is no
  longer in portage,
 
 How? I run eix-sync and at that point it's no longer in
 /usr/portage/distfiles.

AFAIK, eix-sync doesn't touch $DISTDIR. If it does, that's a very good
reason to not use it.

 Am I supposed to study what eix-sync is going
 to do before it does it for the 800 or so packages that are on my
 system? Fat chance anyone does that on a regular and thorough basis.
 
 Or do you mean let eix-sync happen, then study emerge -pvDuN and
 somehow determine that it's going to delete one out of 100 packages
 that it's going to update?

How often do you update? I have myth front and backends, running mostly
stable and I doubt they get that many updates a year.

Gentoo gives you responsibility for maintaining your machines. You don't
get to hand that back. emerge -avuDN does exactlky what you tell it to
do, whether that's what you wanted or not, it is your responsibility to
ensure that the two match.

  then you can copy the ebuild from /var/db/pkg to your
  overlay (and run quickpkg for speed) before updating. Remember that
  nothing is ever truly removed from portage, it is still in the CVS
  attic,
 
  What would be handy would be a script that you run after you sync. If
  a package you have installed is no longer in the tree, it copies the
  ebuild to an overlay.
 
 Ebuild and the source code package also?

The source code is still in $DISTDIR, still on the upstream server
and probably still on the mirrors for a while.

 (Sarcastically) What's an 'personal' overlay? You don't need one to
 install Gentoo. You don't seem to need one until it's too late and you
 have to somehow create it and deal with this after it's become a
 problem.

Creating and setting up your own overlay is as complex as copying one
line from make.conf.example to make.conf.

 My problem was I'm already toast at the dinner table tonight.
 I told the family that the machine doesn't work anymore and now it's
 not clear I'm allowed to sleep here anymore. Hard to build an overlay
 if I'm locked out.

What, no SSH? ;-)

 A different short-term solution might be to find another old junker
 machine that is supported, building it out of junker parts. This would
 be good if I had any certainty that when the work was completed
 portage wouldn't immediately create the same havok.

Your real problem is that you are using outdated and unsupported
hardware. Not unsupported by Gentoo but unsupported by ATI. Incidentally,
have you filed a bug report about this, if the only available driver for
your hardware has been removed from portage, you should post a bug asking
it to be reinstated.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 02:28:50 Neil Bothwick wrote:

 Those who can, do. Those who cannot, teach. Those who cannot teach, HACK!

No, no - those who can't teach teach teachers. Or so my father used to say, 
from what he said had been bitter experience.

-- 
Rgds
Peter



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is xorg-server-1.1.1 completely gone and I'm hosed? I'm not finding it
 on my my machine. The only variations on that theme seem to be in
 /var/db/pkg. No tar files, just other programming junk.

http://sources.gentoo.org/ is your friend :) Specifically:

http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5.ebuild

Every ebuild that has ever been in portage is available on CVS or via
the web viewcvs interface above. You'll probably need the patches for
this version from
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-base/xorg-server/files/?hideattic=0
as well as whatever other split-ebuilds may be required to support
this version. It looks like it was obsoleted and deleted from the main
portage tree almost 2 years ago.

Download them, put them in your local overlay, mask newer-than-1.1
versions in your /etc/portage/* and hopefully your problem will be
solved. :)



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Neil Bothwickn...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:42:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:

SNIP

 A different short-term solution might be to find another old junker
 machine that is supported, building it out of junker parts. This would
 be good if I had any certainty that when the work was completed
 portage wouldn't immediately create the same havok.

 Your real problem is that you are using outdated and unsupported
 hardware. Not unsupported by Gentoo but unsupported by ATI. Incidentally,
 have you filed a bug report about this, if the only available driver for
 your hardware has been removed from portage, you should post a bug asking
 it to be reinstated.


 --
 Neil Bothwick

 I laugh in the face of danger, then I hide until it goes away


Unfortunately for me:

1) It absolutely isn't that the hardware is unsupported, it's that a
*feature* of the hardware (TV Out S-Video) became unsupported. The
machine works (AFAIK) with Gentoo. It boots, it probably runs X just
fine using the VGA output. It's that the S-Video output feature (TV
Out) has become unsupported by ati-driver. Who would have ever guessed
when you purchased a machine that uses and ATI chipset with a built-in
ATI graphics controller that it would be ATI that chose to obsolete
it? Amazing...

2) Following your Bugzilla suggestion about asking that it be put back
into portage to it's logical conclusion and it gets scary. Here's the
paraphrased request:

a) I need ati-driver-8.28.8 put back into portage because it's the
last driver that supports TV out for the 9100 IGP chipset.
b) Unfortunately I need 2.6.19 added back into portage because it's
the last kernel that ati-driver-8.28.8 runs on.
c) Because all this old stuff doesn't work on the new xorg-server I
need xorg-server-1.1.1 to remain in portage.

Multiply this sort of requirement up by whatever additional packages
are required to get the stuff above actually working and it looks
unlikely, 'eh? Granted, I don't need the kernel because I can just get
that and manage it myself. (I.e. - I don't need gentoo-sources)

I really think this is what a personal overlay is for, but as I've
said for years, it's hard to build an overlay when you don't know what
needs to be in it until it's been removed. And yes, *something* has
removed these files, at least from my distfiles directory and I'm
pretty confident it wasn't me by hand because the machines all have
disk space which is the only reason I ever remove packages from there
by hand. There are still things lurking around in /var/db/pkgs or
whatever it's called so maybe I can learn how to create a personal
overlay form what's left and then go look elsewhere for other things
required.

Anyway, thanks for the inputs. I'm not sure what I'm going to do next
other than take some time and figure things out.

As always I appreciate your help.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:17:12 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:

 1) It absolutely isn't that the hardware is unsupported, it's that a
 *feature* of the hardware (TV Out S-Video) became unsupported.

And the S-Video output is part of the hardware, so you do have
unsupported hardware.

 2) Following your Bugzilla suggestion about asking that it be put back
 into portage to it's logical conclusion and it gets scary. Here's the
 paraphrased request:
 
 a) I need ati-driver-8.28.8 put back into portage because it's the
 last driver that supports TV out for the 9100 IGP chipset.
 b) Unfortunately I need 2.6.19 added back into portage because it's
 the last kernel that ati-driver-8.28.8 runs on.
 c) Because all this old stuff doesn't work on the new xorg-server I
 need xorg-server-1.1.1 to remain in portage.

When you put it like that... but there's no harm in asking.

 I really think this is what a personal overlay is for, but as I've
 said for years, it's hard to build an overlay when you don't know what
 needs to be in it until it's been removed.

I think that whenever you start masking newer versions of a package to
force portage to stay with the older ones, you should consider
copying them to an overlay. Everything is removed eventually and if you
can't keep up with updates, you preferred version will disappear at some
time. It's not the end of the world as you can still get the files from
the CVS attic, it's just that copying them in advance saves some work.

 And yes, *something* has
 removed these files, at least from my distfiles directory and I'm
 pretty confident it wasn't me by hand because the machines all have
 disk space which is the only reason I ever remove packages from there
 by hand.

eix-sync makes no mention of cleaning $DISTDIR, either in its man page or
--help output, so I reckon you're running something else to do this.
Maybe eclean in a postsync script. What do you have in
/etc/portage/postsync.d? 

You could put a script in here that runs

rsync -a /usr/portage/ /usr/portage.bak/

which would mean you have your own portage attic and could retrieve any
deleted ebuild whenever you want.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Anything is possible if you don't know what
you are talking about.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 22:17:12 Mark Knecht wrote:
 I really think this is what a personal overlay is for, but as I've
 said for years, it's hard to build an overlay when you don't know what
 needs to be in it until it's been removed. And yes, something has
 removed these files, at least from my distfiles directory and I'm
 pretty confident it wasn't me by hand because the machines all have
 disk space which is the only reason I ever remove packages from there
 by hand. There are still things lurking around in /var/db/pkgs or
 whatever it's called so maybe I can learn how to create a personal
 overlay form what's left and then go look elsewhere for other things
 required.

So why don't you do exactly that? 

I can't help but think when reading this thread that you are going round in 
circles, wondering if you should create a personal overlay, when you already 
know that the only possible solution IS a personal overlay.

It's documented in the gentoo docs. Briefly:

Create a directory somewhere for your stuff and include it in PORTDIR_OVERLAY 
in /etc/make.conf. If the current versions of ebuilds you need are currently 
installed, the ebuilds will be in /var/db/pkg so copy them to your overlay 
directory retaining the category/package structure. If not currently 
installed, get them from gentoo's cvs. Look inside each ebuild, see what it's 
DEPENDS are, make sure you have suitable ebuilds in your overlay. Rinse, 
repeat. It's fiddly, but not hard to do.

Mask stuff using normal portage methods to make sure you don't upgrade to 
something incompatible. emerge world and let rip.

Stop playing dixie with the idea and just do it, man!

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



RE: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Adam Carter
I havent been following this thread but have you checked the open source 
drivers? New features are always being ported in. The two options are;
- Radeon driver (module is named ati)
- Radeonhd driver (module is named radeon)

Check out the current features here http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature all 
boxes are for the radeon/ati driver unless the box contains (RHD, in which case 
it's the radeonhd/radeon driver). In particular TV out should work on 
R100/R200/R300 based cards.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Adam Carteradam.car...@optus.com.au wrote:
 I havent been following this thread but have you checked the open source 
 drivers? New features are always being ported in. The two options are;
 - Radeon driver (module is named ati)
 - Radeonhd driver (module is named radeon)

 Check out the current features here http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature all 
 boxes are for the radeon/ati driver unless the box contains (RHD, in which 
 case it's the radeonhd/radeon driver). In particular TV out should work on 
 R100/R200/R300 based cards.




It's a great question and one I'd like to answer. Someone else
suggested this yesterday I think. Thanks for suggesting I get back to
it.

I am scanning the /var/log/Xorg.0.log looking for info on what chip
this is. I'm not finding anything that says what Radeon family it's
part of. lspci tells me what I posted here already - that it's part of
the IGP 9100 family.

I found this page at the AMD/ATI site but I suspect it's for a newer
version of the chipset:

http://ati.amd.com/products/radeon9100igp/features.html

I'm going to pursue this with more dedication as it is really the only
current path I've heard of so far that gives me a chance to stay
current with Gentoo.

What VIDEO_DEVICES setting might one use to get this driver called up?
Either ati or radeon and check that it installs Open Source?

It is a bunch of work, but it would be great if I can use it.

Thanks,
Mark

DesertFlower ~ # lspci -vv
SNIP

01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon 9100
IGP (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8107
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium
TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx-
Latency: 64 (2000ns min), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
Region 0: Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Region 1: I/O ports at d000 [size=256]
Region 2: Memory at fde0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
Expansion ROM at fdd0 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [58] AGP version 3.0
Status: RQ=256 Iso- ArqSz=0 Cal=7 SBA+ ITACoh- GART64-
HTrans- 64bit+ FW+ AGP3+ Rate=x4,x8
Command: RQ=1 ArqSz=0 Cal=0 SBA+ AGP- GART64- 64bit-
FW- Rate=none
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/25/2009 03:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Adam Carteradam.car...@optus.com.au  wrote:

I havent been following this thread but have you checked the open source 
drivers? New features are always being ported in. The two options are;
- Radeon driver (module is named ati)
- Radeonhd driver (module is named radeon)

Check out the current features here http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature all 
boxes are for the radeon/ati driver unless the box contains (RHD, in which case 
it's the radeonhd/radeon driver). In particular TV out should work on 
R100/R200/R300 based cards.


[...]
I am scanning the /var/log/Xorg.0.log looking for info on what chip
this is. I'm not finding anything that says what Radeon family it's
part of. lspci tells me what I posted here already - that it's part of
the IGP 9100 family.

I found this page at the AMD/ATI site but I suspect it's for a newer
version of the chipset:

http://ati.amd.com/products/radeon9100igp/features.html


That's an R200 chip.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R200




RE: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Adam Carter
 I am scanning the /var/log/Xorg.0.log looking for info on what chip
 this is. I'm not finding anything that says what Radeon family it's
 part of. lspci tells me what I posted here already - that it's part of
 the IGP 9100 family.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ATI_Graphics_Processing_Units says 
its an R200.

 I found this page at the AMD/ATI site but I suspect it's for a newer
 version of the chipset:

 http://ati.amd.com/products/radeon9100igp/features.html

 I'm going to pursue this with more dedication as it is really the only
 current path I've heard of so far that gives me a chance to stay
 current with Gentoo.

 What VIDEO_DEVICES setting might one use to get this driver called up?
 Either ati or radeon and check that it installs Open Source?

So you want the radeon/ati driver, the package name is xf86-video-ati, so I 
guess that means you want ati in VIDEO_DEVICES.

 It is a bunch of work, but it would be great if I can use it.

I thought emerge xf86-video-ati, then swapping Driver flgrx to Driver 
radeon in xorg.conf was all that is required??



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/25/2009 04:04 AM, Adam Carter wrote:

What VIDEO_DEVICES setting might one use to get this driver called up?
Either ati or radeon and check that it installs Open Source?


So you want the radeon/ati driver, the package name is xf86-video-ati, so I 
guess that means you want ati in VIDEO_DEVICES.


It's radeon in recent X.Org, not ati.  Not sure when that changed. 
Probably with xorg-server 1.5.





RE: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Adam Carter
  So you want the radeon/ati driver, the package name is
 xf86-video-ati, so I guess that means you want ati in VIDEO_DEVICES.

 It's radeon in recent X.Org, not ati.  Not sure when that
 changed. Probably with xorg-server 1.5.

Damn - I had checked the /usr/portage/x11-drivers directory and the packages 
are called -ati and -radeonhd, so I assumed that's what would be passed via the 
variable, but of course it's the modules name, so

flgrx installs ati-drivers
radeon installs xf86-video-ati
radeonhd installs xf86-video-radeonhd



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/25/2009 03:46 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Adam Carteradam.car...@optus.com.au
  wrote:

 I havent been following this thread but have you checked the open source
 drivers? New features are always being ported in. The two options are;
 - Radeon driver (module is named ati)
 - Radeonhd driver (module is named radeon)

 Check out the current features here http://www.x.org/wiki/RadeonFeature
 all boxes are for the radeon/ati driver unless the box contains (RHD, in
 which case it's the radeonhd/radeon driver). In particular TV out should
 work on R100/R200/R300 based cards.

 [...]
 I am scanning the /var/log/Xorg.0.log looking for info on what chip
 this is. I'm not finding anything that says what Radeon family it's
 part of. lspci tells me what I posted here already - that it's part of
 the IGP 9100 family.

 I found this page at the AMD/ATI site but I suspect it's for a newer
 version of the chipset:

 http://ati.amd.com/products/radeon9100igp/features.html

 That's an R200 chip.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radeon_R200


Thanks. That would be good news as the new ATI driver says TV Out is supported.

Building a new kernel now.

cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Adam Carteradam.car...@optus.com.au wrote:
 I am scanning the /var/log/Xorg.0.log looking for info on what chip
 this is. I'm not finding anything that says what Radeon family it's
 part of. lspci tells me what I posted here already - that it's part of
 the IGP 9100 family.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_ATI_Graphics_Processing_Units says 
 its an R200.

 I found this page at the AMD/ATI site but I suspect it's for a newer
 version of the chipset:

 http://ati.amd.com/products/radeon9100igp/features.html

 I'm going to pursue this with more dedication as it is really the only
 current path I've heard of so far that gives me a chance to stay
 current with Gentoo.

 What VIDEO_DEVICES setting might one use to get this driver called up?
 Either ati or radeon and check that it installs Open Source?

 So you want the radeon/ati driver, the package name is xf86-video-ati, so I 
 guess that means you want ati in VIDEO_DEVICES.

 It is a bunch of work, but it would be great if I can use it.

 I thought emerge xf86-video-ati, then swapping Driver flgrx to Driver 
 radeon in xorg.conf was all that is required??



No, I need a new kernel also. The kernel on this machine is 2 years
old. Also, I have about a dozen packages masked so I've unmasked those
and will need to get the whole machine up to date.

None the less I'm happy to do it if there's any chance it will work.

Thanks,
Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/25/2009 04:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

I thought emerge xf86-video-ati, then swapping Driver flgrx to Driver 
radeon in xorg.conf was all that is required??


No, I need a new kernel also. The kernel on this machine is 2 years
old. Also, I have about a dozen packages masked so I've unmasked those
and will need to get the whole machine up to date.

None the less I'm happy to do it if there's any chance it will work.


If it works, better make sure you keep the system up to date.  Gentoo 
will bark and bite you at some point if you don't; I'm sure you figured 
that out by now :P





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-24 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/25/2009 04:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 I thought emerge xf86-video-ati, then swapping Driver flgrx to Driver
 radeon in xorg.conf was all that is required??

 No, I need a new kernel also. The kernel on this machine is 2 years
 old. Also, I have about a dozen packages masked so I've unmasked those
 and will need to get the whole machine up to date.

 None the less I'm happy to do it if there's any chance it will work.

 If it works, better make sure you keep the system up to date.  Gentoo will
 bark and bite you at some point if you don't; I'm sure you figured that out
 by now :P


Except for being forced into all these old kernel and video packages
the machine has been kept up to date. Now it will be completely up to
date. :-)

The new kernel booted the first time and except for me forgetting to
enable the correct NIC things looked good. I added the 3c590 and now
can get to it over ssh. emerge -DuN @world will take a few hours as
there are a number of packages to update.

Tomorrow I will delve into the newer Open Source ATI driver and see
how things go. Wish me luck.

cheers,
Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/24/2009 02:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

Hi all,
Main question is whether there is any change in the way I select
the fglrx driver with xorg-server-1.5?

I have a big emerge running on one of my MythTV frontends that uses
an old 2.6.19 kernel with an old 8.28 ati-driver package. The machine
does not use a keyboard or mouse. I cannot update either the kernel or
the ati-driver for hardware support reasons. When the emerge is
finished in a couple of hours do I need to change the xorg.conf file
at all to use the server with the fglrx driver or will it just work?


There's a pretty big chance that 8.28 is so old that it does not support 
xorg-server 1.5 at all.  That means you can't use xorg-server 1.5.  And 
if you're not prepared to update your kernel, then the xorg native 
driver (xf86-video-ati) is out of the question too.


It looks to me you'll have to keep using the older xorg-server.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/24/2009 02:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 Hi all,
    Main question is whether there is any change in the way I select
 the fglrx driver with xorg-server-1.5?

    I have a big emerge running on one of my MythTV frontends that uses
 an old 2.6.19 kernel with an old 8.28 ati-driver package. The machine
 does not use a keyboard or mouse. I cannot update either the kernel or
 the ati-driver for hardware support reasons. When the emerge is
 finished in a couple of hours do I need to change the xorg.conf file
 at all to use the server with the fglrx driver or will it just work?

 There's a pretty big chance that 8.28 is so old that it does not support
 xorg-server 1.5 at all.  That means you can't use xorg-server 1.5.  And if
 you're not prepared to update your kernel, then the xorg native driver
 (xf86-video-ati) is out of the question too.

 It looks to me you'll have to keep using the older xorg-server.




Thanks Nikos. I hope that's not the case or I've waster a couple of
hours because emerge didn't stop me from doing this. No messages at
all about anything like too old a kernel or vidieo driver.

It's almost done so I guess I'll just wait and then see how it goes.

There is no way to update the kernel as far as I know. The ATI chip
that's in the computer has an S-video output that I need to drive the
TV. After 8.28 ATI stopped supporting S-Video for this chip meaning I
cannot update ati-drivers. To use the 8.28 ati-driver package I'm
forced to use the 2.6.19 kernel.

Believe me, I'd like to update but don't know how to unless I buy a
new video card. I haven't looked in the box in a LONG time but I think
it's possibly PCI only, and then it's also low form factor so it will
probably be pretty hard to find ANY video card to fit it, but maybe
I'll look around in case I have to go that way.

Cheers,
Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/24/2009 02:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 Hi all,
    Main question is whether there is any change in the way I select
 the fglrx driver with xorg-server-1.5?

    I have a big emerge running on one of my MythTV frontends that uses
 an old 2.6.19 kernel with an old 8.28 ati-driver package. The machine
 does not use a keyboard or mouse. I cannot update either the kernel or
 the ati-driver for hardware support reasons. When the emerge is
 finished in a couple of hours do I need to change the xorg.conf file
 at all to use the server with the fglrx driver or will it just work?

 There's a pretty big chance that 8.28 is so old that it does not support
 xorg-server 1.5 at all.  That means you can't use xorg-server 1.5.  And if
 you're not prepared to update your kernel, then the xorg native driver
 (xf86-video-ati) is out of the question too.

 It looks to me you'll have to keep using the older xorg-server.




 Thanks Nikos. I hope that's not the case or I've waster a couple of
 hours because emerge didn't stop me from doing this. No messages at
 all about anything like too old a kernel or vidieo driver.

 It's almost done so I guess I'll just wait and then see how it goes.

 There is no way to update the kernel as far as I know. The ATI chip
 that's in the computer has an S-video output that I need to drive the
 TV. After 8.28 ATI stopped supporting S-Video for this chip meaning I
 cannot update ati-drivers. To use the 8.28 ati-driver package I'm
 forced to use the 2.6.19 kernel.

 Believe me, I'd like to update but don't know how to unless I buy a
 new video card. I haven't looked in the box in a LONG time but I think
 it's possibly PCI only, and then it's also low form factor so it will
 probably be pretty hard to find ANY video card to fit it, but maybe
 I'll look around in case I have to go that way.

 Cheers,
 Mark


OK, after the reboot fglrx is in memory but Xorg.0.log is complaining
about missing symbols:

myth12 ~ # uname -a
Linux myth12 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 #2 PREEMPT Sat May 19 17:55:30 PDT 2007
i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
myth12 ~ # lsmod | grep fglrx
fglrx 390828  0
agpgart24240  2 fglrx,ati_agp
myth12 ~ #

(II) LoadModule: fglrx

(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol:
miZeroLineScreenIndex
(EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
(II) UnloadModule: fglrx
(EE) Failed to load module fglrx (loader failed, 7)
(EE) No drivers available.

Fatal server error:
no screens found


Am I completely hosed here?

Looking on NewEgg I'm not finding any AGP fanless, low-profile cards
yet and I'm not sure the machine supported AGP anyway. I'll have to
open the box or find some old docs online. There is one fanless ATI
Radeon 9250-based PCI-based card but it's expensive for this
application at $90.

Looks like it's back to the older xorg-server.

- Mark



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Mark Knechtmarkkne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/24/2009 02:20 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 Hi all,
    Main question is whether there is any change in the way I select
 the fglrx driver with xorg-server-1.5?

    I have a big emerge running on one of my MythTV frontends that uses
 an old 2.6.19 kernel with an old 8.28 ati-driver package. The machine
 does not use a keyboard or mouse. I cannot update either the kernel or
 the ati-driver for hardware support reasons. When the emerge is
 finished in a couple of hours do I need to change the xorg.conf file
 at all to use the server with the fglrx driver or will it just work?

 There's a pretty big chance that 8.28 is so old that it does not support
 xorg-server 1.5 at all.  That means you can't use xorg-server 1.5.  And if
 you're not prepared to update your kernel, then the xorg native driver
 (xf86-video-ati) is out of the question too.

 It looks to me you'll have to keep using the older xorg-server.




 Thanks Nikos. I hope that's not the case or I've waster a couple of
 hours because emerge didn't stop me from doing this. No messages at
 all about anything like too old a kernel or vidieo driver.

 It's almost done so I guess I'll just wait and then see how it goes.

 There is no way to update the kernel as far as I know. The ATI chip
 that's in the computer has an S-video output that I need to drive the
 TV. After 8.28 ATI stopped supporting S-Video for this chip meaning I
 cannot update ati-drivers. To use the 8.28 ati-driver package I'm
 forced to use the 2.6.19 kernel.

 Believe me, I'd like to update but don't know how to unless I buy a
 new video card. I haven't looked in the box in a LONG time but I think
 it's possibly PCI only, and then it's also low form factor so it will
 probably be pretty hard to find ANY video card to fit it, but maybe
 I'll look around in case I have to go that way.

 Cheers,
 Mark


 OK, after the reboot fglrx is in memory but Xorg.0.log is complaining
 about missing symbols:

 myth12 ~ # uname -a
 Linux myth12 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 #2 PREEMPT Sat May 19 17:55:30 PDT 2007
 i686 Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.26GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
 myth12 ~ # lsmod | grep fglrx
 fglrx                 390828  0
 agpgart                24240  2 fglrx,ati_agp
 myth12 ~ #

 (II) LoadModule: fglrx

 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
 dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so: undefined symbol:
 miZeroLineScreenIndex
 (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
 (II) UnloadModule: fglrx
 (EE) Failed to load module fglrx (loader failed, 7)
 (EE) No drivers available.

 Fatal server error:
 no screens found


 Am I completely hosed here?

 Looking on NewEgg I'm not finding any AGP fanless, low-profile cards
 yet and I'm not sure the machine supported AGP anyway. I'll have to
 open the box or find some old docs online. There is one fanless ATI
 Radeon 9250-based PCI-based card but it's expensive for this
 application at $90.

 Looks like it's back to the older xorg-server.

 - Mark


Am I hosed again? Did updating portage break my machine by removing
what I was just using:

1245799356: === Unmerging... (x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5)
1245799361:   unmerge success: x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r5
1245799361:   emerge (62 of 64) x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6 to /
1245799363:  === (62 of 64) Cleaning
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6::/usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6.ebuild)
1245799363:  === (62 of 64) Compiling/Merging
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6::/usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6.ebuild)
1245800519:  === (62 of 64) Merging
(x11-base/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6::/usr/portage/x11-base/xorg-server/xorg-server-1.5.3-r6.ebuild)
1245800527:   AUTOCLEAN: x11-base/xorg-server:0

myth12 ~ # ls -a /usr/portage/distfiles/xorg-server-*
/usr/portage/distfiles/xorg-server-1.5.3-gentoo-patches-08.tar.bz2
/usr/portage/distfiles/xorg-server-1.5.3.tar.bz2
myth12 ~ #

Is xorg-server-1.1.1 completely gone and I'm hosed? I'm not finding it
on my my machine. The only variations on that theme seem to be in
/var/db/pkg. No tar files, just other programming junk.

I absolutely HATE this about portage. Update your machine just
thinking about trying a new piece of software and then find you cannot
immediately go back. Gentoo was supposed to be about choice. Seems
it's not about my choice anymore. Bummer.

Maybe I can find this on another machine somewhere. Don't know what to
do though.

Family gets no MythTV for a few days, or maybe forever?

I'm trying to mask things to check this and emerge is really mad at me.

- Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/24/2009 03:06 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

[...]
Am I hosed again? Did updating portage break my machine by removing
what I was just using:
[...]

Is xorg-server-1.1.1 completely gone and I'm hosed? I'm not finding it
on my my machine. The only variations on that theme seem to be in
/var/db/pkg. No tar files, just other programming junk.

I absolutely HATE this about portage. Update your machine just
thinking about trying a new piece of software and then find you cannot
immediately go back. Gentoo was supposed to be about choice. Seems
it's not about my choice anymore. Bummer.


I hate to say this, but if you have a machine that you don't keep up to 
date by doing full updates at least each month or two, then Gentoo is 
*not* for you because Gentoo simply lacks the notion of stable. 
Stable refers to package versions, not system stability.  Gentoo is 
never stable in that sense like other distros that offer stable 
releases.  Something like Debian stable should be more appropriate and 
far more easier to keep operational for machines like that.





Re: [gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
 On 06/24/2009 03:06 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

 [...]
 Am I hosed again? Did updating portage break my machine by removing
 what I was just using:
 [...]

 Is xorg-server-1.1.1 completely gone and I'm hosed? I'm not finding it
 on my my machine. The only variations on that theme seem to be in
 /var/db/pkg. No tar files, just other programming junk.

 I absolutely HATE this about portage. Update your machine just
 thinking about trying a new piece of software and then find you cannot
 immediately go back. Gentoo was supposed to be about choice. Seems
 it's not about my choice anymore. Bummer.

 I hate to say this, but if you have a machine that you don't keep up to date
 by doing full updates at least each month or two, then Gentoo is *not* for
 you because Gentoo simply lacks the notion of stable. Stable refers to
 package versions, not system stability.  Gentoo is never stable in that
 sense like other distros that offer stable releases.  Something like
 Debian stable should be more appropriate and far more easier to keep
 operational for machines like that.

Gentoo is for me. Gentoo is the only distro I run and the only one
I've run for at least 6 years. Gentoo has run on THIS VERY MACHINE for
over 4 years and it is the ONLY distro that has EVER run on this
machine. Today I run eix-sync and emerge xorg-x11 and the machine
breaks and I cannot go back. It is not my choice that Gentoo
maintainers decided to drop something from portage required to make
this machine run and not give me a way to get it back. Portage chose
to erase files on MY machine - files that are required to make the
machine work. Gentoo package maintainers decided to obsolete my
machine, not me.

I'm sure there's some way to get things back working again but I don't
know what they are. I've got two identical machines but looking around
on the other machine it doesn't seem much happier, even though it's
currently functional.

Well, I guess you can chuckle at my problems and say tough luck.
Better if you can offer some guidance about what to read to go find
these files.

Again, I'd LOVE to keep the machine COMPLETELY up to date. It's not my
fault the folks who run portage decided to remove what this machine
requires to work. It's not my fault that ATI stopped supporting the
hardware. It's not my fault that the only driver that works with the
hardware only works with an old kernel. And there is probably NO
distro that would support this box anymore off the install CD.

- Mark



[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/24/2009 03:06 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

[...]
Family gets no MythTV for a few days, or maybe forever?

I'm trying to mask things to check this and emerge is really mad at me.


As a last attempt at damage control, try the full update anyway.  Remove 
fglrx from VIDEO_CARDS and replace it with radeon (I assume you have 
a Radeon card?)  Delete /etc/X11/xorg.conf and see what happens.  Maybe 
the recent xorg driver for Radeons supports the S-Video port of your 
card correctly.  At least that's what I'm seeing while googling for 
xf86-video-ati S-Video.





[gentoo-user] Re: xorg-server-1.5 update/old kernel+old fglrx

2009-06-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras

On 06/24/2009 03:27 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

Gentoo is for me. Gentoo is the only distro I run and the only one
I've run for at least 6 years. Gentoo has run on THIS VERY MACHINE for
over 4 years and it is the ONLY distro that has EVER run on this
machine. Today I run eix-sync and emerge xorg-x11 and the machine
breaks and I cannot go back. It is not my choice that Gentoo
maintainers decided to drop something from portage required to make
this machine run and not give me a way to get it back. Portage chose
to erase files on MY machine - files that are required to make the
machine work. Gentoo package maintainers decided to obsolete my
machine, not me.


You should have taken a backup of /usr/portage and created binary 
packages using quickpgk before the update.  Portage can't contain 
every ancient version of every package out there.  It would grow to 
infinity.  Old stuff has to go.  That's the very nature of Gentoo's 
rolling release nature (or on other words, its lack of a stable notion.)


Anyway, see my other post, maybe you can go on with the update and have 
it working in the end.




I'm sure there's some way to get things back working again but I don't
know what they are.


The rule is simple.  If a fresh installation of Gentoo wouldn't work, 
you're out of luck.  Gentoo lacks releases.  Either you change hardware 
or distribution.





  1   2   >