On Sunday, 17 April 2022 16:42:35 -00 Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday, 17 April 2022 14:54:50 -00 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> Can't you just fix your USE flags with systemd-utils? Why revert?
> >
> > No, because the flag I'd need is 'boot
,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
Hold your horses.
The devs will work something out; systemd is not replacing the udev
package for all users. For the moment, it's just replacing the udev
package for users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/19/2014 03:02 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:04:14 -0600, Daniel Campbell wrote:
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be
chosen as the default.
Quite
Am 06.08.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Rich Freeman:
You're defining really systemd-free in the same sense that the FSF
defines a really free distro (they think Debian FOSS-only isn't good
enough). Sticking with the base profile should get you an experience
about the same as what you'd have gotten 4
Dear Dr. Valdés,
I am sorry to tell you that the result still remains the same.
I am also not a systemd expert
but somebody in the mailing list told me, that the "order" of process
might not be right ?
url: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/7293
best, Tamer Higazi
stuff:
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/canberra-system-shutdown-reboot.service
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/console-kit-daemon.service
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/canberra-system-shutdown.service
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/udev-trigger.service
/usr/lib64/systemd/system/udev-control.socket
/usr/lib64/systemd/system
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:15 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:22 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I have been trying to get systemd to boot, but I have run into
several problems and need some help. I am using
On 01/09/2015 02:12, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 31/08/2015 18:54, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>>>> The words make sense, the meaning doesn't :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like fail2
On 07/26/2013 06:39 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
must I check that every entry previously in /etc/init.d now has an entry
in /usr/lib/systemd/system? What do I do if there is no corresponding
entry?
I actually had to write a few of my own *.service files, which belong in
/etc/systemd/system
running openrc and do
*not* have systemd installed?
No, you can't: systemd is now a requirement for GNOME 3; gdm-3.8.4
requires systemd unconditionally. If you try to install GNOME 3.8, it
will install gdm 3.8.4, which will bring systemd. You cannot install
gdm without systemd; therefore, you
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 11:49:41 -0700 Joseph wrote:
I have in make.conf USE: ... -systemd
But gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon wants to pull in systemd-208
so I need to emerge sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 and I have installed udev which
conflicts with systemd.
Do I need to unmerge udev
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it
took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have
measured several times and left mean comments about whichever
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:56 AM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 02:16:24 PM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
And with systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds ;)
And here I was thinking that the pro-systemd crowd doesn't care about the
boot
install it and pray it works as I've read if
systemd goes sideways you can't even log in.
Are there people running systemd and mdadm together that can comment? I
think I'm going to try anyway, and I have a suspicion that systemd is
going to bomb the first time it boots.
I'm not, I stopped using
Am 07.08.2015 um 00:10 schrieb Rich Freeman:
Like I said - if you want to go this route be prepared to tweak half
your system to keep it working.
Why would I need to tweak half my system? That sounds exactly like those
Poetterix fanboys, particularly when they forced systemd on every user
On 31/08/2015 18:54, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>> The words make sense, the meaning doesn't :-)
>> >
>> > It looks like fail2ban wants systemd without python support, but the
>> > true reason is still hidden. The fail2ban eb
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:55:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>On 01/09/2015 02:12, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[...]
>
>Got it, finally :-)
>
>fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the
>highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later ver
On 01/09/2015 12:18, Marc Joliet_1 wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:55:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 01/09/2015 02:12, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Got it, finally :-)
>>
>> fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and system
On 2015-11-24 13:17, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I am running systemd-226-r1
There's your problem ;)
I'm really kidding.
and am having some strange problems with
systemd-logind. It gets into some state where it can take 20 seconds to
login to the box via ssh, if I restart systemd-logind
Hello,
Well I have one system I need to migrate to eudev. All sorts of things are
now calling for *systemd* and I do not want that at all.
Here is the blockers on the latest list ::
[blocks B ] sys-fs/eudev ("sys-fs/eudev" is blocking
sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4, sys-ap
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:59 AM Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> Hi,
> since the upgrade from systemd-242-r6 to systemd-243_rc1 I cannot mount
> my (external) USB drive any more.
> I get
> kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] Assuming drive cache: write through
> kernel: sde: sde1 sde2 sde
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 2:46 PM antlists wrote:
>
> On 14/11/2020 18:48, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > Probably the cause for me running into so much difficulty converting from
> > openrc to systemd is there is no path for systems using systemd unless
> > they're using uefi a
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 1:05 PM Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Sunday, 17 April 2022 16:42:35 -00 Martin Vaeth wrote:
> >> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> > On Sunday, 17 April 2022 14:54:50 -00 Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> >> Can'
On 31/07/13 at 11:26am, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-07-31 11:20 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
If you don't use the systemd USE flag (and never install anything that
depends on systemd), you will not get systemd installed, but many
packages will install systemd unit files
for a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
You need to get your root filesystem and /usr mounted. Just keep that
goal in mind and start adding files to support it.
There doesn't need to be anything systemd-specific.
I am not sure about
On 05/02/2014 19:03, Joseph wrote:
On 02/05/14 18:35, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 05/02/2014 18:32, Joseph wrote:
Which program is responsible for mounting USB stick on XFCE4?
After enable systemd flag in make.conf USE=
the following packages were rebuild:
sys-apps/busybox
sys-apps/dbus
sys
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging it; you need to change
your init= line in grub-legacy or GRUB2 and reboot. The contents of
/proc/1/comm is systemd?
I only have this:
cat /proc/1/comm
init
I propose a separate systemd
profile for those willing to use it.
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you need to
use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
That's the best response I've read in, like, many years. That's
perfect; I'm 100% behind it. I even
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Greetings fellow Gentooistas,
Hi Marc.
I am looking for input on how to speed up my boot process with systemd on
Gentoo.
First of one word to systemd: Gentoo is about choice, and I choose to take a
deeper look
On 06/24/2014 10:01:24 AM, Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:39:13 -0400
schrieb gottl...@nyu.edu:
I think I had first misinterpreted the news msg, but want to be
sure I
do understand it correctly now.
The message ends with
All non-systemd users are recommended to choose
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am 06.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb Jc García:
OpenRC is there on the stage3, systemd isn't, if you don't think about
systemd you get an OpenRC installation, I think it would confuse more
people to talk about choosing init
consolekit
* These packages depend on consolekit:
gnome-base/gdm-3.6.2 (consolekit ? sys-auth/consolekit[pam])
gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.6.3-r1 (!systemd ? sys-auth/consolekit)
gnome-base/gnome-session-3.6.2-r1 (!systemd ? sys-auth/consolekit)
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.6.4
in by:
gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.8.3 requires sys-auth/consolekit
Dependency of gnome-control-center:
|| ( ( app-admin/openrc-settingsd sys-auth/consolekit )
=sys-apps/systemd-31 )
gnome-base/gnome-session-3.8.2.1-r1 requires sys-auth/consolekit
gnome-session:
systemd
understand it correctly now.
The message ends with
All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils'
or
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace '=sys-power/upower-0.99.0'
However, all systemd users are recommended
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 13:02 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Raffaele Belardi
> <raffaele.bela...@st.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:47 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > >
> > > A Google search found this systemd iss
Dear Dr. Valdés,
/etc/systemd/network/20-wirded.network:
[Match]
Name=enp6s0
[Network]
Address=192.168.0.50/24
Gateway=192.168.0.1
DNS=192.168.0.1
for enp7s0 there is no other network file.
/etc/systemd/networkd.conf:
[Network]
#SpeedMeter=no
#SpeedMeterIntervalSec=10sec
On 10/29/2012 03:21 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
I just wonder why GenToo still sticks to
openrc while other distributions have switched to systemd.
Not all gentoo packages have been updated with systemd *.service
files, which live in /usr/lib/systemd/system/.
I installed a live-CD virtual
getting rejection messages.
I got my systemd scripts here:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/**wiki/Systemd#NFShttp://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#NFS
I know the problem is with the nfs server because the nfs clients work
normally if I boot the nfs server using openrc instead of systemd.
Anyone have
Am 27.01.2013 22:08, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
udev-197 in the tree installs everything to /; systemd-197 installs to
/usr. I'm pretty sure that is not going to end well; I haven't
upgraded to 197 in neither package.
forking this thread:
decided to give systemd another chance here
Am 05.03.2013 07:40, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
Sorry, long trip, just got home. I messed up NTP with hwclock. Anyway,
I don't handle hwclock either: it's basically included in systemd:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/shared/hwclock.c
wow, and I thought there has
Am 2013-07-23 08:11, schrieb András Csányi:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of
the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd
Am 27.09.2013 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long.
systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have.
Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some
boot-process
On Fri, December 6, 2013 08:53, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Just remove init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd from your kernel command
line, and you can boot your old openrc installation (if you did un
unmerge it)
That should mean: ..if you did not unmerge it.
It doesn't seem that simple from
-replicator.pid
ExecStart=/usr/bin/http-replicator $DAEMON_OPTS
KillSignal=SIGINT
#User=
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
# systemctl status http-replicator
http-replicator.service - HTTP Replicator
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib64/systemd/system/http-replicator.service;
disabled)
Active
Hi all,
Not to revive a flame-fest against systemd, but...
I'm sure some or most of you have already heard about this, but I found
a really decent thread discussing this whole systemd thing. It is only
really comparing systemd and upstart, as that was the debate going on in
the debian TC
Am 15.02.2014 16:16, schrieb Tanstaafl:
Hi all,
Not to revive a flame-fest against systemd, but...
I'm sure some or most of you have already heard about this, but I
found a really decent thread discussing this whole systemd thing. It
is only really comparing systemd and upstart
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 22:22:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Well, running systemd now I can reboot into OpenRC; it just works.
How is this done?
Simply by booting without init=. although some packages have been built
with USE=systemd they still work when booting using openrc. Of course
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
I wouldn't like to be the one who has to write a new installation handbook
for
systemd-only systems! :)
We'll need to rewrote
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:16 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 08:03:11 -0700
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been running systemd for a long time without needing to enable
the dhcpcd service at boot time. Starting with systemd-224 that is no
longer true.
Oops
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I've no idea how tightly bootctl (as gummibot is now called after its
> assimilation in the the systemd collective) is bound to systemd. It may
> well be feasible to create an ebuild that builds bootct
On 12/21/2016 06:59 AM, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> Corbin Bird wrote:
>> The "sys-fs/eudev" package is the Gentoo fork of "sys-fs/udev" for
>> people who don't want systemd.
> Ehm... I still use "sys-fs/udev" (not eudev) without systemd.
>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:50:53 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> >> I'm also a heretic who uses the systemd bootloader no matter what
> >> pid1 is in charge.
> >>
> >> It's the best thing that the systemd developers have produced!
> >
> > Except they didn't
Hi,
since the upgrade from systemd-242-r6 to systemd-243_rc1 I cannot mount
my (external) USB drive any more.
I get
kernel: sd 10:0:0:0: [sde] Assuming drive cache: write through
kernel: sde: sde1 sde2 sde3 sde4 sde5 sde6 sde7
kernel: systemd-udevd[480887]:
Assertion 'key' failed at src
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:19:22 +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> Happened on 2/2 systems tested. You can bring the interface up manually
> if you're at the console.
>
> Error looks like
> systemd-networkd[252]: enp5s0: Could not bring up interface: Invalid
> argument
>
> Loo
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:43:17 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I use the completions a lot to emerge or unmerge various versions
> in the tree and this is no longer working. I use zsh all the time and
> if I hit, for instance emerge -1 \=sys-apps/systemd and hit tab I get
> so
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/14 13:06, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging it; you need to change
your init= line in grub
look like so.
But it does, you can cat with journalctl; it's one of its output
options:
-o, --output=
cat
generates a very terse output only showing the actual
message of each journal entry with no meta data, not even a timestamp.
As I do not have systemd
390990] EXT4-fs (nvme0n1p2): mounted filesystem with ordered data
mode. Opts: (null). Quota mode: none.
[2.391735] VFS: Mounted root (ext4 filesystem) readonly on device 259:2.
[2.392955] devtmpfs: mounted
[ 2.660857] systemd[1]: Condition check resulted in Arbitrary Executable
File
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés caneko at gmail.com writes:
Hi; I've been running systemd in Gentoo since September from 2010, and
it works great for me: all my machines run it at this point.
Well, I'm curious.
How well does
Am 30.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Hinnerk van Bruinehsen:
I've just installed systemd on one of my systems to give it a test and I
had similar problems due to the systemd useflag on policykit being
hardmasked (it also pulled in consolekit because of that).
Since the errors are very similar you may
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-07-31 8:22 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:34:22 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Where is this 'INSTALL_MASK' option for opting out of systemd
completely documented?
man
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:34:35 -0600, Daniel Campbell wrote:
How is putting systemd setting in a profile that a user has to
consciously choose to use forcing anything on anyone? Profiles are
the essence of choice but it appears you only want the choices you
approve of to be available
2016-02-08 20:53 GMT-06:00 James <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com>:
> Hello,
>
> Well I have one system I need to migrate to eudev. All sorts of things are
> now calling for *systemd* and I do not want that at all.
>
> Here is the blockers on the latest list ::
>
> [blocks
Hi. So, after two weeks, I finally got my emerge -e world finished.
Now I was trying my regular world update with --deep, etc., but I get
an impossible situation. It seems openrc is now blocking systemd, but
I apparently need both.
Here is the output from emerge.
* Error: The above package
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 3:56 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Same here, it's been reported on b.g.o and dropping the two patches
> linked to there into /etc/portage/patches/sys-apps/systemd-242-r4/ and
> re-emerging systemd fixed it.
>
Thanks Neil - that fixed both boxes.
For anyon
Dear Dr. Valdés,
As requested the desired output.
tux / # systemctl status systemd-networkd.socket
systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
● systemd-networkd.socket - Network Service Netlink Socket
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.socket;
enabled; vendor preset
On 09/25/2012 02:42 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I just installed and booted with systemd and most services are working
normally, except syslog.service and remote-fs.service. Both of those
failed on bootup with a No such file
Re
20121109171149.1d8a3e18@dartworks.biz20121109171149.1d8a3e18@dartworks.biz509D9C62.9040909@gmail.com509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.sek7k1hn$ce6$1...@ger.gmane.org,
Canek Peláez Valdés said:
Just a word of advice: if you are a normal laptop user, systemd has
replaced most of the functionality
Upgrading to systemd-198 and udev-198 magically enabled me to login via
gdm again.
Nice ...
Stefan
On 2013-03-27 10:33 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going*completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about
Am 15.05.2013 20:27, schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org:
Direct from the Making systemd more accessible to normal users
flamewar on gentoo-dev...
And now that GNOME 3.8 is out, the game starts over again: logind
is a hard requirement, logind is part of systemd, starting logind
(which
in testing as now, or
stable later) requires init=systemd? I am converting an old ~amd64
machine to systemd for practice so that I can convert my main laptop
(also ~amd64) to systemd. The purpose of the conversions is to run
gnome-3.8 and higher. I have other machines running stable. Will I
need
On 09/05/2013 05:43 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
[I will be going to systemd since it is aparently required for
gnome-3.8. I first want to try systemd on a test system so am building
that one up.]
On my main system (currently running openrc) I have masked all of
gnome-3.8. I wonder
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I just did 'emerge -pv digikam' for 3.3.0
it wants to install 54 pkgs, incl systemd ;
10 pkgs are KDE include Marble.
Is my surprise justified ?
Yes, I think it is. Probably gphoto2 pulls GNOME stuff, which
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:04:14 -0600, Daniel Campbell wrote:
Or to create a non-systemd profile :)
For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as
the default.
Quite the opposite, to have a separate systemd profile would mean that
systemd was not the default
On 2014-02-20 10:55 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
while I agree with most everything you said, your primary point -
that it should be the people who *don't* want systemd doing all of
the work
I think I had first misinterpreted the news msg, but want to be sure I
do understand it correctly now.
The message ends with
All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between:
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils'
or
# emerge --oneshot --noreplace '=sys-power
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-09-18, Alec Ten Harmsel a...@alectenharmsel.com wrote:
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am deluded? Who again posted systemd propaganda again?
Point is he's trying to paint the picture that systemd folks rattle on and
on about its speed, but they don't.
except when they do
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:05 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com [14-12-06 21:16]:
Prong (1) includes all issues related to systemd. Probably embedded
experience with systemd is rare, just guessing. Certainly I have none
of that experience. So post to those iotop
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Zitat von Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com:
Lennart claims that the embedded world loves systemd. I suspect that,
as in other corners of the Linux world, there are lovers and haters of
systemd.
Embedded systems also quite
2015-07-20 19:13 GMT-06:00 gottl...@nyu.edu:
I tried via depclean. I wanted to ask here before actually trying
--unmerge, which seems rather brutal. I actually had a tiny part in the
systemd wiki and remember that you could switch from an openrc system to
systemd without unmerging
but I've commented where I would like to have something similar for
> systemd users. Anybody know how to do that?
>
> We can't count on systemd being installed, so we need to...
>
> 1. Test that systemd is installed.
>
> 2. Check if e.g. spamd is running (depends on #1 for th
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Corbin Bird <corbinb...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> On 12/21/2016 06:59 AM, Matthias Hanft wrote:
>> Corbin Bird wrote:
>>> The "sys-fs/eudev" package is the Gentoo fork of "sys-fs/udev" for
>>> people wh
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 10:55:04AM +, Akater wrote
> It looks like systemd scripts often (always?) get installed, regardless
> of USE flag settings.
>
> Why would they? Is this a policy?
>
> E.g., in
>
> cat /usr/portage/net-p2p/transmission/transmission-2.92-r2.e
hanks for the clarification. I checked my three systemd systems and all
are;
# CONFIG_BPF_JIT is not set
systemd ebuild is looking for;
$ grep -i bpf /usr/portage/sys-apps/systemd/systemd-2*
/usr/portage/sys-apps/systemd/systemd-235-r1.ebuild:kernel_is -ge 4
10 && CONFIG_CHECK+="
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:03 PM Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Dear Dr. Valdés,
> I am sorry to tell you that the result still remains the same.
>
That is weird.
I am also not a systemd expert
> but somebody in the mailing list told me, that the "order" of process
> mi
Many thanks Arve,
reemerging sys-apps/hwids with -udev -systemd use flags solved it.
Helmut
On 11/29/2021 04:18:59 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:11, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
>
> Hi
> systemd-249.6-r1 conflicts with sys-apps/hwids[udev]
>
> But when I remo
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have in make.conf USE: ... -systemd
But gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon wants to pull in systemd-208
so I need to emerge sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 and I have installed udev
which conflicts with systemd.
Do I need to unmerge
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, before I go and open up a bug requesting this...
I know there have to be a lot of people on this list who can answer this
question...
Is making the use of systemd or not based on a selected Profile
On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell li...@sporkbox.us wrote:
For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as
the default.
Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant...
This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek
is saying in this last rant
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, it does work (see attached screenshot). I set my root= kernel
command line parameter wrong on purpose, and systemd (inside dracut) dropped
me inside a rescue shell.
Interesting. Perhaps it just enables
Didn't do much research around this lately.
Today I revived my SSD (we'll see) and therefore fell over systemd when
I edited grub.conf
Where would/should I put stuff from /etc/local.d/ with systemd?
I have some commands there setting parameters for ssd-usage and those
would be skipped
Am 20.07.2012 20:50, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
I really don't know, since I don't use LVM. However,
After=remount-rootfs.service, and Before=gdm.service sound like
good candidates.
I have success with:
Requires=systemd-udev-settle.service
After=systemd-udev-settle.service
That service
(replying to list as I assume this could interest and/or help other
users as well)
Peter, Canek, how did you approach syslogs?
systemd brings its own journal (readable via systemd-journalctl, learned
right now) and so it possible to run the box without syslog-ng or similar.
archlinux-wiki
I found the solution a few hours ago here
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#PAM_support:_su.2C_sudo.2C_screen...
. Now everything is fine :)
About the packages you mentioned, you've ran 'equery uses pambase polkit
udisks upower', and none of them has the userflag systemd. Anyway, systemd
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:07 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
title Gentoo Linux 3.7.1 systemd
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/thekernel2 root=/dev/sda1 rootfstype=ext4 init=/bin/systemd
vga=0x31B resume=/dev/sda3 journalctl -b
Why do you have journalctl -b in there? That makes no sense
Am 16.05.2013 00:28, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
systemd 201 is targeted to be stabilized soon:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465870
The LVM issue is mentioned, but it's not yet on the block list.
I didn't read all this thread ... but I still face issues with lvm2
systemd here
101 - 200 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
