On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, 刘洋 amankw...@gmail.com wrote:
journalctl --boot=-1
-- Logs begin at Tuesday 2013-12-24 21:48:33 CST, end at Friday
2014-01-24 22:38:38 CST. --
1月 24 21:54:22 diamond systemd[3061]: Failed to open private bus
connection: Failed to connect to socket
/run/user
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:24:46AM -0600, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote:
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:45 AM, amankw...@gmail.com wrote:
journalctl --boot=-1
-- Logs begin at Tuesday 2013-12-24 21:48:33 CST, end at Friday
2014-01-24 22:38:38 CST. --
1?? 24 21:54:22 diamond systemd[3061
It is marked stable. Otherwise it wouldn't cause blockers because it attempts
to force an installation of systemd.
--
Joost
On 3 June 2014 12:06:26 CEST, Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:48:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been
On 04/06/14 15:58, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than build it
to work independently of the init system), this will in fact result in
*users* (read: those lacking
On Friday 26 Aug 2016 16:13:53 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> > In my search for a suitable boot method, I'm trying Mike G's
> > systemd-boot
> > ebuild. I've installed it with no problem
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:29 AM Raffaele Belardi
wrote:
>
> Yesterday I tried to switch my ~amd64 box from Gnome/systemd to Xfce/openrc.
> I followed
> the wiki [1], [2] to install Xfce from a Gnome terminal:
>
> - switch profile from 17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd to 17.1/deskto
(consolekit ? sys-auth/consolekit[pam])
gnome-base/gnome-control-center-3.6.3-r1 (!systemd ? sys-auth/consolekit)
gnome-base/gnome-session-3.6.2-r1 (!systemd ? sys-auth/consolekit)
gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-3.6.4 (!systemd ? sys-auth/consolekit)
gnome-base/gnome-shell-3.6.2-r1 (!systemd ? sys-auth
--beginning of wiki ]
Sounds reasonable.
[ I asked about /etc/mtab and /proc/self/mounts
If you switch to systemd, you will need to make /etc/mtab a symlink to
/proc/self/mounts.
Done.
After that comes the big one
emerge systemd
USE=... systemd ...
emerge --newuse ... [ a change from
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:13:39 -0600 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
It simply doesn't matter if systemd boils down to one monolithic binary, or
600, if they are tied together in such a way that they can not
*individually* be replaced *easily and simply* (ie, without having to
rewrite the whole
Am 17.09.2014 um 22:58 schrieb Mark David Dumlao:
On Sep 18, 2014 2:37 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com mailto:volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:06 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
This is highly off-topic, and systemd-related, so if you don't want
] gnome-base/gvfs-1.24.2-r1::gentoo USE="cdda http udev
udisks -afp -archive -bluray -fuse -gnome-keyring -gnome-online-accounts
-gphoto2 -gtk -ios -mtp -nfs -samba -systemd {-test} -zeroconf"
[ebuild N ] sys-fs/udisks-2.1.4:2::gentoo USE="gptfdisk
introspection systemd -cr
On 18/03/12 03:45, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/03/12 13:53, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hello, Nikos.
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:25:48AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Happy Computer Users, systemd is on your
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Does anyone use systemd on gentoo, with gnome3?
Would someone share a tarball of /etc/systemd/system with me (off-list)
so I could figure
Am 27.03.2013 15:34, schrieb Michael Mol:
On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely*
away, *totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind
On 23/07/13 09:11, András Csányi wrote:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd
a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally
intended.
not possible, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart, and such
as in, the idea of using logind outside of systemd is a dead end
so keeping ConsoleKit in portage for long
Top-posting because my question is about something in the linked threads...
In one comment was said the following:
Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting out? I
can't support this initiative without such a solution and I would be happy
to work with the systemd
Samuli Suominen wrote:
FUD again. The backwards compability is still all there and udev can be
built standalone and ran standalone.
Sorry I'm going to call bullshit on this one.
You know damn well upstream moved udev into systemd, promising everyone it
would
be possible to continue to build
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
(I brought an old system upto the state of my real one and am trying to
follow the wiki for converting to systemd).
I am upto the part where the wiki says
emerge --ask systemd
I believe the wiki left out unmerging or something
On Mon, Aug 05 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
(I brought an old system upto the state of my real one and am trying to
follow the wiki for converting to systemd).
I am upto the part where the wiki says
emerge --ask systemd
I
for mounting the real root and other partitions, and
handling control over to systemd (or OpenRC, or whatever).
Dracut is able to create an initramfs (with the systemd Dracut module)
that executes systemd inside the initramfs, which mounts /usr,
switches to the real root, and gives control
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
130906 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
I just did 'emerge -pv digikam' for 3.3.0
it wants to install 54 pkgs, incl systemd ;
10 pkgs are KDE
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like
the plague/all the more...
On 2013-09-23 4:21 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 23.09.2013 10:00, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Getting that unit-name right is quite annoying ... fiddling
On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgroups-redesign
Not sure if I read that just right... but since nobody is doing cgroup
management besides systemd, in practice the cgroups
On Sat, Dec 07 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Dec 7, 2013 12:40 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
Just updated my stable amd64 machine to use systemd and all is working
okay except for the lvm.service.
The lvm.service starts with no errors, but OTOH it finds no physical or
logical
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:07:16 -0500, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Switched to systemd and all was well for weeks.
Then failure occurred (non-global ctrl_ifname).
Tried network-manager (NM) with no success.
New.
Canek told
On 02/04/14 18:03, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB sick
(it mounts as root:root) and I can not even change
never used
Xfce,
so I'm not certain.
Do I need to put flag: systemd in make.conf file: USE=...
to enable it globally?
Supposedly, you should enable local flags per package in
/etc/portage/package.use, but many does put it on make.conf.
Either way, if you are using
On 16.02.2014 20:50, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[ ... ]
It's because they are cons only if you agree with systemd's view of the world.
I do.
Isn't there too many if you believe and if you agree? A church of
systemd? ;)
I wonder why all systemd's fancy stuff hasn't yet been integrated
we think differently (regarding this particular
point). The work must be done by *whomever* wants to do the job. So if
the systemd people want to do a profile that's fine (and this already
happened); but if they don't want to, nobody can force them to do it
(this is academic right now, since
On 25/02/2014 14:40, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-24 4:48 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
In Gentoo you need systemd, but that's a decision from the Gentoo
maintainers. They do the job, they make the choices.
Interesting. Now I have to spin off a new thread as to why
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
[snip]
The way systemd services handle network whatever network manager you
enable is the last thing preventing me from using systemd on servers.
Seting up manual advanced setups on systemd looks crappy (if even
On 03/04/2014 17:35, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Douglas J Hunley doug.hun...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm sure this is way more trivial than I'm making it out to be, but how in
the world would one converty /etc/init.d/dmesg to a systemd service file?
Mmmh. Seeing [1
Am 03.05.2014 12:27, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
On 3 May 2014 12:12:09 CEST, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
I see boot problems on two of my machines ... very likely related to
lvm2 as far as I can tell so far.
Downgraded and even disabled systemd, re-emerged stuff ... I am still
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:22 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I have been trying to get systemd to boot, but I have run into
several problems and need some help. I am using everything but /boot as
lvm's, with a separate user partition. I had to copy systemd to /sbin
because the initrd
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[snip]
OK, I will try dracut,
I hope it works with dracut. This is my kernel command line and
RAID/LVM related stuff from GRUB2:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd quiet nosplash
GRUB_PRELOAD_MODULES=lvm mdraid1x
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
[snip]
OK, I will try dracut,
I hope it works with dracut. This is my kernel command line and
RAID/LVM related stuff from GRUB2:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd
is from October 2012 ...
Did you recompile it with the suggested options for systemd?
Maybe it doesn't matter, but just a thought ... that kernel is quite old.
It doesn't matter, at least in theory systemd works with linux-3.0.
John, could you please send the output from dracut --print-cmdline
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 08:31:12 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On Thursday, May 22, 2014 04:54:45 AM cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am having a strange problem running under systemd since Monday.
I use logwatch to get nice summaries
On 03/06/2014 18:48, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more
infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime
it happens is unrealistic?
Weren't you
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Incidentally, what exactly is wrong with systemd writing a dhcp server
client, and an ntp client? Is that project prohibited from
On 06/06/2014 05:34 PM, Gevisz wrote:
After today's emerge-webrsync, I have found out that usual
# emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --ask world
does not work, trying but being unable to emerge systemd.
As I have found out, the reason for it was that upower
suddenly decided
, but by your definition you're
enforced to have thousands of files you never use on your system.
How many man pages do you actually use? How many packages in
/usr/portage do you use?
The systemd units are there so that if you ever do switch to systemd
you don't have to rebuild your entire system to get
.
I am running networkd and I'm very happy with it. Setting it up for
dhcp-only is brain-dead simple, and I have it serving up a bridge for
containers/kvm with fairly little trouble as well.
AFAI understand it the systemd-timedated.service helps setting clock and
time-related settings
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 18:23 +1000, wraeth wrote:
On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 13:31 +0530, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
systemd-nspawn seems to be interesting. But will it work on my i5?
Because I prefer to use -march=native. For using distcc I copied all the
flags that gcc selects in march=native
is going to break sysvinit
if that happens to be the thing you tell Linux to execute as PID 1.
OK, where are your performance studies on how wonderful systemd is?
Simple (2) identical system except for systemd only on one. Run a
wide variety of tests, publish the data.
Publish perfomanced metrics
in this thread that's imposing on everyone
to produce anything. You're the only one in this thread that
SHOULD be producing anything. That's how open source works and
that's how it's supposed to work. We're not your unpaid researchers.
I'm sorry, Volker pointed out that the pro systemd folks came
going to have the resources needed to run
systemd.
You are mistaken.
No, I am not.
I've helped a friend debug problems on a couple devices running a
custom Arch system with systemd.
How does that contradict the statement I made that the systems where
I care about boot times do not have
. At some early point portage suggested that I run --newuse
--update when doing this, but now I am down to the following:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
=sys-apps/systemd-212-r5:0/2[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32
. Leaving root= invalid without adding neither emergency nor
rescue.
If root= is valid, with emergency systemd drops you to a shell with your
root filesystem mounted read-only. With rescue, systemd drops you to a
shell with all your filesystems mounted read-write.
If root= is invalid
Am Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:50:28 -0400
schrieb allan gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu:
Trying to emerge systemd-cron results in the following error
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-process/systemd-cron
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy systemd-cron has unmet requirements
On Tue, Jul 21 2015, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 21:13:19 -0400, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Did you read this part?
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full/Installation#Optional:_Using_systemd
Yes I did and had the systemd wiki page on a chromium tab while
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:00 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am installing gentoo on a new laptop. I am a gnome, hence systemd,
user. I also use lvm (I have / and /usr combined on a non-lvm partition).
At the point where you choose a profile
(//
wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Full
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 01:51:51 +0200 (CEST)
Jeremi Piotrowski <jeremi.piotrow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Just to let you know, most of the python entries were mandated by
> > portage, certainly the
file is still in $DISTDIR, you don't need to do
anything. You could put the file somewhere; personal web space, github
etc, and change the SRC_URI to point to it, but that's not really
necessary.
> > If a serious bug does arise, you then have the choice of trying to
> > persuade someon
ps_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_ppc_32(-)?,abi_ppc_64(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?,static-libs?]
(>=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[abi_x86_32(-),abi_x86_64(-)]) required by
(virtual/libudev-215-r1:0/1::gentoo, installed)
(sys-apps/systemd-226-r2:0/2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled
mistake.
Anyway, I just tried to add my user to group gdm, no change.
>
> Other thing, who is the user UID=32 ?
>
> Why it's him who try to execute systemd ?
It's gdm, by comparison with another system where gdm starts fine it is
normal.
> >
> > "The only special p
IPv6 compiled into systemd is most likely for systemd-networkd. If you're not using that part it shouldn't be a problem. If you're using systemd-networkd, you can configure it to not do IPv6.But, I would recommend configuring your system to not use IPv6 instead of removing support. That should
kernel with openRC support and install
> > 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager
> > 3. emerge -C systemd
> > 4. change profile to generic desktop (non-Gnome)
> > 5. emerge -N lxde-meta
> > 6. emerge -N xdm openrc anacron sysklogd sysvinit
> > 7. reboot
> >
On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017, 22:29:59 CET schrieb allan gottlieb:
>> On Wed, Nov 29 2017, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> [...]
>> >> Both 6430 and 7450 have the following content in
>> >> /etc/portage/package.use/systemd-cr
merge
>python-3.5.4 [ebuild NS]
>many to reinstall [ebuild R]
>
> This was not surprising.
>
> The other system (dell 7450) failed with the following
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-process/systemd-cron from @selected
> ... done!
>
> !!!
]
This was not surprising.
The other system (dell 7450) failed with the following
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for sys-process/systemd-cron from @selected
... done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sys-process/systemd-cron" has unmet
requirements.
- sys-process/systemd-cron-1.5.4::
Hello.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:01:29 -0600, J García wrote:
> 2017-12-11 15:03 GMT-06:00 Alan Mackenzie <a...@muc.de>:
> > OK. But it's still there taking up RAM, and (more importantly) makes a
> > systemd system a broader target for attacks. Whether a system h
/etc/overriding those it /usr. It saves cluttering up /etc with tons
of default settings.
However, with both openrc and systemd you don't need to trawl the
filesystems to find the settings, using the provided tools, rc-update and
systemctl in this case, is both preferred and simpler.
One of the bene
0, John Covici wrote:
> > >
> > > > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd-coredump[5334]: Process
> > > > 5332 (umount.davfs) of user 0 dumped core.
> > > > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]:
> > > > systemd-coredump@0-5333-0.serv
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:14:13 -0400
John Covici wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 03:20:25 -0400,
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:41:41 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> >
> > > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd-coredump[5334]: Proc
0, John Covici wrote:
> > >
> > > > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd-coredump[5334]: Process
> > > > 5332 (umount.davfs) of user 0 dumped core.
> > > > Apr 17 18:39:55 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]:
> > > > systemd-coredump@0-5333-0.serv
ortunately, they have been resolved by recompiling the kernel
(5.2.0),
systemd and all packages depending on systemd - using the new
gcc-9.2.0
Furthermore I had to add the use flags
cgroup-hybrid -sysv-utils
for systemd. This hasn't been necessary before - very strange.
For me, systemd is a monst
;>
> >> I had a problem with docker on gentoo and found the solution for
> >> all my
> >>
> >> problems with a custom mount command:
> >> |sudo mount -t cgroup -o none,name=systemd cgroup
> >> /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd
> >>
> >> Can a
of the gnome maintainers on Gentoo.
It looks like Gnome is integrating with systemd via xdg and a new
systemd generator to have systemd automatically launch some services
based on events. If I had to take a wild guess some of these services
are managed by systemd, and others are not, and syst
me so I can't
> really be sure. You might do well to ask on a Gnome mailing list, or
> maybe ping one of the gnome maintainers on Gentoo.
>
> It looks like Gnome is integrating with systemd via xdg and a new
> systemd generator to have systemd automatically launch some services
>
local services and then here are the last few lines, which may be
> relevant or not:
>
> Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]: Starting local.service...
> Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.com systemd[1]: Starting
> systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service...
> Feb 14 06:36:31 ccs.covici.
ice, i get this :
> > apache2.service: start operation timed out. Terminating.
>
> It is missing something, can't connect to the IP/port it needs, or there's
> a
> file missing. What is the output of:
>
> 'systemctl -l status apache2'
>
>
apache2.service - The Apac
and collide. "emerge --info" is showing the
split-usr flag enabled on my profile (5):
[5] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop (stable)
[6] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome (stable)
[7] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd (stable)
[8] default/linux/amd64/17.1/des
and collide. "emerge --info" is showing the
split-usr flag enabled on my profile (5):
[5] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop (stable)
[6] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome (stable)
[7] default/linux/amd64/17.1/desktop/gnome/systemd (stable)
[8] default/linux/amd64/17.1/des
Hi; I've been running systemd in Gentoo since September from 2010, and
it works great for me: all my machines run it at this point. Right
now, we are getting really close to the point where we will be able to
uninstall sys-apps/openrc, sys-apps/sysvinit and sys-apps/baselayout,
and run a systemd
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz wrote:
Re
509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.se509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.sek7k1hn$ce6$1...@ger.gmane.org,
Dale said:
I don't worry about boot up times much either. Here is why:
I was thinking of converting to systemd on my Gentoo laptop
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Nuno Silva nunojsi...@ist.utl.pt wrote:
On 2013-03-22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
do you know some guide to switch form systemd to openrc, or keep both? I
googled and I didn't find
greetings ...
for some days now I fiddle around with an issue on my ~amd64 thinkpad.
Whether with gdm nor with xdm I am able to log in to gnome3 anymore.
This box runs systemd which adds some possibilities to the picture ;-)
The system is rather up-to-date ... I rebuilt stuff like
pam*
all
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/07/2013 19:56, Stroller wrote:
On 31 July 2013, at 18:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
Whinging about systemd binaries being installed is valid, but whinging
about some data files is not. Anyone who does
removed, and Lennart Poettering wants udev on
non-systemd systems dropped. Add those two items together, and we get
systemd rammed down our throats...
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html
(Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case
systemd, in practice the cgroups implementation in
Linux wasn't very consistent. So since systemd is doing it, their work
is helping shape the kernel's cgroups api?
Interesting...
From my perspective it looks like systemd developers are trying to push
their ideas into the kernel, almost like
?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Yes, that is correct. This is a old box and in fstab all line have
hda...
CONFIG_IDE is deprecated in the kernel and systemd/udev requires it to
be unset. It's possible that you disabled it, and then you now have
sda
On Sunday 16 Feb 2014 19:00:43 Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
On 16.02.2014 20:50, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
[ ... ]
It's because they are cons only if you agree with systemd's view of the
world.
I do.
Isn't there too many if you believe and if you agree? A church of
systemd? ;)
I
-power/upower; the MATE in the portage tree doesn't do this as it
allows upower-pm-utils to satisfy this, I think this has also been
fixed up in the MATE overlay recently which a sync could solve.
[blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration
(sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration is blocking
On 09/23/2014 07:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might
see some useful error messages. But when systemd-journal started up
again the journal file was back in /var/log
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:40 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/23/2014 07:46 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:27 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I used systemctl to stop and restart systemd-journald, thinking I might
see some useful error messages. But when systemd
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:03:04PM +1100, wra...@wraeth.id.au wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
snip
systemd. Maybe i could adopt that to my custom one as well.
/snip
Working
On 11/21/14 07:31, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Am 21.11.2014 um 08:17 schrieb Paige Thompson:
I just read an article that says systemd is taking over linux and linux
is not linux anymore:
http://blog.lusis.org/blog/2014/11/20/systemd-redux/
I kinda have to agree which is partially why I'm not using
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:12 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Ok
So I'm reading about systemd support in ebuilds; just trying to
understand the beast wee bit better.
In in this ebuild: www-misc/monitorix (A lightweight system monitoring
tool)f
the newest version has added
Am Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:41:50 +0100
schrieb lee l...@yagibdah.de:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk writes:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:49:54 +0100, lee wrote:
I wonder if the OP is using systemd and trying to read the journal
files?
Nooo, I hate systemd ...
What good are log
Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:41:50 +0100
schrieb lee l...@yagibdah.de:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk writes:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:49:54 +0100, lee wrote:
I wonder if the OP is using systemd and trying to read the journal
files?
Nooo
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
If packages that don't need systemd as a hard dependency or are
installed with USE=-systemd write anything which is important for them
or could break them even without systemd into one of those systemd
directories which I
On Mon, Jul 20 2015, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:02 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18 2015, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:00 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am installing gentoo on a new laptop. I am a gnome, hence systemd,
user
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:02 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18 2015, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:00 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I am installing gentoo on a new laptop. I am a gnome, hence systemd,
user. I also use lvm (I have / and /usr combined
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/4/20 12:02 PM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> So basically, that package would have to start over from scratch to be
>> fixed. That's not very likely if history means anything.
>>
>
> I think the opentmpfiles devs are planning to copy/pa
On 2020-10-09, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I'd say you're better off using a UEFI boot manager. If you use systemd,
> add the boot USE flag to get its boot manager, formerly gummiboot. If you
> don't use systemd you can install the boot manager on its own as
> systemd-boot. Or try
After updating to rsyslog 8.2008.0, I discovered that the systemd
service file no longer existed.
Upstream removed it from their tarball:
- 2020-08-12: systemd service file removed from project
This was done as distros nowadays have very different service files and it no
longer is useful
mentioned
systemd-tmpfiles as a alternative that doesn't have the same security
problems.
There's a full explanation here:
http://michael.orlitzky.com/cves/cve-2017-18925.xhtml
I'm a champion systemd hater, but you should switch to systemd-tmpfiles.
There's no downside other than the name.
On Friday, 5 February 2021 03:34:12 GMT Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 01:06 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > The plex-server ebuild appears to require systemd, but it isn't listed
> > > as a dependency. Am I missing something?
> >
>
901 - 1000 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
