Hi,
I'm having some problems with a simple OpenGL program (as described
here: http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-464101.html) which is
supposed to render a small red sphere inside a larger wireframe one.
It seems that when I switch the order of the OpenGL calls to render
them it renders the
Hello pls any talk spanish?Buenas tardes , tengo una mac powerpc 7300/200 estoy tratando de instalar gentoo con el cd universal 2006, bootee con el Xboot pues he configurado mi red todo ok hasta ahi, despues de eso deseo crear mis particiones con mac-fdisk pero tengo un error a la hora de crear ,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 07:48:30 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Has the additional advantage, that it lists all new and updates
packages, when the sync is finished.
You don't know eix, do you? Because, what you list here as an
advantage is no advantage, as eix does the same.
Also, unless this
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:21:42 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
I didn't even have to edit /boot/grub/menu.lst!
Are you sure you're running it if you didn't have to edit grub? Does
`uname -r` agree with the new version you just installed?
make install symlinks the new kernel to vmlinuz and the
Hello.
New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called kdehiddenvisibility, which
is described as:
[-] kdehiddenvisibility - Makes KDE symbols hidden by default, requires GCC
4.1 (experimental)
Well, this doesn't tell me much. What would I get, if I'd enable this
flag? Where can I read more
Hello!
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
Alexander Skwar
--
Life is like an egg stain on your chin -- you can lick it, but it still
won't go away.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and contribute to
the portage project... at least
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
I don't think so.
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060522-newsletter.xml
| To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
| that is required is to upgrade
Hello!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ hostname -d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /etc/conf.d/domainname
# /etc/conf.d/domainname
# When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
# If you wish to always override DHCP/whatever, set this to 1.
OVERRIDE=1
# To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility should tell you all you need to know about
the new symbol visibility features of gcc.
On Friday, 26 May 2006 17:12, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello.
New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called kdehiddenvisibility, which
is described as:
[-]
oops there was a little typo:
$ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86 /etc/portage/package.use
should be:
$ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 26 May 2006 10:09, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ hostname -d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cat /etc/conf.d/domainname
# /etc/conf.d/domainname
# When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
# If you wish to always override DHCP/whatever, set this to 1.
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:09:27 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
# To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup /etc/hosts
and /etc/resolv.conf # properly (domain entry in /etc/resolv.conf, and
FQDN in /etc/hosts).
What do these files contain?
--
Neil Bothwick
UNIX is the OS of the future and
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New KDE ebuilds feature a USE flag called kdehiddenvisibility, which
is described as:
[-] kdehiddenvisibility - Makes KDE symbols hidden by default, requires
GCC 4.1 (experimental)
Well, this doesn't tell me much. What would I get, if I'd
Now I remember. It just sort of hit me all at once. I had to re-emerge
all this:
1137403163: Started emerge on: Jan 16, 2006 03:19:23
1137403163: *** emerge --verbose gnome-icon-theme
evolution-data-server hicolor-icon-theme miscfiles gconfmm madplay
libglade gnome-vfsmm gnome-vfs
Hello. In an office we helped set up, there are a lot of X terminals for the
clerks. (These X terminals are the old computers from school's lab,
installed simple Gentoo Linux only to start X). Now they need VIOP, is it
possible? I mean, is it possible the clerks use VOIP on X terminals, when
the
:
# emerge-webrsync -v
Fetching most recent snapshot
Attempting to fetch file dated: 20060526
--11:10:45--
http://www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/snapshots/portage-20060526.tar.bz2.md5sum
=
`/var/tmp/emerge-webrsync/portage-20060526.tar.bz2.md5sum'
Resolving www.mirror.ac.uk
Hi,
Currently i don't have a X-enabled hardened system (only a router).
Would suggest at least two/three ways to check things.
1.start mozilla from a console, check/post error logs;
2.use 'strace' to start mozilla, post strace logs.
I already wrote about these two; no errors appear in
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility should tell you all you need to know about
the new symbol visibility features of gcc.
It tell's me more than I want to know :)
Thanks for the pointer!
Alexander Skwar
--
The Bible is not my Book and Christianity is not my
Graham Murray wrote:
One thing to note is that if you want to use kdehiddenvisibility then
you will have to re-emerge qt-3.3.6-r1 before rebuilding KDE as the
KDE builds (upstream) will disable hidden visibility unless qt
was built with the hidden visibility patch which is only applied when
Bo Andresen wrote:
Hi
I am having problems with the elog mail module failing to send mail due to the
following error:
!!! An error occured while trying to send logmail:\n{'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
(504, 'portage: Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address')}
I am using my ISP's SMTP
Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
# cat /etc/hosts
Changing:
10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
to:
10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
has just solved this issue for me. :) Thanks!
Don't know whether dhcp
Friday 26 May 2006 12:03 skrev Alexander Skwar:
I'm using ssmtp and thus also have this problem. Is there any
solution, which does NOT require patching portage, like suggested
in the above mentioned bug?
As I have stated to the bug report this issue was solved for me with portage
2.1_pre9-r4.
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:07 +0800, fei huang wrote:
On 5/26/06, Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:04 +0800, fei huang wrote:
I have seen wierd problems with binary packages.
Have you
tried
I am running Blackbox with an rxvt terminal open.
If I su to root I get the following error msgs.
configuration error - unknown item 'FAILLOG_ENAB' (notify
administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'LASTLOG_ENAB' (notify
administrator)
configuration error - unknown item 'MOTD_FILE'
Alex wrote:
Now I'm emerging -e world with -Os. When it is finished, I'll mail you
the results.
Hi,
now I have a -Os-system and it isn't faster. So now I'll emerge the
whole system again, but with -O3.
Alex
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
# cat /etc/hosts
Changing:
10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
to:
10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
has just solved this issue for me. :)
Arnau Bria wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 08:28:49 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make install symlinks the new kernel to vmlinuz and the previous one
to vmlinuz.old. If grub.conf uses these names, you never need to edit
it when installing a new kernel.
Does it control if my /boot
Christian Limberg wrote:
just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
*removing* gcc-3.4?
That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
So, all the packages compiled with gcc-3.4 will
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:14 +0200 Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. You don't need to have gcc installed to be able to
run a *compiled* program.
but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java programs
On Fri, 26 May 2006 17:12:20 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java programs should
continue to run. So quickpkging the old GCC is probably not a bad
idea until revdep-rebuild took
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:48:47 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I'd like portage to use /usr/sbin/sendmail (and thus ssmtp, nbsmtp
or what not) to send out mails, instead of having it try to connect
to some SMTP server.
You can use PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND to call any command
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/22/06, Anthony E. Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Richard. Those steps did the trick. And the author's
correction fixed the problem also.
Cool. If upstream is going to apply the patch to a future release
that may be some weeks off, you might consider
On Friday 26 May 2006 07:48, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 04:12, Lord Sauron wrote:
sorry for my sin. I didn't know about eix.
On 5/25/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 01:00 skrev Lord Sauron:
If it's
On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 10:46 skrev Etaoin Shrdlu:
I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
# cat /etc/hosts
Changing:
10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
to:
10.0.0.10
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofilefriendid=36939781
xorg shuts down immediatly direct access to the box via the terminal is
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
--
Bo Andresen
pgpsWVltWa7BV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 5/25/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 18:20 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
Anyway, the OP is using genkernel (wether it likes/knows it or not)...
This doesn't look like genkernel:
It doesn't have to
On 5/26/06, leszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but what is RSYNC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync
basically, portage use rsync to update the information on packages
(ebuilds) in /usr/portage (with emerge --sync)
If anything, this is a indicator that I need to try and
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:27 +0400, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofilefriendid=36939781
xorg shuts
On 26 May 2006 15:01, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Christian Limberg wrote:
just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
*removing* gcc-3.4?
That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
So,
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 12:48:47 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
I'd like portage to use /usr/sbin/sendmail (and thus ssmtp, nbsmtp
or what not) to send out mails, instead of having it try to connect
to some SMTP server.
You can use PORTAGE_ELOG_COMMAND
Zac Slade wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
But I wonder what this DNSDOMAIN setting in /etc/conf.d/domainname is
supposed to do. Because of
It sets the domain in /etc/resolv.conf
No, it doesn't.
# When setting up resolv.conf, what should take precedence?
# If
* Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-05-22 16:46]:
Hello.
From time to time, I'm looking for a *not* installed package, which
might provide a certain file. Say, I'd like to know, which packages
could provide /etc/foo/bar, how would I do that? Are there any sites
out there, which provide a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JimD wrote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
It uses wine, in any case. But the interesting things lies in
http://code.google.com - There are
lots of patches they've provided to wine
JimD a gentiment tapote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
^
^^^
^
( 0 0 )
I solved it setting X11forwarding to true, so now it goes all right !!!
Thanks !!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/26/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Yay!
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
JimD
Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol
Milky Way galaxy, Orion
On 5/26/06, Ptitjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JimD a gentiment tapote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
Worked just fine for me...
--
== GCv3.12 ==
GCS d-(++) s+: a? C++ UL+ P+
From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
On Saturday, 27 May 2006 4:10, Lord Sauron wrote:
On 5/26/06, Ptitjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JimD a gentiment tapote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
Lord Sauron a gentiment tapote:
On 5/26/06, Ptitjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JimD a gentiment tapote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Jim
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
Worked just fine for me...
Yes, now it works !
-
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only
eseatab ;)
--
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 19:40:02 +0200
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zac Slade wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 08:25, Alexander Skwar wrote:
But I wonder what this DNSDOMAIN setting in /etc/conf.d/domainname is
supposed to do. Because of
It sets the domain in /etc/resolv.conf
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote:
you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many
improvements: $ echo sys-apps/portage ~x86
/etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage
Just a question, but there's got to be a reason why it's still in ~x86.
Yes, it's less
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:30:22 +0930, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
Worked here from the UK.
--
Neil Bothwick
One world, one web, one program -- Microsoft promotional ad
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer -- Adolf Hitler
signature.asc
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
I am using search less, than syncing, so still a win, and it is only
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 04:30:22 +0930, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
From what I understand it is only accessible from the US.
Worked here from the UK.
Works also from Germany.
It would be interesting to find out, from where Raymond got his
understanding.
Alexander Skwar
I saw a few reports on /. and digg that it was only accessible from within the
US. It may have been a temporary issue that was resolved or perhaps there was
no issue and it was simply user error.
On Saturday, 27 May 2006 5:14, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
I saw a few reports on /. and digg that it was only accessible from within
the
US. It may have been a temporary issue that was resolved or perhaps there was
no issue and it was simply user error.
On Saturday, 27 May 2006 5:14, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Neil
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:24 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is
Roman Zilka wrote:
Now I remember. It just sort of hit me all at once. I had to re-emerge
all this:
1137403163: Started emerge on: Jan 16, 2006 03:19:23
1137403163: *** emerge --verbose gnome-icon-theme
evolution-data-server hicolor-icon-theme miscfiles gconfmm madplay
libglade
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/faq.h tml
ain and it workedJimD a gentiment tapote:
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/
On 5/26/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ptitjack wrote:
Hi,
404 Error Not found !
- Ptitjack -
Your not in the USA. It is blocked by Google for non-US people right
now. However you can work around that by using NYU proxy:
http://picasa.google.com.nyud.net:8080/linux/
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
using gcc-config.
Wrong. An emerge -e world
On Friday 26 May 2006 21:28, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 18:13, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Friday 26 May 2006 17:51 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
ok, but still less to type ;)
But esearch is more than twice as long as eix... ;)
I am using
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofilefriendid=36939781
xorg shuts down immediatly direct access to the box via the terminal is
On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:25:53 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
alias es=eix-sync cuts it down to two, for anyone sad enough to care...
or you could run it from cron.
BTW how many characters have you typed in your emails to make the point
I have seen it seems to need its own version of Wine to work.
I guess it keeps its Wine separated from my own Wine, but I'd like to
ask before hosing my Wine installation...
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/26/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is official.
http://picasa.google.com/linux/
It installs and runs well with Gentoo.
Gentoo on the x86 arch you mean. It's a shame they released a binary
only version, especially one using a Wine wrapper around the original
Windows application.
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofilefriendid=36939781
xorg
On Saturday 27 May 2006 00:43, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 00:25:53 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;)
alias es=eix-sync cuts it down to two, for anyone sad enough to care...
or you could run it from cron.
BTW how many
Neil Bothwick neil at digimed.co.uk writes:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:09:27 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
# To have a proper FQDN, you need to setup /etc/hosts
and /etc/resolv.conf # properly (domain entry in /etc/resolv.conf, and
FQDN in /etc/hosts).
What do these files contain?
Holas,
Two days ago I updated the nvidia drivers, so I killed gdm and restarted xdm
to reload the newer modules.
Problem is, it looks like xdm never restarted.
root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm status
* status: stopping
root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm stop
* ERROR: xdm is already stopping.
rc-status
Hello,
I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks to
someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
which had dragged in the java IDE which dragged in x11.
That worked wonderfully, and I removed x11 and thought I was done.
As a
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:04 -0700, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote:
recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with
mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in combination with xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7. After
visiting
On 5/25/06, znx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This _does_ help.It's mysterious enough that I tested it, and it seems to work except that it removes . from any path.This is not quite what I want.Glad it was almost a success ;) Interesting, thats not something I
noticed before, I have never wished . in
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks
to
someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
which had dragged in the java IDE which dragged in x11.
That worked wonderfully,
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to remove any dependencies on x11 from my headless server. Thanks
to
someone's help last week, I learned how to configure libdb to not use java,
which had dragged in the java IDE
Etaoin Shrdlu shrdlu at unlimitedmail.org writes:
I seem to remember that this was somehow related to /etc/hosts, look:
# cat /etc/hosts
10.0.0.10 mybox mybox.my.domain
# hostname -d
#
# (modify /etc/hosts)
# cat /etc/hosts
10.0.0.10 mybox.my.domain mybox
# hostname -d
On 5/25/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Somewhere along the line, ssh and ssh2 have gotten conflated, confused or just downright broken.I have been running ssh daemon(s) for so long I
don't even remember how I set them up.They Just Ran
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have included that in my original email, of course:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v ^#
USE=berkdb innodb
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
$ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults
USE=alsa apm arts avi bitmap-fonts cups
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
such a k3b, that were compiled against the old libraries. Right?
Using
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have included that in my original email, of course:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v ^#
USE=berkdb innodb
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
$ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults
USE=alsa apm arts avi
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
Steven Susbauer wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have included that in my original email, of course:
$ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v ^#
USE=berkdb innodb
I have no /usr/portage/package.use
Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to recompile all non-kde but related apps,
such a k3b, that were compiled against the old
On 5/26/06, Kevin O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/25/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On May 25, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: Somewhere along the line, ssh and ssh2 have gotten conflated, confused or just downright broken.I have been running ssh daemon(s) for so long I
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to
it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem,
but I think I will then have to
89 matches
Mail list logo
