On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
From what I know for sure, many people in different countries
supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that
this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can easily be
repeated anywhere. And the point of
On 1/19/2012 01:27 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good.
Agreed.
Chris
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 120118-1, 01/18/2012
Tested on: 1/19/2012 5:30:31
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing.
--
- Yohan Pereira
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:11:24 +0530
Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 08:27:20 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Humanity starts things and continues things. This is good.
Governments stop things. This is only sometimes good
im fairly certain it was humanity that
On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment thing.
True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own - I am
pretty certain that most government officials are from another planet.
Besides, isn't it up to
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:03:29 -0500
Chris Walters cjw20...@comcast.net wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:41 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
im fairly certain it was humanity that started this whole goverment
thing.
True. Once started, though, governments tend to evolve on their own
- I am pretty certain
On 1/19/2012 06:58 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
If by fix you mean wage war on and shoot, then yes :-)
It seems like that is the only method humanity uses to fix it's
governments that go toxic - witness the last year's events in that part
of the world that has lots of desert
By fix I mean
How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts?
For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1,
but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can
access it by name.
Similarly, how do you enter an ipv6 link-local address in Firefox or
Opera?
Grant Edwards wrote:
How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts?
For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1,
but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can
access it by name.
Tried several different approaches, can't get any
I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but
every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache...
Does anyone know of a decent tutorial written specifically to those who
have an ok (but not hugely in-depth) understanding of IPv4, and doesn't
get bogged down in
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts?
For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1,
but I can't figure out how to put that address in /etc/hosts so I can
access it by
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but
every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache...
Does anyone know of a decent tutorial written specifically to those who have
an ok (but
AFAIK, link-local addresses shall not be used for usual services like
HTTP. They are only for neighbour discovery, local multicasts (all local
NTP servers, all local DHCP servers, and so on) or pinging.
It is possible (by specifying %interface) to access them, but this
remains unimplemented in
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in /etc/hosts?
For example, I can ping/telnet/ssh to fe80::02c0:4eff:fe07:0005%eth1,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Felix Kuperjans
fe...@desaster-games.com wrote:
AFAIK, link-local addresses shall not be used for usual services like
HTTP. They are only for neighbour discovery, local multicasts (all local
NTP servers, all local DHCP servers, and so on) or pinging.
In a
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you specify a link-local ipv6 address in
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Grant Edwards
On 1/19/2012 05:29 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 01:44 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
From what I know for sure, many people in different countries
supported the opposition to these bills because they understand that
this is not just a US problem. If it happens there, it can
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your mail, then I could write you encrypted. :)
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your mail, then I could
Dear All,
I'm totally lost in settings especially fonts and Netbeans!
So, I'm using Netbeans to develop my java things. Version 7.0.1. looks
beautiful because it uses Ubuntu fonts. As far as I know Netbeans gets
this font information, I'm speaking about the window fonts and not
about the editor
On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:09 -0800
Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
In man emerge I read:
--changed-use
Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have
changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective
option. Unlike --newuse, the
On 19 January 2012 13:30, »Q« boxc...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:07:09 -0800
Hilco Wijbenga hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
In man emerge I read:
--changed-use
Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have
changed since installation. This option also
On 2012-01-19, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. Other reasons to avoid using LL addresses unless necessary:
What if the MAC address on the server changes?
It won't. It's an embedded device with a hard-wired MAC that the user
can't change.
What if your network grows to have
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I want to test some things OFF LIST.
Well, if you had signed your
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
In man emerge I read:
--changed-use
Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have
changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective
option. Unlike --newuse, the --changed-use option does not trigger
reinstallation
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but
every time I start rading about IPv6 I get a headache...
Does anyone know of a decent
Hi,
can anybody tell me, what font is used by gitview in the diff pane and how
to configure it? I did not use gitview for some time and cannot say, when
this started, but currently I get some kind of strange script font that is
hardly readable. I am normally working in a KDE4 environment.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt and decrypt emails? I
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set
up to encrypt and decrypt
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired key to
sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and expired
key to
sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-01-19, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed. Other reasons to avoid using LL addresses unless necessary:
What if the MAC address on the server changes?
It won't. It's an embedded device with a
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but
every time I start
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single
private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your
bank). I feel very confident saying no known way as cracking that
puzzle has been the Holy Grail of
Paul Hartman wrote:
There are basically 2 things PGP/GPG normally does for emails: signing
and encrypting. They are not mutually exclusive.
Signing (like you see on a lot of messages on this list, for example)
is about the person who SENT the message. It lets you verify that the
person
On 19 January 2012 14:28, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
In man emerge I read:
--changed-use
Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have
changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective
option. Unlike --newuse,
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 22:44:12 Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
I have a question now. I got a message from Paul Hartman and replied to
it, off list, and it was encrypted and I hope my reply was too. My
question is this. How do you make a email that only the
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:04:11 -0600 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email
set up to
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
I have a reasonable grasp of how to use IP addresses etc with IPv4, but
every time I start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 05:04 PM, Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
This is a test. Enigmail has been trying to use a revoked and
expired key to sign my messages, lately.
Chris
I have a question now. I got a message from
On 1/19/2012 06:00 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:42:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There's no known way to decrypt a mail like that without the single
private key needed (this works exactly like https traffic to your
bank). I feel very confident saying no known way as
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Dale
:-) :-)
- --
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood
or how you interpreted my
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Well, I get this on top of your message:
Error - No valid armored OpenPGP data block found
What's wrong with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
When he quoted your message, he
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 14:28, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
In man emerge I read:
--changed-use
Tells emerge to include installed packages where USE flags have
changed since installation. This option also implies the --selective
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but
people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check
with a picture ID that matches. :/
Better than that.
Readers (all that have access
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 15:48:32 Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
I have a
On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do?
-N == --newuse not --changed-use :-)
It's exactly for this reason that I use --changed-use and not
--newuse. See the man page for the details.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:28:04 -0500, Chris Walters wrote:
I feel very confident saying no known way as cracking that
puzzle has been the Holy Grail of maths prizes for 40 years and
no-one has announced success. Seeing as mathematicians are a vain
lot, and the one that accomplishes this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/19/2012 07:27 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:28:04 -0500, Chris Walters wrote:
Possible, but not too likely*. RSA keys are based on two very large
prime numbers and their composite. The two primes are hundreds of
digits
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Well, I get this on top of your message:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Chris Walters cjw20...@comcast.net wrote:
On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 06:55 PM, Dale wrote:
Matthew Finkel wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mud is clearing up a bit.
Excellent! Lookin good!
When he quoted your message, he included part of your
Mick wrote:
On Thursday 19 Jan 2012 23:20:44 Dale wrote:
Chris Walters wrote:
I'm starting to see this now. When I sign a message, it is public but
people are assured that it came from me. Sort of like having a check
with a picture ID that matches. :/
Better than that.
Readers (all
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:36:56 -0500, Chris Walters wrote:
GCHQ, as mentioned above :)
GCHQ, eh? What does that stand for, or is that a State secret? Like
the NSA = No Such Agency...
Going back to the start of this thread, Wikipedia's back on so you can
look it up :P
It's Government
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do?
-N == --newuse not --changed-use :-)
It's exactly for this reason that I use --changed-use and not
--newuse. See the man page for the
On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do?
-N == --newuse not --changed-use :-)
It's exactly for this reason that I use
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do?
-N == --newuse not --changed-use :-)
It's exactly for
On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have mine set up to sign them all. I did a couple to see if it
worked or not. Whenever I sign a message, it asks for the password. It
is quite a long password and I don't want to type it in every time I
send something.
On 19 January 2012 19:25, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 17:38, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 19 January 2012 16:05, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, the USE flag got changed. Isn't that what -N is supposed to do?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/19/2012 08:26 PM, Dale wrote:
Ohhh, great, something is to make sure to fix when quoting. O_O
You live in the USA? If yes, mind a off list question?
Dale
:-) :-)
Yes I do live in the USA, and no I don't mind an off-list question.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 01:22:50PM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:32 AM, Chris Walters wrote:
On 1/19/2012 11:57 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:07AM -0600, Dale wrote:
While on this subject, sort of. Who on here as their email set up to
encrypt
64 matches
Mail list logo
