Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-23 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote: First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed. It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to resolved might be

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:52:39 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: The comments there say that if you run etc-update right after the emerge all is well (but this isn't sufficient for people who use screen, detatch, and log out). Someone also mentioned dispatch-conf working. No one mentioned

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-22 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Sun, Apr 22 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 03:52:39 +0200, Alex Schuster wrote: The comments there say that if you run etc-update right after the emerge all is well (but this isn't sufficient for people who use screen, detatch, and log out). Someone also mentioned

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-22 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote: First, thanks for the fix, hopefully not needed. It appears that the bug is in conf-update and not shadow so the rather brusque changing of the status of the shadow bug to resolved might be appropriate. But it would have been nice

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-21 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what happens. What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause. conf-update reported only trivial

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-21 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote: On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what happens. What happened is it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-21 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Sat, Apr 21 2012, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote: There is a bug filed https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412721 Am I correct in believing the safe procedure is to add =sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 =sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5. to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-21 Thread Alex Schuster
Hinnerk van Bruinehsen writes: On 21.04.2012 17:30, Allan Gottlieb wrote: On Fri, Apr 20 2012, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: [...] What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause. conf-update reported only trivial

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-20 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Before etc-update severaly login-related things didn't work for me (su not possible for example). After running etc-update everything seems to work fine for me (e.g. selinux and gnome3). I must confess that I didn't use sshd on my laptop so I can't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:12:55 -0700, walt wrote: That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded, did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you run it after the original upgrade? No, no and no. Just to confirm, are you saying that you did *not* run

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:56:48 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what happens. What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause. conf-update reported only trivial changes to three files. % su su: Authentication failure

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:22:20 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: I'll run the update again today, paying more attention, and see what happens. What happened is it broke again, with no obvious signs of the cause. conf-update reported only trivial changes to three files. I've just tried it on my

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:57:45 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Good thing I don't have pambase installed :-P This is a recent build, so I thought I'd come out of the stone age and try using pam. That cave looks rather inviting right now... -- Neil Bothwick - We are but packets in the internet

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:58:42 -0700, walt wrote: I upgraded to sys-auth/pambase-20120417 and sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1 and found I couldn't login to a new session or use su. Rebooting only made the problem permanent, I had to SSH in to revert to sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pambase/shadow warning

2012-04-19 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:39:25 -0700, walt wrote: That would have failed on su. It works because I have key authentication for SSH. Otherwise I'd have been screwed. That seems like a (possibly) helpful clue. When you downgraded, did you do etc-update again, or were you asked to? Did you