about it, with links
to cometary by yours truly, on the inetbib archive.
https://www.inetbib.de/listenarchiv/msg67546.html
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomask
mstances surrounding its production
* some initial conditions
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing li
, to address this issue. It's an expertise-sharing
system powered by human selectors who are aided by sophisticated use
of machine learning.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
gained from doing but also
from storing, organising, and reviewing it. Libraries ought to have
pressed that case a long time ago.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:t
Ec. It's
work funded with a 3000 Euro grant by the French central bank
foundation for economic research.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
is repository based
infrastructure. That's why the first mandate failed. The resources
available for repositories were a pittance compared to what the
proprietary publishers got, so the repositories could not compete.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
ee things: zilch, nada, and sweet fa.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
tter.
I'm not closely following Plan S but I tend to agree. Open access
has the risk of making commercial intermediation even more expensive
than toll-gated access ever was.
> We are continuing to actively work against efforts to return control of
> publishing to the academic community
ng OA more expensive than subscriptions.
But I am not worried yet, because Plan S would only cover funded
research, and it calls for a cap.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
__
spent building open access tools and/or
data.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.or
Jean-Gabriel Bankier writes
> I am thrilled
Is anybody else thrilled?
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
G
ers up at the MPRA
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/
And get in touch with re...@repec.org if you want to sponsor us.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
al repositories.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
Stevan Harnad writes
> 1. Actually, no one really knows why it is taking so long to reach the
> optimal and inevitable outcome -- universal OA --
oh I know. It's because libraries are spending money on subscriptions.
And as long as they do, OA remains evitable.
--
Cheers,
,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
and discussed. Do join us if
you would like to be part of this conversation by registering to
attend the Workshop at https://indico.cern.ch/event/332370/registration/
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
and preservation of large and complex scientific objects
Use https://indico.cern.ch/event/332370/registration/ to register.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
/registration/register#/register
The OAI Organisers (see http://indico.cern.ch/event/332370/page/7)
look forward to meeting you all in Geneva in June.
For the OAI9 Organising Committee with cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
-review whatever that means.
I have created such a service for RePEc at http://nep.repec.org.
I want to work on creating similar services for areas other than
economics.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
lists the Twitter feed and
hashtag for the meeting.
On behalf of the OAI9 Programme Committee, I look forward to seeing
you in the University of Geneva to hear news of current developments
in scholarly communication.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home
that, at current speed, we can wait for centuries to achieve
open access. In the meantime, the publishing industry can use the
subscription revenue bonanza to effectively lobby for any change to
be on its terms.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
subscriptions. Faculty
who have not made their work open access just don't deserve it to
be read or cited.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
Friend, Fred writes
I am sorry to be cynical, but the academic community gets the
contracts it deserves. We have to learn to say no and really mean
it.
Say no to what? And how will you make sure what you say is matched
by what you do?
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
other publishers
are just as expensive.
The only ones who have clout here are libraries. They can cancel
subscriptions. It's the only message publishers will understand.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
would have incentives to take up your suggestions.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http
institutional visibility. And it is
beneficial globally as it increases incentives for academics to make
papers available in IRs or with open access publishers because
otherwise they loose more impact.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
citation
links would give them advertizing. We never got anywhere with them.
When I became aware of Aaron's actions I was pleased this may
raise awareness of JSTOR's locking away historic scholarly contents
behind their firewall with no prospects of ever releasing it.
Cheers,
Thomas
-with-the-public-api
An API is not the same thing as a stock of data that is freely
available. For example CrossRef also has an API, you can conduct
searches but you will never know if/when you have the complete data.
Neither ORCID nor CrossRef are open access.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
the accessibility of OA content and not just that of commercial
publishers and content providers.
ORCID itself is not an open access initiative. It's a step backwards.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http
. ORCID say
there will be some dump of some data made available on an annual
basis. That's not enough to build a service on the data that
require bulk instantaneous access to the data.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
material they obtained for free and that was reviewed for them for
free. Surely the amounts wasted on open access publishing dwarf the
sum spent on library subscriptions to buy access to articles that
nobody ever seems to cite, so probably nobody ever reads.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
skype: thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL@eprints.org
http
is not fair to compare both approaches. But that's precise what
the Finch report is doing.
L'appétit vient en mangeant...
On ne fait pas d'omelette sans casser des œufs.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http
with this?
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
skype: thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL
somebody agrees with what I have been saying for years. It
is libraries, rather than publishers or researchers, that hold back
open access.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
...
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
skype: thomaskrichel
___
GOAL mailing list
GOAL
is not reducing the cost of the other, it just adds to the total cost.
It is time to reduce expenditure on the former to build the latter.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
. But discussing details here would be too technical.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
skype: thomaskrichel
of the paper was a permissions
issue. Their official version was a technical error.
ECDL still publish with Springer, without open access. Yet
the same people who go to ECDL hang around the open access meetings.
I guess it is a case of do what I say, don't do what I do.
Cheers,
Thomas
who has been working on usage statistics for many years now.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
http://authorclaim.org/profile/pkr1
skype: thomaskrichel
, an OAI-PHM data users, polite for OAI-PMH data
exegetes list is probably a good idea. I'd be happy to run it, but
I don't want to be the only member.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
to suggest that OAIster will become part of
a toll-gated product. I suspect that the RePEc community will not
be very much amused to see OCLC making a commercial gain on what
RePEc have collected for free use.
What do others think?
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp
://visit.oclc.org/t?ctl=26B403F:09562C313F0DE2FB62E0BBD7DFD73DADF544A2D6437664E7;
asks me to nominate an IP address to receive free access to
OAIster from. Meaning that the IP addresses will no have free access.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
Arthur Sale writes
I totally disagree that researchers should be free to deposit where they
will.
This one of the basic tennants of academic fredom. Instititutional
mandates reduce that freedom. That's why I, and many other
academics, oppose mandates.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
makes RePEc archives so successful.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
this is precisely what I am working on. Thus is the same
way that I have been battling for years to set up RePEc, against
all odds since no such system had been set up, I am now battling to
on these registries.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
skype: thomaskrichel
there.
If the university wants a copy they can download it from the
funders' site.
and conflicts of interest.
What conflicts?
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
the creator of RePEc and involved in E-LIS.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
phone: +7 383 330 6813 skype: thomaskrichel
of RePEc and involved in E-LIS.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
phone: +7 383 330 6813 skype: thomaskrichel
.
Your memory is indeed fading.
The Santa Fe meeting was informed by work of a group of authors:
Herbert Van de Sompel, Thomas Krichel, Michael L. Nelson, Patrick
Hochstenbach, Victor M. Lyapunov, Kurt Maly, Mohammad Zubair, Mohamed
Kholief, Xiaoming Liu, and Heath O'Connell, The UPS Prototype
that
we can agree that, from today's perspective, filling IRs
until we achieve 100% open access will be a very very long
process.
With cheers from Novosibirsk (sunny, -13C),
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965
not notice that this spontaneous formula has utterly
failed to generalize to all other disciplines for well over a decade
now,
I may be dump, but I am not deluded. I do notice.
The problem is that there are not enough pioneers such as Paul Ginsparg and
Thomas Krichel. And they don't get enough
that a mandate really can work.
I am not saying that mandates IRs are wrong, but relying
exclusively on them is failing to realize other opportunities.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichelhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05
the new medium allows so much more freedom.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
visiting CO PAH, Novosibirsk http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
is not a centralized archive. It is an archival system that
has itself more than 350 archives contributing to it.
CiteSeer is not an archive at all.
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
for this purpose, see
http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/oai-eprints
I set it up as an outcome of the last CERN OAI workshop.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
, $$$,
I don't see how EconLit will survive in the longer run.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
Stevan Harnad writes
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Thomas Krichel wrote:
$1500 per paper should be amply sufficient to fund the
publishing operation. I suggest that libraries support other
ventures with more moderate charges.
Thomas, did you mean $500 ? Otherwise your posting does
Announcement [crossposted]
CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication:
Implementing the benefits of OAI
3rd Workshop on the Open Archives Initiative (OAI3)
LIBER, SPARC and SPARC-Europe, and the CERN Library are organising the
third OAI workshop at CERN, Geneva (Switzerland) on
. The
crucial part, though, it RePEc's author registration service.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
from Espoo, Finlandhttp://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
, in that way you
minimize cost on a central collection. The RePEc collection
illustrates this masterfully.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
visiting CO PAH, Novosibirsk http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05
for each academic, not just collectively
rational for the academic community as a whole. This is
not a trivial task. We need to have freely-available
conventional abstract and indexing data, as well as
evaluative data.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric
, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
/disk0/00/00/16/99/ (Thomas
Krichel argued against central archiving,
Nope. I simply argued that the centralized model would not
carry through to many disciplines. Where it worked it
was certainly an extremely good model. But you insisted
that because the Physcists had done it everyone
project. Thus we can furnish researches
with precise data to see how much the papers that they have been
making available are accessed.
With greetings from Minsk, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05
of
disciplinary archives, because some of them will be prepared
with the specifics of an aggregator in mind.
With greetings from Minsk, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
of finding a solution.
With greetings from Minsk, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
. They should be conceived
as instruments to incentivize authors to contribute to
formal archives.
With greetings from Minsk, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
way, departmental is another way,
discipline based archiving another, but there is no right or
wrong way. Whatever way there is discipline-based services will
be a key to providing incentives to scholars.
With greetings from Minsk, Belarus,
Thomas Krichel http
and by no intents and purposes
a scholarly journal. Some contents are short full texts,
others are summaries of articles in the magazine, and
some are short news items. But this is by no means
the full contents of the magazine, I should think.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
to publish there.
Can anyone tell me how an organization can cash in $9 Million,
over 5 years, and not be able to operate two, presumably
online, journals with this money without charging a submission
fee, for at least the time that the subsidy runs for?
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
/index.php ).
Yes but all those services require discipline based,
relational dataset to be precise.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
changes to the thesis?
Universities should preserve the students' works, because students
don't have the lifespan to take on that task. This is a principle
that should be medium-independent.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
through Eprints, and pay for this by not buying
dissertations produced anywhere else, or reduce serials holdings.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
it is not
freely available online. If the FOS movement can not convince scholars
in scholarly communication to make their work freely available online,
we do have a problem. I would like to understand what the problem is
here.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
be a handful
of people on campus who read that language. That brings me
back to my earlier point about the automated translation.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
initative for economics.
I have had my fair share of arguments with Stevan in the past,
but on this occasion :-), he is spot on right, there is nothing
to worry about.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
Stevan Harnad writes
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Thomas Krichel wrote:
Not so simple.
What do you mean? He does not give away, I do not read. Two
simple choices by two individuals. It has no bearing on the
general issues.
Then why post it to this Forum, which is concerned
.
Yes, but David Cahill is right that you can not build many
good services with the oai_dc metadata. For your data, we
rely on massaging cdl data into RePEc's internal format to
deliver the services that we do.
We really need better data and better metadata.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
it on another web
site. On an open archive managed by someone else ?
The concept of own web site is a fuzzy one.
Salut,
Thomas Krichel mailto:kric...@openlib.org
http://openlib.org/home/krichel
in marketing, which is as area that is further away from
economics. Thus it has more to do with established behaviour rather than
flexibility towards a new behaviour.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06
ps, there is just today an interesting article in the
Cronicle of HE Scholars Urge a Boycott of Journals That Won't Release
Articles to Free Archives
http://chronicle.com/free/2001/03/2001032601t.htm
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
Unions, Working Party on
Scientific Publication, Committee on Free Circulation of Scientific
Ideas, XXV meeting, Aachen, Germany, 1991, pp 55423-87.
[2] International Standards Organization, ISO/TC 297/SC 42/WG 3 N 8/
Revision 25b/ 1981-10-32.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
for further screening.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
2000-10-05 to 2001-01-06:
Institute for Economic Research / Hitotsubashi University
2-1 Naka / Kunitachi / Tokyo 186-8603
outweight by other advantages, such as distributed costs,
minimum quality control, and wide community partipation.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
2000-10-05 to 2001-01
in the proceedings. I presume that I will
still be able to present the paper. It will simply not appear in the
conference proceedings, which I consider to be a minor inconvenience.
Has anybody here stories to share about copyright surrender refusal?
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel
it to
the tendency of informal archiving in homepages. My impression
is that formal archiving is relatively declining, whereas informal
archiving is on the increase. I see the OAi as an attempt of formal
archivers to regain initiative.
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home
to another company, who
may hold different beliefs than yours?
Thomas Krichel http://gretel.econ.surrey.ac.uk
RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
for those who are involved in
dissemination to perform the tasks that they are already
doing.
p.s.
Note that these remarks should not be regarded as a comment on
the NIH proprosal, they simply sum up the experience of my six
years of work in this area.
Thomas Krichel
not be optimal to consider xxx as the only possible model.
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel mailto:t.kric...@surrey.ac.uk
http://gretel.econ.surrey.ac.uk
93 matches
Mail list logo
