Jan,
Most likely HPs fault. There are a lot of poorly designed SDRs.
While not specific to IPMITool, we have attempted to document some of
the inconsistent practices in reading sensors.
http://www.jblade.com:8080/products/retuli/ipmiClient/doc/programmers/SensorReading.html
As far as bridging.
I'm not an expert on ipmitool, we use our Compass GUI instead. I've seen
setting and retrieving the shelf location done as a raw command to
IPMItool.
Another option is instead of using the PICMG 3.0 shelf location is use
one of the PICMG 3.0 IP address records that is accessed using PICMG 3.0
And there is another case where there is no Mac at all.
The IPM Controller uses a private interface to a ethernet switch and the
switch does not report the MAC back to the the IPM Controller.
Examples of this are the switch hub boards chassis with multiple blades.
Hank
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at
It may recognize the power supply but it does not mean there is an
electrical bridge between the IPMB bus and PSMI bus.
Check with your vendor that bridging between the two buses is supported.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:22 PM, S. H. Lee smil...@korea.ac.kr wrote:
Hi,
I've attempted some
Randy,
Is there a list of hardware that supports PSMI ? We need this for ipmitool
and the Java version...
http://www.jblade.com:8080/products/retuli/ipmiCx/RetuliIpmiCxOverview.jsf
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Schafer, Randy A randy.a.scha...@intel.com
wrote:
If the SDR update did not see
The RMCP server can use any UDP port it wants to for a SOL session. Some
implementations use port 623. If you have more than two SOL sessions open
on a single RMCP server at least one will be on a port other than 623. Each
of the SOL sessions may be encrypted differently using separate cipher
-01-03 at 16:55 -0800, Hank Bruning wrote:
A large number of computers allow renumbering of the SDR records. In
practice renumbering of sensor records has been done for more than a
decade. The Intel MPCMM001 from 2001 was the first I can remember.
Since then all major computer server
Please wait for three weeks while this is reviewed.
Hank
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
All,
Anyone care to code review this before I submit this to the CVS repository?
I'm planning on submitting this on Wed April 11 unless I hear from someone
before then.
I totally agree with Jim. He beat me in sending the email.
Srinivas could you withdraw your patchs and then add lots of comments
especially around the if statements and then resubmit them.
hank
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
G,
Would it be possible for you
This may help. It's from the Java counterpart to ipmitool that's used in
data centers and mentions the password sizes.
http://www.jblade.com:8080/jbpublic/products/retuli/ipmiCx/doc/javadoc/com/jblade/lib/retuli/ipmi/std/session/JbIpmiRmcpSessionAccountPassword.html
and a more general overview.
/retuli/ipmi/std/session/JbIpmiRmcpSessionAccountPassword.html
http://www.jblade.com/products/retuli/ipmiCx/RetuliIpmiCxOverview.jsf
Gentleman, the discussion on passwords lengths is getting silly and stupid.
This was settled 5 years ago independent of C++ vs Java by Intel.
Hank Bruning
JBlade
on code someone else wrote and an
industry standard specification.I'm just trying to help out the best I
can.
-- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com --
On 5/1/2012 5:42 AM, Hank Bruning wrote:
Duncan,
maybe you should use a different model in programming. Object Oriented vs
Procedural.
Make
Jim,
We tested the patch on Kontron, Radisys and and Motorolla ATCA blades.
Looks good, no problems that we can see.
Hank
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
All,
Anyone care to code review this before I submit this to the CVS repository?
I'm planning on
Jim,
We can test on Dell(no 12Gs yet. Al Chu. has access to them), SuperMico,
Emerson, Radisys, Foritnet and Advantech.
The problem is, it takes a long time to schedule moving these computers to
the racks that where they will be tested. I can't commit to moving all that
hardware because of another
Can you post the single event from the raw sensor log ?
When you dump the raw event log.
I'm looking for the IPMB address, LUN ID and sensor number.
Hank Bruning
JBlade
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Raymundo Vega rmv...@san.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 12:53 -0500, Corey Minyard
Jan,
What does this do to the IPMI UPD packet rate ? Increase or decrees ? Don't
do the patch till he answers.
Hank Bruning
President
JBlade
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com wrote:
I understand it as nobody is starting ipmevd directly from PID=1 except
systemd
, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Jan Safranek jsafr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hank,
I am not sure I understand the question. The patch has nothing to do
with any packet rate. It only ensures that ipmievd forks properly on
systems with systemd.
Jan
On 09/03/2012 08:47 PM, Hank Bruning wrote:
Jan
sigemptyset(sighup);
sigaddset(sighup, SIGHUP);
~~~
?
I'd say Jan is referring to later while you're referring to former,
original, patch Jan proposed.
Regards,
Z.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Hank Bruning h...@jblade.com wrote:
Ok, so the patch is a low level thing
Regards,
Hank Bruning
JBlade
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
Dmitry,
1.pps-bugfixes.diff
Looks good
2.pps-oem.diff
ipmi_oem.c patch failed to apply to TOB lib/ipmi_oem.c
The other changes look ok to me
3. pps-sol-instance.diff
I prefer accepting
Dan,
Corey's opeipmi is a good option. He has done a really good job.
hank bruning
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Andy Cress andy.cr...@us.kontron.comwrote:
Dan,
** **
For discovery, I have a bit of code that uses RMCP ping, or alternatively
GetChanAuthCap packets to discover some
of 14) and Y is one of the 255.
http://www.jblade.com/products/hemi/hpm2/sol/Hpm2SolOverview.jsf
Hank Bruning
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Corey Minyard tcminy...@gmail.com wrote:
The SOL protocol supports multiple serial ports using the instance,
allow this to be passed in to ipmitool.
Index
that is in Java(Our Hemi software).
Hank Bruning
JBlade
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
Dmitry,
See my comments below.
Thanks,
Jim
-- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com (US Mountain Time) --
On 4/15/2013 11:01 PM, Dmitry Bazhenov wrote:
Hello, Jim
more valuable when the IPMI System Manager is
20,000+ servers from a single multi core CPU.
Hank Bruning
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Fabio Andrijauskas biozit.lis...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I am using ipmitool version 1.8.11 to control a cluster with bmc. I
succeeded read
LAN bridging and redundancy for LAN
interfaces.
In other words the HPM.2 and Calxeda conflict.
Hank Bruning
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Albert Chu achu.de...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick comment, there appears to be new OEM options under the 'lan'
command of ipmitool.
+ lprintf
when the bus is busy.
Hank Bruning
JBlade
IPMI Hemi Architect
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Pat Donlin p...@sgi.com wrote:
Funada,
I have seen similar retry failures in the lanplus driver, and have
submitted fixes which are presently part of the 1.8.14-rc1 build. The
specific problem
Mark Ov,
is PPS going to answered this ?
hank bruning
Jblade
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Dmitry Bazhenov dim...@pigeonpoint.com
wrote:
Hello, Zdenek,
Please, see below.
28.07.2014 15:00, Zdenek Styblik пишет:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Dmitry Bazhenov dim...@pigeonpoint.com
of
the page?
Regards,
hank bruning
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Jens Nyberg jens.nyb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My name is Jens Nyberg and I work as part of a team at Ericsson that
currently are working on IPMI support for Ericsson Blade Systems
(EBS). Previous iterations of these systems had been
then you can then process the data according the Compact
or Full sensor record.
Hank Bruning
JBlade
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:41 PM, dan farmer zenf...@gmail.com wrote:
Jim -
It may be true that experts know how to interpret the results. But for
the other 99.99% of the planet, “ok” means things
of CPU threads with Nagios on large scale deployments, Over 3000
servers and the monitoring system spends more time thread context switching
than collecting IPMI data. Solve that problem and the IMB becomes
irrelevant.
Hank Bruning
JBlade
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Zdenek Styblik zdenek.styb
/ipmiDC/doc/programmers/RetuliIpmiCXProgrammersGuideOverview.html
Regards
Hank Bruning
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan XX
parthasarathy.xx.bhuvara...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi,
I have attached three patches to Merge. Let me know if you have comments
on them
30 matches
Mail list logo
