:37:45 - 1.25.2.13
+++ ServerImpl.java 4 Jul 2003 11:19:22 - 1.25.2.14
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Marc Fleury/a
* @author a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Jason Dillon/a
* @author [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- * @version $Revision: 1.25.2.13
Change it to org.jboss.util.NestedRuntimeException(t);
--jason
On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 01:00 PM, Rod Burgett wrote:
The testsuite code no longer seems to compile with Sun's 1.3 jdk:
[exec]
/home/rburgett/testAtlas/planb/jboss/test/jboss-3.2/connector/src/
main/org/j
Looks like Java Meets PHP with some .NET flavoring. I like it.
--jason
On Saturday, March 29, 2003, at 04:56 PM, julien viet wrote:
sorry I gave a wrong link :
http://talks.php.net/show/php5intro
jv have a look at the new php 5 : http://talks.php.net
jv they added : exceptions,
It is certainly possible, though it does not look like the new features
will inhibit PHP folks from coding they way they do now. It just looks
like it will allow them to write better software. I spent the past 2
weeks writing a PHP application and over and over I wished for features
like
not sure how updated these babies are...
--jason
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 02:38 PM, Kristian Köhler wrote:
Hi
there is a snapshot page at
http://jboss.sourceforge.net/snapshots/
You will find some notes at
http://www.jboss.org/developers/sourcecode.jsp
Kristian
--
Orientation in
Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring. Will
probably have something ready to check in tomorrow. If you have EJB
related bits to commit in system please do so now.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto
Actually now that I think about it I have to wait until i can actually
build the source tree again...
Any word from the XDoclet folks on what the problem is?
--jason
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 03:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Tonight I will be working on the EJB module re-factoring
;-)
--jason
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 09:46 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
Make sure you can actually build and test this before doing it please.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Jason
://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/
ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-376
They want feedback.
I need to keep working so I haven't up(?)graded my 1.4.1 copy yet.
david jencks
On 2003.03.12 04:53 Jason Dillon wrote:
Actually now that I think about it I have to wait until i can actually
build the source
I was gonna try but thought I was tired and went to sleep... I was
wrong.
--jason
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 02:46 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Did it work? I'm dead in the water as my linux box won't build either.
-dain
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 11:30 AM, Jason Dillon wrote
FYI,
export
JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/
Home
or if you like csh pain:
setenv JAVA_HOME
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/Home
And you can build again.
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom
Looks like 1.4.1 breaks more than XDoclet :-( Eclipse does not like it
so much either. Looks like jEdit is a tad happier than it was with the
preview release, but it still functions better with 1.3.1 (no
corruption on screen elements, like the dockling prefs and such). On
the other hand
Eclipse decided to start behaving just after I wrote that mail... go
figure.
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help. Jason is this working on your
Um but it looks like HEAD will only build with 1.4+ so I will shut up
now.
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 06:19 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI,
export
JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.3.1/
Home
or if you like csh pain:
setenv JAVA_HOME
/System
Just curious if anyone has had time to look at the dependency-manager
task usage in the buildmagic-2.0 tree?
If not could I get a few peeps to have a look and give me some feedback
on how well it works to download depends to build this project?
cvs get -r buildmagic-2_0 buildmagic
cd
I am currently using 1.4.1 p10. I will download the latest ASAP.
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 01:13 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I just upgraded to 1.4.1 on OS X and now the build won't work. I tried
a fresh checkout, but that didn't help. Jason is this working on your
mac.
-dain
Why not add it to system?
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have another issue now... should have checked before sending this
email.
I have a written new basic service ObjectCopier, which is an MBean
that knows how to *efficiently* deep copy objects.
more of the
persistence engine moved, because we use MarshalledValue for BLOBs.
-dain
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Why not add it to system?
--jason
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:32 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have another issue now... should have checked
get back.
-Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jason
Dillon
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?
This is fine until the naming service is rewritten and starts to make
use
Starting two instances is a pain in the ass on OS X :-(
--jason
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 08:51 AM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:
What do you want to do? Won't two Eclipse instances do?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:02 PM
I fixed the problem which was preventing email from being sent out, so
your watches should work again.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
Is jboss-cache required to boot the server?
--jason
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 05:21 AM, Jeff Haynie wrote:
Because bela's
I just finished my initial attempt at adding Maven/Greebo-like
dependency management to the Buildmagic project (branch
buildmagic-2_0). Currently it is only used to grab deps for use inside
of library.classpath, but can easily be used to grab tool dependencies
too (except for the core).
When did naming become a core module? Appears that a remoting test
depends upon it. Is this what we really want? The core is now
dependent on naming to build... naming is a service, not part of the
core system. Any way we can fix this so the dependencies are not whack?
--jason
detector into
remoting, but just for source build dependencies only.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Naming a core module?
When did naming become
Does anyone one if it is possible to get eclipse two have JBoss HEAD
and JBoss 3.2 opened at the same time?
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs
Enjoy.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Enjoy.
--jason
---
This SF.net
]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
Thanks - I will start moving stuff over
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence
Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss/Persistence module added to CVS
EJB bits to ejb module ;)
--jason
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 11:28 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The EJB part yes, the generic persistence stuff no.
-Original
as I am
not sure where Bill is with the interceptor changes. It can move to ejb
along with the rest (whenever whoever does that, just not me right now
:-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 9:20 AM
Use XML Schema.
--jason
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 12:50 AM, Scott M Stark wrote:
I am working on adding the ability to specify a loader repository to
all
of the deployment types, and this adds a loader-repository element that
needs a mixed content type with a loader-repository-config
ServerImpl should probably send notifications when it does any
life-cycle changes. Should not be too difficult to implement, though I
have never really played with JMX notifications much. Do you have any
suggestions on how to go about adding that? I mean specifically about
Notification
Can we just make it official right now that HEAD is 1.4 only?
--jason
On Saturday, March 8, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
So when can I start to check in code into HEAD that will only build
1.4?
What parts of the server must run on 1.3?
After spending an entire day writing a lame
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up the server. We can not assume that those jars are
on the local file system and thus can not query a directory to discover
which jars need to be loaded.
If you would rather not have them hardcoded then
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up
WebDav?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
The jars which are hardcoded in Main are references to jars which are
required to load up
take everything in lib/*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jason Dillon
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 5:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss Boot lib jars
I have no exp. with WebDav so I can not say... but do we want
+1 to required JDK 1.4 for HEAD
--jason
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Is JDK 1.4 now required to build? If not when are we going to add
this requirement?
I need an IdentityHashMap for the ObjectCopier and would like to
encapsulate and delegate to
Any idea when this will become reality for HEAD? The spaghetti
interceptor model is making the separation of EJB bits from the server
module very hairy if not impossible.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of
] Behalf Of
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 2:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Unified interceptors?
Any idea when this will become reality for HEAD? The spaghetti
interceptor model is making the separation of EJB bits from the server
module very hairy
Well it is still possible to separate the two w/o unified interceptors.
Not including the bits from org.jboss.cmp (this stuff is very
independent) there are about 150+ classes which are not directly
dependent on the bits from org.jboss.ejb (and related).
Some bits are forced to remain in
Any preferences on when the changes should be made as to not interfere
with your work? I guess it will take about a day to make the change.
How long will it take you to complete the interception changes?
--jason
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 07:00 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
I'm begging people
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to
EJB
land.
Any preferences on when the changes should be made as to not interfere
with your work? I guess it will take about a day
I just quickly scanned the packages in server and it looks like quite a
bit is non-ejb specific.
There is just too much mingling between core system components and EJB
fluff. JBoss will be better off with these nice and cleanly separated.
JBoss... more than just and EJB container.
Not EJB
- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] please notify before large scale changes to
EJB land.
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 11:56 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
EJB specific
Why not do a full checkout each day always?
--jason
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:56 PM, Chris Kimpton wrote:
Hi,
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so, the error is not shown.
I built fresh from a clean checkout last night with no problems.
The
problem may be that
I just added CVSROOT/cvsignore to the repository for global ignores.
If something needs to be ignored globally added it here, else use a
local .cvsroot.
--jason
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The
I changed the XDoclet config in libraries.ent to default to
thirdparty/xdoclet-xdoclet/lib, which allows other projects to continue
to function. If you want to use the bits from jboss/xdoclet define
xdoclet.xdoclet.lib in your build/local.properties.
I still have not figured out how this ever
and I would love to have the EJB related stuff
moved to an EJB module. I'd also like to get rid of the
org.jboss.ejb.plugins as it is just a junk drawer.
-dain
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 12:07 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
Sunday, March 02, 2003, 9:15:33 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
JD I think it might
Whatever happened to the NetBoot PetStore work?
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
I am looking into using Maven for JBoss... nothing more, nothing less.
Comments on your experience would be helpful though... :-)
--jason
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:01 AM, Luke Taylor wrote:
Someone pointed out a post today on the Maven-dev list which said that
JBoss wants to move to
, and we demonstrated that we
don't keep up. (originally build/build.sh clean main worked, but it
stopped
working a really long time ago: the order of the modules is confused
in the
main target).
Thanks
david jencks
On 2003.03.02 03:43 Jason Dillon wrote:
What happened to the XDoclet tool
Just curious if the class-loading experts have looked at ClassWorlds:
http://classworlds.werken.com/
I wonder if we could make use of this as part of the UCL loading
system... ?
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
The primary overall goal is to move the xdoclet jboss module into jboss
cvs. A secondary goal is to be able to build a jboss specific
version of
xdoclet core, since changes to the jboss-specific stuff have often
required
bugfixes or implementation of missing functionality to xdoclet core.
I
I hope so to both...
--jason
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:09 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Would it be appropriate to put the new cmp framework in its own module
since it is not particularly dependent on ejbs?
Are we going to move the ejb support into the currently empty ejb
module?
david
I think it might be better to use a different name non-ejb related...
but whatever... what about just persistence?
--jason
On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 01:45 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I think so.
Is 'cmp' OK for the new module name, or is that too strongly associated
with EJBs? Maybe
I just committed a tiny change to the build system which allows a
module to bypass the compile/output phase when the module has already
been built and is up to date.
It works using the uptodate task and checking the ${module.source}
tree, module build files and project build files against a
We already have nested throwables (org.jboss.util.Nested*) that function in JDK 1.3 1.4, just use them.
--jason
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 09:18 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
We're not going to have .jpp or other ant switches just so that people can use nested exceptions
-Original
Any automated build and reporting system would be valuable... just
depends on the implementation as to whether it is useful or not.
--jason
On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 10:36 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On 2003.02.28 10:23 Jeff Haynie wrote:
The problem really is with me - I fess up. Bill's
Assertions could also help debug server problems and generally improve
the quality of the code too. 1.4 is good, just too bad not everyone
has it yet. Still waiting for a final for Mac OS X :(
--jason
On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 01:08 PM, Ricardo Argüello wrote:
I was planning to use
force it to use ant to do all compiles? Seems like
that would be best
to solve most problems.
I've been able to get it to run our ant build files
directly. You might have to go into the eclipse
properties and add all the tools/lib/*.jar files to
the ANT runtime classpath.
Do you know if there is
IMO interceptors are much simpilar than hard coded invokers.
--jason
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
What I'm saying is, why add this complication? Do we really need it? KISS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Any reason not to set it up as multiple projects? I have had nothing
but success when connecting Eclipse projects to a checked out
jboss-head.
--jason
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:42 AM, Nathan Phelps wrote:
While we're on the subject of Eclipse...
Can anyone give me some tips for
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Eclipse is so amazing...
+1 I use it all them time. The Refactoring support
and the Quick Assist features rock.
Regards,
Hiram
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can not believe how fast, intelligent and
functional this little IDE.
I have tears
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version to
version.
Is there any way to make Eclipse create jars? Or any way to make it
conditionally compile stuff for 1.3 and others for 1.4? Or a way to
I think it is better to use the jars from the module output directory,
cause the exact location under build/output will change from version
to
version.
What build/output will change from version to version?
The directory name under build/output changes when the version
number/tag changes.
Is
Interceptors seem reasonable, as long as there are no hidden costs behind
them. Why not keep them seperated and more flexible? Also allows
invokers to become a little bit simpler. The only down (aside from any
performance client-side class loading issues) are the read code as a
story fluff
Did this mail just make it to the list ? Ouch...
--jason
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, marc fleury wrote:
he is bck
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Dillon
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:05 PM
This seems to need a fresh checkout to get the new module - does
anyone know
another way?
cd jboss-head/thirdparty
cvs get _thirdparty_apache_slide
---jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Wanted to get feedback before starting to implement...
;)
The current support for loading deployment units has several special
cases
to deal with loading from the network e.g. in
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath(), NetBootHelper.getDefaultListUrl() or
even
HttpURLDeploymentScanner itself.
You should really have a Thailand training too... =]
--jason
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 09:05 AM, marc fleury wrote:
Guys,
the training in January 14-17th in Hong Kong. We lowered the price to
$2000 for early registration and it is the only training I am
personally
doing in
Post a patch on sf.net
--jason
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
where should I post correction to jboss 3.0.4 adm. and devel. Second
Edition?
by this list?
by bug at source forge?
--
| Emerson Cargnin
I am not sure, but I believe the changes to back port might be small...
you could post a patch... getting you closer to a RW... if you want it
that is.
--jason
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'm trying to get PetStore 1.3.1 running with 3.2 but its DAO code
: Jules Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
November 21, 2002 6:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jetty NIO SL in JBoss 3.0.4 no worky
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:
Fuck... how can we make one build work
Yes, I am hoping this will be the case... seems like a no brainer to me
though.
--jason
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 08:57 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
fredagen den 22 november 2002 kl 01.35 skrev James Cook:
Prob the most interesting part will be setting it up to work on hsql
out
of
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out of
the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Anyone want to make a NetBoot configuration which runs the latest
PetStore from SUN? I have been meaning to do this for awhile, but
never seem to find the time. This is a simple task for someone who has
setup the PetStore in JBoss 3.x before, or an intermediate task for
someone who is
such problems... note sure.
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out
of the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).
--jason
.
Bah, fucking Java... write once, package a billion times
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 01:41 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Looks like the Jetty NIO listener for JBoss 3.0.4 does not work out
of the box (ie. simply uncommenting the nio listener def).
--jason
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies. BB
is simple technology, but is way to complex to configure and maintain.
Using JBoss NetBoot it would be trivial to bring up new systems. Using
J2EE technologies it would be trivial to setup the configuration data
model and
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 02:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Nov, Jason Dillon wrote:
Bah... this sucks. Can't we get one build to function for both? Or
do
we have to build a 1.3 and 1.4 version? Blah :(
Its
and 1.4? That really seems
anit-java i principal.
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 03:50 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
torsdagen den 21 november 2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch
Um... so the phrase crack smoker comes to mind... anyone else?
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 04:24 AM, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
in a preprocessor ala xDoclet ?
2002 kl 11.46 skrev Jason Dillon:
Fuck... how can we make one build work for both?
Use a runtime switch ...
1. Jetty's config is static - I could work around it
2. You would need to build to the LCD (1.3) and then do another build
for optional 1.4 components...
Or - we just live
of the
effort here is deploying it to JBoss and configuring the necessary
resources.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jason
Dillon
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] TODO: NetBoot
It is a system monitoring tool: http://bb4.com
--jason
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 06:08 AM, Emerson Cargnin - SICREDI
Serviços wrote:
what woul'd be the BigBrother, is it that reality show : ))?
Jason Dillon wrote:
Someone should write a Big Brother clone using JBoss technologies
I would be careful about going with a huge file, these tend to become
unnamable fast.
--jason
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 09:07 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Dain and I were IMing. He said Scott was thinking about a MetaData
service...
My idea for a MetaData/Configuration service would be
across
my hard drive, but that's not saying a lot.
-dain
Jason Dillon wrote:
I would be careful about going with a huge file, these tend to become
unnamable fast.
--jason
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 09:07 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Dain and I were IMing. He said Scott was thinking about
CVS sucks...
--jason
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:02 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
rant
Because of the new structure when I do an update in the thirdpaty
package it doesn't pickup the added directories. For example the
apache-commons package was just added, but when I do an update
Yes.
--jason
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:23 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Thanks...
Is get an alias for checkout?
How do I know _jboss_thirdparty is the right name to use? Is this
name from the modules file?
-dain
Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi Dain,
cd jboss-head
cvs get
This is not true for jboss-head or other psuedo module created via
CVSROOT/modules. Update will not check CVSROOT/modules for changes, it
will only work off of the local data in CVS/Entires.
--jason
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Taylor,Timothy L. wrote:
cvs up -d
will create
To build HEAD you need to checkout jboss-head not jboss-all.
--jason
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 02:02 PM, Publius Ismanescu wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded the source using WinCVS.
and this is the output that I get when I build.
Please let me know what I am doing wrong.
Output:
What about Quartz? Lets integrate instead of invent where we can.
--jason
snip
what do you guys think of a new scheduler?
marc f
-Original Message-
From: Ben Sabrin [mailto:ben;jboss.org]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:58 AM
To: Marc Fleury
Subject: FW: Quartz J2EE Scheduler
...
On Friday 01 November 2002 05:05 pm, Jason Dillon wrote:
This is funny, funny shit. Submit a real patch (ala sf.net
w/attached
file) and I will commit this.
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T
This is resolved.
--jason
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 11:26 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
Hello Sacha,
clicking on Read More on the site I get
HTTP ERROR: 404 /services/training Not Found
alex
Monday, November 04, 2002, 7:12:31 PM, you wrote:
SL Hello,
SL It seems that no e-mail
This is funny, funny shit. Submit a real patch (ala sf.net w/attached
file) and I will commit this.
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size!
This is a recent change to the build system. Feel free to submit a
patch of the docs.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Tompkins
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Ok. I can patch the doc with the content of my last mailing How to
get
it to build. But I will need a cvs account to do that.
Ben
Submit a patch. We do not give up RW for nothing.
--jason
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Documentation Patch Question
Exactly what documentation are we talking about?
Is this it?
jboss/manual/src/xdocs/jbossdocs.xml
If not, please tell me which file(s) you would like me to patch.
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 16:59, Jason Dillon wrote
1 - 100 of 3862 matches
Mail list logo
