Paul == Paul Kinnucan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Hi Nick,
Paul I am posting my response to your idea of JUCI-based plugins
Paul to the JDEE list because I am interested in getting other
Paul people's
Paul input on this idea.
This sounds like a thoroughly good idea to me. I've
I second those sentiments and that motion.
/ Petter
-Original Message-
From: Mark Pollack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 19 februari 2003 02:01
To: Paul Kinnucan; Nascif Abousalh-Neto
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
Hi,
Just my two cents
would spend the time to do some new
things.
-Nic
-Original Message-
From: Nascif Abousalh-Neto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:35 AM
To: Paul Kinnucan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
Hi Paul,
Just to recap:
1) The plug
snip/
Until
recently I think Emacs has been unsurpassed as the editor to
use for Java, but I think some of the IDE's are catching up,
specifically IntelliJ which most people I work with use.
There are a few features there which I think would be easy to
implement as JDE plugins
PM
To: Nic Pottier; Abousalh-Neto, Nascif [NCRTP:3X20:EXCH];
Paul Kinnucan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
snip/
Until
recently I think Emacs has been unsurpassed as the editor to
use for Java, but I think some of the IDE's are catching up
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
snip/
Until
recently I think Emacs has been unsurpassed as the editor to
use for Java, but I think some of the IDE's are catching up,
specifically IntelliJ which most people I work with use.
There are a few features
-
From: Nascif Abousalh-Neto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:47 AM
To: James Higginbotham; Nic Pottier; Paul Kinnucan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
Well, looks like I jumped the gun. There is not API to look at yet for this JSR 198.
I
Hi,
You and others have raised two related but separate issues: one is the
need for plugin-in support and the other is a need for a way to extend
the JDEE that requires only Java programming skills. My proposal
addresses the first. I believe Nick Sieger's JUCI addresses the
second. Perhaps Nick
Nascif Abousalh-Neto writes:
Hi Paul,
Just to recap:
1) The plug-in will follow the proposed directory structure;
2) It will have a lisp/plugin.el file that will be evaluated at load time by
JDE (still not sure what goes here, any suggestion?);
plugin.el might be useful in
MP == Mark Pollack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MP Hi, Just my two cents, I'm a lisp-wimp as I am sure are many of
MP the users of JDEE, but a good Java programmer. If there was some
MP way that I could write JDEE extensions in Java for at least some
MP subset of plug-in functionality that would
PK == Paul Kinnucan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
4) Based on (3), it can replace direct invocations of the JVM with
jde-eval
calls (which should make it much faster)
PK Yes.
Problem with (4) is how to get the output to a compilation
buffer. When I launch a new JVM process myself,
PK == Paul Kinnucan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PK Hi, You and others have raised two related but separate issues:
PK one is the need for plugin-in support and the other is a need for
PK a way to extend the JDEE that requires only Java programming
PK skills. My proposal addresses the first. I
Hi Nick,
Where possible, talk in terms of emacs
interface objects (buffers, windows, frames, region, point,
etc.) but also express them in terms of what a Java interface
might look like. What are the logical groupings for
retrieving certain kinds of information? What would you name
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this plugin architecture may require enough redesign to rethink the
way JDE works now.
One thing that seems prevalent in these thoughts is that the JDE is the
central point of focus for this plugin architecture and the plugin
architecture is
To: Nascif Abousalh-Neto
Cc: Paul Kinnucan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JDEE plugins (was JUCI)
Nascif Abousalh-Neto writes:
Sounds like a great idea!
I would volunteer to re-write the Jalopy
(http://jalopy.sourceforge.net/) integration package I put together.
I could also take a stab
15 matches
Mail list logo
