Op dinsdag 29-01-2008 om 11:11 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef willem:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Personally I would rank debugger way higher on my wishlist than packages.
That won't work. DDD is a frontend to GDB. And guess where the problem
is? The problem is GDB.
Can you
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
Can you tell me more about the problems with GDB ?
That it's not available at all at win64.
(since there's no gcc for win64)
That is not the case anymore. Try
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/Lazarus-0.9.25-fpc-2.2.1-20080130-win64.exe
Vincent
Vincent,
With this you got integrated debugger working at Win64 Lazarus?
--
Att,
Wanderlan Santos dos Anjos
On Jan 30, 2008 12:26 PM, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joost van der Sluis schreef:
Can you tell me more about the problems with GDB ?
That it's not available at
mramirez schrieb:
Compiler Design its not a trivial task. IT'S THE DIFFICULT TASK. A
famous compiler book shows a knight trying to kill a dragon, as a metaphor.
Nobody needs compiler building knowledge to push this matter.
There are other things which prevent package support
- provide an
Florian Klaempfl schrieb:
because of changed memory locations etc. so we know that we can make a
memory=file :)
_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe as the Subject
archives at
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Personally I would rank debugger way higher on my wishlist than packages.
That won't work. DDD is a frontend to GDB. And guess where the problem
is? The problem is GDB.
Can you tell me more about the problems with GDB ?
Joost.
regards Wim
Hi all,
Well I've read this thread with interest, and now I want to interject.
I learned pascal on my own in primary school. In high school I studied
it much further. Then I entered university and it was all java (which I
grew to hate).
I began to work professionally, and learned many
Op dinsdag 29-01-2008 om 03:03 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef willem:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Personally I would rank debugger way higher on my wishlist than packages.
Yes I agree with you that a debugger is important.
I am thinking of porting DDD to Lazarus.
That won't work. DDD is a
Wow, this is a great success story! I hope you don't mind, but I've
added your project to the wiki of 3rd-party projects developed with
Lazarus (feel free to edit it):
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Projects_using_Lazarus#OutKafe
Maybe you could add a screenshot or two here:
On Jan 29, 2008 2:57 AM, A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snipping well thoughtout, highly interesting background]
I run a highly successful business (profitable in it's first year -
almost unheard of) using lazarus
Wow, this is a great success story! I hope you don't mind, but I've
added
Quoting A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't want to flame delphi, I want to state to all who flame lazarus
that frankly lazarus puts bread on my plate, and delphi could not have
Well said.
mramirez
_
To unsubscribe: mail
I was waiting for this one, here it is, you wrote it!!
At this time I'm far to be the best Lazarus contributor, but please let
me explain why I am still there, why my mailer still fetch more than 1
hundred mails every day... with maybe 50% of them from lazarus,
including debug list:
On Tue,
Quoting Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nobody needs compiler building knowledge to push this matter.
I read somewhere (mail-list/Lazarus web site) that there wasn't that problem.
- provide an ftp.freepascal.org mirror (requires approx. 1TB/month
traffic) to reduce the matter of
Kindly send the website's URL please ;)
http://outkafe.outkastsolutions.co.za
Ciao
A.J.
--
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic -
Clarke's law
Any technology that is distinguishable from magic is insufficiently
advanced -Gehm's corollary
Any technologist
On 28/01/2008, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I first learned of Lazarus on Delphi newsgroups...
Exactly my point! :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
Quoting zaher dirkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I Delphi programmer too (10 years) , and i like FPC/Lazarus too match, than
Delphi.
Same here.
This day (before i see this comments), my co worker ask me if some day we
see some people try to make fight Lazarus, i have no answer for him, and i
hope
Quoting John Stoneham [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
entire threads with subjects like Quit talking about Lazarus here or
Its their company, and they forum. It's normal to diminish any of
their products' competition (such as Lazarus).
If you think you need cross-platform you don't need Delphi or
Warren Postma schreef:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is
that it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it
for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
Such as? Please create bug reports, if they are not there
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Warren Postma wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Warren Postma schrieb:
You still can't install packages in Lazarus because the underlying FPC
compiler lacks a runtime package system that could support a more
delphi-like designtime/runtime packages installation
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Warren Postma schrieb:
You still can't install packages in Lazarus because the underlying FPC
compiler lacks a runtime package system that could support a more
delphi-like designtime/runtime packages installation system. Which by
the way is the worst part of Delphi.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:48:56PM -0500, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that
it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
One assumes here
Warren Postma schrieb:
You still can't install packages in Lazarus because the underlying FPC
compiler lacks a runtime package system that could support a more
delphi-like designtime/runtime packages installation system. Which by
the way is the worst part of Delphi. Everyone complains about
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that it
suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus could be as useful to me
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is
that it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus could be as useful to me as Delphi 7, I would change my
opinion from
On Jan 28, 2008 11:48 AM, Warren Postma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is
that it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
And these are...?
Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is
that it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use
it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus could be as useful to me as Delphi 7, I would
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that it
suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as Delphi 2005.
If Lazarus
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 12:48:56PM -0500, Warren Postma wrote:
My reason for complaining about Lazarus, and calling it unusable, is that
it suffers from worse usability defects (for what I want to use it for)
than even the worst-ever versions of Delphi such as
John Stoneham schrieb:
Well, I guess the term Delphi users is a little broad, but it seems
that every post that mentions Lazarus on
borland.public.delphi.non-technical gets BLASTED by Delphi fanboys.
90% of the posts in b.p.d.non-tech would be qualified as troll posts on
other mailings lists
I Delphi user and I love Lazaros (and FPC). :-)
See the newsgoup name. Contains delphi and borland. That is a newsgroup
on Borland's own newsserver about Delphi.
Gabor
John Stoneham írta:
borland.public.delphi.non-technical
_
On Jan 27, 2008 7:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW:
the cardinal mul/div overflow bug still exists in Delphi 2007 ;-)
Wow, that's weird! They fixed it in the 7.1 update, but that update
broke the integer optimization, which in my opinion was just as
serious a bug. I guess they re-broke
BTW:
the cardinal mul/div overflow bug still exists in Delphi 2007 ;-)
John Stoneham wrote:
Well, I guess the term Delphi users is a little broad, but it seems
that every post that mentions Lazarus on
borland.public.delphi.non-technical gets BLASTED by Delphi fanboys. I
mean, it's really
I Delphi programmer too (10 years) , and i like FPC/Lazarus too match, than
Delphi.
This day (before i see this comments), my co worker ask me if some day we
see some people try to make fight Lazarus, i have no answer for him, and i
hope no.
(OK bad english :P )
On Jan 27, 2008 3:22 PM, John
I just hope the Lazarus community isn't discouraged by those negative comments.
;-) Everything there is being bashed. In my opinion nothing in that
forum should ever be taken to serious (including the teamb or
codegear-team msgs).
Its all free advertisement in the end (that included the
On 27/01/2008, John Stoneham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I guess the term Delphi users is a little broad, but it seems
that every post that mentions Lazarus on
borland.public.delphi.non-technical gets BLASTED by Delphi fanboys. I
Take all those comments with a pinch of salt. ;-) I believe
35 matches
Mail list logo
