Michael MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So I apologize to Aduva for suggesting their product might be dead.
But not to Levanta -- not only is the z product dead, but as of 3/31/08, the
company itself closed its doors; the website finally went down a few days ago.
Another one bites the
Thanks to all who replied.
I did get a note off-list that Aduva does still support System z:
Yes, we do still have a version that
supports Z - but most of our growth is really in the distributed Linux
and Solaris space.
So I apologize to Aduva for suggesting their product might be dead.
Mike
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
MacIsaac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to all who replied.
I did get a note off-list that Aduva does still support System z:
Yes, we do still have a version that
supports Z - but most of our growth is really in the
by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:06 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Systems management - quick survey
In preparing some z/VM course material, I found myself having to define
z/VM system management. It turns out that you have:
- Provisioning (real and virtual)
We are utilizing Shared-Root, therefore we picked up various
scripts and modified as needed ( if any ).
- Human operations (IPL,
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 11:30 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Security (authentication, authorization, audit)
Directory only.
(sigh) This means you cannot audit the activites of a virtual machine and
your passwords are stored in cleartext. Your backups contain the same
At 12:10 PM 7/8/2008, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 11:30 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Security (authentication, authorization, audit)
Directory only.
(sigh) This means you cannot audit the activites of a virtual machine and
your passwords are stored in
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 12:47 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THANX! I know but you do with what you have. Backups go thru a
hipersocket from MFL/z/VM to z/OS.
You do with what you have as long as you have a Get Out Of Jail Free card
in your pocket. That is, a management-approved
At 01:00 PM 7/8/2008, you wrote:
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 12:47 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THANX! I know but you do with what you have. Backups go thru a
hipersocket from MFL/z/VM to z/OS.
You do with what you have as long as you have a Get Out Of Jail Free card
in your
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 03:05 EDT, Brian France [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanx Alan. Looks like I need to do some reading on NPIV. By the
way, I'm pretty sure, thos you have me second guessing, that if you
have several chpds on a frame, they all have the same WWPN which
comes from the
Michael MacIsaac wrote:
I tried to categorize what's available today into 4 main areas (I
apologize if I your software is not on the list, or if it listed as Dead
or dying but is not. I do not also plan to address performance
management). Here is the survey:
I use RHN Satellite for my
On Tuesday, 07/08/2008 at 09:10 EDT, Shawn Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What is your greatest need in z/VM and Linux systems management? :
Bare metal provisioning. I'd like to provision Linux guests entirely
through the web -- allocate all resources (hipersockets, DASD,
everything), have
Hello list,
I'm preparing for a SHARE presentation (week of Aug 11, San Jose, CA) on
z/VM and Linux systems management. If you use Linux and z/VM on System z,
do you have time for a quick survey?
I tried to categorize what's available today into 4 main areas (I
apologize if I your software is
.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael MacIsaac
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 12:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] Systems management - quick survey?
Hello list,
I'm preparing for a SHARE presentation (week of Aug 11, San Jose, CA
Marcy,
Define systems management :)
Yes, that is what I hope to do in an hour at SHARE :))
I tried to leave the form open-ended. But let's say systems management =
monitoring, provisioning and patching, while performance management is
perhaps a separate science unto itself.
Mike MacIsaac
On Monday, 07/07/2008 at 04:08 EDT, Michael
MacIsaac/Poughkeepsie/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define systems management :)
Yes, that is what I hope to do in an hour at SHARE :))
I tried to leave the form open-ended. But let's say systems management
=
monitoring, provisioning and patching,
I agree with Alan - the list is much broader.. I've updated below what
I've seen my customers using, using Alan's list. Not sure if this is what
you want, Michael - but FWIW:
Scott
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 07/07/2008 at 04:08 EDT,
17 matches
Mail list logo
