2008/10/8 Shlomo Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm thinking of moving from ADSL to HOT (Cable). I wanted to know 2 things:
1 - Since today I have an ADSL router (bought from Bezek), I no longer use
pptp, NAT or any other Linux tools to connect to the Internet. The router is
the only computer
2008/10/9 Shlomo Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Now I'm confused. Firstly, I certainly don't expect to plug the HOT modem into
the ADSL plug. As I already wrote (see quote above), I thought I could plug
the HOT modem into one of the ethernet ports. I may be missing something, but
I don't
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
Now I'm confused. Firstly, I certainly don't expect to plug the HOT modem into
the ADSL plug. As I already wrote (see quote above), I thought I could plug
the HOT modem into one of the ethernet ports. I may be missing something,
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting gcc to do pre-compiled headers. The
instructions for doing it are at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Precompiled-Headers.html.
Here's what I got:
precomp.h:
#ifndef PRECOMP_H
#define PRECOMP_H
//#error Include twice
#include stdio.h
#endif
hello.c:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:23:23AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I have lots of problems with Hot disconnecting and very high latency.
Hot blames Nezeq Beinleimi, Nezek blames Hot. I personally believe
that Nezeq is to blame for the latency, but Hot is to blame for the
_hours_ of downtime every
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Wednesday 08 October 2008, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Do remember that unlike PPTP/L2TP, as far as my firewall is concerned
(which connects directly over Ethernet to the HOT modem), I'm using
normal IP-over-Ethernet to
Shlomo Solomon wrote:
My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to HOT. I
would just have to unplug the ADSL line and plug the HOT modem into one of
the ethernet ports on the router. Am I correct?
well if you want to still use the router as a router, I'd think that
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Here's what I do:
$ gcc -x c -o precomp.h.gch -c precomp.h -g -Wall -O2
Uncomment the error line
$ gcc -x c -o hello.o -c hello.c -g -Wall -O2
In file included from hello.c:1:
precomp.h:4:2: error: #error Include twice
Never
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Here's what I do:
$ gcc -x c -o precomp.h.gch -c precomp.h -g -Wall -O2
It appears that, in strict contradiction to what the HTML manual says,
-x should NOT be used. When it is used, the file is compiled as if it is
a source file. When it is not used, the file is
On Thursday 09 October 2008, shimi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to
HOT. I
would just have to unplug the ADSL line and plug the HOT modem into one
of the ethernet ports on the router. Am I
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Shlomo Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2008, shimi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to
HOT. I
would just have to unplug the ADSL
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:47:39AM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
OK - so assuming I can't use the router I bought fom Bezeq after moving to
HOT, can anyone say if they've had any Linux experience (good or bad) using
the cheap routers sold by www.ivory.co.il?
The two models they have are:
1 -
On Friday 10 October 2008, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
The usual routers only have one ethernet port on the LAN side, not 4.
It is connected to an internal 5 port hub, so you get 4 LAN ports to
plug things into, but the router part only sees one port.
OK - so assuming I can't use the router I
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 10:20:22PM +0200, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
On Thursday 09 October 2008, shimi wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Shlomo Solomon wrote:
My assumption is that I could still use the same router after moving to
HOT. I
would just have to unplug the ADSL line and
Hi all!
Can anyone recommend email hosting (secure POP + SMTP) without an
overzealous blacklisting policy?
I've been hosting my email at my web provider, but the server has now
become buggy and the hostmaster left on a two weeks trip and is
unreachable. I tried forwarding the @shlomifish.org
How about google apps? It has secure pop+smtp+imap, has excellent web
interface, and can support many domain aliases. Ohh and it is free (up
to ~7Gb).
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 23:05, Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Can anyone recommend email hosting (secure POP + SMTP) without an
Shlomi Fish wrote:
So all the email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is bouncing.
No, that's not it. It's not that email sent is bouncing. It is that it
is bouncing with an explanation that accuses the sending SMTP (hamakor
server, in this case) of being a host for spam, yet provides no proof of
Perhaps the real problem is that the rdns does not point to the sending
domain:$ host tux.hamakor.org.iltux.hamakor.org.il has address 82.80.248.176$
host 82.80.248.176176.248.80.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
bzq-82-80-248-176.dcenter.bezeqint.net.   Contrast that with:$ host
Take 2. More readable?
Perhaps the real problem is that the rdns does not point to the sending domain?
$ host tux.hamakor.org.il
tux.hamakor.org.il has address 82.80.248.176
$ host 82.80.248.176
176.248.80.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
bzq-82-80-248-176.dcenter.bezeqint.net.
Contrast
19 matches
Mail list logo
