On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:58:43 +0300
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- 2.5 adds system calls for manipulating a task's processor
affinity: sched_getaffinity() and sched_setaffinity()
I haven't checked if RH 9.0 includes a backport of it to their 2.4
kernel. (It's pretty trivial to
On 03 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0300
Gilboa Davara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
B. Events (posix conditions).
Wait it doesn't work right (PulseEvent never did... MS, like MS, just
refuses to fix it), NT events are much easier to use, and have much
better control. The posix conditions are a just pain in
talk to me when it will have kde+hebrew+mozilla+oo.
Then we will talk about h/w
linux still is the best os for personal useage: more drivers+app's, greater
updates. IMHO.
, 2 2003, 19:03, Mix Sella :
This is offtopic.
I know I'm doing a bad thing.
I know it's the wrong address.
I
Isn't it exactly what windows people tell linux users?:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
talk to me when it will have kde+hebrew+mozilla+oo.
Then we will talk about h/w
linux still is the best os for personal useage:
there sure are. However, I can proove them wrong in linux.
Anyway, updates in windows sux.. linux has a better update system (urpmi,
atp-get, emrge). And about hebrew? Soon kde3 will have better hebrew support
then windows, and when OO will be really usable, I will be even more glad.
In BeOS,
Actually, when considering the out of box support for hardware, Linux
has more drivers then Windows 2K/9x/Me. (For the sake of the people
here, I'll simply ignore a certain Spyware OS).
Both KDE and Mozilla are by far, more feature rich then the Microsoft
(Internet) Explorer. Plus, well, Linux
Windows is better than Linux. Windows has higher technology, it's
developed by serious proffesionals, and of course you can't write
quality software if you're not paid for it.
Well, these are not my opinions, of course, but it seems like we all
need another thread of 30 messages about who is
Actually you are correct (here I get myself crucified) but hear me out.
I spent years of work on NT internal APIs (The the IBM OS2 APIs that
share the same design) and the design itself is *very* impressive.
Even with the 2.6 NPTL (The Native Posix Thread Library, already out
with the RedHat 9),
On Monday 02 June 2003 21:37, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
talk to me when it will have kde+hebrew+mozilla+oo.
Then we will talk about h/w
linux still is the best os for personal useage: more drivers+app's, greater
updates. IMHO.
You forgot the most important one: Freedom
, 2 2003, 19:03,
GD with the RedHat 9), the Windows NT/2K/XP/2K3 has better security
GD and scheduling (Though performance is impressive)
Windows security is a funny thing. It is so good almost no one
understands/uses it :) I mean, certainly, using it like it was intended.
GD In short, the Win32API is
On Tue 03 Jun 03, 1:14 AM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GD with the RedHat 9), the Windows NT/2K/XP/2K3 has better security
GD and scheduling (Though performance is impressive)
Windows security is a funny thing. It is so good almost no one
understands/uses it :) I mean,
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Actually you are correct (here I get myself crucified) but hear me out.
I spent years of work on NT internal APIs (The the IBM OS2 APIs that
share the same design) and the design itself is *very* impressive.
Even with the 2.6 NPTL (The Native Posix Thread Library, already out
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 07:28, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Actually you are correct (here I get myself crucified) but hear me out.
I spent years of work on NT internal APIs (The the IBM OS2 APIs that
share the same design) and the design itself is *very* impressive.
Even with
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:09:59PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Actually you are correct (here I get myself crucified) but hear me out.
I spent years of work on NT internal APIs (The the IBM OS2 APIs that
share the same design) and the design itself is *very* impressive.
Where is it
First just a short reminder to everybody:
Linux is Free (and *BSD as well) --
Itches will be scratched, eventually
Window, BeOS, are not --
wait for some benevolent vendor to scratch you itches
And now to more interesting technical issue:
On
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 08:33, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:09:59PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Actually you are correct (here I get myself crucified) but hear me out.
I spent years of work on NT internal APIs (The the IBM OS2 APIs that
share the same design) and the
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:46:09AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Argh.
I never said that it had anything to do with A. Scheduling or B.
Security.
That's what your sentence above implied, but it may or may not be my
lack of reading comprehension.
I did say that NT still has a lead on that
Gilboa Davara wrote:
As much as I think that Windows NT/2K/XP/2K3 original design is
impressive, the implementation is sourly lacking and MS has an annoying
tendency to push all of their development resources on ways to screw
their clients instead of trying to get the damn thing to work right.
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 09:06, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:46:09AM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
Argh.
I never said that it had anything to do with A. Scheduling or B.
Security.
That's what your sentence above implied, but it may or may not be my
lack of reading
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Posix thread library is problematic.
Here's a couple of examples.
A. Threads:
Lack of true, low level, thread control.
For instance, in Win32 I can save a thread's context, suspend it
remotely (from another thread or even a controlling process) implant the
saved context into
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Posix thread library is problematic.
Here's a couple of examples.
A. Threads:
Lack of true, low level, thread control.
For instance, in Win32 I can save a thread's context, suspend it
remotely (from another thread or even a controlling process) implant the
saved context into
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:06, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Gilboa Davara wrote:
Posix thread library is problematic.
Here's a couple of examples.
A. Threads:
Lack of true, low level, thread control.
For instance, in Win32 I can save a thread's context, suspend it
remotely (from
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMHO this is the real problem with ACLs - they give you the ability
to define a security policy with very fine resolution. But guess -
what? it doesn't help you one bit understand what that security policy
should be. In a sense, having more options
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 13:58, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:01:33PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
CPU affinity is available under Linux, at least.
If you can find me the command, I'll be forever in your debt. I googled
myself to death over this one.
Quoting Dave
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:01:33PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
CPU affinity is available under Linux, at least.
If you can find me the command, I'll be forever in your debt. I googled
myself to death over this one.
Quoting Dave Jone's What to Expect Document:
- 2.5 adds system calls for
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 02:01:32PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I would have married Linus if I could get a production 2.6 kernel
today... My efforts to move our clients (a couple of people I'm working
for) to Linux would have been much easier...
Getting a 2.6 kernel today is easy, a one line
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote on 2003-06-03:
hmm... beyond the questionable ethics of M$, I beleive that the
impressive design has a lot to do with the crappiness of the implmentation.
Unix and Unix like systems such as Linux that share the same design
philosophy are 'worse is better' systems. I
27 matches
Mail list logo
