IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
I just received a confirmation, that firmware in file
latest-dvb-fe-xc5000c-0.6.30.5.fw is working.
xc5000: Firmware latest-dvb-fe-xc5000c-0.6.30.5.fw loaded and running
xc5000: *** HW: V6.0, FW: V 0.6.40990
So, it's has a build number 40990
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
An image of the top of the tuner clearly showing any manufacturing
markings would be welcome - assuming its accessible.
It's a best picture I could find:
http://www.reviews.ru/clause/over/T7_2/image41.jpg
Thanks.
--
Steven Toth - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
--
To unsubscribe
Here is a link on a chinese site with datasheet for xc5100.
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/7f92f3fe700abb68a982fb96.html
If you look at it, after reading Product ID we also should receive
0x14b4 (5300 decimal)
I'll try extract a FW from a Windows driver and will share results,
in case of success.
Em Fri, 26 Jun 2015 03:58:48 +0700
Unembossed Name severe.siberian@mail.ru escreveu:
Hi,
I was working on a Linux driver for a hybrid TV-tuner with SAA7134 PCI
bridge, XC5000C RF tuner and Si2168 DVB demodulator by a
combining all existent at that time drivers together.
During that
Correct. These are not parts that have any form of default firmware
in their ROM mask (i.e. not like the silabs or micronas parts which
have a default firmware and the ability to patch the ROM via a
software loaded code update). The firmware must be loaded every time
the chip is brought out
It's not new IC. It's XC5000C. Maybe i was interpreted wrong.
As I have understood, such behaviour can depends from FW version.
HW vendor says, that with his latest FW he always gets response 0x14b4.
Ah, so you're running a completely different firmware image? Well in
that case that would
Correct. These are not parts that have any form of default firmware
in their ROM mask (i.e. not like the silabs or micronas parts which
have a default firmware and the ability to patch the ROM via a
software loaded code update). The firmware must be loaded every time
the chip is brought out of
IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
To: Unembossed Name
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; Devin Heitmueller
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: XC5000C 0x14b4 status
After that RF tuner identification became always successful.
I had a conversation with a hardware vendor.
Now I can say
It's not new IC. It's XC5000C. Maybe i was interpreted wrong.
As I have understood, such behaviour can depends from FW version.
HW vendor says, that with his latest FW he always gets response 0x14b4.
Ah, so you're running a completely different firmware image? Well in
that case that would
IMHO, the best is to get the latest firmware licensed is the best
thing to do.
Does that new xc5000c come with a firmware pre-loaded already?
I've got firmware here that is indicated as being for the xc5300 (i.e.
0x14b4). That said, I am not sure if it's the same as the original
5000c
13 matches
Mail list logo
