Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Alfredo> Should have "Mathed" in the name then no?
>
> No because the long term objectove is to merge all these things, I
> guess.
I think that the nice name should be reserved as a reward for the merger ;-)
> And a bit of mystery and surprise makes life more
On Thursday 07 June 2007 20:03:09 Bo Peng wrote:
>
> Do you want to insert an inset?
I want everything to be an inset. Say an inset chapter, with the first line
being the title, and all other lines being inside the inset. The same would
be applied to sections and subsections and so on...
On Thursday 07 June 2007 20:03:09 Bo Peng wrote:
> Using the environment approach, I enter , choose separator
> layout, , and then start a new list. (How to avoid that second
> ?)
Something like new page inset?
An inset separator?
> Bo
--
José Abílio
Something like new page inset?
An inset separator?
That still falls into the insert something category. You still have to
insert in the 'standard' environment. Otherwise your inset, although
output nothing in latex, will be nested. I mean
1. item1
2. your do-nothing inset
3. item1
Bo
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:33:45PM -0400, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> The attached patch to amsdefs.inc (versions 1.4.x and 1.5.x) turns on
> short titles, which amsart.cls supports. I'm not sure why they're not
> on already -- maybe there was a reason?
I suppose it was because the feature was
Here are two further patches to clean up the code:
* local_bidi.patch: The bidi object in the class Text is only used in
places now where a ParagraphMetrics::computeRowMetrics call comes
before. And this function the Bidi object is updated. So it is a
little step now to remove the
Bo Peng wrote:
>>
>> saveSelection does not hurt even in the LFUN_FINISHED case. At worst
>> it is useless.
>
> Logically speaking, we should saveSelection after cur has moved to its
> place. In that case, cur is undispatched so saveSelection should not
> be called.
Maybe the best would be
On Thursday 07 June 2007 21:01:10 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Here are two further patches to clean up the code:
>
> * local_bidi.patch: The bidi object in the class Text is only used in
> places now where a ParagraphMetrics::computeRowMetrics call comes
> before. And this function the Bidi object
> Logically speaking, we should saveSelection after cur has moved to its
> place. In that case, cur is undispatched so saveSelection should not
> be called.
Maybe the best would be calling saveSelection at the end of
Cursor::dispatch (maybe adding the check if the cursor has moved), and
nowhere
Bo Peng wrote:
>> > Logically speaking, we should saveSelection after cur has moved to its
>> > place. In that case, cur is undispatched so saveSelection should not
>> > be called.
>>
>> Maybe the best would be calling saveSelection at the end of
>> Cursor::dispatch (maybe adding the check if the
On Thursday 07 June 2007 08:47:24 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The patch is OK to me (with the extra switchKeymap).
Dov if you come with a patch with this suggestion implemented then you have
my OK. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:19:41 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Order to apply:
>
> no_bidi_isboundary.patch
> no_bidi_setcurrentfont.patch
> local_bidi.patch
> cursor_get_font.patch
> rtl_spaces.patch
What is missing to apply from this set?
> Stefan
--
José Abílio
Am 07.06.2007 um 22:29 schrieb José Matos:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:19:41 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Order to apply:
no_bidi_isboundary.patch
no_bidi_setcurrentfont.patch
local_bidi.patch
cursor_get_font.patch
rtl_spaces.patch
What is missing to apply from this set?
Just the last one.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 21:41:45 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Just the last one. Want to hear some report by people here in the
> thread. Then it can go in.
That is fair.
> Stefan
--
José Abílio
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 07.06.2007 um 22:29 schrieb José Matos:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:19:41 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Order to apply:
no_bidi_isboundary.patch
no_bidi_setcurrentfont.patch
local_bidi.patch
cursor_get_font.patch
rtl_spaces.patch
What is missing to apply from this
José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 08:47:24 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The patch is OK to me (with the extra switchKeymap).
Dov if you come with a patch with this suggestion implemented then you have
my OK. :-)
JMarc
Thanks, I will send a corrected patch soon.
Am 07.06.2007 um 22:51 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 07.06.2007 um 22:29 schrieb José Matos:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 14:19:41 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Order to apply:
no_bidi_isboundary.patch
no_bidi_setcurrentfont.patch
local_bidi.patch
cursor_get_font.patch
drawMarkers moved to InsetMathNest?! See r18701. Please revert or fix
that.
/Users/sts/Quellen/mac/lyx-devel/src/mathed/InsetMathMBox.cpp: In
member function 'virtual void lyx::InsetMathMBox::draw
(lyx::PainterInfo&, int, int) const':
Dov Feldstern wrote:
José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 07 June 2007 08:47:24 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The patch is OK to me (with the extra switchKeymap).
Dov if you come with a patch with this suggestion implemented then
you have my OK. :-)
JMarc
Thanks, I will send a corrected
On 6/7/07, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
drawMarkers moved to InsetMathNest?! See r18701. Please revert or fix
that.
Interesting, why my compiler did not complain? (The test was also
tested by others).
I will see what is going on...
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
I can polish this and add lyx2lyx.
I guess it is better called 'Splitter' or 'Separator', and is
displayed as '--- split environment ---' Othewise, we will see lyx
files with all environment properly ended with this environment.
Yes, that seems right. I had a similar idea.
rh
On 6/7/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/7/07, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> drawMarkers moved to InsetMathNest?! See r18701. Please revert or fix
> that.
The patch is partially reverted to move drawMarkers and drawMarkers2
back to its original place. The problem
> "Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> But what do you think about this suggestion: instead of adding
Dov> switchKeyMap in the new place, and where I added it originally,
Dov> just add it inside translateAndInsert() itself? (I haven't tried
Dov> this out yet --- but if it
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That makes sense but as I have said (or implied), to avoid
>> introduction of new bugs, it is unwise to overhaul clipboards now.
>> JMarc's two-liner stops crashes, my two-liners saves selection
>> correctly for that particular
Alfredo> Seems fair enough ;-)
Go for it,
Will do.
but Alfredo's suggestion is the way to go later.
I hope Alfredo will go further enough to merge text and table clipboards. :-)
Bo
On Thursday 07 June 2007 22:06:47 Bo Peng wrote:
> Interesting, why my compiler did not complain? (The test was also
> tested by others).
I had no problems with gcc 4.1.2 (with bits from 4.2) or else I would have
complained earlier. :-)
--
José Abílio
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> I have a personal agenda against this kind of hacks. :-) I
José> know because I have used them in the past.
I'd rather avoid such hacks too, since they do not add much we cannot
already can do.
José> The solution would be to go to
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 21:32:05 Mael Hilléreau wrote:
> Le 5 juin 07 à 19:14, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
> > Pleas send patches (also) to the mailing list unless they are
> > exceptionally large. And please create 'unified diffs'. People
> > here are used to them...
>
> Sorry about that, I updated
On Thursday 07 June 2007 23:01:16 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The 'only' problem is a very tough one...
>
> Another solution is to remove this special handling for environments
> and force to use depth when several paragraphs are in a same env.
>
> JMarc
It needs carefull thought but it is not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
José> I have a personal agenda against this kind of hacks. :-) I
José> know because I have used them in the past.
I'd rather avoid such hacks too, since they do not add much we cannot
already can do.
José> The solution would be to go to a box based approach
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 22:11:14 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> He is just trying to please his new boss :)
>
> JMarc
As it can be seen here in the second photo taken in Berlin (first person
standing in the left side):
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2007/05/30/qt-430-released/
--
José
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into account the
delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
(Executive summary: rc2 - 15 June; final - 22 June)
I would like to only allow
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:01 PM, José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into account
the delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual
place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
(Executive summary: rc2 - 15 June; final - 22
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Guy in the other thread prefers some magic here that the first space is
moved to the other side (so in fact the LyX 1.3 behavior. What do you
think? We could probably implement such a magic in the insertChar handler.
Right, and so does Ran. Attached is a patch
Sorry, please use the corrected patch attached...
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Guy in the other thread prefers some magic here that the first space
is moved to the other side (so in fact the LyX 1.3 behavior. What do
you think? We could probably implement such a magic in
An environment paragraph would be inserted inside a box, allowing other
things to be inserted before the begin of the first item.I like this idea
a lot :-) Then we can customize the environment with ERT.Or else the first
item will not be customized...
The validation mechanism of InsetListingsParams is great but is not
flexible to handle unrecognized parameters introduced, e.g., by a new
version of the listings.
The attached patch allows users to input arbitrary parameters by
prefixing it with a '@' sign. @ will be removed in latex output, but
Strange, maybe my checkout it broken. But as far as I could see with
my tired eyes yesterday the mentioned patch moves drawMarkers from
InsetMath to InsetMathNest. And as InsetMathMBox is derived from the
former there should be an error, no?!
Stefan
On Thursday 07 June 2007 22:06:47 Bo
Am 08.06.2007 um 01:22 schrieb Bennett Helm:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:01 PM, José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into
account the delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual
place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> I can not believe that I am hitting a second WONTFIX in two days, but
> this is likely the fate of this patch.
>
> The attached patch adds SplitLayout environment to a few layout/inc
> files that will end up in almost all layouts. This
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:54:55AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Ran Rutenberg wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I tried to write a bidi file using the four patches and I didn't see
> >a big difference in writing with the patches and without them. One
> >small problem I did find is that when writing a word
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:12:47AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Comments? OK?
Make sense. Fine with me.
Andre'
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:18:55AM +1000, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:48 -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > Is there some way to find out what the user has installed as his or her
> > default pdf reader? Obviously, this will be highly platform sensitive,
> > and even desktop
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:18:55AM +1000, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:48 -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> > Is there some way to find out what the user has installed as his or her
> > default pdf reader? Obviously, this will be highly platform sensitive,
> > and even desktop
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I need four positive votes to
outnumber our future-oriented masters (who consider this as a useless
ugly hack).
I like it. And the future work needed to get to that "box-based" solution
will be substantial.
José Matos Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:05:49 -0700
- What are the patches submitted that you think deserve
attention?
I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and
so on.
Since the most need for saving as 1.4.x should occur in the
transition to 1.5, I think
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:06:47PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >drawMarkers moved to InsetMathNest?! See r18701. Please revert or fix
> >that.
>
> Interesting, why my compiler did not complain? (The test was also
> tested by others).
>
> I
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:36:56PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 6/7/07, Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> drawMarkers moved to InsetMathNest?! See r18701. Please revert or fix
> >> that.
>
> The patch is partially reverted to move
201 - 248 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
