Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-21 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.02.2016 um 05:48 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: "If you want to reference the subequations at once". I don't think "at once" sounds right to a native English speaker. "At once" means "immediately" rather than "as a whole" or "collectively". Thus I would prefer, "If you want to reference the

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-20 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 21/02/2016 4:49 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 21.02.2016 um 03:56 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: OK, so it seems that this referencing method is used. I will add it to the Math manual. Attached is the changed Math manual (sec. 19.3). Is this OK? regards Uwe Thank you Uwe (and apologies for the recent

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-20 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 21/02/2016 3:56 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 20.02.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Sec 3.11.3: "A \label command immediately after \begin{subequations} will produce a \ref of the parent number 4.9, not 4.9a.". OK, so it seems that this referencing method is used. I will add it to

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-20 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 20.02.2016 um 20:41 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Sec 3.11.3: "A \label command immediately after \begin{subequations} will produce a \ref of the parent number 4.9, not 4.9a.". OK, so it seems that this referencing method is used. I will add it to the Math manual. And particularly section

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-20 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 20/02/2016 3:32 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: However, the question for me is if your method should be part of math.lyx or not. ... But maybe you find a nice solution in stackexchange. If so, please send me a LyX file how it is done and i will have a look what could be ported to Math.lyx.

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-18 Thread Uwe Stöhr
  Original Message   From: Andrew Parsloe Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016 02:50 To: Uwe Stöhr; lyx-docs@lists.lyx.org Subject: Re: Referencing subnumbered equations > It's possible we are talking about different things Uwe. Extracting the example from 19.3 in the maths manual and compil

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-17 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 17.02.2016 um 03:08 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: Rather than try to explain things, I've attached two example documents Uwe, one using ERT and one with a local layout that requires no ERT. They show how to reference both a group of equations as a whole and the subequations in the group. Thanks.

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-16 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 17/02/2016 3:08 p.m., Andrew Parsloe wrote: On 17/02/2016 1:05 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: Rather than try to explain things, I've attached two example documents Uwe, one using ERT and one with a local layout that requires no ERT. They show how to reference both a group of equations as a

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-16 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 17/02/2016 1:05 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 16.02.2016 um 10:37 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: The math manual, section 19.3,... Hi Andrew, this is something for the lyx-docs list. gives a method for numbering and referencing subnumbered equations so that although the equations are numbered,

Re: Referencing subnumbered equations

2016-02-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 16.02.2016 um 10:37 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: The math manual, section 19.3,... Hi Andrew, this is something for the lyx-docs list. gives a method for numbering and referencing subnumbered equations so that although the equations are numbered, e.g., (1a), (1b), (1c), it is possible to