Kevin Pfeiffer writes:
Angus Leeming writes:
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Is there a way that I can do this:
Find: My text to replace
Replace with: [an ERT container and its contents]
-Kevin
Not within LyX. Outside LyX it's trivial because you're just
replacing one string with
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
\magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get
fed up with the slowness of LyX development and
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
\magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get fed
up with the slowness of LyX development and if (or
Herbert Voss writes:
However, using \textit
maybe not good idea when it could be done by the bst file
(running custom bib)
Agreed; I think in my own specific situation here I will use Angus's
original use newcommand in the Preamble suggestion. There, with
clarifying comments, I can carefully
On 5/5/05, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope this isn't too simple I'd like to define a quick way in Lyx of
entering this construct for entering a system of equations:
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
\\\end{array}\right.$
Currently I achieve this by using the Math panel
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C + 2D = 0\\
C + (4-\lambda)D =
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes them unreadable.
Is there any way to either
Brian Williams wrote:
By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: If you decide after
the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to go
Brian Williams wrote:
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C + 2D = 0\\
C +
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes them unreadable.
Brian Williams wrote:
By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: If you decide after
the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to go
Thanks Herbert, you are a genius!
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented
somewhere?)
Thanks!
Brian
Send instant messages to your online friends
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the
Brian Williams wrote:
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented somewhere?)
yes, but it is easier to write the _whole_ stuff in real
LaTeX code, LyX is not designed for
Johan Ingvast wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
Yes, that would be good if the lyx special file for preview could sense
if showkeys was loaded.
I'd rather not go into following
Angus Leeming wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes
Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
make them available in the preferences and everything is ok.
Which
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
make them available in the preferences and everything is
Herbert Voss wrote:
What happened to your package manager BTW? Do you still have it? Could
you post it?
don't know. If yes, then only as a diff and from LyX 1.3.
I suppose useless then.
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the current sources
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Sure, but that would cause problems when making documents not using
package showkeys.
Or can I have a local copy of the lyxpreview script in my local directory?
That would be acceptable.
I hope
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
What happened to your package manager BTW? Do you still have it? Could
you post it?
don't know. If yes, then only as a diff and from LyX 1.3.
I suppose useless then.
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the
Dear All,
Trying to tie up the last couple of things towards my thesis and have
run into a few road blocks. My question is how to include the front
matter into the TOC. I currently have an un-numbered title page and
letter of transmittal. Following this are 4-5 pages of matter before
the TOC.
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would like
to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline container
should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post wishes? Or should they go into the
bugzilla?
-K
--
Kevin Pfeiffer [EMAIL
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try to imagine that LyX development can proceed only with LyX developers.
If you want more then the best way to push your agenda is to roll up our
sleeves and help.
No!!! I am sorry, I didn't mean to be derogative to the great work you guys
do (certainly, that there is not
Hi Herbert,
using some of your ideas, I've got what I wanted using a single row, 3 element array. It's almost all done with LyX with a minimum of Latex in-line code.
Question is, do you think it's terribly kludgy? See attached.
Thanks for all your help
Brian
Yahoo! Messenger
- want a free
Herbert Voss wrote:
nonsense,
chmmm -- that's a serious argument :-)
a BibTeX database is a base for LaTeX and big and complex databases
use the power of LaTeX in the data records, e.g. \url{...} for
web addresses together with hyperref. However, using \textit
maybe not good idea when it
Herbert Voss wrote:
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the current sources will be relatively easy. So, if you
can find it, I'd be very interested.
I found some lyx-devel stuff and put _all_ into a tgz.
Don't know if the package manager is in
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Ryan King wrote:
Trying to tie up the last couple of things towards my thesis and have run
into a few road blocks. My question is how to include the front matter into
the TOC. I currently have an un-numbered title page and letter of
transmittal. Following this are 4-5 pages of
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would
like to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline
container should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post wishes? Or should they go into the
bugzilla?
If
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try to imagine that LyX development can proceed only with LyX
developers. If you want more then the best way to push your agenda is to
roll up our sleeves and help.
No!!! I am sorry, I didn't mean to be derogative to the great work you
guys do
Hi!
I been trying to make a matrix with square borders and identification labels
on top for columns and to the left for rows, both of them outside of the
borders.
I typed the following equation inside the math editor (so I could get
preview)
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Herbert Voss wrote:
\AtBeginDocument{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
should do the trick
thanks, but it did not do what I wanted.
Strangly it took away both labels, both the one that showkeys put in and
the one that preview put in. That is for standard equations.
For mulitline
Johan Ingvast wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Herbert Voss wrote:
\AtBeginDocument{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
should do the trick
thanks, but it did not do what I wanted.
Strangly it took away both labels, both the one that showkeys put in and
the one that preview put in. That is for standard equations.
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:46:41PM +0100, Brian Williams wrote:
Hi Herbert,
using some of your ideas, I've got what I wanted using a single row, 3
element array. It's almost all done with LyX with a minimum of Latex
in-line code.
Question is, do you think it's terribly kludgy? See
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:36:32PM +0200, Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would like
to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline container
should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:12:50AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
where the 8 indicates you will have 8 editable entries. In the macro
definition box, insert the left brace, the 2x4 array (with right
justification) and the right null delimiter. Then (still in the macro
definition box) switch
On 5/6/05, Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where the 8 indicates you will have 8 editable entries. In the macro
definition box, insert the left brace, the 2x4 array (with right
justification) and the right null delimiter. Then (still in the macro
definition box) switch into
Out of band, I suggested a key binding to Brian.
-- Paul
Brian Williams wrote:
Hi,
Hope this isn't too simple I'd like to define a quick way in Lyx of
entering this construct for entering a system of equations:
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
\\\end{array}\right.$
Currently I achieve this by
Angus Leeming writes:
If all you need is to replace '\L{' with '{\englishtext' then I'd
suggest that you should write a little wrapper script
Thanks, this was a useful tip; I'm adding some often-occurring Index tags
this way.
One problem I experienced was that Lyx seems to read in these
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
Hi,
If I want to view the Lyx file I am working at with pdflatex,
I always get the message
3 errors detected.
You should try to fix them.
The error messages are
1. LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing \item.
2. and 3. Extra \else. I'm ignoring this; it
I do not have a solution to your strange problem, but when you find the answer
I very much hopy you'll publish it on the list. I am currently doing my final
thesis using LyX, and the problem you are facing is exactly something like
that I have nightmares about. For this reason, please tell us
Kevin Pfeiffer writes:
Angus Leeming writes:
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Is there a way that I can do this:
Find: My text to replace
Replace with: [an ERT container and its contents]
-Kevin
Not within LyX. Outside LyX it's trivial because you're just
replacing one string with
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
\magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get
fed up with the slowness of LyX development and
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
\magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get fed
up with the slowness of LyX development and if (or
Herbert Voss writes:
However, using \textit
maybe not good idea when it could be done by the bst file
(running custom bib)
Agreed; I think in my own specific situation here I will use Angus's
original use newcommand in the Preamble suggestion. There, with
clarifying comments, I can carefully
On 5/5/05, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope this isn't too simple I'd like to define a quick way in Lyx of
entering this construct for entering a system of equations:
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
\\\end{array}\right.$
Currently I achieve this by using the Math panel
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C + 2D = 0\\
C + (4-\lambda)D =
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes them unreadable.
Is there any way to either
Brian Williams wrote:
By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: If you decide after
the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to go
Brian Williams wrote:
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C + 2D = 0\\
C +
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes them unreadable.
Brian Williams wrote:
By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: If you decide after
the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to go
Thanks Herbert, you are a genius!
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented
somewhere?)
Thanks!
Brian
Send instant messages to your online friends
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the
Brian Williams wrote:
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented somewhere?)
yes, but it is easier to write the _whole_ stuff in real
LaTeX code, LyX is not designed for
Johan Ingvast wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
Yes, that would be good if the lyx special file for preview could sense
if showkeys was loaded.
I'd rather not go into following
Angus Leeming wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes
Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
make them available in the preferences and everything is ok.
Which
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
make them available in the preferences and everything is
Herbert Voss wrote:
What happened to your package manager BTW? Do you still have it? Could
you post it?
don't know. If yes, then only as a diff and from LyX 1.3.
I suppose useless then.
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the current sources
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Sure, but that would cause problems when making documents not using
package showkeys.
Or can I have a local copy of the lyxpreview script in my local directory?
That would be acceptable.
I hope
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
What happened to your package manager BTW? Do you still have it? Could
you post it?
don't know. If yes, then only as a diff and from LyX 1.3.
I suppose useless then.
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the
Dear All,
Trying to tie up the last couple of things towards my thesis and have
run into a few road blocks. My question is how to include the front
matter into the TOC. I currently have an un-numbered title page and
letter of transmittal. Following this are 4-5 pages of matter before
the TOC.
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would like
to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline container
should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post wishes? Or should they go into the
bugzilla?
-K
--
Kevin Pfeiffer [EMAIL
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try to imagine that LyX development can proceed only with LyX developers.
If you want more then the best way to push your agenda is to roll up our
sleeves and help.
No!!! I am sorry, I didn't mean to be derogative to the great work you guys
do (certainly, that there is not
Hi Herbert,
using some of your ideas, I've got what I wanted using a single row, 3 element array. It's almost all done with LyX with a minimum of Latex in-line code.
Question is, do you think it's terribly kludgy? See attached.
Thanks for all your help
Brian
Yahoo! Messenger
- want a free
Herbert Voss wrote:
nonsense,
chmmm -- that's a serious argument :-)
a BibTeX database is a base for LaTeX and big and complex databases
use the power of LaTeX in the data records, e.g. \url{...} for
web addresses together with hyperref. However, using \textit
maybe not good idea when it
Herbert Voss wrote:
It's the logic of it all that will be interesting (and difficult).
Slotting it into the current sources will be relatively easy. So, if you
can find it, I'd be very interested.
I found some lyx-devel stuff and put _all_ into a tgz.
Don't know if the package manager is in
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Ryan King wrote:
Trying to tie up the last couple of things towards my thesis and have run
into a few road blocks. My question is how to include the front matter into
the TOC. I currently have an un-numbered title page and letter of
transmittal. Following this are 4-5 pages of
Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would
like to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline
container should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post wishes? Or should they go into the
bugzilla?
If
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Try to imagine that LyX development can proceed only with LyX
developers. If you want more then the best way to push your agenda is to
roll up our sleeves and help.
No!!! I am sorry, I didn't mean to be derogative to the great work you
guys do
Hi!
I been trying to make a matrix with square borders and identification labels
on top for columns and to the left for rows, both of them outside of the
borders.
I typed the following equation inside the math editor (so I could get
preview)
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Herbert Voss wrote:
\AtBeginDocument{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
should do the trick
thanks, but it did not do what I wanted.
Strangly it took away both labels, both the one that showkeys put in and
the one that preview put in. That is for standard equations.
For mulitline
Johan Ingvast wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Herbert Voss wrote:
\AtBeginDocument{
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
should do the trick
thanks, but it did not do what I wanted.
Strangly it took away both labels, both the one that showkeys put in and
the one that preview put in. That is for standard equations.
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:46:41PM +0100, Brian Williams wrote:
Hi Herbert,
using some of your ideas, I've got what I wanted using a single row, 3
element array. It's almost all done with LyX with a minimum of Latex
in-line code.
Question is, do you think it's terribly kludgy? See
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 03:36:32PM +0200, Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
Following up on myself again, 'Idx'es are another object that I would like
to be able to find/replace. As mentioned, actually _any_ inline container
should be find/replaceable if possible.
Is this the best place to post
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:12:50AM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
where the 8 indicates you will have 8 editable entries. In the macro
definition box, insert the left brace, the 2x4 array (with right
justification) and the right null delimiter. Then (still in the macro
definition box) switch
On 5/6/05, Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where the 8 indicates you will have 8 editable entries. In the macro
definition box, insert the left brace, the 2x4 array (with right
justification) and the right null delimiter. Then (still in the macro
definition box) switch into
Out of band, I suggested a key binding to Brian.
-- Paul
Brian Williams wrote:
Hi,
Hope this isn't too simple I'd like to define a quick way in Lyx of
entering this construct for entering a system of equations:
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
\\\end{array}\right.$
Currently I achieve this by
Angus Leeming writes:
If all you need is to replace '\L{' with '{\englishtext' then I'd
suggest that you should write a little wrapper script
Thanks, this was a useful tip; I'm adding some often-occurring Index tags
this way.
One problem I experienced was that Lyx seems to read in these
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
Hi,
If I want to view the Lyx file I am working at with pdflatex,
I always get the message
3 errors detected.
You should try to fix them.
The error messages are
1. LaTeX Error: Something's wrong--perhaps a missing \item.
2. and 3. Extra \else. I'm ignoring this; it
I do not have a solution to your strange problem, but when you find the answer
I very much hopy you'll publish it on the list. I am currently doing my final
thesis using LyX, and the problem you are facing is exactly something like
that I have nightmares about. For this reason, please tell us
Kevin Pfeiffer writes:
> Angus Leeming writes:
> > Kevin Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > Is there a way that I can do this:
> > >
> > > Find: "My text to replace"
> > > Replace with: [an ERT container and its contents]
> > >
> > > -Kevin
> >
> > Not within LyX. Outside LyX it's trivial because you're just
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
>> \magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
>
> No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get
> fed up with the slowness of LyX
Matej Cepl wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Shrug. Taste's differ. Change \textit to \magazine_style and define
\magazine_style as you choose in the preamble of the document.
No, that is not what I meant -- try to imagine, that I will finally get fed
up with the slowness of LyX development and if (or
Herbert Voss writes:
> However, using \textit
> maybe not good idea when it could be done by the bst file
> (running custom bib)
Agreed; I think in my own specific situation here I will use Angus's
original "use newcommand in the Preamble" suggestion. There, with
clarifying comments, I can
On 5/5/05, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hope this isn't too simple I'd like to define a quick way in Lyx of
> > entering this construct for entering a system of equations:
> >
> > $\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
> > \\\end{array}\right.$
> >
> > Currently I achieve this by
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C & + & 2D & = & 0\\
C & + & (4-\lambda)D & = &
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes them unreadable.
Is there any way to either
Brian Williams wrote:
> By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: "If you decide after
> the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
> root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
> highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to
Brian Williams wrote:
Hi folks,
looks like this isn't such a newbie question after all.
Maybe I should ask it more carefully.
I want to use LyX to produce systems of equations that look like this (output
exported from LyX):
$\left\{ \begin{array}{r}
(3-\lambda)C & + & 2D & = & 0\\
C & + &
Johan Ingvast wrote:
> Hi
> I use the preview of math which works fine.
> However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
> there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
> the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
> makes them
Brian Williams wrote:
> By the way, the user guide says this in section 5.2: "If you decide after
> the fact to place parentheses (or other math structure, like a square
> root, or other decoration) around some math structure, you can do that by
> highlighting (selecting) the structure that is to
Thanks Herbert, you are a genius!
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented
somewhere?)
Thanks!
Brian
Send instant messages to your online friends
On Fri, 6 May 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Johan Ingvast wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I use the preview of math which works fine.
> > However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
> > there is a problem
Brian Williams wrote:
Hope you don't mind a followup! :-) Is there a way to right justify the
equation numbers?
(I'm guessing the items in red are standard LaTeX macros I can find documented somewhere?)
yes, but it is easier to write the _whole_ stuff in real
LaTeX code, LyX is not designed for
Johan Ingvast wrote:
>> I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
>> That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
> Yes, that would be good if the lyx special file for preview could sense
> if showkeys was loaded.
> I'd rather not go into
Angus Leeming wrote:
Johan Ingvast wrote:
Hi
I use the preview of math which works fine.
However now I want to use the package showkeys for my printouts. Then
there is a problem with the preview. Both the preview package and
the showkeys put the labels to the right of the equations, which
makes
Herbert Voss wrote:
>> I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
>> That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
>
> huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
> make them available in the preferences and everything is ok.
Angus Leeming wrote:
Herbert Voss wrote:
I think that the best solution here is to take this to the auctex list.
That way David Kastrup can address the root cause of the problem.
huh?? It is a LyX problem, that the options are hardcoded ..
make them available in the preferences and everything is
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
