That's awesome. I'll check this out ASAP. Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
Fabian Santiago
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:37 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>
> Hey Fabian,
>
>> Does anyone know where I can find more info on deploying mailman 3 on centos
Hey Fabian,
> Does anyone know where I can find more info on deploying mailman 3 on centos
> 7 aside from the standard docs site?
I'm currently packaging Mailman3 and HyperKitty + Postorius for Red
Hat / CentOS 7. My packages are here:
Does anyone know where I can find more info on deploying mailman 3 on centos 7
aside from the standard docs site?
I am having some difficulty and am unfamiliar with the python virtual env stuff
so I'm interested in any help anyone can provide.
Thanks all.
Sincerely,
Fabian Santiago
Sent
No I am not an expert but simply an avid user. I wish I could be of more help
and of course would in any way I can.
--
Fabe
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> On Sep 15, 2015, at 01:05 AM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
>>
>> Any plans to support Qmail along
On Sep 15, 2015, at 01:05 AM, Fabian Santiago wrote:
>Any plans to support Qmail along with Mailman 3.0 and above?
We'd be very happy to accept Qmail support if someone were to contribute it
and agree to help support it for some reasonable amount of time. It shouldn't
be difficult. Are you a
Hello,
Just re-posting this on the appropriate list this time;
Any plans to support Qmail along with Mailman 3.0 and above?
--
Fabe
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
Is there a recommended server environment to run Mailman 3?
It should install and run on any *nix server that supports both Python
2.7 and Python 3.0, an MTA capable of LMTP delivery to Mailman
(currently configurations for Postfix and Exim are provided) and a web
server compatible with Django.
On Apr 29, 2015, at 08:53 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
That's wrong. I was conflating Mailman and Python Releases. Mailman 3.0
nominally requires Python 2.7 and Python 3.4. It may run with earlier
Python 3.x releases, but no guarantees and probably not as old as 3.0 or
even 3.1 in any case.
Nobody
-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Developers [mailto:mailman-developers-
bounces+brian=emwd@python.org] On Behalf Of Barry Warsaw
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:03 PM
To: mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman 3.0 roadmap, feature-parity
-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Developers [mailto:mailman-developers-
bounces+brian=emwd@python.org] On Behalf Of Danil Smirnov
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 4:24 PM
To: Mailman Developers
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman 3.0 roadmap, feature-parity
with mailman 2.x
2015-04-29 18:03 GMT+03:00 Brian Carpenter br...@emwd.com:
Just to be clear, this is a stable fully working version of Mailman 3.0? I
tried setting up Mailman 3 on a CentOS server about 2 weeks ago and had a
number of issues including listinfo pages not working (404 errors), no clear
On 04/29/2015 01:26 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote:
Is there a recommended server environment to run Mailman 3?
It should install and run on any *nix server that supports both Python
2.7 and Python 3.0, an MTA capable of LMTP delivery to Mailman
(currently configurations for Postfix and Exim are
-Original Message-
From: Mailman-Developers [mailto:mailman-developers-
bounces+brian=emwd@python.org] On Behalf Of Mark Sapiro
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:43 PM
To: mailman-developers@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Developers] mailman 3.0 roadmap, feature-parity
On 04/29/2015 08:45 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote:
On 04/29/2015 01:26 PM, Brian Carpenter wrote:
Is there a recommended server environment to run Mailman 3?
It should install and run on any *nix server that supports both Python
2.7 and Python 3.0
That's wrong. I was conflating Mailman and
On Apr 29, 2015, at 01:17 AM, shirish wrote:
We aim to release Mailman 3.0rc1 in late April, 2015. - wiki entry
What would be nice is if there is some ETA as to when 3.0 will be released to
the general public. Are there going to be another 2-3-4 RC releases before
3.0 is ready ?
Actually, we
Hi all,
Thank you for the unblemished service by Mailman. It is due to you that
many FOSS projects continue to see the light of the day as email
continues to hold its sway on developers rather than forums and mail
management continues to be easier due to Mailman.
Newbie here. I have been
nkarageuz...@gmail.com writes:
I'm looking forward mailman 3 to find efficient archive UI, with posting
from web feature (just like in http://groupserver.org/)
I don't see a reply, so even though I'm not the best person to answer
this I'll take a hack at it.
There were two or three
Hi Steeve,
Thank-you for spending some time answering my noob question.
I've found hyperkitty after reading many docs.
It's great and i have submitted pull request for it.
Best regards
2013/8/12 Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org
nkarageuz...@gmail.com writes:
I'm looking forward
Hi,
I'm looking forward mailman 3 to find efficient archive UI, with posting
from web feature (just like in http://groupserver.org/)
I don't know if it's in the roadmap, from the archive i can read
The archiver and the web interface are at best early beta, but there
are running prototypes. You
Hi,
I was just about to ask about the status of Mailman 3. What I'm looking
for is some idea of what it can do already. For example, it has all its
features but needs to be administered from the command line, or it's
missing important feature X, or it has everything but some switches can't
Geoff Shang writes:
The reason why I'm asking is that I'm in need of some Mm3 features
and was wondering if it was ready for limited deployment, and if
so, what those limits currently are.
The list server is in beta, when combined with Postfix as the MTA.
Interfaces to other MTAs have not
On 7/14/2013 9:21 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Terri Oda writes:
I've started a new things left to do before Mailman 3 releases list
over at
http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+3.0
Mostly this is so the next time someone asks me So, when are you
releasing? I can at
On 13-07-15 8:28 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
There are no deployments I know of, although Barry may. (I'm leaving
out people who are playing with betas; by deployment I mean
supporting real work.) The GSoC mentors and students are discussing
setting one up that we can experiment either.
On Jul 14, 2013, at 03:52 PM, Terri Oda wrote:
I've started a new things left to do before Mailman 3 releases list over at
http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+3.0
Thanks Terri. I'll spend some time pouring over that page w.r.t. the core,
updating it, removing old to-do items, and filling
On Jul 15, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
There are no deployments I know of, although Barry may. (I'm leaving
out people who are playing with betas; by deployment I mean
supporting real work.) The GSoC mentors and students are discussing
setting one up that we can experiment
On Jul 15, 2013, at 01:21 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
The only thing I can think of offhand for core is Exim support.
(Sendmail support, I suppose, but nobody I know uses Sendmail, and I
can't do it. Exim on the other hand is on my personal list.)
I'd very much love to have Exim and Sendmail
Barry Warsaw writes:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 01:21 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
The only thing I can think of offhand for core is Exim support.
(Sendmail support, I suppose, but nobody I know uses Sendmail, and I
can't do it. Exim on the other hand is on my personal list.)
I'd very
I've started a new things left to do before Mailman 3 releases list
over at
http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Mailman+3.0
Mostly this is so the next time someone asks me So, when are you
releasing? I can at least say We don't have a date yet, but here's the
remaining todo list but also because I
In case others might be interested and appreciating a bit of help recalling
what the search feature's development status is at the moment, this email
spawned from a thread in June 2012, here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers@python.org/msg12921.html
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:36
Jessy,
Yes, there are plans (and activity) related to the presentation of list
archives within the django framework.
In fact, Aamir, one of our GSoC interns, is working on that very subject as his
project for the summer.
In keeping with the django philosophy of combining many special purpose
good to know, look forward to seeing it!
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Richard Wackerbarth rich...@nfsnet.orgwrote:
Jessy,
Yes, there are plans (and activity) related to the presentation of list
archives within the django framework.
In fact, Aamir, one of our GSoC interns, is working on
hello again, and thanks for the response.
What I've always thought is that overview, architectural, and other useful
higher level documentation should go in src/mailman/docs. Still using the
reST format, but they needn't necessarily be doctests. So I think an
overview
page about interacting
hi richard,
Good end-user documentation always seems to be something that gets shorted
by the developers intimately related to the implementation aspect of the
code. And, even when they make the effort, I'm not sure that they are the
most qualified to write that kind of documentation. Someone
thanks mark and barry. i've been traveling so apologies for the delayed
reply...
using `bin/mailman shell` command does indeed work flawlessly, thank you!
should the docs be updated perhaps? something either under getting started
with GNU Maiman or even a specific page on interacting with
On Jun 07, 2012, at 09:31 AM, Jessy Kate Schingler wrote:
should the docs be updated perhaps? something either under getting started
with GNU Maiman or even a specific page on interacting with mailman
through the python interpreter? i am happy to add something or contribute
to that; i think it
Jessy,
I'm sure that any additions to the documentation will be welcomed.
Good end-user documentation always seems to be something that gets shorted by
the developers intimately related to the implementation aspect of the code.
And, even when they make the effort, I'm not sure that they are
Hi Jessy,
You're doing everything right, but there's one conceptual step that you're
missing, and which isn't evident from the docs.
As Mark says, `mailman shell` is the best way to get a Python interactive
interpreter shell to play with the internal Mailman API. Why is this better
than just
hello!
i am setting up mailman 3.0 on ubuntu 12.04. but getting errors when i try
to work with mailman through the python interpreter. i hope this is the
correct list to post to.
here are the steps i took:
- installed mailman 3.0.0.b1 in a fresh virtualenv
- install is happy, all tests pass
Jessy Kate Schingler wrote:
then i go to follow the example on how to create new mailing lists:
http://packages.python.org/mailman/src/mailman/commands/docs/create.html
but attempting to import mailman packages fails, so it seems the python
packages aren't installed? so i run `python setup.py
HI all,
I am trying to install mailman 3 on Solaris 10 x86 as I would like to
test a few new features that would greatly simplify our current
deployment. (mailman 2.1.12)
I got the latest bazaar image as per the website instructions:
bzr branch lp:mailman
I then ran
#python2.6 bootstrap.py
--On 14 June 2010 19:21:04 +0200 Florian Fuchs f...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
Hi all,
we have set up a test server for the development of the Mailman 3.0 UI.
As coding on the UI progresses we will update it regularly so everybody
can see what's being done.
For now it contains a simple,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:31:30PM +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote:
The server's address is http://mailman.state-of-mind.de
That's so much nicer than Mailman2!
Agreed! An earlier reply containing an ascii mockup got rejected, so
here is an image of what I was trying to convey:
* Ian Eiloart i...@sussex.ac.uk:
--On 14 June 2010 19:21:04 +0200 Florian Fuchs f...@state-of-mind.de wrote:
Hi all,
we have set up a test server for the development of the Mailman 3.0 UI.
As coding on the UI progresses we will update it regularly so everybody
can see what's being
Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
Basically I want to make sure that the subscribe box always shows up
above the fold on the listinfo page. I get a fair number of tickets
because things are not above the fold.
I like the idea in principle, but I don't think it'll work because
there's a *lot* of stuff
Hi all,
we have set up a test server for the development of the Mailman 3.0 UI. As
coding on the UI progresses we will update it regularly so everybody can see
what's being done.
For now it contains a simple, experimental Django app I've written to test list
creation and subscription through
On Jun 14, 2010, at 07:21 PM, Florian Fuchs wrote:
we have set up a test server for the development of the Mailman 3.0 UI. As
coding on the UI progresses we will update it regularly so everybody can see
what's being done.
For now it contains a simple, experimental Django app I've written to test
* Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org:
On Jun 14, 2010, at 07:21 PM, Florian Fuchs wrote:
we have set up a test server for the development of the Mailman 3.0 UI. As
coding on the UI progresses we will update it regularly so everybody can see
what's being done.
For now it contains a simple,
On Jun 14, 2010, at 09:14 PM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
Can we get access to the IMAP folder?
host: mailman.state-of-mind.de
user: mail...@mailman.state-of-mind.de
pass: hemispheres
And, please (!), don't use it to trade files...
Nice! I'm in.
-B
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Mar 22, 2010, at 01:46 PM, Jennifer Redman wrote:
Since Django is being used for the web-interface I'm curious about the
implications for the ORM. Since MM 3.0 is using STORM - do you plan to just
not use the built-in Django ORM and go with STORM - or are you going to wind
up with 2 different
On Mar 23, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Kovács Zoltán writes:
Dear All, do you have some screenshots about the upcoming Mailman3 UI? I
have been Googling for some time but I didn't got appropriate results.
If you think screenshots of the UI are important, then Mailman 3 is
Since Django is being used for the web-interface I'm curious about the
implications for the ORM. Since MM 3.0 is using STORM - do you plan to just
not use the built-in Django ORM and go with STORM - or are you going to wind
up with 2 different database interfaces?
Hi Jen,
so far the plan
Hi,
I tried to find the page in the wiki Florian mentioned but realized it
probably hadn't been created yet. Would you mind sending a link to it once
it's finished?
Thanks,
Anna
there are still a few things to do but I'm hopeful I can get things ready
over the weekend. My goal is to have a
I tried to find the page in the wiki Florian mentioned but realized it
probably hadn't been created yet. Would you mind sending a link to it once
it's finished?
No, it's not been created yet, I'm afraid. I will send the link around as soon
as I have finished it.
Florian
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 09:18 AM, Florian Fuchs wrote:
there are still a few things to do but I'm hopeful I can get things ready
over the weekend. My goal is to have a simple django skeleton running that
talks to the rest server
Dear All, do you have some screenshots about the upcoming Mailman3 UI? I
have been Googling for some time but I didn't got appropriate results.
Yours, Zoltan
___
Mailman-Developers mailing list
Mailman-Developers@python.org
Kovács Zoltán writes:
Dear All, do you have some screenshots about the upcoming Mailman3 UI? I
have been Googling for some time but I didn't got appropriate results.
If you think screenshots of the UI are important, then Mailman 3 is
not for you, yet. Please have some patience, it will be
Hi all,
there are still a few things to do but I'm hopeful I can get things ready over
the weekend. My goal is to have a simple django skeleton running that talks to
the rest server in a working MM3-environment. I will update the wiki with info
on what is where and also outline some of the
On Mar 19, 2010, at 09:18 AM, Florian Fuchs wrote:
there are still a few things to do but I'm hopeful I can get things ready
over the weekend. My goal is to have a simple django skeleton running that
talks to the rest server in a working MM3-environment. I will update the wiki
with info on what
Hello!
I believe that there was a Code Sprint at Pycon to work on the MM 3.0 UI
(and other items). Is there any place I can go to read about what has been
implemented thus far in MM 3.0 and what features are still outstanding with
regards to MM 3.0 and in particular the UI?
Thanks,
Jen
On Mar 17, 2010, at 03:41 PM, Jennifer Redman wrote:
I believe that there was a Code Sprint at Pycon to work on the MM 3.0 UI
(and other items). Is there any place I can go to read about what has been
implemented thus far in MM 3.0 and what features are still outstanding with
regards to MM 3.0
* Barry Warsaw ba...@list.org:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 03:41 PM, Jennifer Redman wrote:
I believe that there was a Code Sprint at Pycon to work on the MM 3.0 UI
(and other items). Is there any place I can go to read about what has been
implemented thus far in MM 3.0 and what features are still
--On 29 November 2009 15:01:49 -0500 Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I'm happy to announce the release of Mailman 3.0 alpha 4.
The build instructions in src/mailman/docs/ALPHA.txt say that you can run
bin/test before they go on to describe configuring mailman. I found I had
to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 17, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
It looks like config_list isn't working yet in Mailman 3.0, and
there seems to be quite a lot of work to do to get it working.
In the meantime, how can I configure accept_these_nonmembers for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 18, 2008, at 9:06 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
It looks like config_list isn't working yet in Mailman 3.0, and
there seems to be quite a lot of work to do to get it working.
In the meantime,
Hi,
It looks like config_list isn't working yet in Mailman 3.0, and there seems
to be quite a lot of work to do to get it working.
In the meantime, how can I configure accept_these_nonmembers for a list? I
need to test LMTP qrunner code that uses this value.
I can do an SQL update, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys,
Is there publically accessible code for Mailman 3.0 anywhere? I took a
look on SF using their CVS web browser and all I saw was a readme for 3.0.
Jeff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
66 matches
Mail list logo