Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Monday 08 May 2017 22:44:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Sieghard wrote: > > Hallo Marcos, > > > > Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300: > >> >> 2. In this case: > >> >> obj2: ^objty; //on heap > >> >> > >> >> Is it possible to

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Fred van Stappen
Hello. If I may give my HO, I see more future for libraries than for executables for Pascal. So I hope that mselang will take (much more) care for the size and speed of libraries than fpc does. It is sad that still a fpc library with same code is 5 times bigger than a fpc executable ( and

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 10:41:00 Fred van Stappen wrote: > Hello. > > > If I may give my HO, I see more future for libraries than for executables > for Pascal. > > > So I hope that mselang will take (much more) care for the size and speed of > libraries than fpc does. > MSElang uses LLVM to produce

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > > It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to > do the work. > Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and possibly redundant "class". You are against the "class" which eliminates the explicit "^"

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: >> >> It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to >> do the work. >> > Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Monday 08 May 2017 22:44:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: >> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Sieghard wrote: >> > Hallo Marcos, >> > >> > Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300: >> >> >>

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > On Tuesday 09 May 2017 14:08:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: >> >> I understand your point of view but I think this could be confusing... >> Well, first of all we should understand the proposal this new language: >>

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSElang Objects

2017-05-09 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 14:08:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote: > > I understand your point of view but I think this could be confusing... > Well, first of all we should understand the proposal this new language: > > 1. Is it a low level language that will works like C to make libs, OS and > so