On Monday 08 May 2017 22:44:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Sieghard wrote:
> > Hallo Marcos,
> >
> > Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300:
> >> >> 2. In this case:
> >> >> obj2: ^objty; //on heap
> >> >>
> >> >> Is it possible to
Hello.
If I may give my HO, I see more future for libraries than for executables for
Pascal.
So I hope that mselang will take (much more) care for the size and speed of
libraries than fpc does.
It is sad that still a fpc library with same code is 5 times bigger than a fpc
executable ( and
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 10:41:00 Fred van Stappen wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> If I may give my HO, I see more future for libraries than for executables
> for Pascal.
>
>
> So I hope that mselang will take (much more) care for the size and speed of
> libraries than fpc does.
>
MSElang uses LLVM to produce
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>
> It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to
> do the work.
>
Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and possibly redundant "class".
You are against the "class" which eliminates the explicit "^"
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 15:26:24 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>>
>> It is not about if these languages are better, but if they are easy to
>> do the work.
>>
> Thats the reason why I proposed the additional and
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 3:24 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Monday 08 May 2017 22:44:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Sieghard wrote:
>> > Hallo Marcos,
>> >
>> > Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300:
>> >> >>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 14:08:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>>
>> I understand your point of view but I think this could be confusing...
>> Well, first of all we should understand the proposal this new language:
>>
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 14:08:39 Marcos Douglas B. Santos wrote:
>
> I understand your point of view but I think this could be confusing...
> Well, first of all we should understand the proposal this new language:
>
> 1. Is it a low level language that will works like C to make libs, OS and
> so
8 matches
Mail list logo