Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

;>>> Classification, and ensure a full sync is done. >>>> >>>> You'll also then have many individual updates appearing as Superseded >>>> (a good thing). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Shane >>>> >>

Re: [mssms] User profile migration with windows 10

I think you can specify domains you want to migrate, have a look at the command line options. I have not done it, I migrate the machines and users then roll them to the new os. On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > > I have X(old domains with

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

o be true. But does anyone know, is it > expected/normal behavior for the SCCM client to enable Windows Updates > service on a computer/server that has it disabled if the SUP policy is > enabled in the client settings? > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gm

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

, most will lay off of you. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:49 PM, David Jones <dkjones9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Todd! > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For the exchange servers, look in the event logs,

Re: [mssms] Enabling/Disabling SUP

For the exchange servers, look in the event logs, specifically the setup log. It will be in there. SCCM can install something and not reboot, THEN the AU agent on the server kicks in, sees it needs a reboot, and bounces the machine.\ For the WSUS, look in the C:\Windows\WindowsUpdate.log for

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

I thought you were with tanium? On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Daniel Ratliff wrote: > Why deploy the convenience rollup as an Application? Why not an update? > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. >

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

I would do very thorough testing before I deployed anything. A nice representative cross section of users. Especially on any IE upgrades. I would also get the base up to the same standard. Same IE, Same .net, same windows update agent. Each IE and .net will user different patches. If you get

Re: [mssms] Windows 10 - UAC Prompt for everything

Once upon a time I would create collections of machines with a specific app installed on it and then advertise an uninstall program to it and make it user optional. That way they could select to uninstall it and SCCM would actually do the uninstall. Now I put the uninstall in an app and make it

Re: [mssms] Migration to Current Branch in a New Domain

ists.myitforum.com> > on behalf of Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 1, 2016 2:33:07 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Migration to Current Branch in a New Domain > > Add the SMSMP into your client install command lin

Re: [mssms] Migration to Current Branch in a New Domain

Add the SMSMP into your client install command line On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Brian McDonald wrote: > Yes, I am using SCCM OSD. This is the only change I've made in the > environment and since then imaging PCs I get this error in the SMSTS.log > > > "Invalid MP

Re: [mssms] Migration to Current Branch in a New Domain

use the new cert switch On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Brian McDonald wrote: > I setup boundaries on the new Site Server and now have an issue imaging > machines. I also removed the Boundary Group for Site assignment from the > old Site Server. The SMSTS.log is showing

Re: [mssms] Prevent PC from reboot during Patch Deployment

Depends on if the countdown is coming from SCCM or from the OS. *shutdown* /a should abort most shutdown counters from the OS On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Brian McDonald wrote: > No. > > > I'm talking about a machine that has been patched with SCCM and is >

Re: [mssms] default profile customization

I agree. They added a ton of crap to the servers that add no business value, and they keep moving things around for no reason at all. If they want to get rid of the gui, why do they keep redesigning it? Why not just leave it alone? On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mote, Todd

Re: [mssms] default profile customization

Curious why you want to do that? How does it add value? On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Mote, Todd wrote: > What’s the “best” way to customize the default profile in the windows 10 > era since copyprofile is defunct? I can set the desktop with unattend.xml > during

Re: RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

ms] Live Meeting Uninstall > > > > If you suck at scripting like I do you can actually just stick all of the > uninstall commands in a batch file and run the file. If the program isn’t > installed that command just don’t do anything. YMMV > > > > > > > > > >

Re: RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

> installed that command just don’t do anything. YMMV > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 19, 2016 12:25 PM > *To:* mss

Re: RE: [EXTERNAL][mssms] Live Meeting Uninstall

'Msiexec /X '+ arp.prodid0 +' /q /norestart /L*v C:\Windows\Temp\IninstallLivemeeting.Log' On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Garth Jones wrote: > Use the query below. > > ·Copy the results into a text file > > ·Remove the most current version from the list.

Re: [mssms] RE: Strange popup

to be able to deploy the client using WSUS. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Sandys wrote: > What choice do they have? Either they get pop ups like this or they > disable auto updates. Why would anyone leave auto updates enabled? > > > > J > > > > *From:*

Re: [mssms] RE: W10 In-Place Upgrade & Updates

into the install.wim from the DVD? On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jason Sandys wrote: > You can inject the latest CU though (using DISM or offline servicing – > they’re really the same thing) into your image. In fact, this is highly > recommended to fix bugs in Windows setup

Re: [mssms] Hashes

Jere is where it is in the CM12 DB. Select * From CI_ContentFiles -- has per file hash Select Content_ID, SourceSize, ContentHash, ContentHashVersion From CI_Contents -- has the hash for content using hash version 0 Select * From PackageContentInfoHash -- unused? Select * From SMSContentHash

Re: [mssms] Hashes

It uses several hashes, even within versions. SMS 2007 had an app you could get called "hashdir" and you would pass it the hash VERSION that you were using, and it could verify the hash. I have a copy and a script that more or less does what content validation in CM12 does... pulls a list of all

Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

he product group members manning the booths, and a > dizzying number of 1:1 customer meetings with everyone from me all the way > up to our CEO. And I answered questions in pretty much every place > imaginable – in the airport, in my hotel, in restaurants, on the MARTA > trains, even in the restroom.

Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

Probably :) On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Adam Juelich <acjuel...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're just not yourself when you're hungry > > [image: Inline image 1] > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

"So, the bigger the event, the worse the quality?" No only in food, but also in quality of content and the depth of the content. The only people big events like that work out for are vendors and Microsoft. MS employees have to take off less time from work to go to the event. Marketing can plan

Re: [mssms] Horrible food at Ignite

Anyone foolish enough to pay to go to a marketing event deserves the crappy lunch they get fed. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Marable, Mike wrote: > Jumping on the bandwagon… > > > > There is nothing worse than having to wait in line to be severed. The > anxiety of

Re: [mssms] RE: Help with a few SQL queries

! The one thing I need to know is which workstations > have this. How do I add that to the query? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > -- > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > on behalf of Todd Hemsell <hems..

Re: [mssms] RE: Configuration Manager Local SQL Best Practice Documentation

One of the best arguments to keep them away from SQL... If it sits on their server it chews up resources that you have to pay for (cpu licensing) If it is on a dedicated server there is no SQL licensing costs as SCCM is licensed as "SCCM with SQL technology" Once I pointed that out to management

Re: [mssms] RE: Client AutoUpgrade CB1602

thanks. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Miller, Todd wrote: > My case is now closed with premier. Autoupgrade will only function on > clients within a boundary of a protected DP. The setting to allow clients > to get the CCMsetup agent from a fallback DP was removed.

Re: [mssms] Sloooow App Catalog

all users is the way to go. It bypasses the group and collection membership checks and all the rbac stuff. There is an article out there about it somewhere. no idea what the issue is, but I would leave it at all users. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Jason Wallace wrote:

Re: [mssms] RE: Help with a few SQL queries

gt; Thanks, > > Brian > -- > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > on behalf of Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, September 2, 2016 4:17:47 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject

Re: [mssms] DP selection

DP selection is not load balanced or anything. Are these in the same boundaries? If so then SCCM just picks them in some order and never varies. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Jason Wallace wrote: > Yes - none of my DPs are enabled for HTTPS but one is on the same box as

Re: [mssms] RE: Help with a few SQL queries

Select ARPDisplayName0, InstalledLocation0, CASE When InstalledLocation0 Like '%(x86)%' Then 'x86' Else 'x64' End AS [DetectedArchitecture] >From v_GS_INSTALLED_SOFTWARE Where ARPDisplayName0 = 'Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2013' On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Brian McDonald

Re: [mssms] RE: SQL Query Help with total and count

missing the counts per ou. :) On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Garth Jones wrote: > Try this., > > > > select > >DS.Name0 as'Computer Name', > >DS.Creation_Date0 as 'Date', > >DS.Operating_System_Name_and0 as 'Operating System', > >

Re: [mssms] SQL Query Help with total and count

select VRS.Name0 [Computer Name], VRS.Creation_Date0 [Date], VRS.Operating_System_Name_and0 [Operating System], O.OU [OU Name], C.Instances AS [MachinesInOU] FROM V_R_System VRS -- want to remove duplicates LEFT JOIN (Select ResourceID, MAX(System_OU_Name0) AS [OU] From v_RA_System_SystemOUName

Re: [mssms] Application deployment report for removed machines from the report

CM12 is designed to do the processing client side, not server side. Put the requirements in the app, not the collection. You are not using SCCM the way it was designed to be used, hence the poor results. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Kevin Ray wrote: > Hi All, > >

Re: [mssms] RE: Query for TPM capable systems

Win32_TPM is where my data is. On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Murray, Mike wrote: > Which one? > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcum, John > *Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 7:34 AM > *To:*

Re: AW: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

.com<mailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com> > Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a > disasterous way > > Just curious, what 52 are you referring to? > > We routinely release additional updates throughout the month. It’s very > rare to have an out-of-

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

> > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On Behalf Of *Aday, > Karalene B (RCIS) > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 17, 2016 8:01 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* RE: [mssms] M

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

all of the out of > band updates they release each month. We pulled 52 out of bands last night > and I’m sure with their pattern that’s not the end of them for this month. > Patch Tuesday is kind of a joke when they continually do this. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

lled 52 out of bands last night > and I’m sure with their pattern that’s not the end of them for this month. > Patch Tuesday is kind of a joke when they continually do this. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com &l

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

What you want or need does not matter. Only thing that matters is MS profits. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Roland Janus wrote: > So, what’s the practical.. solution to 3170455? > > > > I really see no real thread on keeping point working as before > compared to not

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Yes, that shifts the burden to the customers. Saves a ton of money for Microsoft. If they get enough people to sign up, they will not have to hire any testers. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Ed Aldrich wrote: > Don’t let Michael’s earlier comment about the availability of

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Security updates will be next. Same as they did for IE. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Steve Whitcher wrote: > To be fair, the new model is still offering security updates separate from > the update rollups, with non-cumulative security updates each month. If > you only

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Yes, I doubt we would be able to deploy anything. Seems like every month there is a bad update that breaks something. I would expect us to be at least a year behind. But when my network gets infected it does not cost MS any money at all. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Stuart Watret

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Well, MS just now figured out that the .Net update for TLS creates intermittent connectivity issues for Lync. The update was released in June. I just uninstalled it. Now how the hell would you roll back 2 or three months worth of cumulative updates? On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Michael

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Well said. I like it. I wish I was that eloquent. On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Erno, Cynthia M (ITS) < cynthia.e...@its.ny.gov> wrote: > Oh I get it. So, when we fail to apply a patch until we can manage our > domains so it doesn’t screw up our group policies or print servers or etc…, > >

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

AM, Ed Aldrich <ed.aldr...@1e.com> wrote: > How do you see this approach being driven as a profit-making process? > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16,

Re: [mssms] Microsoft set to change Windows patching in a disasterous way

Hey, it makes MS more profitable, that is all that matters,. Same with the forced advertising in a corporate OS you pay millions for Same as with the cloud Same as with everything Screw you, suck it up. lol On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Murray, Mike wrote: > I’ve

Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ?

ists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:03 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ? > > > > This view = vDCMDeploymentCompliantAssetDetails &g

Re: [mssms] RE: Problems applying GPOs with Windows 10?

Add an extra reboot into the task sequence? Find all the reg keys and make a reg file and import that during the task sequence, "preset" the values that you want. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Steve Whitcher wrote: > Did anyone ever make any progress on this, or are

Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ?

t; > > > Thanks > > > > Rob > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 4:03 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com >

Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ?

LECT * FROM SMS_DCMDeploymentCompliantAssetDetails WHERE > AssignmentID=16777877 > > > > Both fn_DCMDeploymentCompliantAssetDetails and SMS_ > DCMDeploymentCompliantAssetDetails report as invalid object names in SSMS. > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com

Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ?

MS_ > DCMDeploymentCompliantAssetDetails report as invalid object names in SSMS. > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:22 PM > *To:* mssms@list

Re: [EXTERNAL]RE: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

My apologies. this was out of line. bad day here. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> wrote: > Answer is simple, here is a theoretical way that *might* work, but I do > not know how to do all of it > > Simple > Cannot do it > simple &

Re: [EXTERNAL]RE: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

04 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]RE: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to > another. > > > > Another option using PoSH. > > > > Import boot image drivers from existing boot image > > https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Import-boot-im

Re: [mssms] RE: Compliance Status Query ?

you will have to get the data and then make case statements for the actual statuses. Most of them are stored as an array in WMI and not actually in the database at all. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Mote, Todd wrote: > That’s a decent idea.. I’ll see what I can get,

Re: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

llery.technet.microsoft.com/Import-boot-image-drivers-c43e04da > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:46 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:*

Re: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

yitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:46 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another. > > > > What I do is open up the existing boot i

Re: [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsadmin@lists. > myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:46 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* [mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another. > > > > What I do is open up

[mssms] Move Drivers from one boot image to another.

What I do is open up the existing boot image and then open the SMSPROV.log in cmtrace. THEN click on the drivers tab of the boot image. Once you can see all of the drivers go to cmtrace and pause it. open the smsprov.log Open the boot image. Find the line like this select all

Re: [mssms] Boot Image Drivers

I have a powershell script that will move the drivers from one boot image to another. It is not good powershell, you have to use a SQL query and Excel to actually make the powershell commands, but I can give you what I have. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Adam Juelich

Re: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 1511 PXE Boot Selection

version On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Jason Sandys wrote: > That’s the boot image being delivered though (based on the log snippet > provided earlier). Are there any task sequences deployed at all with that > boot image assigned? > > > > J > > > > *From:*

Re: [mssms] SQL errors in AD Discovery component logs after 1606 update

Apologies, this is a result of reading the emails from the bottom up. By the time I got to the newest emails I realized my reply was incorrect. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:51 PM, s kissel wrote: > Not sure what you mean by upgrade again. Both of us experienced the >

Re: [mssms] Schedule re-evaluation for deployments

That is not how it works. the RE evaluation cycle looks at items that SCCM *thinks* are already installed, to verify they are installed. It should be showing up when it gets the policy. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:48 PM, SCCM FUN wrote: > Just curious what people set this

Re: [mssms] RE: Easy way to remove MS16-087

that is how I do it. I have a script for it if you want it. 7 lines. Have used it for a few years now to both install and remove updates. On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Chris Carbone < chris.carb...@fairmountsantrol.com> wrote: > You could always use the application model and this would only

Re: [mssms] SQL errors in AD Discovery component logs after 1606 update

can you run the upgrade again? One of the procs did not update correctly. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:35 PM, s kissel wrote: > Could be a bug. > > This appears first: > *** [42000][102][Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0][SQL > Server]Incorrect syntax near '='.

Re: [mssms] sms agent host stopped

If it were me, I would del the reg keys that define the service then kick off the built in maintenance task (in scheduled tasks) and let SCCM fix itself. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Qadri, Syed wrote: > Hello Buddies. > > > > Need help here. Has anybody

Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

gt; Just to add more confusion. The application that I’m deploying does show > up in Software Center and if I install it, THEN it will show up under the > status for that deployment. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *

Re: [mssms] FW: Strange issue with deployments

Silly question, but is the client installed on the ones that do not show up? You could have added records where the client is not installed. You would see them in the collection, but not in status messages, because they are not clients. In the collection view see if the client = yes and active =

Re: [mssms] AMT/OOBM

Switches are more interesting than your avg person... On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Adam Juelich wrote: > Why would I ever want to sit and manually talk to switches? Maybe I'm > missing something but that sounds hellish > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:08 PM,

Re: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers?

; > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:13 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers? > > > > It works fine f

Re: [mssms] Current Branch - Safe to go all virtual servers?

It works fine for me, but our VMware guys hate my server, it chews up more resources than anything else. All depends on how much resources your server gets. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Burke, John wrote: > Hi folks, > > > > We got a little push back against

Re: [mssms] RE: Multiple SCCM Consoles on Same System?

AppV On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM, wrote: > Bump… anyone? > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *andrew.ber...@everestre.com > *Sent:* Friday, July 8, 2016 3:36 PM > *To:*

Re: [mssms] MW and Server Restart behavior question

pdates, you're saying the server won't be forced > to reboot? > -- > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com> > on behalf of Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 6, 2016 2:45:34 PM > *To:* ms

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 6, 2016 2:48 PM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES > > > > will they let you use

Re: [mssms] MW and Server Restart behavior question

set it to mandatory with a date 20 years in the future. Allow them to install it before if they want to. Set it to do not reboot. Problem solved. I do not know the answer to your question, but I can solve the problem, On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Brian McDonald

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

connection from WinPE trying to connect as anonymous rather than > with the NAA credentials. > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 6, 2016 1:46 PM > *To:* mssms@list

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

rontend > > > > Not looking for a UDI/MDT Frontend – but an alternative to the CM Console > for light management and assignment > > > > Venlig hilsen / Best regards > > > > *Thomas Marcussen* > Security and Cloud Architect > > D: +45 88418792 &

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

dk > > > > *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104 > > DK-2980 Kokkedal > +45 70217021 > www.comm2ig.dk > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* 5. juli 2016 21:15 >

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

Can you log into a workstation with SQL Management studio on it using those credentials and connect to the DB? On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Giroux, Eric J wrote: > Confirmed those are all configured as they should be. Here is the SQL > section from my CS.ini: > > > >

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

The drive it is mapping, is it mapping it to the SQL server or some other server? On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you using the default instance of SQL or a named instance? What port > number? > Post your [DB_WIAT] section pl

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Giroux, Eric J <egir...@unum.com> wrote: > Yes to both of those. > > > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2016 6:46 PM > *To:* mssms

Re: [mssms] Loading bootimage slow

Any changes to the switches or ports you are using? On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Steve Wouden wrote: > > > SCCM 2012R2 CU1+MDT 2013 and windows 7 clients > > I configure and administer the SCCM environment, but Servicedesk do the > testing and deployment. > > Today I

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

send the entire SQL section and more of the log. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Todd Hemsell <hems...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you specifying a SQLShare? > Does the Database allow integrated authentication? > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J <egir...@unum.co

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

Are you specifying a SQLShare? Does the Database allow integrated authentication? On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J wrote: > I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini > using NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

2980 Kokkedal > +45 70217021 > www.comm2ig.dk > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* 5. juli 2016 18:54 > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

google "Maik Koster" On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen < thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote: > Hi, > > > Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends > for CM2012? > > Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management > > > > > > Venlig

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

lt piece is >> tracking stock that isn’t deployed yet. SCCM can do neither of these >> natively. >> >> >> >> *Daniel Ratliff* >> >> >> >> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [ >> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

It is the "Machines Ordered, Machines Received, Machines Stored, Machines Deployed" that gets tricky. Certainly doable, but you need custom ways to get the data into a DB. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jay Parekh wrote: > If you have Service Manager or licensed for it,

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

not natively. no. On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Ratliff <dratl...@humana.com> wrote: > How…natively? > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell >

Re: [mssms] RE: mystery slowdown

I agree with you, but to play devils advocate Keeps the compliance reports very up to date If somone goes and installs a new version of .net or enables a new server feature those will get updated right away. If somebody installs project or visio that will get updated right away. On Wed, Jun

Re: [mssms] RE: OT: Licensing SCCM Distribution Points

ut licensing for non-production > environments as long as you have your production environment licensed. > > > > J > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

m [ > mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com <listsad...@lists.myitforum.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:03 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com > *Subject:* Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM > > > >

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

loyed yet. SCCM can do neither of these > natively. > > > > *Daniel Ratliff* > > > > *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto: > listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:03 AM > *To:* mssms@lists.my

Re: [mssms] RE: mystery slowdown

Antivirus products take a hash of the files as the access and scan them. When the definition file gets updated the hash table gets deleted out of memory. This makes the AV product scan all of the files it is accessing using the new Definition file. That can cause a slowdown. Move the time the

Re: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

Why can't it be the definitive source? That is a silly notion. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Jim Walker wrote: > Hey folks, > > I know this is probably a rehashed topic, but what are some of the good > products out there you guys are using to compliment SCCM with

Re: [mssms] mystery slowdown

Definition updates do that. On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Timothy Ransom wrote: > Hi, > > > > We have a mystery slowdown of PCs each day around noon to 2:00 approx. Not > many details, just slow - everything slows down! When I check never see > anything unusual to

Re: [mssms] All SW Query Help

this is what I like Select Netbios_Name0, Caption0, ARPDisplayName0, S.InstallDate0, InstallSource0, OSComponent0, ProductVersion0, Publisher0, SoftwareCode0, Full_User_Name0, Title0, Department0 >From V_R_System VRS Left Join V_GS_INSTALLED_SOFTWARE S on S.ResourceID =

Re: [mssms] All SW Query Help

give me a few minutes On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Brian McDonald wrote: > Hello all, > > > I'm trying to gather a report of all Software in Add or Remove Programs > from SCCM. I need to identify which servers or workstations have the > software installed. I

Re: [mssms] SCCM force reboot after patching

I sent you a way to do it. On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Erno, Cynthia M (ITS) < cynthia.e...@its.ny.gov> wrote: > Thank you Sherri. > > I was hoping that was not the answer since too many of our servers are not > rebooting after having been patched with SCCM. > > No reboot = machine not in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >