The patch seems to break \footnote:
\unprotect % workaround
\def\@@makedescription[#1]#2%
{\postponenotes % new, assumes grouping
\doenumerationcheckconditions{#1}%
\dodescriptioncomponent[\c!reference=#1,\c!label={\descriptionparameter\c!text},\c!title={#2},\c!bookmark=,\c!list=][]%
Am 05.04.10 15:39, schrieb Vianney le Clément:
The patch seems to break \footnote:
New attempt.
\unprotect
% strc-des.mkiv
\def\@@makedescription[#1]#2%
{\postponenotes % new, assumes grouping
\edef\currentdescriptionreference{#1}%
\doenumerationcheckconditions
Hi,
In MK-II the following enumeration worked, sadly in MK-IV they don't. I
browsed the internet,
tried the proclaim solution and searched the mailing list for an solution,
found
that several people experiencing the same problem with different numbering
schemes.
Tried several of the proposed
Hi,
hope that helps (see attachment).
best regards
Bernhard
Am 16.03.2010 um 14:22 schrieb gummybears:
Hi,
In MK-II the following enumeration worked, sadly in MK-IV they don't. I
browsed the internet,
tried the proclaim solution and searched the mailing list for an solution,
found
On 3/16/2010 4:52 PM, gummybears wrote:
Hi,
In MK-II the following enumeration worked, sadly in MK-IV they don't.
I browsed the internet,
tried the proclaim solution and searched the mailing list for an
solution, found
that several people experiencing the same problem with different
Dear all,
when I have an enumeration with empty text (i.e. text={},),
mk4 produces undesired indenting. mk2 works ok. Here a minimal example:
\setupbodyfont [10pt]
\defineenumeration
[exercise]
[before=\blank,
after=\blank,
way=bysection,
text={},
start=1,
location=hanging,
letter=rm
Hi All,
Here's a corner case for you: place a figure with the 'force' option,
followed by an enumeration with a background. Like this (also
attached as tadtest1.tex):
\defineenumeration[enum][before={\startbackground},after
, as
indicated. I would prefer to have the text Exercise in the enumeration
to become a hyperlink to the corresponding solution, and vice versa for
the text Solution.
Is there a way of doing this (or something similar)?
actually in mkii there is (using symbols pointing to the companion that
can be clicked
? If so, how?
Then, I'd like to have little inconspicuous hyperlinks from the
exercise to its solution and back. So far, I can only do this
manually, as indicated. I would prefer to have the text Exercise in
the enumeration
to become a hyperlink to the corresponding solution, and vice versa
that enumeration numbers are out
of page and you don't see them.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg
=middle]
\starttext
\defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft]
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
\problem
problem 1
\problem
problem 2
\stoptext
In okular (or Adobe Reader) you see that enumeration numbers are out
of page and you don't see them
Hi,
I've got a problem with \blackboard. When I use it in the title of an
enumeration (title=yes in setupenumerations), I get this error during
compilation:
! Incomplete \iffalse; all text was ignored after line x. inserted
text \fi
For instance:
\starttext
\defineenumeration[hello
or
enumeration.
Has anyone run into such a situation?
The example below shows what I need to do (but actually I wasn't able to add
the section number as a prefix to the number…).
Best regards: OK
begin
\newcounter\Lemmacount
\setcounter\Lemmacount1
\def\Lemmanumber%
{\global\increment\Lemmacount
description or enumeration.
Has anyone run into such a situation?
is quite trivial but there is an inheritance bug in mkiv so more later
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Otared Kavian wrote:
Another issue with this approach would be that then if one wants to have
for example a Conjecture or a Guess, one has to define a new description
or enumeration.
One way around this is the following.
\defineenumeration[proclaim][text=,style=slanted
description or
enumeration.
One way around this is the following.
\defineenumeration[proclaim][text=,style=slanted,title=yes,titleleft=,titleright=,location=serried,width=fit]
and then
\startproclaim{Definition}
..
\stopproclaim
etc.
Aditya
No one wants to help on this? I would appreciate any help. Am I missing
something too obvious? I tried some other options but they do not help.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello All,
I have defined the following enumeration
' to your enumeration setup.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http
to make sure that, that is the best way).
Thanks very much for your help.
% Defining Problem enumeration
\defineenumeration
[Problem]
[location=top,
text=Problem,
between=\blank,
before=\blank,
after=\blank]
% Changing the location of the page numbers so that they appear in the
footer
Am 12.11.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Thanks Wolfgang. Here is a working example. The use of distance reduces the
space if I put a negative number. But is there an option that gives a regular
space as between any two words, or do I have to play with the negative
distance number
Thanks Wolfgang. 'width=fit,distance=...' option does the trick.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 12.11.2009 um 22:56 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Thanks Wolfgang. Here is a working example. The use of distance reduces
the space if I
Hello All,
I have defined the following enumeration:
\defineenumeration
[Problem]
[location=top,
text=Problem,
between=\blank,
before=\blank,
after=\blank]
Now for one of the problems, I want the heading Problem 13 to appear not
on the top, but on the left. So before this particular problem I
Thank you, Aditya, for help!
My further questions:
Why after={}or after= does not remove the space between enumeration
caption and next paragraph?
For example:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
prefixset=section, titleleft=, titleright=, after=]
\exercise
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Thank you, Aditya, for help!
My further questions:
Why after={}or after= does not remove the space between enumeration
caption and next paragraph?
For example:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
prefixset
Please, disregard my last question about enumeration setup. Now I know
more and created definition that works fine for me:
\defineenumeration[exercise][title=yes, text=Вправа, prefix=yes,
prefixset=section, titleleft=, titleright=, after=,
inbetween={\blank[medium]}]
The trick
Hello Aditya,
Thanks for help again. However, the result is far from OK.
[title=yes, text=Вправа, way=bysection, prefix=yes, width=broad]
I use enumeration within subsubsection, namely 1.3.1. If I put
prefix=yes, the first exercise is 1.3.1.1. That is, it is numbered
within subsubsection
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello Aditya,
Thanks for help again. However, the result is far from OK.
[title=yes, text=Вправа, way=bysection, prefix=yes, width=broad]
I use enumeration within subsubsection, namely 1.3.1. If I put
prefix=yes, the first
three problems
I currently have using an enumeration for code listings.
The first problem is that \placelist[enumeration:listing] errors out with:
has to do with the fact that the list is not initialized (i'll add a test
for that) and therefore variables are not resolved using the parent chain
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Willi Egger w.eg...@boede.nl wrote:
Hi all,
There might be a bug in the enumeration environment. First the enumeration
definition contains the option location=top.
When an enumeration item is started while there is already a figure placed
left
Hi all,
There might be a bug in the enumeration environment. First the
enumeration definition contains the option location=top.
When an enumeration item is started while there is already a figure
placed left, then the enumeration tag shows up as expected, however
the text
put braces and do that enumeration formula is at middle
possition (not in first or last line, just in the middle). I use Aditya
manual but I did not see it.
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
have MKII.
How can I put braces and do that enumeration formula is at middle possition
(not in first or last line, just in the middle). I use Aditya manual but I
did not see it.
Can you visually show what you want to achieve?
Aditya
B. Vogel wrote:
Hi all,
I have an enumeration: example that will reset by section.
Using my own header: Mysection the enumeration is not reset by section.
The second instance shows the failure.
However, after a \section it suddenly works.
And there is a problem with the sectioncounter
On Wednesday 19 August 2009, Hans Hagen wrote:
B. Vogel wrote:
Hi all,
I have an enumeration: example that will reset by section.
Using my own header: Mysection the enumeration is not reset by section.
The second instance shows the failure.
However, after a \section it suddenly
Hi all,
I have an enumeration: example that will reset by section.
Using my own header: Mysection the enumeration is not reset by section.
The second instance shows the failure.
However, after a \section it suddenly works.
And there is a problem with the sectioncounter as well
]
\definecolor[agvbrown][r=.8,g=.4078,b=.2392]
% define other things
\setuplabeltext[en][chapter=Chapter\,]
\setuplabeltext[en][section=Section\,]
% Enumeration
\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]
\setupenumerations[definition][location=serried,width=broad,headstyle=italic,
inbetween
at 9:11 PM, U Avalos amscopub-
m...@yahoo.com wrote:
Say I want to change the whitespace before an item in an
enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots)
in a list?
How can I do that? Tried
in an
enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots)
in a
list?
How can I do that? Tried various settings: changing margin,
adding
hskip, but nothing seems to do the trick. There doesn't seem to
be
anything
Say I want to change the whitespace before an item in an enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots) in a list?
How can I do that? Tried various settings: changing margin, adding
hskip, but nothing seems
Am 11.08.2009 um 17:41 schrieb U Avalos:
Say I want to change the whitespace before an item in an enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots) in a
list?
How can I do that? Tried various settings
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:11 PM, U Avalos amscopub-m...@yahoo.com wrote:
Say I want to change the whitespace before an item in an enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots) in a list?
How can I do
projects...
I'm really trying to make this work for me though :)
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 12:42:35 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 11.08.2009 um 17:41 schrieb U Avalos:
Say I want to change the whitespace before an item in an enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
the whitespace before an item in an enumeration.
The diagram below:
|.(a) Item 2
|.(b) item 2
Say I want to change the whitespace (represented by the dots) in a list?
How can I do that? Tried various settings: changing margin, adding
hskip, but nothing seems to do the trick
Hi all,
How do I reset an enumeration with my own header?
See the example below.
The build-in section works and my own header fails.
Tia,
Bernard
% MKIV beta
% MTXrun | current version: 2009.08.07 11:22
% linux-32
\definehead[Mysection][section]
\setuphead[Mysection]
[after=\nowhitespace
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
number=no,location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have
\setupformulae[indentnext=auto]
but when I put a \startformula \stopformula in demo environment it does not
indent.
Why? What can I do for getting that?
My environment is:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},
Thanks Aditya, but it does not work what it should?
With:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},number=no,
location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,indentnext=yes,
between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},
style=normal,indenting=yes]
and
\starttext
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Thanks Aditya, but it does not work what it should?
With:
\defineenumeration[demo][text={Demostració.\space},number=no,
location=serried,width=fit,headstyle=italic,indentnext=yes,
between=\blank,textdistance=.5em,closesymbol={\mathematics{\Box}},
style=normal,indenting=yes]
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
Is it possible to put numerstyle=boldstyle in this enumeration?:
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
[text={\startcolor[middlecyan]Exercici\stopcolor},headstyle=bold,between=\blank,titledistance=0em,textdistance=1em,
stopper={.\space},location=serried,titleleft
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Xan wrote:
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
Is it possible to put numerstyle=boldstyle in this enumeration?:
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
[text={\startcolor[middlecyan]Exercici\stopcolor},headstyle=bold,between=\blank,titledistance=0em,textdistance=1em,
stopper={.\space
En/na Aditya Mahajan ha escrit:
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Xan wrote:
En/na Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
Is it possible to put numerstyle=boldstyle in this enumeration?:
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
[text={\startcolor[middlecyan]Exercici\stopcolor},headstyle=bold,between=\blank,titledistance=0em
Hi,
Is it possible to put numerstyle=boldstyle in this enumeration?:
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
[text={\startcolor[middlecyan]Exercici\stopcolor},headstyle=bold,between=\blank,titledistance=0em,textdistance=1em,
stopper={.\space},location=serried,titleleft=(,titleright=),width=fit
Dear Sirs,
I need to define a enumeration with the text label = Remark. For
that I define \defineenumeration[Remark][text=Remark]. The label for
the subRemark should be subRemark. Is there a easy way to do that?
The subRemark is a son of Remark and the numeration expected is:
Remark 1
\setupenumerations[subRemark][text=subRemark]
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:42:41AM +, batela wrote:
Dear Sirs,
I need to define a enumeration with the text label = Remark. For that I
define \defineenumeration[Remark][text=Remark]. The label for the subRemark
should be subRemark
Hi Xan. You may try:
margin=yes,
location=serried,
Regards.
2009/2/18, Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net:
I have the following enumeration:
\defineenumeration
[definition]
[text=Definició,headstyle=bold,style=italic,
between=\blank,titledistance=.5em,
textdistance=1em,stopper=.,location
I have the following enumeration:
\defineenumeration
[definition]
[text=Definició,headstyle=bold,style=italic,
between=\blank,titledistance=.5em,
textdistance=1em,stopper=.,location=hanging,titleleft=(,titleright=)]
and when I use it (\startdefinition ... \stopdefinition) it appears
of
an enumeration. I am able to obtain the main frame by a proper
definition of the \definenumeration, but not the title !
For clarity, a sample test file is provided below.
I have tried to look in the mailing list for some examples that can
help me, but no luck ! Do you think this is something
. However, the second interlude is
numbered with 'A' instead of 'B'. Is there a missing key=value pair, or
is the approach completely wrong?
An enumeration passes the duck test [1] for headings, so ...
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_test
\defineenumeration
[interlude]
[before
]
\stopsetups
% And switch back on chapter pages
\setuphead[chapter][before={\page[right]\def\CURRENTDIVISION{chapter}}]
% Now define the enumeration
\defineenumeration[interlude]
[before=\setups{interlude},
conversion=Characters,way=bytext,list=interludeA
margin and break the text
across pages.
Hello,
I, too, am trying to create a similar CV layout. As I have already
reported in other emails to the list, I have been having trouble when
the first thing after the title is an enumeration. More specifically,
the first item of the enumeration
Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
Hello,
I, too, am trying to create a similar CV layout. As I have already
reported in other emails to the list, I have been having trouble when
the first thing after the title is an enumeration. More specifically,
the first item of the enumeration is not aligned
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Alexandros Frantzis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, too, am trying to create a similar CV layout. As I have already
reported in other emails to the list, I have been having trouble when
the first thing after the title is an enumeration. More specifically
{\inmargin{#1 #2}}
When the text that follows the heading is a simple paragraph everything
works as expected:
Subject Text Text...
Text Text...
However when the first thing after the heading is an enumeration (or a
table, for that matter) the enumeration is not aligned with the heading
a similar CV layout. As I have already
reported in other emails to the list, I have been having trouble when
the first thing after the title is an enumeration. More specifically,
the first item of the enumeration is not aligned with the title in the
margin (it is always placed a bit below
paragraph everything
works as expected:
Subject Text Text...
Text Text...
However when the first thing after the heading is an enumeration (or a
table, for that matter) the enumeration is not aligned with the heading
(it's lower than the heading):
Subject
* Item1
everything
works as expected:
Subject Text Text...
Text Text...
However when the first thing after the heading is an enumeration (or a
table, for that matter) the enumeration is not aligned with the heading
(it's lower than the heading):
Subject
* Item1
* Item2
I have
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have another question regarding Theorems and equation
numbers.
I defined an enumeration that produces theorem statements
in slanted style.
Whenever I have an equation inside the theorem statement the
equation number is also typeset in slanted style. But I would
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Ernesto Schirmacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have another question regarding Theorems and equation
numbers.
I defined an enumeration that produces theorem statements
in slanted style.
Whenever I have an equation inside the theorem
Quoting Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Ernesto Schirmacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear ConTeXt experts,
I have another question regarding Theorems and equation
numbers.
I defined an enumeration that produces theorem statements
in slanted style
Hi,
I am getting the following error while using backgrounds with enumeration.
(Context ver: 2008.07.10 09:58 MKIV, LuaTeX, Version
snapshot-0.28.0-2008070423)
The error depends on the frame occuring at a particular location on the
page, so the example is not so minimal. The error
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following error while using backgrounds with enumeration.
(Context ver: 2008.07.10 09:58 MKIV, LuaTeX, Version
snapshot-0.28.0-2008070423)
The error depends on the frame occuring at a particular location on the
page, so the example is not so
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I am getting the following error while using backgrounds with enumeration.
(Context ver: 2008.07.10 09:58 MKIV, LuaTeX, Version
snapshot-0.28.0-2008070423)
The error depends on the frame occuring at a particular location
Alan Stone wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the meaning and use
of the c! and v! prefixes in commands in, for
example, the layo-xx.tex source files at
http://context.aanhet.net/svn/manuals/context/
aka...
c is a constant (LHS), v is a variable (RHS enumeration).
Best wishes,
Taco
Euuuh, other than constant and variable...
LHS, RHS and enumeration are like klingon to me. :O)
Are these terms important to understand the code ?
Alan
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Stone wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out the meaning
Best wishes, and welcome to the world of artificial languages.
Charles
On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 13:09 +0200, Alan Stone wrote:
Euuuh, other than constant and variable...
LHS, RHS and enumeration are like klingon to me. :O)
Are these terms important to understand the code ?
Alan
On Sun
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Alan Stone wrote:
Euuuh, other than constant and variable...
See http://wiki.contextgarden.net/System_Macros/Scratch_Variables
LHS, RHS and enumeration are like klingon to me. :O)
Are these terms important to understand the code ?
While reading code you can simply
a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because in enumerations indenting is set to never.
You can see the same affect with
\setupindenting[no]
\testtext
One possible fix is to add
in an earlier
mail in this thread (and also in an earlier post:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070830.154143.005528b8.en.html
)
And new minimals seem not to include the fourier fonts.
If I set indenting=next (or first) in the enumeration, the file compiles...
Sorry for complaining
the fourier fonts.
If I set indenting=next (or first) in the enumeration, the file compiles...
Sorry for complaining about old versions of ConTeXt. I am finishing
my PhD thesis, and have not found any nice combinations of text and
math fonts in the new minimals. (I am not too fond of the lm
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because in enumerations indenting is set to never.
You can see the same affect with
\setupindenting[no]
\testtext
One
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
This is basically because
\snapmathtogrid\vbox
* snip *
Wolfgang
This fix seems not to solve the problem entirely. With this fix
applied, If one now put a formula inside an enumeration one gets
double space before the formula. This is a test file that shows the
problem:
%%% Test file
\setupindenting[yes,small
is generated
* 'ftype'must be one specific value from an enumeration list,
default tex
* mustexist must be a boolean, default false
* dpimust be a number, and only applies if 'ftype' is
'pk', 'gf', or 'bitmap font'. It is the bitmap size.
* f can either
2008/4/1, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are Opensuse and freebsd using an older version of ConTeXt? (ctxtools
--contextversion should tell the context version). There was a bug in
enumeration and conversions which was fixed around the middle of last
year.
You're right.
Ubuntu's version
in
enumeration and conversions which was fixed around the middle of last
year.
Another little question
If in defineenumeration[anenumeration] I specify text={\bfc Title}
and
\startanenumeration{\bfc The History}\stopanenumeration
Title and The History are not properly aligned (The History
hi,
I am trying to migrate from latex to context and i would like to create an
enumeration using this minimal example :
\startitemize[m,joinedup]
\item\startitemize[a,columns,three]
\item test 1
\item test 2
\item test 3
an 'enumeration' block, is there
an option to do that? Thank you for your patience!
I still think that it would be great to have one option to indent absolutely all
paragraphs...
Best regards,
Morgan
Best wishes,
Taco
Selon Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, it's clearer to me now. Then I've got one last question on the subject:
I
didn't manage to have paragraph indented inside an 'enumeration' block, is
there
an option to do that? Thank you for your patience
# \doifXMLop
# \doifXMLparelse
# \doloop
# \donothing
# \dontleavehmode
\donttest
# \dorecurse
# \dostepwiserecurse
# \dowithnextbox
# \dowithnextboxcontent
# \empty
\emptylines[number]
# \emptytoks
# \enablemode
# \endstrut
\enumeration
# \environment
# \EQ
# \eTABLE
# \eTABLEbody
# \eTABLEfoot
\setupitemize[]
and
\setupitemgroup[[itemize][]
Wolfgang
Hi Wolfgang,
\setupitemize is only macro for \setupitemgroup[itemize] and is
generated with \defineitemgroup like many other setup commands.
To start your enumeration with 2 you have to define your own
number conversion.
\def
[[itemize][]
Wolfgang
Hi Wolfgang,
\setupitemize is only macro for \setupitemgroup[itemize] and is
generated with \defineitemgroup like many other setup commands.
To start your enumeration with 2 you have to define your own
number conversion.
\def\nextnumber#1{\the\numexpr#1+1\relax
Intensive googling brought me these solutions for paragraph enumeration:
1)
% Enumerate paragraphs
\newcounter\ParNum
\def\GuyPar{\doglobal\increment\ParNum\inleft{\ParNum}}
\setupbodyfont[ber,10pt]
\setupwhitespace[big]
\starttext
\section[sec-language]{How this Book Teaches You The Language
There are three decimal places, so
$0.648=\frac{648}{1000}=\frac{81}{125}$.
\stopanswer
\endlonganswer
\beginshortanswer
\startanswer
$\displaystyle \frac{81}{125}$
\stopanswer
\endshortanswer
Shortanswer and longanswer are blocks. Startanswer is an enumeration.
I've tried this in other files and gotten
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The source:
\startproperty
Let $a$ and $b$ be any numbers such that $a=b$. Then, if $c$ is
any number other than zero,
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
ac=bc.\index{equations+multiplication
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Arnold wrote:
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The newmat module seems to be the culprit. After loading newmat add
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1}{#2}}}
and it should work fine
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Arnold wrote:
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The newmat module seems to be the culprit. After loading newmat add
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac
:57 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Arnold wrote:
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The newmat module seems to be the culprit. After loading newmat add
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Arnold wrote:
On Jul 4, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007, David Arnold wrote:
Here is another example, this time not within a block, but within an
enumeration again:
The newmat module seems to be the culprit. After loading newmat add
not within a block, but
within an
enumeration again:
The newmat module seems to be the culprit. After loading newmat add
\unexpanded\def\frac#1#2{\mathematics{\genfrac{}{}{}\donothing{#1}
{#2}}}
and it should work fine. I do not really understand why this is
failing.
Aditya,
Thanks
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael wrote:
On 7 May 2007, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Michael wrote:
Hi, I'd like to define a 'enumeration' so I can type \doc, \doc, which
expands to 'Document A', 'Document B' (so I don't have to keep track of the
A/B/C.
A defineenumeration does
401 - 500 of 575 matches
Mail list logo
