Re: [NTG-context] placenamedformula in placelist (MKII vs MKIV/LMTX)

net/Math/Display) and > the test suite (cont-tst/doc/context/tests/mkiv/math/formulas-003.tex) > shows what I would like to have. > > Using MKII I get the desired output (1 formulaname ... and 3b formulaname > ...) but with MKIV and LMTX I only get the reference from the placeform

[NTG-context] placenamedformula in placelist (MKII vs MKIV/LMTX)

) shows what I would like to have. Using MKII I get the desired output (1 formulaname ... and 3b formulaname ...) but with MKIV and LMTX I only get the reference from the placeformula (as 1 and correctly not listed in the placelist) and none of the placenamedformula numbers. The placeformula number is

Re: [NTG-context] From mkii to mkiv: MathML mtable alignment

On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 16:22, Wolfgang Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Duncan Hothersall schrieb am 08.07.2019 um 16:45: > > The command \setupMMLappearance[mtable][alternative=b] used to give > > me, in mkii, MathML layouts in which the first column was

Re: [NTG-context] From mkii to mkiv: MathML mtable alignment

Duncan Hothersall schrieb am 08.07.2019 um 16:45: The command \setupMMLappearance[mtable][alternative=b] used to give me, in mkii, MathML layouts in which the first column was ragged left, the second column centred, and the third column ragged right. It now seems to be ignored, and the output

[NTG-context] From mkii to mkiv: MathML mtable alignment

The command \setupMMLappearance[mtable][alternative=b] used to give me, in mkii, MathML layouts in which the first column was ragged left, the second column centred, and the third column ragged right. It now seems to be ignored, and the output has all three columns centred. Minimal working

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - section numbering with minimal example

On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 at 19:08, wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I guess this may be what you want to do: > > \setuphead[part][placehead=yes] > \setuphead[section][sectionsegments=section] > \setuphead[subsection][sectionsegments=section:subsection] > \starttext > \part{Part} > \ch

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - section numbering with minimal example

nd subsection number. Now that I know how to do it I see mkiv is much cleaner on this code and the change gets reflected in tables of contents etc. This was much harder in mkii. Thanks again. Duncan ___ If your questi

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - section numbering with minimal example

On 6/23/19 10:26 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote: > Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have > solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to > identify the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below. > > I want the sect

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - section numbering with minimal example

On 6/23/2019 10:26 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote: Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to identify the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below. I want the sections and subsection

[NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - section numbering with minimal example

Further to my previous query about updating from mkii to mkiv, I have solved some of the issues by trial and error but am beginning to identify the ones I can't resolve. My first minimal example is below. I want the sections and subsections not to prefix the part and chapter numbering, givi

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - what an ancient user needs to know

On 6/12/2019 10:32 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote: Thanks Hans, that's good to know. I was seeing issues which seemed to be related to setupheader statements using command=, which are in heavy use in our system because we use this to externalise styles. But it could easily have been something font

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - what an ancient user needs to know

me user but haven't posted in a long while... > > ** > > > > After many happy years of running a mkii set up I am finally facing the > > fact that time has moved on and upgrading to mkiv. > > > > I understand the biggest change needed to my sources is in t

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - what an ancient user needs to know

On 6/12/2019 5:22 AM, Duncan Hothersall wrote: Hi all. Long-time user but haven't posted in a long while... ** After many happy years of running a mkii set up I am finally facing the fact that time has moved on and upgrading to mkiv. I understand the biggest change needed to my sourc

[NTG-context] mkii to mkiv - what an ancient user needs to know

Hi all. Long-time user but haven't posted in a long while... After many happy years of running a mkii set up I am finally facing the fact that time has moved on and upgrading to mkiv. I understand the biggest change needed to my sources is in the fonts handling, but I am getting a few

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

On 5/19/2018 7:45 PM, Shreevatsa R wrote: On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 05:05, Hans Hagen > wrote: the other languages in indic will probably be supported in a couple of weeks (basics are there but a bit of extra code is needed) Is this still planned? I would love to

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 at 05:05, Hans Hagen wrote: > the other languages in indic will probably be supported in a couple of > weeks (basics are there but a bit of extra code is needed) > Is this still planned? I would love to be able to use LuaTeX for say Kannada or Telugu typesetting.

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

> On 18. Apr 2018, at 14:04, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 4/18/2018 9:39 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: >>> On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:35, luigi scarso wrote: >>> >>> Do you really need mkii ? >> I'm afraid so. I need XeTeX for its support of Indic font

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

On 4/18/2018 9:39 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:35, luigi scarso wrote: Do you really need mkii ? I'm afraid so. I need XeTeX for its support of Indic fonts. And for my purposes MkII is already very, very nice. the other languages in indic will probably be supp

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

;http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Luigi.scarso/modules.pdf> > > uh.. still there ? I will remove it. In any case, too old (its main purpose was testing mkii) -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: > > > On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:35, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > Do you really need mkii ? > > I'm afraid so. I need XeTeX for its support of Indic fonts. And for my > purposes MkII is already very, very nic

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

t; as mentioned on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Manuals, but the server does not respond. > On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:39, Robert Zydenbos wrote: > > >> On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:35, luigi scarso wrote: >> >> Do you really need mkii ? > > I'm afraid so. I need XeTeX for its suppo

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

> On 18. Apr 2018, at 09:35, luigi scarso wrote: > > Do you really need mkii ? I'm afraid so. I need XeTeX for its support of Indic fonts. And for my purposes MkII is already very, very nice. Robert _

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Robert Zydenbos wrote: > A question for the hardcore members. On http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ > Manuals I read: > > ConTeXt Sources (MkII) > Apart from the manuals, the source files (especially, some of the old > ones) contain excellent

[NTG-context] ConTeXt Sources (MkII)

A question for the hardcore members. On http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Manuals I read: ConTeXt Sources (MkII) Apart from the manuals, the source files (especially, some of the old ones) contain excellent documentation and examples. If you want a pretty printed pdf of a source file, say core

[NTG-context] Getting file name of \externalfigure in the header/footer (mkii)

,width=277mm,height=190mm,header=5mm,footer=1mm] \rotate[rotation=90]{\externalfigure[Exercise-1a-B2B-web-site-Anna-A.pdf][width=\hsize]} I'd like to have the name of the external file in the header. Can I do that? G PS. I'm still using mkii for my production (only used mkiv for a transfor

Re: [NTG-context] Something weird about PATHs and MkII: wrong pdfTeX picked up

6 (TeX Live 2015) > ... >> texexec foo.tex > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/MacPorts > 2015_3) (preloaded format=cont-en) > \write18 enabled. > entering extended mode > (./foo.tex > > ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2015.9.15 int:

[NTG-context] Something weird about PATHs and MkII: wrong pdfTeX picked up

--version pdfTeX 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015) ... > texexec foo.tex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-1.40.16 (TeX Live 2015/MacPorts 2015_3) (preloaded format=cont-en) \write18 enabled. entering extended mode (./foo.tex ConTeXt ver: 2013.06.07 17:34 MKII fmt: 2015.9.15 int: eng

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

> Am 21.03.2015 um 19:49 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > On 20 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >> >>> Am 20.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >>> >>> Sorry to ask again, but is there no solution? >> >> Can you send a *working* minimal example! > > I don’t know how. It h

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

On 20 Mar 2015, at 18:33, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Am 20.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >> >> Sorry to ask again, but is there no solution? > > Can you send a *working* minimal example! I don’t know how. It happens with my project. I can’t publish my entire project’s source co

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

> Am 20.03.2015 um 14:43 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > Sorry to ask again, but is there no solution? Can you send a *working* minimal example! Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please ad

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

Sorry to ask again, but is there no solution? G On 16 Mar 2015, at 15:03, Gerben Wierda wrote: > > On 15 Mar 2015, at 23:24, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >> >>> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >>> >>> I am running into two i

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

On 15 Mar 2015, at 23:24, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >> >> I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project >> >> - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace between the header and

[NTG-context] Different output with \blank[force, ...] in MkII and MkIV

Hi, the force keyword for the \blank commands create an unwanted space in MkIV when you use it at the begin of page compared with MkII. Attached are the results from MkII and MkIV which have been produced with the following example. In MkIV the first page has an extra line while the space on

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project > > - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace between the header and > the first paragraph. How can I influence this? The different space befo

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

> Am 15.03.2015 um 15:57 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > The itemize white space issue was a difference in handling \reference. In > mkii a \reference between \startitemize and the first item did not produce > empty space, in mkiv it does. I moved the \reference to inside the \ite

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

The itemize white space issue was a difference in handling \reference. In mkii a \reference between \startitemize and the first item did not produce empty space, in mkiv it does. I moved the \reference to inside the \item G On 14 Mar 2015, at 17:14, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > &g

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

mkiv result On 14 Mar 2015, at 17:14, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >> >> I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project >> >> - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace bet

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

I’m struggling to make a minimal example.It happens in my project, so it is a result of my …/products/prd_book.tex and ../environment/env_cataoia.tex and the test file. I need to give three files, two of which differ between mkii and mkiv because of different font commands and lettrine vs

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

mkii result On 14 Mar 2015, at 17:14, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >> >> I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project >> >> - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace bet

Re: [NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

> Am 14.03.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project > > - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace between the header and > the first paragraph. How can I influence this? > - \startitemize[pac

[NTG-context] mkiv versus mkii: whitespace issues

I am running into two issues with my mkii-to-mkiv conversion project - The \chapter command in mkiv uses more whitespace between the header and the first paragraph. How can I influence this? - \startitemize[packed,joinedup] inserts whitespace between the list and the paragraph before it where

Re: [NTG-context] mkii to mkiv, setting the fonts for my project

> Am 01.03.2015 um 11:20 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > I’m trying to get my project from mkii to mkiv. I’m running into a font > issue. I’m using the Optima font from OS X on the Mac. My current setup is as > added below. Can someone tell me how to do that in mkiv? > >

[NTG-context] mkii to mkiv, setting the fonts for my project

I’m trying to get my project from mkii to mkiv. I’m running into a font issue. I’m using the Optima font from OS X on the Mac. My current setup is as added below. Can someone tell me how to do that in mkiv? \usetypescript[serif,sans,mono] [hanging] [normal] \starttypescript [sans,serif

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

mkiv instead of mkii? .tex.pdf: texexec --pdf ${MODE} ${ONCE} $< Change `texexec --pdf` to `context` Aditya___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maill

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

I have a standard ConTeXt project setup (products, environment, chapters subdirectory). In the chapters subdirectory there is a Makefile. I’ve just installed mkiv. Can someone tell me what I need to change in this Makefile to compile my project with mkiv instead of mkii? OPEN=echo MODE=--mode

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Gerben, Sorry, one typo! The file is tools-mkiv.pdf. It is not in the MacTeX distribution! You get it with Standalone, I normally use that! But you can get it at: http://www.pragma-ade.nl/general/manuals/tools-mkiv.pdf regards

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

On 26 Jan 2015, at 19:51, Keith Schultz wrote: > Hi Gerben, > > I would not say old-fasshoined , but old school. > > Wolgang said to use context, but that is just a script that calls mtxrun! > > So you can use: > > mtxrun —script context > > for other options look for: > > tool-mkiv.pdf Is

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Gerben, I would not say old-fasshoined , but old school. Wolgang said to use context, but that is just a script that calls mtxrun! So you can use: mtxrun —script context for other options look for: tool-mkiv.pdf I am sure your makefiles are more complex. regards Keith. > Am 26.0

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

> Am 26.01.2015 um 17:19 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > […] > > So, what would be easiest for me if I know what commend to use instead of the > texexec command. You can use context to process your document with MkIV and context —pdftex to process your document wit

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

I don’t use TeXShop for these projects. I use a separate editor in a shell and a Makefile (very old-fashioned). The Makefile contains stuff like: OPEN=echo MODE=--mode=standalone ONCE= .SUFFIXES: .pdf .tex .open .pdf.open: open $< .tex.pdf: texexec --pdf ${MODE} ${ONCE} $< onc

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Keith, I got it! With the proper setting of paths it works without sourcing setuptex. Thus I have for my installation of mkii: -- #!/bin/bash export PATH=/Volumes/OK/context-minimal/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:$PATH texexec --autogenerate --synctex=1 &qu

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

imal/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin)’ > > So at this point I have to keep the instruction to source the setuptex file > in order to typeset either with mkii or mkiv, using the standalone Context. > > Best regards: OK >

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

$path /Volumes/OK/context-minimal/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin)’ So at this point I have to keep the instruction to source the setuptex file in order to typeset either with mkii or mkiv, using the standalone Context. Best regards: OK > On 21 Jan 2015, at 12:55, Keith Schultz wrote: > > Hi Ota

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Otared and Gerben, I do not know which version of TeXShop you are using but the more recent ones have Engines for ConTeXt, already. If they are not already installed you can find them in: ~/Libraries/TeXShop/Engines/Inactive just more the Contex( LuaTeX).engine into Engines and restart TeXSho

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Gerben, Mkii and Mkiv are to different animals and live side by side. You do not need to change your TeX setup at all! All you need to do is change the call to start the processing. Mkiv can be called with the context … or mtxrun -script context … What I do not know is in what kind of

Re: [NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

Hi Gerben, Indeed this is possible to use mkii and mkiv side by side. In particular if you use TeXShop, it is enough to say at the beginning of your TeX file %!TEX TS-program = mkii or %!TEX TS-program = mkiv where it is assumed that you have created two files named mkii.engine

[NTG-context] Can I use mkii and mkiv side by side?

I have a finished mkii project and I’d like to be able to export it to a format that can be a start for other distributions (such as epub or the like). For this, I get the impression I need mkiv. Now, before I go on trying to move my project to mkiv I have a question. Can I run mkii and mkiv

Re: [NTG-context] mkii definition of \setupnotedefinition

> Am 13.12.2014 um 12:25 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > Thanks. > > Is it possible to influence the font size of the endnote number too, > preferably separate in the text and at the location where the endnotes are > printed? \setupcolors[state=start] \setupnotedefinition [endnote] [style={\

Re: [NTG-context] mkii definition of \setupnotedefinition

Thanks. Is it possible to influence the font size of the endnote number too, preferably separate in the text and at the location where the endnotes are printed? G On 13 Dec 2014, at 12:02, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > >> Am 13.12.2014 um 11:41 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >> >> Adding to myself, I

Re: [NTG-context] mkii definition of \setupnotedefinition

> Am 13.12.2014 um 11:41 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > Adding to myself, I tried to increase the font of my endnotes with > > \setupnotedefinition[endnote][indenting={yes,medium},bodyfont=11pt] > > But whatever size I put in, the result remains the same. Notes use the description/enumeration cod

Re: [NTG-context] mkii definition of \setupnotedefinition

Adding to myself, I tried to increase the font of my endnotes with \setupnotedefinition[endnote][indenting={yes,medium},bodyfont=11pt] But whatever size I put in, the result remains the same. On 13 Dec 2014, at 11:31, Gerben Wierda wrote: > While both mkii and mkiv are formally in operat

[NTG-context] mkii definition of \setupnotedefinition

While both mkii and mkiv are formally in operation, it seems ConTeXtgarden has moved to mkiv (more or less). So, as a mkii user, where do I find the documentation of \setupnotedefinition? G ___ If your question is

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > >> Hi Luigi, >> >> I did a test with mkiv (see the tex file attached), and then tested the >> resulting pdf file on the site you mentioned, >> >> http://www.pdf-tools.com/p

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > I did a test with mkiv (see the tex file attached), and then tested the > resulting pdf file on the site you mentioned, > > http://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf/validate-pdfa-online.aspx > > Unfortunately it says that the PDF p

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Luigi, > > I did a test with mkiv (see the tex file attached), and then tested the > resulting pdf file on the site you mentioned, > > http://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf/validate-pdfa-online.aspx > > Unfortunately it says that the PDF p

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

Hi Luigi, I did a test with mkiv (see the tex file attached), and then tested the resulting pdf file on the site you mentioned, http://www.pdf-tools.com/pdf/validate-pdfa-online.aspx Unfortunately it says that the PDF produced by mkiv is not conform: test-PDF-A-1b.pdf does not conform

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Thanks Luigi! > > It turns out that with some slight modifications I could typeset the > mentioned project with mkiv. > Then after having added the following from your article: > > %% For PDF/A > \setupbackend[ > format={pdf/a-1a:2005}, > pro

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

any case you gave me good hope… Thanks! Best regards: OK On 02 Jul 2014, at 17:05, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > > Thanks Luigi for the hint to that paper. > Unfortuantely the project has been done with mkii… th

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > > Thanks Luigi for the hint to that paper. > Unfortuantely the project has been done with mkii… that’s why I would like > to know if it’s possible to produce a PDF/A compliant file with ConTeXt > mkii. > By the way, is th

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On 02 Jul 2014, at 16:46, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Dear List members, > > Does anyone know how to create a PDF/A file (where A stands for Archive) in > mkii? In a thesis project which has to be uploaded on

Re: [NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: > Dear List members, > > Does anyone know how to create a PDF/A file (where A stands for Archive) > in mkii? In a thesis project which has to be uploaded on an archiving site > it is required that the fonts should be imbedded in

[NTG-context] How to create a PDF/A file with mkii?

Dear List members, Does anyone know how to create a PDF/A file (where A stands for Archive) in mkii? In a thesis project which has to be uploaded on an archiving site it is required that the fonts should be imbedded into the PDF file and be compatible with the PDF/A standard. How can this be

Re: [NTG-context] MOving from MkII to MkIV / EPUB

s attached below. I use "texexec --pdf" and probably ConTeXt MkII from the MacTeX 2012 distribution. I'd like to make an EPUB from this book as well. I suspect that means going over to LuaTeX/MkIV and doing extra stuff. I got lost in the ConTeXt documentation (for as much as t

[NTG-context] MOving from MkII to MkIV / EPUB

f" and probably ConTeXt MkII from the MacTeX 2012 distribution. I'd like to make an EPUB from this book as well. I suspect that means going over to LuaTeX/MkIV and doing extra stuff. I got lost in the ConTeXt documentation (for as much as there is, old and new) and would appreciate an

Re: [NTG-context] Percent in mkii mathmode is rendering wrongly using lucida.

you fix the problem? thanks a lot. > > > > test document: > > %mkii > > \usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] > > \setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt] > > \starttext > > 5\% $5\%$ > > \stoptext > > Citing myself: > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:22 AM,

Re: [NTG-context] Percent in mkii mathmode is rendering wrongly using lucida.

On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Yue Wang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > can you fix the problem? thanks a lot. > > test document: > %mkii > \usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] > \setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt] > \starttext > 5\% $5\%$ > \stoptext Citing myself: On Sat, Feb 20

[NTG-context] Percent in mkii mathmode is rendering wrongly using lucida.

Hi Hans, can you fix the problem? thanks a lot. test document: %mkii \usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] \setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt] \starttext 5\% $5\%$ \stoptext Yue ___ If your question is of interest to others as

[NTG-context] Typescripts package and MkII/XeTeX

Hi all, are there people who use typescripts from my collection which are available with minimals in combination with XeTeX. I'm planing to remove the MkII files and will only keep files which are in use. For people who use MkIV there is nothing to worry because these files will be

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

On 14-9-2012 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi : Hello, In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of \textrule and \setuptextrule are different... What I did was quite simple: \textrule{Testing head} blah

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

Hi Alessandro, On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Alessandro Perucchi wrote: > So probably it would be good to correct the documentation > accordingly ( even if all coders hate that part :-D ) Or maybe > update the > wiki... Is anybody able to modify the wiki? if > yes then I would be more than ha

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

On 15 sept. 2012, at 09:28, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Remove "[top]" from \starttextrule. All possible combinations are: > > (...) Hello Wolfgang, Thanks, now I understand how this command works. So probably it would be good to correct the documentation accordingly ( even if all coders h

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

Am 14.09.2012 um 23:50 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi : >>> And apparently the command \starttextrule ... \stoptextrule doesn't work >>> (this was explain in the cont-entp.pdf page 204) in either mkii & mliv. >> >> This does work for me:

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

On 15 sept. 2012, at 00:12, luigi scarso wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Alessandro Perucchi > wrote: > > On 14 Sep 2012, at 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > > > There is a vertical skip missing in the MkIV version of the macros. > > > > pack-mrl.mkiv > > > > \def\pac

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

gt; Hello, > >> > >> In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of > \textrule and \setuptextrule are different... > >> > >> What I did was quite simple: > >> > >> \textrule{Testing head} > >> blah bl

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

On 14 Sep 2012, at 13:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi : > >> Hello, >> >> In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of >> \textrule and \setuptextrule are different

Re: [NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

Am 14.09.2012 um 00:08 schrieb Alessandro Perucchi : > Hello, > > In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of > \textrule and \setuptextrule are different... > > What I did was quite simple: > > \textrule{Testing head} > blah blah b

[NTG-context] MKII & MKIV difference between \textrule

Hello, In my experimentation, I've found that in mkii and mkiv the behavior of \textrule and \setuptextrule are different... What I did was quite simple: \textrule{Testing head} blah blah blah \textrule in mkii the text in well centered between the lines. But in mkiv the bottom line i

Re: [NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 24-5-2012 11:50, luigi scarso wrote: > warning: kpathsea: configuration file texmf.cnf not found >>> >>> >>> If you avoid --make in ./first-setup.sh, then formats can normally be >>> generated later. It is only that the script fails to

Re: [NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

On 24-5-2012 11:50, luigi scarso wrote: warning: kpathsea: configuration file texmf.cnf not found If you avoid --make in ./first-setup.sh, then formats can normally be generated later. It is only that the script fails to generate formats for some reason. the latest beta works ok here --

Re: [NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:19 AM, luigi scarso wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >>> Just a short notice, can’t debug ATM: >>> Since yesterday evening, ConTeXt doesn’t se

Re: [NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:19 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Just a short notice, can’t debug ATM: >> Since yesterday evening, ConTeXt doesn’t seem to be able to build MkII >> formats (via the first-setup script on

Re: [NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Just a short notice, can’t debug ATM: > Since yesterday evening, ConTeXt doesn’t seem to be able to build MkII > formats (via the first-setup script on OSX 10.5.8 Intel), it claims, > cont-nl.mkii, cont-en.mkii, meta

[NTG-context] MkII in standalone distribution broken?

Just a short notice, can’t debug ATM: Since yesterday evening, ConTeXt doesn’t seem to be able to build MkII formats (via the first-setup script on OSX 10.5.8 Intel), it claims, cont-nl.mkii, cont-en.mkii, metafun would be missing. As far as I saw, MkIV builds. Greetlings, Hraban

Re: [NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

Am 2012-04-26 um 19:38 schrieb Bill Meahan: BTW, the code was literally a copy-'n'-paste from the wiki page without any alteration by me. Probably should be fixed. Just do it, if you're at it, therefore it’s a wiki. Thanks. Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.co

Re: [NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

, with MkII this isn’t a problem because the setting doesn’t work. Wolfgang [snip] Switching the \define and \setup along with removing the "align=left" fixed it. Thanks! BTW, the code was literally a copy-'n'-paste from the wiki page without any alteration by me. Prob

Re: [NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

Am 26.04.2012 um 18:36 schrieb Bill Meahan: > > On 04/26/2012 11:11, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> Am 25.04.2012 um 23:20 schrieb Bill Meahan: >> >>> Hi, folks. >>> >>> I've tried running the example from the "descriptions" article o

Re: [NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

On 04/26/2012 11:11, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 25.04.2012 um 23:20 schrieb Bill Meahan: Hi, folks. I've tried running the example from the "descriptions" article on the wiki and it works fine if I use MkII via "texexec" but fails miserably if I use MlIV via "

Re: [NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

Am 25.04.2012 um 23:20 schrieb Bill Meahan: > Hi, folks. > > I've tried running the example from the "descriptions" article on the wiki > and it works fine if I use MkII via "texexec" but fails miserably if I use > MlIV via "context." Outs

[NTG-context] Example only works in mkii

Hi, folks. I've tried running the example from the "descriptions" article on the wiki and it works fine if I use MkII via "texexec" but fails miserably if I use MlIV via "context." Outside of changing "location" to "alternative" in the

Re: [NTG-context] \par in macro definition (mkii issue)

On 18 janv. 2012, at 23:07, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > […] > This is a limitation of the MkII version of the \define command, you can’t > use \par in the replacement text but you can use \endgraf which does also end > a paragraph. > > Wolfgang Thanks Wolfgang: indeed

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >