[NTG-context] Re: Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 15:09:32 +0100 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > You get the same error with Latin Modern as soon as you use a non > predefined font size in combination with bold math. True, thanks for pointing that out. I wasn't aware and frankly, that's rather unexpected behaviour. So

[NTG-context] Re: Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

[mainface, 8.5pt] \starttext \bold{\math{x_y}} \stoptext You get the same error with Latin Modern as soon as you use a non predefined font size in combination with bold math. begin example % \starttypescript [math] [default] [size] %   \definebodyfont [8.5pt] [mm] [default

[NTG-context] Re: Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

m] [math] [pagella] \definetypeface generates the same error message if the font size is changed: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella] \definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros] \definetypeface [mainface] [mm] [math] [pagella] %% 8pt works \setupbodyfont [mainface, 8.5pt]

[NTG-context] Re: Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:51:42 +0100 Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > %% comment/remove this line and it works > > \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math] > > Use the \definetypeface command to load the math font. That example was taken straight from

[NTG-context] Re: Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

Marco Patzer schrieb am 30.11.2023 um 20:43: Hi! I have a strange issue when TeX Gyre Pagella Math is used together with bold text. MWE: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella] \definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros] %% comment/remove this line and it works

[NTG-context] Bold TeX Gyre Pagella Math results in Math error: parameter 'subshiftdown' with id 48 in style 2 is not set

Hi! I have a strange issue when TeX Gyre Pagella Math is used together with bold text. MWE: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [TeX Gyre Pagella] \definefontfamily [mainface] [ss] [TeX Gyre Heros] %% comment/remove this line and it works \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps

On 4/3/23 09:07, Peter Münster via ntg-context wrote: > Hi, > > I'm quite sure, that this worked some time ago with the standard font (LM): I had the same impression, Peter. But LM fonts don‘t have the OT feature smcp: \setuppapersize[A8] \starttext \doloopoverlist{lm, pagella, termes,

Re: [NTG-context] bold small caps

On 4/3/2023 9:07 AM, Peter Münster via ntg-context wrote: Hi, I'm quite sure, that this worked some time ago with the standard font (LM): \setff{smallcaps} Normal and \bf bold Small Caps. (See also https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_small_caps). But it does not work with the latest ConTeXt

[NTG-context] bold small caps

Hi, I'm quite sure, that this worked some time ago with the standard font (LM): \setff{smallcaps} Normal and \bf bold Small Caps. (See also https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_small_caps). But it does not work with the latest ConTeXt version. How could I get bold small caps with the latest

Re: [NTG-context] Cambria giving all bold

Curious - I just tried on another computer (Mac) using the exact same source and MS .ttf files and I do not get bold regular text. Both use updated lmtx. Something odd going on (that I will try to figure out). Clearing the luametatex cache corrected the problem - sorry all for the noise. Alan

[NTG-context] Cambria giving all bold

Would somebody test and confirm that cambria gives all bold text (including the header)? - Of course, you need to have the cambria.ttf from MS. Thank you Alan \starttext Not bold \bold {bold} \setupbodyfont [cambria,10pt] Not bold \bold {bold} \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

t > > Wolfgang However there seems to be an inconsistency, as in the example below: in this particular example it is better to use explicitely \bi to have bold italic. \starttext text {\italicface text {\boldface text} text} text text {\it text {\bf text} text} text: here

Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

Reviczky Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together? Adam Reviczky via ntg-context schrieb am 29.01.2022 um 17:19: > Hi Joel, > > I don't think you can stack those, just use \bi (see: > https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Font_Switching) > > \starttext >

Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

Joel via ntg-context schrieb am 29.01.2022 um 15:46: I am finishing the final touches on a manuscript, which I hope to send to a publisher later today and noticed this problem where bold and italic text isn't rendered at the same time. I am using the EB Garamond font in my document. I set

Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

Adam Reviczky via ntg-context schrieb am 29.01.2022 um 17:19: Hi Joel, I don't think you can stack those, just use \bi (see: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Font_Switching) \starttext \startitemize \item This text has {\bf bold} in it. \item This text has {\it italics} in it. \item Why

Re: [NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

Hi Joel, I don't think you can stack those, just use \bi (see: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Font_Switching) \starttext \startitemize \item This text has {\bf bold} in it. \item This text has {\it italics} in it. \item Why doesn't this have {\bi bold and italics} in it? \stopitemize See also

[NTG-context] Why isn't bold + italics working together?

I am finishing the final touches on a manuscript, which I hope to send to a publisher later today and noticed this problem where bold and italic text isn't rendered at the same time. I am using the EB Garamond font in my document. I set it up exactly as shown below. Strangely, bold works

Re: [NTG-context] Why does HerosBold give bold italic?

Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context schrieb am 25.08.2021 um 23:15: On 25 Aug 2021, at 13:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context schrieb am 25.08.2021 um 14:28: Why does HerosBold give bold italic instead of just bold? \definefont[TestA][name:Heros at 14pt] \definefont[TestB

Re: [NTG-context] Why does HerosBold give bold italic?

> On 25 Aug 2021, at 13:56, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context schrieb am 25.08.2021 um 14:28: >> Why does HerosBold give bold italic instead of just bold? >> >> \definefont[TestA][name:Heros at 14pt] >> \definefont[TestB][na

Re: [NTG-context] Why does HerosBold give bold italic?

Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context schrieb am 25.08.2021 um 14:28: Why does HerosBold give bold italic instead of just bold? \definefont[TestA][name:Heros at 14pt] \definefont[TestB][name:HerosBold at 14pt] \definefont[TestC][name:HerosItalic at 14pt] \starttext \TestA {The quick brown} \TestB {fox

[NTG-context] Why does HerosBold give bold italic?

Why does HerosBold give bold italic instead of just bold? \definefont[TestA][name:Heros at 14pt] \definefont[TestB][name:HerosBold at 14pt] \definefont[TestC][name:HerosItalic at 14pt] \starttext \TestA {The quick brown} \TestB {fox jumps over} \TestC {the lazy dog} \stoptext — Bruce Horrocks

Re: [NTG-context] How to define a {\bf}-compatible fake-bold switcher?

). And that year, BachoTeX included a presentation with the implemented feature (also included in LMTX @ tex/texmf-context/doc/context/presentations/bachotex/2018/bachotex-2018-fonteffects.pdf [also with sources]). I was very interested on that particular feature, because the previous fake bold

Re: [NTG-context] How to define a {\bf}-compatible fake-bold switcher?

BachoTeX included a presentation with the implemented feature (also included in LMTX @ tex/texmf-context/doc/context/presentations/bachotex/2018/bachotex-2018-fonteffects.pdf [also with sources]). I was very interested on that particular feature, because the previous fake bold feature was simple

Re: [NTG-context] How to define a {\bf}-compatible fake-bold switcher?

useful. Sylvain On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 at 16:41, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > On 11/7/20 4:06 PM, Sylvain Hubert wrote: > > [...] > > Could anyone help me define a {\bf}-aware version of \fakebf which can > > render the "4 5 6" in the example above in lat

Re: [NTG-context] How to define a {\bf}-compatible fake-bold switcher?

On 11/7/20 4:06 PM, Sylvain Hubert wrote: > [...] > Could anyone help me define a {\bf}-aware version of \fakebf which can > render the "4 5 6" in the example above in latinmodern's bold? Hi Sylvain, there is an already defined font feature that fakes boldened fonts: boldened

[NTG-context] How to define a {\bf}-compatible fake-bold switcher?

Dear List, I'm using a weirdfont that does not have a pre-defined bold variant but still want to emboldening short extracts of text occasionally, so I've defined \defineeffect[thicker][alternative=both,rulethickness=0.3pt] \define\fakebf{\effect[thicker]} but in situations like

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

[font:fallback:sans] \definefontsynonym [Sans] [file:Helvetica Neue.ttc(Helvetica Neue)] [features=default] \definefontsynonym [SansBold] [file:Helvetica Neue.ttc(Helvetica Neue Bold)] [features=default] \definefontsynonym [SansItalic] [file:Helvetica Neue.ttc

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

See this link: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Mac_Installation In particular, you need this set of shell commands from that page: mkdir $HOME/context cd $HOME/context rsync -av rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh . sh ./first-setup.sh --modules=all --engine=luatex but we

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 11:56, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > Hi, > > FYI, my "context mkiv” standalone seems to be fine (latest download). > “lmtx” standalone (also latest download) not so much (same problems). Thx. How do I get/install a ‘context mkiv’ standalone? The standalone on

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 12:14, Benjamin Buchmuller > wrote: > > Hi Hraban, > > This might confirm Taco‘s notion that there is some bug lmtx. We have moved this off-list for a while. For now, if you have problems with lmtx, just switch back to the regular mkiv standalone. Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Hi Hraban, Thanks for the hint (and the proper fontfamily setup), I have forced reload ten times now from various accounts; the issue persists unfortunately. This might confirm Taco‘s notion that there is some bug lmtx. I’m running macOS Catalina too, but as it worked with the standalone of

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Hi, FYI, my "context mkiv” standalone seems to be fine (latest download). “lmtx” standalone (also latest download) not so much (same problems). Looks like something is broken in ltmx’ TTC parser. OS X Catalina 10.15.4 Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> Am 24.04.2020 um 11:13 schrieb Benjamin Buchmuller > : > > Although this specific issue might have been solved meanwhile by the helpful > suggestions of Wolfang, Thomas and others, I would like to point out that I > have recently also encountered an odd behaviour of the mtxrun fontloader

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

ontents of ntg-context digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). > Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works > (Wolfgang Schuster) > > From: Wolfgang Schuster > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Ba

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24. Apr 2020, at 09:21, Gerben Wierda wrote: > > > I altready did that earlier as per the Wiki information (did not report it) > and just tried again. No difference. Steps to happiness: 1. Extract the ttc font to ttf 2. Copy the ttf files to your local texmf directory 3. reload the

[NTG-context] ConTeXt beta issue? Was: Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt (beta) does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

As per the fuller console output I included (where you can find all the details of the run as put out by ConTeXt): This is LuaMetaTeX, Version 2.05.01 open source > level 1, order 1, name 'cont-yes.mkiv' system > system > ConTeXt ver: 2020.04.03 10:31 MKIV beta fmt:

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> On 24 Apr 2020, at 08:53, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Can you try this: > > \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [Optima] > [it=optimaitalic, >bf=optimabold, >bi=optimabolditalic] I altready did that earlier as per the Wiki information (did not report it) and just tried again.

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

With Arial: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Arial] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] with Optima: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Optima] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] It doesn’t matter if the font statements are before or after \starttext Then I thought, let’s test some other things. I logged

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

> Am 24.04.2020 um 08:48 schrieb Gerben Wierda : > > Then I thought, let’s test some other things. I logged in as another user, > and used ConTeXt from TeX Live 2019: > > > It seems to be that on my system, the standalone installed ConTeXt does not > work with Optima, but the TeX Live

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics). Standalone ConTeXt does not work. TeX Live 2019 works

Gerben Wierda schrieb am 24.04.2020 um 08:48: With Arial: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Arial] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] with Optima: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Optima] \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] It doesn’t matter if the font statements are before or after \starttext Then I

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

> Am 24.04.2020 um 05:19 schrieb kaddour kardio : > > It's noticed that Optima is a Sans Serif font. > Maybe it conflicts with MacOS way to handle fonts. No, ConTeXt doesn’t care what kind of font you define as rm/ss/tt, and the OS has no say in that. Best, Hraban

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

st --all ...' command again No, since all the subfonts were already found, that’s not the problem. > and your example: > >> \starttext >> \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Optima] >> \setupbodyfont[mainface,10pt] > >> {\bf Bold} and {\it Italic} and {\rm Regular} text.

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

remove and I rebooted. I am running an up to > > date macOS Mojave. > > I think Henning Hraban Ramm meant not OS font cache (but may be including > it, > I'm not a Mac OS user) but context font cache. Run > > $ mtxrun --script fonts --reload --force > > and try abov

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

No such luck for me. Any help welcome. I did remove the macOS font cache > with sudo atsutil databases -remove and I rebooted. I am running an up to > date macOS Mojave. I think Henning Hraban Ramm meant not OS font cache (but may be including it, I'm not a Mac OS user) but context font cache. Run

Re: [NTG-context] Basic font question (Optima, but no bold, no italics)

22 schrieb Gerben Wierda : >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 23 Apr 2020, at 16:16, Vladimir Lomov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> ** Gerben Wierda [2020-04-23 16:00:34 +0200]: >>>>>

Re: [NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

Pablo Rodriguez schrieb am 07.02.2020 um 21:22: On 2/7/20 8:34 AM, cont...@vivaldi.net wrote: Hello Pablo, thank you for showing the way; unfortunately, still something is missing: Hi Lukas, I’m afraid you missed to install the fonts in ConTeXt. - the resulting file uses LMRoman instead of

Re: [NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

ot;file": \definefontfeature[smallcaps][default][smcp=yes] \starttypescriptcollection[charis] \starttypescript [serif] [charis] \definefontsynonym [Charis-Roman] [file:CharisSIL-R.ttf] \definefontsynonym [Charis-Italic] [file:CharisSIL-I.ttf]

Re: [NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

On 2/7/20 8:34 AM, cont...@vivaldi.net wrote: > Hello Pablo, > > thank you for showing the way; unfortunately, still something is > missing: Hi Lukas, I’m afraid you missed to install the fonts in ConTeXt. > - the resulting file uses LMRoman instead of WorkSans, Otherwise, \definefontfamily

Re: [NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

ce] \setupbodyfontenvironment [default] [a=1.2, b=2.4, c=3.6, d=4.8, em=italic] \starttext \startTEXpage[offset=1em] roman\\ {\bf bold}\\ {\it italic}\\ {\bi bold italic}\\ {\tfa roman}\\

Re: [NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

g. termes)]. > [...] > so that: > > - normal text and math (nothing special - just subscripts) would be > typeset with work-sans.light.otf > - \bold (\bf) would use work-sans.bold.otf, > - \emph (\em and \it) would use work-sans.light-italic.otf, > - \bi would use work-sans.bold-itali

[NTG-context] Fonts from various .otf to work with \bold, \emph, \bf, \bfa ...

n: work-sans.bold.otf work-sans.bold-italic.otf work-sans.light.otf work-sans.light-italic.otf (all from https://www.1001fonts.com/work-sans-font.html) so that: - normal text and math (nothing special - just subscripts) would be typeset with work-sans.light.otf - \bold (\bf) woul

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

embold feature (similar to the slanted font feature) that fakes the bold font with \starteffect[both]...\stopeffect and it doesn’t strecht the font? much is possible if i can motivate myself Good to know in order to propose new features :-). Hm. Fake bold / slanted / small caps / of a bas

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted >>>> font feature) that fakes the bold font with >>>> \starteffect[both]...\stopeffect and it doesn’t strecht the font? >>> >>> much is possible if i can motivate myself > > Good to kn

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

On 03/27/2018 09:01 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/26/2018 11:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> Just out of curiosity (and not related to this feature), I see that >> Windows and Linux binaries (both 64bit) in the Suite contain different >> versions (1.08 v. 1.07). >> >> Is version 1.08 to

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

On 3/26/2018 11:02 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 03/26/2018 07:24 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/26/2018 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/26/2018 1:40 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, would it be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted font feature) that fakes the bold font

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

On 03/26/2018 07:24 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/26/2018 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 3/26/2018 1:40 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >>> Hans, >>> >>> would it be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted >>> font feature) that f

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

On 3/26/2018 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/26/2018 1:40 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, would it be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted font feature) that fakes the bold font with \starteffect[both]...\stopeffect and it doesn’t strecht the font? much is possible if i

Re: [NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

On 3/26/2018 1:40 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Hans, would it be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted font feature) that fakes the bold font with \starteffect[both]...\stopeffect and it doesn’t strecht the font? much is possible if i can motivate myself This was already

[NTG-context] (fake) bold as font feature

Hans, would it be possible to add a embold feature (similar to the slanted font feature) that fakes the bold font with \starteffect[both]...\stopeffect and it doesn’t strecht the font? This was already requested by Ulrike Fischer (https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2017/090094.html

[NTG-context] bold formulas

How to display a bold formula (here Bragg's law): \starttext \startformula \bf 2d\sin θ_n = nλ \stopformula \stoptext The problem is that \sin is not bold. Suggestions on better practice? Alan

Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta

On 1/2/2018 11:30 PM, Henri wrote: On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote: \starttext oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$ \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$} \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$} \stoptext \mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern

Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta

On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 22:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote: > > > > \starttext > > > > oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$ > > > > \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$} > > > > \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$} > > > > \st

Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta

On 01/02/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote: > \starttext > oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$ > \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$} > \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$} > \stoptext Hi Henri, I can confirm the issue with bold math. From the beta backups I have, it seems to have been introduced in beta from 2

Re: [NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta

On 1/2/2018 10:17 PM, Henri wrote: \starttext oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$ \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$} \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$} \stoptext \mb : there is no full-blown bold math in latin modern, just use \bf Hans

[NTG-context] Bold math broken in beta

\starttext oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$ \bold{oeps $e^{i\pi} = -1$} \bold{oeps $\mb e^{i\pi} = -1$} \stoptext test.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add

Re: [NTG-context] Small caps and bold

Hello, On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:16:33 +0100, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: On 12/14/2017 8:37 AM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote: Hello, I'm trying to typeset some text in bold + smallcaps. But even the sample on wiki: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_small_caps ex

[NTG-context] Small caps and bold

Hello, I'm trying to typeset some text in bold + smallcaps. But even the sample on wiki: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_small_caps extended to: \starttext \setff{smallcaps} Normal and \bf bold Small Caps. {\sc Normal and \bf bold Small Caps.} \stoptext doesn't

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

On 05/12/2017 07:58 PM, Jose Luis Arellano wrote: > Dear list. > Please your help > I've troubles to use this code from Wolfgang. > > \definefontfamily [minionmath] [rm] [Minion Pro] > \definefallbackfamily [minionmath] [mm] [Minion Pro] > [preset=math:lowercasenormal] > \definefallbackfamily

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Dear list. Please your help I've troubles to use this code from Wolfgang. \definefontfamily [minionmath] [rm] [Minion Pro] \definefallbackfamily [minionmath] [mm] [Minion Pro] [preset=math:lowercasenormal] \definefallbackfamily [minionmath] [mm] [Minion Pro] [preset=math:lowercaseitalic]

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > Another input method is shown in the following video [1] where each symbol > get its own command, e.g. \mbfitx is equal to {\bi x}. The source table > mentioned in the video can be found on the STIX page

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >>> Hans Åberg 15. September 2016 um 19:44 >>> >>> I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support >>> (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, but it is slow. >>>

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 15 Sep 2016, at 20:19, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >>> Hans Åberg 15. September 2016 um 19:44 >>> >>> I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support >>> (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, but it is slow. >>>

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Hans Åberg 15. September 2016 um 19:44 I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, but it is slow. One can also design one's own keyboard map, but that is very time consuming.

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:50, Hans Hagen wrote: > > (the scite setup that ships with context provides alphabet / symbol strips) I use Xcode on MacOS (former OS X), which has very good Unicode support (including RTL scripts). There is a Unicode symbols table, but it is slow. One

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:50, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 9/15/2016 6:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> If one does not know the Unicode character, because the translation is >> correct, one can typeset using legacy TeX commands, and copy from the output >> PDF. It can then be used in

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

On 9/15/2016 6:33 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote: On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote: On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote: > >>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 10 Sep 2016, at 18:19, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >> Hans Åberg 10. September 2016 um 17:31 >> >> Does it cover those listed here: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols > \setupbodyfont[xits,30pt] OK. Fine. Adding a comparison

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Hans Åberg 10. September 2016 um 17:31 Does it cover those listed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbols \setupbodyfont[xits,30pt] \starttext \startformula {\mathtf A} {\mathit A} {\mathbf A} {\mathbi A} {\mathss

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:13, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote: > >>> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, Hans Åberg wrote: On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote: On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic styles. So perhaps the TeX commands should expand to these: what tex commands ... we're

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

> On 10 Sep 2016, at 16:06, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: >> The STIX fonts, and XITS then, support Unicode math semantic styles. So >> perhaps the TeX commands should expand to these: > > what tex commands ... we're talking characters and they

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

On 9/10/2016 12:57 PM, Hans Åberg wrote: On 10 Sep 2016, at 10:09, Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote: Most math fonts come only with a regular style which provides upright, italic, bold and bolditalic symbols but all of them part of the same font, only a few

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

But I lose upright numbers this way. How can I solve this issue. I've tried without success: \definefallbackfamily[...][math][...][preset=math:digitsitalic] Math symbols in MkIV are (mostly?) restricted to Unicode which doesn’t define italic digits (but you can choose between regular, bold, sans

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Thanks Wolfgang for explanation, as always very clear. Another related question: If I want to use italic numbers in math, I use: \definefallbackfamily[...][math][...][tf=style:italic,preset=math:digitsnormal] But I lose upright numbers this way. How can I solve this issue. I've tried without

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

On 9/10/2016 10:09 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Jose Luis Arellano <mailto:jose.4rell...@gmail.com> 10. September 2016 um 09:56 For Math. The \tf and \bf commands in math aren’t font switches like in text. Most math fonts come only with a regular style which provides upright, italic

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Jose Luis Arellano <mailto:jose.4rell...@gmail.com> 10. September 2016 um 09:56 For Math. The \tf and \bf commands in math aren’t font switches like in text. Most math fonts come only with a regular style which provides upright, italic, bold and bolditalic symbols but all of the

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

2016-09-10 4:54 GMT-03:00 Wolfgang Schuster : > Is this for normal text or math? > > Wolfgang For Math. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Jose Luis Arellano 10. September 2016 um 09:38 Dear Wolfgang. There is way to instruct to (\definefallbackfamily) to use shapes defined in typescript (eg: mi,mb)? Is this for normal text or math? Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Dear Wolfgang. There is way to instruct to (\definefallbackfamily) to use shapes defined in typescript (eg: mi,mb)? \starttypescript [serif] [Minion Pro] \definebodyfont [default] [rm] [tf=name:minionproregular sa 1, it=name:minionproit sa 1, mb=name:minionpromedium sa 1,

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Jose Luis Arellano <mailto:jose.4rell...@gmail.com> 10. September 2016 um 03:24 Hello list, What is correct way to set bold italic font in math? \definefontfamily [Mainface] [rm] [Minion Pro] \definefallbackfamily [Mainface] [mm] [Minion Pro] [preset=math:lowercaseitalic] \definefont

Re: [NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Hello again. After some research, i found what (I think is a bug) in \definefallbackfamily. Check the following code: \starttypescript [serif] [Minion] \definebodyfont [default] [rm] [tf=name:minionproregular sa 1, it=name:minionproit sa 1, mb=name:minionpromedium sa 1, mi=name:minionpromediumit

[NTG-context] Bold italic font in Math (\definefallbackfamily)

Hello list, What is correct way to set bold italic font in math? \definefontfamily [Mainface] [rm] [Minion Pro] \definefallbackfamily [Mainface] [mm] [Minion Pro] [preset=math:lowercaseitalic] \definefontfamily [Mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math] \setupbodyfont[Mainface] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

Oh. Thank you so much. I'm going to try that on Monday. Now that I understand this, I can move to supporting the different sizes. On 4 May 2016 at 16:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Antoine Cailliau > 4. Mai 2016 um 10:31 > Thank you very

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

Antoine Cailliau 4. Mai 2016 um 10:31 Thank you very much for the example. I got it working for the "regular" style-alternative. I don't know why, but the italic style-alternative do not work. In the log, the font is not even loaded... Do you have an idea of

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

;> bf=SansBold sa 1, >> bi=SansBoldItalic sa 1] >> \stoptypescript >> >> \starttypescript [sans] [source-sans] >> \definefontsynonym [Sans] [file:SourceSansPro-Regular.otf >> ] >> \definefontsynonym [SansItalic]

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

-Semibold.otf > ] > \definefontsynonym [SansMediumItalic] [ > file:SourceSansPro-SemiboldIt.otf] > \definefontsynonym [SansBold] [file:SourceSansPro-Bold.otf] > \definefontsynonym [SansBoldItalic] [file:SourceSansPro-BoldIt.otf] > \stoptypescript > > \defi

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

peface [source] [ss] [sans] [source-sans] [default] [features=default] \definetypeface [source] [mm] [math] [xits][default] \setupbodyfont[source] \starttext Upright {\it Italic} {\sb SemiBold} {\si SemiBoldItalic} {\bf Bold} {\bi BoldItalic} \stoptext Wo

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

> > The \definefontfamily command is limited to the default alternatives (tf, > bf, it, sl, bi, bs ans sc). > Thanks for your answer, what shall I use to define non-default alternatives? ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] Handling Semi-Bold for Minion Pro in Context (LuaTeX)

Antoine Cailliau 2. Mai 2016 um 11:19 Hello, I'm trying to use the font Minion Pro for my document. I'm using the simplefont module but I cannot use the semibold font. I guess I'm missing some line in the configuration to bind sb to the semibold variant. The

  1   2   3   4   5   >