Yes. It works without lualibs-os
Thanks
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
On 8/14/2023 9:13 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
in this case, what does does lualibs-os provide? os.resultof is built
int
It does not work:
\directlua{
34require "lualibs-os"
35 >> tex.sprint(math.floor(os.resultof("git log --pretty=oneline | wc
-l")+1))}
What do you run directlua in LMTX?
___
If your question is of interest
On 8/13/2023 10:39 PM, Xavier B. wrote:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
Running LMTX I have an error: lualibs-os not found:
lua error > lua error on line 35 in file
ng-pre-informacio-document.conTeXt:
token call, execute:
...nt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/l-sandbox.lua:180: module
'lualibs-os' not found:
no field package.preload['lualibs-
(and different linebreaking).
> >
> > \showglyphs
> >
> > \startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
> > \ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
> > \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> > \par
>
e are talks by
Mikael at tug meetings on YT.
The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\und
box{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
> \par
> \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
if you want nicer math switch over to lmtx as mkiv is sort of frozen and
efforts wrt math go into lmtx
Hans
-
raised bar
(and different linebreaking).
\showglyphs
\startTEXpage[offset=1ex]
\ruledhbox{$\overline{OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
\ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$}
\par
Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 12.08.2023 um 11:13:
On 8/12/2023 10:10 AM, Xavier B. wrote:
The font is the default:
\setupbodyfont [modern, 12pt] % modern o cmr, 11pt
I use Linux (arch derivative).
Looks ok here (see atached). Does the modern-math.lfg file have:
AccentTopS
: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
overbar.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\startTEXpage[offset=1ts]
$\overbar{OA} = 4.2$
\stopTEXpage
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non
> proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
> $\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
> \stoptext
>
> Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
> Can you please, see the output attached.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
on proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
> est laborum.
> $\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
> \stoptext
>
> Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
> Can you please, see the output attached.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Xavier
>
> PS: I use context
in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu
fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in
culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
$\overbar{OA} = 4,2$
\stoptext
Then the overbar has the bar in a very long altitude.
Can you please, see the output
On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Johann Birnick via ntg-context wrote:
> please have a look at the following example:
>
> \starttext
> $\overbar{\alpha} \overbar{\beta}$
> \stoptext
>
> The first one works just fine, whereas the second one looks very odd.
> (At least in MkIV...)
Hey there,
please have a look at the following example:
\starttext
$\overbar{\alpha} \overbar{\beta}$
\stoptext
The first one works just fine, whereas the second one looks very odd.
(At least in MkIV...)
Any ideas?
Best,
Johann
Hello,
the following small sample illustrates the problem:
\starttext
\enabletrackers[math.stackers.texts]
\math{\overbar {ABC}} %<-- somewhat okay
\math{\overbar {F}} %<-- too short on the right side
%manual fixing
\math{\overbar {ABC\mkern\onemuskip}}
\math{\overbar {F\
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 00:47 +0200, Sebastian L. wrote:
> It works for single characters, not over braces and brackets though. But
> that's what it was important for for me.
>
> \starttext
>
> \overbar{1}
>
> $\overbar{1}$
>
> $\bar{a}$
>
or me.
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
$\bar{a}$
$\bar{(abcd)}$
$\bar{\left(abcd\right)}$
\stoptext
Thanks though Henri.
On 9/26/2017 12:33 AM, Henri wrote:
Not a solution, but in math mode you should use $\bar{1}$ which is
the proper math accent.
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at
It works for single characters, not over braces and brackets though. But
that's what it was important for for me.
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
$\bar{a}$
$\bar{(abcd)}$
$\bar{\left(abcd\right)}$
\stoptext
Thanks though Henri.
On 9/26/2017 12:33 AM,
Not a solution, but in math mode you should use $\bar{1}$ which is the proper
math accent.
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 23:51 +0200, Sebastian L. wrote:
> Hi fellas,
>
> after some recent beta change some of my documents differ in output
> compared to past builds, when it comes to \overba
Hi fellas,
after some recent beta change some of my documents differ in output
compared to past builds, when it comes to \overbar command in math mode.
MWE:
\starttext
\overbar{1}
$\overbar{1}$
\stoptext
In math mode the example looks broken... Did I miss a change; is there a
Dear,
I am sorry to bring up \overline, \overbar, and \bar issue.
Here is a sample file and
I attached two pdf files which were compiled using two different version of
ConTeXt.
Under the LuaTeX v. 1.03, ConTeXt ver: 2017.03.02 22:23 MKIV beta, the output
overlineB.pdf is OK,
but under the
Dear Henri,
Thank you for your reply.
I used to use ‘\overline’ in LaTeX as shown in many texts, but it is time to
change.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
Dalyoung
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Neither is correct in a mathematics context. Use \bar.
On 05/10/2017 05:54 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are
> slightly different.
> I used \overline in LaTeX.
> But it takes more vertical space that c
Dear all,
In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are slightly
different.
I used \overline in LaTeX.
But it takes more vertical space that cause the alignment trouble while using
\overbar has no problem at all.
Is it normal behavior?
Thank you.
Best regards
Bump. Even a simple yes/no answer would be nice. Is this behaviour intended?
Am 2017-03-29 um 17:03 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm :
> Ahoi,
>
> I played with the "bar" commands:
>
> \underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more}
> \overbar{\underbar{a
Ahoi,
I played with the "bar" commands:
\underbar{underlined \underbar{more and \underbar{more} \overbar{\underbar{and}
\overbar{over}} and back}}
While stacking bars is nice, overbar and underbar exclude each other, while
underbar takes precedence. Is this intended? I expected
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one
for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top"
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan ha escrit:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is
there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression?
Thanks,
Xan
Yes.
That i
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200
Xan ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one
> for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the
> expression?
>
> Thanks,
> Xan
>
>
On 8/20/2014 9:38 AM, Xan wrote:
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is
there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression?
Can you be more explicit? I get the attached.
Thanks,
Hi,
$\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for
$A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression?
Thanks,
Xan
PS: Please CCme
___
If
on nearly every page).
Which unit has this offset?
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3]
I tried the font-independent unit em
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3em]
but that does not work.
as 'ex' is bad font that font, you can try 'em' :
\setupbars[overbar][offset
?
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3]
I tried the font-independent unit em
\setupbars[overbar][offset=3em]
but that does not work.
Huseyin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Am 01.04.2014 um 11:37 schrieb H. Özoguz :
> Hello there,
>
> I tried to overbar an arabic word, and noticed, that the bar is too low and
> overlaps the letters. While producing a minexample, I noticed that this might
> be a issue of my font, because this does not happen with
Hello there,
I tried to overbar an arabic word, and noticed, that the bar is too low
and overlaps the letters. While producing a minexample, I noticed that
this might be a issue of my font, because this does not happen with
Arial. See this minexample:
\definefont[arial][name:arial*arabic at
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> Am 10.06.2013 um 17:43 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum
> wrote:
> > ... no. it should look this (see below): $
Am 10.06.2013 um 17:43 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum
> wrote:
> ... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
>
> it should be ok now with the latest standalone
well,
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:33 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
>> ... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
>>
>> it should be ok now with the latest standalone
--
luigi
_
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> ... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
>
> but coded in MathML.
>
> st.
>
> ok
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as wel
... no. it should look this (see below): $\overline{U_A}$
but coded in MathML.
st.
Bildschirmfoto 2013-06-09 um 16.25.37.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> this seems to be a bug: the overbar should not be set separately again
> over A
>
>
>
> \usemodule[mathml] \starttext
>
>
> \startbuffer
>
Hi Hans,
this seems to be a bug: the overbar should not be set separately again over A
\usemodule[mathml] \starttext
\startbuffer
http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";>
U
most happy holidays and an early
happy new years.
=
ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
\starttext
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=green,offset=7]
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=red,dy=7]
\overbar{test}
\stoptext
=
offset and dy don't seem to do anything. Als
Am 27.12.2012 um 02:17 schrieb Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد
:
> Dear gang,
> First: Here's wishing you all the most happy holidays and an early happy new
> years.
>
> =
> ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
>
>
> \starttext
>
>
Dear gang,
First: Here's wishing you all the most happy holidays and an early happy
new years.
=
ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.14 10:44 MKIV
\starttext
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=green,offset=7]
\overbar{test}
\setupbars[color=red,dy=7]
\overbar{test}
\sto
On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
thank you for your answer. `\overline` works as you say, but it looks
typographically different in the respect that the bar is closer to the
letter, which of course solves the issue for the inline fraction. For α
this looks quite strange in my eyes. But I d
Dear Otared,
Am Freitag, den 04.02.2011, 20:45 +0100 schrieb Otared Kavian:
> I think one should use \overline instead of \overbar in your example. For me
> the following works fine with mkiv:
> \starttext
>\startformula
>\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}
Hi Paul,
I think one should use \overline instead of \overbar in your example. For me
the following works fine with mkiv:
\starttext
\startformula
\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q}}{\overline{α_0}}
\stopformula
In text $\overline{q} = \frac{\overline{q
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I do have some problem with the following example (also attached,
executed with `context test`).
\starttext
\startformula
\overbar{q} = \frac{\overbar{q}}{\overbar{α_0}}
\stopformula
In text $\overbar{q} = \frac{\overbar{q}}{\overbar
Hi,
there was an earlier issue with \underbar{b}
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20091109.094902.baf77ffc.en.html
which seems somewhat related to my problem. When providing only one
character as argument to \underbar or \overbar and a following space (or
paragraph ending) the line
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
Just a question: what's the equivalent of \overbar in math mode. \underbar
works in math mode, but \overbar does not.
\bar or \overline
Aditya
___
If your question
Hi,
Just a question: what's the equivalent of \overbar in math mode.
\underbar works in math mode, but \overbar does not.
Thanks a lot,
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please a
Hi all,
I don't understand differences between \underbar and \overbar
Someone can explain ?
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
56 matches
Mail list logo
