Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-25 Thread Kurt Buff
] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem Is this the equivalent of Vader saying Your powers are weak, old man to Obi Wan? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kurt

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-25 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem Is this the equivalent of Vader saying Your powers are weak, old man to Obi Wan? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Sigh. Yes, but... The 5

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-25 Thread Jonathan Link
peril. :P From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

RE: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-25 Thread Woody Blackman
Well, its bark is worse than its bite... From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Micheal Espinola Jr Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:45 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem I like

RE: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-23 Thread Michael B. Smith
And bit rot is real. -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ben Scott Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 5:48 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem On Sun, Sep 22, 2013

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-22 Thread Kurt Buff
...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem Is this the equivalent of Vader saying Your powers are weak, old man to Obi Wan? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-22 Thread Micheal Espinola Jr
use it. Violate the rule at your peril. :P From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

RE: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Reimer, Mark
I've seen a wire with both ends plugged into a little 5/8 port switch that caused the problem. But it was a long down time, until I found the wire. Mark -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Friday,

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-4-3_rule That's for repeaters. If that applies, I'd suggest an alternate approach... ;-) -- Ben

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Kurt Buff
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: ... core layer3 switch ... spikes its CPU to 99% during these episodes ... ... Volume of traffic is normal ... CPU spikes on a switch is usually

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: ... core layer3 switch ... spikes its CPU to 99% during these episodes ... ... Volume of traffic is normal ... CPU spikes on a switch is usually something weird. Normal traffic is handled in the switch ASIC and doesn't

RE: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Richard McClary
. -- richard -Original Message- From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 1:12 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Ben Scott

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Kurt Buff
Yes, that's why on my other switches (Procurve 2510-48), I have set up loop-detect parameters, in addition to spanning tree. I have it lock out the port for 10 minutes. Kurt On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Reimer, Mark mark.rei...@prairie.edu wrote: I've seen a wire with both ends plugged

RE: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Michael B. Smith
I still use it. Violate the rule at your peril. :P From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Link Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 2:07 PM To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: No, the configuration of the L3 switch is stupidly simple ... Very odd that you're getting CPU spikes, then. You've done a show log -a on the switch right after the trouble and found nothing helpful, I presume? Have

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Kurt Buff
No, I figured he was having me on... Kurt On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Is this the equivalent of Vader saying Your powers are weak, old man to Obi Wan? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: Sigh. Yes, but...

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Michael B. Smith mich...@smithcons.com wrote: I still use it. Violate the rule at your peril. :P Technically speaking, if you're using switches everywhere, you're still following the rule, because every link is its own collision domain. ;-) -- Ben

Re: [NTSysADM] Semi-OT: Network problem

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Scott
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote: You've done a show log -a on the switch right after the trouble and found nothing helpful, I presume? On the 3400cl, 'show log' says the same as 'sho log -a' - nothing of interest. The -a just tells it to include