Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-28 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, on https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads I uploaded 7z-archives for mingw-w64 and for OpenBLAS-0.2.10 for 32 bit and for 64 bit. To use mingw-w64 for Python = 3.3 you have to manually tweak the so called specs file - see readme.txt in the archive. Regards Carl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-28 Thread Olivier Grisel
2014-07-28 15:25 GMT+02:00 Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com: Hi, on https://bitbucket.org/carlkl/mingw-w64-for-python/downloads I uploaded 7z-archives for mingw-w64 and for OpenBLAS-0.2.10 for 32 bit and for 64 bit. To use mingw-w64 for Python = 3.3 you have to manually tweak the so called

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-28 Thread Carl Kleffner
I had to move my development enviroment on different windows box recently (stilll in progress). On this box I don't have full access unfortunately. The patch for scipy build was merged into scipy master some time ago, see https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/3484 . I have some additional patches

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-27 Thread Robert McGibbon
I forked Olivier's example project to use the same infrastructure for building conda binaries and deploying them to binstar, which might also be useful for some projects. https://github.com/rmcgibbo/python-appveyor-conda-example -Robert On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Robert McGibbon

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-11 Thread Olivier Grisel
2014-07-10 0:53 GMT+02:00 Robert McGibbon rmcgi...@gmail.com: This is an awesome resource for tons of projects. Thanks. FYI here is the PR for sklearn to use AppVeyor CI: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/3363 It's slightly different from the minimalistic sample I wrote for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-10 Thread Robert McGibbon
This is an awesome resource for tons of projects. Thanks Olivier! -Robert On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Olivier Grisel olivier.gri...@ensta.org wrote: Feodor updated the AppVeyor nodes to have the Windows SDK matching MSVC 2008 Express for Python 2. I have updated my sample scripts and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-09 Thread Olivier Grisel
Feodor updated the AppVeyor nodes to have the Windows SDK matching MSVC 2008 Express for Python 2. I have updated my sample scripts and we now have a working example of a free CI system for: Python 2 and 3 both for 32 and 64 bit architectures. https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-07 Thread Olivier Grisel
Hi! I gave appveyor a try this WE so as to build a minimalistic Python 3 project with a Cython extension. It works both with 32 and 64 bit MSVC++ and can generate wheel packages. See: https://github.com/ogrisel/python-appveyor-demo However 2008 is not (yet) installed so it cannot be used

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-03 Thread Julian Taylor
On 03.07.2014 05:56, Sturla Molden wrote: On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should be SSE2 -- I:d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to go through some hoops that n have most people get something that is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-03 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should be SSE2 -- I:d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to go through some hoops that n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-03 Thread Matthew Brett
I guess this one's mainly for Carl: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-03 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi Matthew, I can make it in the late evening (MEZ timezone), so you have to wait a bit ... I also will try to create new numpy/scipy wheels. I now have the latest OpenBLAS version ready. Olivier gaves me access to rackspace. I wil try it out on the weekend. Regards Carl 2014-07-03 12:46

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-03 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, I can make it in the late evening (MEZ timezone), so you have to wait a bit ... I also will try to create new numpy/scipy wheels. I now have the latest OpenBLAS version ready. Olivier gaves me access

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Olivier Grisel
Hi Matthew and Ralf, Has anyone managed to build working whl packages for numpy and scipy on win32 using the static mingw-w64 toolchain? -- Olivier ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi all, I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't updated my toolchhain from february, but I do regulary builds of OpenBLAS. OpenBLAS is under heavy development right now, thanks to Werner Saar, see:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't updated my toolchhain from february, but I do regulary builds of OpenBLAS. OpenBLAS is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I do regulary builds for python-2.7. Due to my limited resources I didn't build for 3.3 or 3.4 right now. I didn't

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, The mingw-w64 based wheels (Atlas and openBLAS) are based on a patched numpy version, that hasn't been published as numpy pull for revision until now (my failure). I could try to do this tomorrow in the evening. Another important point is, that the toolchain, that is capable to compile

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The mingw-w64 based wheels (Atlas and openBLAS) are based on a patched numpy version, that hasn't been published as numpy pull for revision until now (my failure). I could try to do this tomorrow in the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Olivier Grisel
Hi Carl, All the items you suggest would be very appreciated. Don't hesitate to ping me if you need me to test new packages. Also the sklearn project has a free Rackspace Cloud account that Matthew is already using to make travis upload OSX wheels for the master branch of various scipy stack

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, personally I don't have a preference of Binstar over somewhere.org. More important is that one has to agree where to find the binaries. Binstar has the concept of channels and allow wheels. So one could provide a channel for NOSSE and more channels for other specialized builds:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, personally I don't have a preference of Binstar over somewhere.org. More important is that one has to agree where to find the binaries. Binstar has the concept of channels and allow wheels. So one could provide

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Chris Barker
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like 99% of Windows users do have SSE2 though [1]. So I think what is required is * Build the wheels for 32-bit (easy) * Patch the wheels to check and give helpful error in absence of SSE2 (fairly easy)

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Chris Barker
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Having a noSSE channel would make sense. Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should be SSE2 -- I:d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to go through some hoops that n have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-07-02 Thread Sturla Molden
On 02/07/14 19:55, Chris Barker wrote: Indeed -- the default (i.e what you get with pip install numpy) should be SSE2 -- I:d much rather have a few folks with old hardware have to go through some hoops that n have most people get something that is much slower than MATLAB. I think we should

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-30 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-22 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:06 AM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-09 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-09 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 09.05.2014 12:42, David Cournapeau wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com mailto:matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-09 Thread Carl Kleffner
this is from: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html // ifunc resolvers fire before constructors, explicitly call the init function. __builtin_cpu_init (); if (__builtin_cpu_supports (ssse2)) code else code Cheers, Carl 2014-05-09 13:06 GMT+02:00 David

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-05-08 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:29 PM, David Cournapeau courn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-29 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote: On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: As you know, I'm really hoping it will be possible make a devkit for Python similar to the Ruby devkits [1]. That would be great!

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-29 Thread Carl Kleffner
(1) Yes, Support for MSVC100 (python-3.3 and up) is on the TODO list (2) both toolchains are configured for static linking. No need to deploy: libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll, libgomp-1.dll, libquadmath-0.dll, libstdc++-6.dll, libgfortran-3.dll or libwinpthread-1.dll (3) I decided to create two

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-29 Thread Sturla Molden
Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: 2) Static linking - Carl's toolchain does full static linking including C runtimes The C runtime cannot be statically linked. It would mean that we get multiple copies of errno and multiple malloc heaps in the process – one of each static CRT. We

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-29 Thread Carl Kleffner
Correction: gcc (mingw) runtimes are statically linked. The C-runtime DLL msvcrXXX is linked dynamically. Carl 2014-04-29 17:10 GMT+02:00 Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com: Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: 2) Static linking - Carl's toolchain does full static linking

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.comwrote: Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic. OSX is somewhat saner in this respect. Oh yes, it seems there are official unofficial gfortran binaries

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Sturla Molden
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be interested to hear if those work well for you. For people that just want to get things working, I would recommend to use the gfortran installers recommended at a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.comwrote: Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be interested to hear if those work well for you. For people that just want to get things working, I would recommend to use the gfortran installers recommended at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Sturla Molden
Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good. Let's give it a bit more time, once you've given it a good workout we can add that those gfortran 4.8.x compilers seem to work fine to the scipy build instructions. Yes, it needs to be tested properly. The build instructions for OS X

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Chris Barker
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: As you know, I'm really hoping it will be possible make a devkit for Python similar to the Ruby devkits [1]. That would be great! From a really quick glance, it looks like we could almost use the Ruby Devkit, maybe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread Sturla Molden
On 28/04/14 18:21, Ralf Gommers wrote: No problems thus far, but I only installed it yesterday. :-) Sounds good. Let's give it a bit more time, once you've given it a good workout we can add that those gfortran 4.8.x compilers seem to work fine to the scipy build instructions. I have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-28 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: A possible option is to install the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi Carl, On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the mingw-builds build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Hi, 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti: Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy wheels for testing. Where can I get your numpy.patch scipy.patch and what's in them? Cheers,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Hi, 25.04.2014 00:56, Matthew Brett kirjoitti: Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy wheels for testing. Where can I get

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. BTW: There is a missing feature in the mingw-w64 toolchain. By now it features linking to msvcrt90 runtime only. I have do extend the specs

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I will definitly don't have not time until thursday this week working out the github workflow for a numpy pull request. So feel free to do it for me. OK - I will have a go at this tomorrow. BTW: There is a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread josef . pktd
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to the toolchain could be extended during import of the package. But I have no idea, whats

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Sturla Molden
Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic. OSX is somewhat saner in this respect. Oh yes, it seems there are official unofficial gfortran binaries available for OSX: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranBinaries#MacOS Cool :) Sturla

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-27 Thread Matthew Brett
Aha, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Carl Kleffner cmkleff...@gmail.com wrote: A possible option is to install the toolchain inside site-packages and to deploy it as PYPI wheel or wininst packages. The PATH to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:20 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:10 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:26 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Sturla Molden
Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy wheels for testing. Thanks for your great effort to solve this mess. By Murphy's law, I do not have access to a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Pauli Virtanen
25.04.2014 08:57, Sturla Molden kirjoitti: [clip] On the positive side: Does this mean we finally can use gfortran on Windows? And if so, can we use Fortran versions beyond Fortran 77 in SciPy now? Or is Mac OS X a blocker? Yes, Windows is the only platform on which Fortran was problematic.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-26 Thread Carl Kleffner
Hi, basically the toolchain was created with a local fork of the mingw-builds build process along with some addons and patches. It is NOT a mingw-w64 fork. BTW: there are numerous mingw-w64 based toolchains out there, most of them build without any information about the build process and patches

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit windows numpy and scipy wheels for testing. The build uses Carl's custom mingw-w64

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Cool. After all these long years... Now all we need is a box running tests for CI. There is http://www.appveyor.com/ though I haven't tried doing anything with it yet... (yes it says .NET at the top, but then

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
OT: Oh, I hate pip and packages that require numpy E:\tmpC:\Python27\python C:\Python27\Scripts\pip-script.py install -U patsy Downloading/unpacking patsy Running setup.py (path:c:\users\josef\appdata\local\temp\pip_build_josef\patsy\setup.py) egg_info for package patsy no

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:29 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 64-bit windows numpy / scipy wheels for testing

2014-04-24 Thread josef . pktd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Charles R Harris charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matthew, On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Thanks to Cark Kleffner's toolchain and some help from Clint Whaley (main author of ATLAS), I've built 64-bit