Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

On Sunday, September 16, 2001 at 2:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on "[obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?," saying.. ... > Riders receive an individual handicap based on past performances, > but afterwards (before knowing others' results) can appeal to a >

RE: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

>2. Do I get extra for being forced to wear a helmet? > Yeah about the 49 (or so) that Laurent Fignon gave to Greg L. :-) And if you do not wear a helmet you have to wear a pony tail. :-). Brian 01 Rocket 91 Burley Duet <>< -- To unsubscribe, send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Club

Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Avery Burdett wrote: > 1. Do members of the Board get any seconds for dealing with this? It's hard to know which way he Mugster's 'll lean. > 2. Do I get extra for being forced to wear a helmet? Maybe you'd better start preparing your case. NO - I didn't mean that!!! Celia -- To unsubscr

Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Don't forget violations of Newton's Third Law of Motion. Any TT caught violating this law should automatically have their handicap cut in half, except on Thursdays, unless The Messiah shows up, and only if it's not raining, provided it is not a tie, in which case the absolute score will take prece

RE: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 1:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: OBC > Subject: Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE? > > Rosella Mac Neil wrote: > > > 1) Is it OK to combine two or more excusxxx er, handicaps, like maybe if > > a rider is an engineer who w

Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Celia, Re your IEEE suggestions (including the one directed at engineers) They're great - they should work out just fine! I certainly think you should do more of that slow riding - obviously, it stimulates the brain. I have just a couple of questions. 1) Is it OK to combine two or more excusxxx

Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

"Simpson, Bob" wrote: > I fear that lawyers and good debaters (except perhaps those who are mathematicians and tired and impatient and maybe even cranky sometimes (apologies!))... > or negotiators will have an advantage > here, so they must be negatively handicapped to start with. Those who ar

Re: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Rosella Mac Neil wrote: > 1) Is it OK to combine two or more excusxxx er, handicaps, like maybe if > a rider is an engineer who wore a dress - only once - and had ridden > 1200 km in new shorts the previous weekend? Again, final decisions to the Mugsters. Fine by the programmer - though the wai

RE: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

I fear that lawyers and good debaters or negotiators will have an advantage here, so they must be negatively handicapped to start with. Those who are meek and non-confrontational should receive a several second handicap. I would like to put forth conclusively that I am of the meek variety and i

[obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Just to let you know, the age/gender handicapped results from Sep06 will disappear from our site when I update the TT results next Thursday, so if you want a copy, grab it before then. Also, when rolling through the countryside this afternoon, and thinking about Simpson's concerns about sore toe

RE: [obc] XX-Rated and IEEE?

Simpson, Bob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) writes: > I fear that lawyers and good debaters or negotiators will have an advantage > here, so they must be negatively handicapped to start with. Those who are > meek and non-confrontational should receive a several second handicap. > > I would like to put fort