Not yet - but it was once a close-run thing!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: Too bad i tried the MZ-S
SNIP
Feroze,
Don't worry about it you'll soon
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:48, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Here's my opinion on TC's:
They Suck compared to real primes at the desired
focal length. Especially for 35mm use. I have
one for 6X7 that degrades quality just like the
35mm ones do but at least with 6X7 the quality
level is still
At 12:52 PM 12/11/2002 -0800, you wrote:
I seem to recall hearing good things about this TC, but a search of the
PDML archives didn't turn up anything useful. Has anyone got one? How
do you like it? If I did pick one up, I'd be using it with a 135/2.5
and a 50/1.7.
I used it with both of
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Dan Scott wrote:
I've read somewhere that MZ and MX users should file away a bit of
the incredibly thick aluminum ring the filters are set into, which is
supposed to fix the problem you mention.
And Program A/Program Plus users :-( I found out the hard way, now my
mirror
Hi David,
Some years ago by the time the 5N was just released, a well known
and appreciated pdml member - Roberto Burgos (who unfortunately has
left the group for some time now) conducted a formal test of the
MZ-5N flash compensation under controlled conditions ( flashmeter,
studio,
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I cannot understand the 'advantage' of inspecting every shot and deleting
as
one is shooting - to each their own. I prefer to do the editing
post-shooting.
having the LCD always come on after a shot means you don't have to fumble
to turn it on
I'm (as we say in England) dead chuffed. I snagged a 27 Gb ATA hard disk
on ebay USA for 60 bucks and it came yesterday morning. I've managed to
stack it with the existing 6 GB and it all works. I now have a 27 GB
partitioned into 20 and 7, and the old 6 GB is now devoted to Photoshop
as a
Is is a repeated message? It sounds so familiar.
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: Too bad i tried the MZ-S
Thomas Heide Clausen a écrit:
...
Ohhyeah, the grip. That is one
on 12.12.02 2:36, Bruce Rubenstein at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And raving lunatic, assholes use Pentax.
I thought that having name so similar to my great compatriot and pianist
(Artur Rubinstein) would obligate you to be more cultured. But it seems I
was just wrong, so wrong!
--
Best
Instant review. I turn it off. But it can be useful, that's why it is
there!!! One point that came up was the weight. I hear far too many
complaints about that. I don't need the strain on my neck/back, it's bad
already. I also don't want to clip some box on my belt that's a power unit!
on 11.12.02 21:39, Carlos Royo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Sylwester:
I sent some messages to the list about the problem you mention.
When you screw a filter to the back of the lens, the mirror in the MZ-S,
MZ-5 or MX gets stuck when it is returning to its normal position after
having
Hi,
http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk has reduced the prices on its
Minolta film scanners, as well as increasing the range
available.
No connection, except as satisfied customer.
mike
Hi,
Question: Is this with a particular flash er, unit, or have you
tried a few?
mike
Subject: RE: Opinions Wanted: Vivitar 2x Macro Focussing Teleconverter
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 21:48, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Here's my opinion on TC's:
They Suck compared to real primes at the desired
focal length. Especially for 35mm use. I have
one for 6X7 that degrades quality
Hey folks,
Does anyone here read Japanese? I think from the Pentax Europe I got a link
to Japan, not the true Pentax Japan site, but Japanese still. I pulled up a
PDF document. The big brochure for the MS-S. It was identical but for 2
things (as far as layout and pictures) I have a copy here
on 12.12.02 5:48, David Willecke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max, I just today got an e-mail from the Pentax corporation confirming my
observations--they said that the camera assumed the flash is the primary
light source and the one the photographer would want to be able to
adjust--and I
http://www.excite.co.jp/world/text
regards,
Alan Chan
Does anyone here read Japanese? I think from the Pentax Europe I got a
link
to Japan, not the true Pentax Japan site, but Japanese still. I pulled up
a
PDF document. The big brochure for the MS-S. It was identical but for 2
things (as
If you mean the QS-??, they are quick release plates and adaptor for tripod.
If I remember correctly, they are identical to the Kenko products in Japan.
Kenko ballheads are quite popular there.
regards,
Alan Chan
Does anyone here read Japanese? I think from the Pentax Europe I got a
link
to
Hey, thanks Alan! Now to find text Japanese!
Regards,
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax Japan
http://www.excite.co.jp/world/text
regards,
Alan Chan
Does anyone here read
No not the QR plates, they are listed in the English brouchure
Link:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/catalog/pdf/mz-s.pdf
page14/15 in print. See if you can read it, or make out the pictures. I
can do neither.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:56:55 -0500
Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh,
I ordered extra ones, rubber eye cap and findercap, because I knew
I'd lose them. Of course, now that I have them, I probably will
never lose one :)
Brad.
heh...
Mine fell off at the most inconvenient moment: I
Could that be the soft camera cases? They come with S/M/L.
regards,
Alan Chan
No not the QR plates, they are listed in the English brouchure
Link:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/catalog/pdf/mz-s.pdf
page14/15 in print. See if you can read it, or make out the pictures. I
can do
Hahahathat's great! So we now have spares but will never use them!!
Too bad you did lose one when you didn't have another. I've been lucky so
far. I don't know whether to cross my fingers or not... g
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Heide Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark D. wrote:
For the Epson 820, Costco sells a 3 pack with 2
color
cartridges and and one black cartridge. It's
approximately $50.
Mark
woo woo - good price! but it is very difficult to
get to one from where
I am.
and dont you ahve to
I haven't a clue. Did you find the images to be very poor like I did? You
could be right, but who knows, the pictures are not all that revealing!
Oh, Alan, thanks for that previous link! I think it'll really come in
handy, tried it out some!
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
I think Costco prices are standard across the lower 48. I believe the
NYC store is supposed to fit the environment, rather than resemble a
suburban warehouse store lost in Manhattan. You do have to be a member,
but it's worth it. It's also fun, because they bring in a lot of very
nice merchandise
Hmmm, usually when I shoot with the D1X/H it just takes the push of a button
to turn the screen on. In the time it takes to look at the screen I have
already turned it on.
I will have to ask to borrow her camera one afternoon just to play around
and compare...
César
Panama City, Florida
--
Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:53:32 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Of course, you can get chip re-setters for most Epson cartridges now and you
can reset the 870 and 1270 cartridges in the printer if you know the trick.
So don't hold out on us Mark!
Short version:
Fuck you!
That's what you get when ho one thinks they have to follow rules of common
decency, dip shit.
BR
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that's nice talk...
BTW, that's MR. Raving Lunatic A-hole to you, Bruce (note: no smiley face
this time!)
have a great day,
frank
At 01:26 AM 12/12/2002 -0500, JCO wrote:
( hint,
for 35mm I have everything from 15 to 1000mm ).
JCO
Did you say hint because you're about to put them all on ebay or did you
mean to say boast
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
Kenneth Waller wrote:
http://www.atlex.com
Ooh, that one's a keeper!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I'm on eyepiece number 2 as well. However, since I believe that the
gods of entropy require a sacrifice for anything to actually work, I'll
offer up the eyepiece. Better than the lens falling off . . .
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Thomas Heide Clausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
-- Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 5:31 AM
--
-- On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:56:55 -0500
-- Brad Dobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
-- Heh,
--
-- I ordered extra ones, rubber eye cap and findercap, because I knew
Subject: Re: Opinions Wanted: Vivitar 2x Macro Focussing Teleconverter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was agressive because I wanted my point to be HARD. TCs are
only good if you want to travel light and are willing to accept
soft, lower contrast images. 35mm photography is borderline
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann, I don't have a detailed list of what we've tried and what the results were
over the years, but one year we tried printing the calendars on card stock and
the ink consumption was RIDICULOUS.
I've done some research into doing what Ann is trying to do (printing
I've seen these in the stores. I'll have to give them a try. Paper is
expensive, and I'm usually not willing to experiment without a
recommendation.
Ilford sells (or used to sell) 6-sheet sampler packs. That's how I
discovered the Fine Art inkjet paper. I never would have tried it if I'd had
to
Hi,
It is truth that old K, M lenses are built very well. My SMC K 135/2.5 is built like a
tank and other my K i M lenses are very good in this respect.
Alek
Uytkownik Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek wrote:
Thank you! so for the price K35/3.5 is great and if one can afford to buy FA
Lost mine too. Don't think I'll bother replacing it though.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: jcoyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: Too bad i tried the MZ-S
Not yet - but it was once a close-run thing!
John Coyle
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 05:40:30 -0800 (PST), Herb Chong
wrote:
Message text written by
INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ann, I've been using an Epson Stylus Photo for about
4+ years and run the
printer till it will no longer print before I change
cartridges. It has
never quit in the middle of
No, Not selling. I plan on using them on a PENTAX digital
SLR in a few years. For now, I'm getting great results
with that old fashioned thing called FILM. If Pentax
decides not to go the digital SLR route, I just might
buy a Canon EOS digital and mount them on that if
I have to.
I am a strong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Now that I come to think about it, when I go out with just one camera body
and one lens, the lens I take is almost *never* a zoom.
The most common combination for me is the MX and 43/1.9 Limited, but
sometimes the lens is either a 50mm
Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too lost my eye piece cover. It did take a while, but evidently it
occurred while placing the camera back in the bag.
I have not had this problem with its replacement. A rep told me to put a
dab of silicone on it. I think I have felt it move just
In fact, I seem to recall that
I've read someplace around Luminous Landscape that Mike thinks of
anyone who earns money with their camera and lenses as professional,
and the rest he considers amateurs of various levels.
If I'm the Mike you're talking about (and you weren't talking about
So Nikon/Canon have some problems with dim light?What about accuracy?
Alek
Uytkownik John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:28:42 +1030, you wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0212/02121201nikondxlenses.asp
I think I've seen Pentax zoom video lenses with an amazing range
whereswayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0212/02121201nikondxlenses.asp
i read somewhere that
full frame digital will become the new medium format
and aps the new 35mm
so i guess there were right
lets hope pentax goes this way
What, so their new lenses won't work with
That is why I could see bad bokeh since many probably third factors affected the final
result which was not bad.
Maybe in other circumstances I would see it. I just must try again.
Alek
Uytkownik Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 10:46
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:35:19 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm surprised there's no printing company that's tried to make a business
specifically around doing calendars for photographers;
I did a Google search a couple of weeks ago looking for custom calendar
vendors, and I found at
Hi Fred,
What about bokeh if one step down a bit aperture? Does it improve?
Alek
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
What is judged good or bad bokeh depends only on the lens, not the
subject's surroundings. What surrounds the subject may be judged
to be a good or bad choice of _background_, but
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 05:43:14 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[The Stylus Photo] has never gotten midway
through a print and stopped or continued to print minus
the depleted color.
My 820 sure has. It's dropped black, both cyans, and light magenta at
various times. When I said I run
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see quite a point in shooting on film and have it later scanned.
Though recently Luminous Landscape keep praising latest Canon 11 MP
camera up to the point of mentioning that it has virtually no noise at
virtually all ISO settings.
i don't
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm, usually when I shoot with the D1X/H it just takes the push of a
button
to turn the screen on. In the time it takes to look at the screen I have
already turned it on.
that push is sometimes too long, especially in macro photography of a
John (JCO),
I hear you on TC's. I've never been a big fan of them, but...
It's Gymnastics season and for the last 3 meets, I've dragged the camera
along.
The gym is dark. The stands are a long way from the vault, bars, beam and
floor.
Even with the A135/1.8 and 800 Fuji film, things are tough
Alan wrote:
If the link you provided is correct, and you mean the picture on the left
of
the tripod adaptors, they are soft cases. I am certain of that. They are
small for certain, but still recognizable to me. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
Yes, they're soft cases. Three fronts are available - S,M L.
Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:35:19 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm surprised there's no printing company that's tried to make a business
specifically around doing calendars for photographers;
I did a Google search a couple of weeks ago looking for custom
In a message dated 12/11/02 2:58:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, but it is debatable whether we are talking about bokeh then or simply
just annoying backgrounds.
Even the best of lenses regarding bokeh cannot perform wonders with annoying
backgrounds.
Pål
I'm not a big believer in
In a message dated 12/11/02 3:59:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I seem to recall hearing good things about this TC, but a search of the
PDML archives didn't turn up anything useful. Has anyone got one? How
do you like it? If I did pick one up, I'd be using it with a 135/2.5
and a 50/1.7.
Hi Keith,
So after reading many opinions about bokeh it can be truth what I wrote that in some
conditions I could see bad bokeh using K105/2.8. MAybe I chose them in such a way that
it was quiete nice.Maybe in other ones bokeh could be harsh.
But in general this lens is very sharp and contrasty.
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm surprised there's no printing company that's tried to make a business
specifically around doing calendars for photographers; they'd just need to
set up a basic calendar template and plug specific photo files into it. I
looked for such a setup
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Overall, I'm not very charitable to pros. Anyone who wishes to do so may
write this off to envy, sour grapes, prejudice, whatever. But I like _art_.
--Mike
you have described advertising photography. those in the stock business
work differently
The only time I find myself using a teleconverter is when I need something
longer than my 300/2.8 (in other words, when there's no alternative for me!)
I think this means I'm agreeing with JCO, but I'm not sure ;)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 09:25:40 -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
Please post the list.
My search was over a year ago and, though I came up with lots of web sites
that looked promising, no one provided the kind of service I was looking
for. A lot can change in the space of a year, though.\
H
...
... I'm still looking for a really convenient way to carry the MX while
running.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
me too. My conclusions so far is that the hand would be best, both in
termns of jarring and in terms of ease of use. The biggest problem is
sweat,
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only time I find myself using a teleconverter is when I need something
longer than my 300/2.8 (in other words, when there's no alternative for
me!)
I think this means I'm agreeing with JCO, but I'm not sure ;)
--
Mark Roberts
he says you
David Willecke a écrit:
Max, I just today got an e-mail from the Pentax corporation confirming
.
You can verify with an AF360FGZ (or 330/500FTZ ?): the useful distance
varies, the max. distance increases in case of correction -
To verify if also works in wireless mode !
Michel
Hi,
What would be the cost of each :A85/1.4, A24/2.8 and LX?
Alek
Uytkownik E. Kragtwijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hello everyone,
A friend of mine without an Internet connection (yes, they still
exist!...:-)) asked me to offer his Pentax gear for sale to the Pentax
discussion list. He is looking
Hi, Bob.
Does anyone know how it compares to the A 2X-S or L ? ...or the
Vivitar 2X Fred mentioned?
I've never compared the Vivitar Macro-Focusing TC with the A 2X-L,
but I have shot it side-by-side (on an A* 300/4) with the A 2X-S and
the T6-2X, and I've found the three TC's to be quite
Hi,
I've got an offer that seems to be so good that I can hardly reject it:
SMC-FA 2/24 like new, complete and in box: 200,- Euro/US$
SMC-FA 1,4/85 like new, complete and in box: 400,- Euro/US$
I don't really need this lenses as I'm satisfied with my SMC FA 2/35 in
the wide angle range and my
Hi Mark,
how is it with yours MX? I am still thinking about selling my ME-S
before I put it to hell cosmetically (with the customisations I
plan to it), as MX would be better suited for me. Is it still
available?
Frantisek
Probbaly you are right. Prices are good IMHO
Alek
Uytkownik Heiko Hamann [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hi,
I've got an offer that seems to be so good that I can hardly reject it:
SMC-FA 2/24 like new, complete and in box: 200,- Euro/US$
SMC-FA 1,4/85 like new, complete and in box: 400,- Euro/US$
I
Heiko,
Certainly the price is great. I have the FA *24/2.0 and the FA
35/2.0. I think that they are very different lenses and I would keep
both. In fact, I sold my FA 20/2.8 and 28/2.8 in favor of keeping
those first two (needed money for 67 glass).
I also have both the FA *85/1.4 and the FA
I recall some japanese LX-dedicated website showing such thumbrest
made from some plastic and glued (?) to LX backdoor (along with
many other LX mods).
F If you (or anyone) can come up with the URL for that site, please
F let me/us know - I'd be curious to see what some people have done to
F
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Cesar posted (addressed to Wendy, but hey, it was out in the open):
I too lost my eye piece cover. It did take a while, but evidently it
occurred while placing the camera back in the bag.
I have not had this problem with its replacement. A rep told me to put a
dab
I was introduced to Fine Art Paper with the Ilford Sampler pack as well.
It's a great marketing idea.
Paul
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've seen these in the stores. I'll have to give them a try. Paper is
expensive, and I'm usually not willing to experiment without a
recommendation.
Ilford sells
Thursday, December 12, 2002, 2:58:44 PM, akozak wrote:
aop So Nikon/Canon have some problems with dim light?What about accuracy?
My friend, who does shoot D100 and F4s a lot, has the D100 constantly
switched to manual focus. Even though the cropped F80 viewfinder is so
small and not that
Hi Frantisek,
Nice to see a fellow Pentax from my southern neighbours.
What equipment do you have? I own Pz1,Super A+some K lenses and A50/1.7 and tamron
SP macro 2.8 and MEtz 40MZ3
Alek
Uytkownik Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Thursday, December 12, 2002, 2:58:44 PM, akozak wrote:
the exercise of picking one prime lens and shooting
with it exclusively until you've forgotten what other
lenses feel like is a learning experience that you
will carry with you for the rest of your life
Yes, and I suspect it would be particularly memorable
if you decided to pick
Hi Bruce,
on 12 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Certainly the price is great. I have the FA *24/2.0 and the FA
35/2.0. I think that they are very different lenses and I would keep
both. In fact, I sold my FA 20/2.8 and 28/2.8 in favor of keeping
those first two (needed money for 67 glass).
I was in WalMart this a.m.
Kodak has an odd retail package.
4 rolls of 400 color print film, plus 1 roll of 400 bw film.
The outside of the box doesn't say what type of bw film it is -- CN,
Tri-X, or T-Max.
Odd that they'd push bw like that. Maybe it's just surplus.
Collin
Use da old nice K55 with a Kbody and open up the other eye.
About the same thru the lens and in the left eye. I'm sure
some photographers find this useful. I do on occasion, which
is why the 55 is my standard carry-around lens with a KX.
John Daniele wrote:
What are the advantages of 55mm
From what I've heard about panorama stitching, using wides is a _bad_
idea, because edge distortion makes overlapping tough. Use something
like a 100mm. This requires taking more photos, but the stitching is
apparently much easier. Mind, I've not done this, just read about it.
-Lon
Michel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems that I can't make a loss, doesn't it?? Help=%-]
Those are good prices, but you can always make a loss...
Regards, Bob S.
I'd bet the Pentax 100/3.5 macro is the best of the Cosina
rebadges for Kmount because:
a) it focuses the right way
b) it has SMC.
We have three Phoenix 100mm/f3.5 macros in the household
They're sharp, but they focus the wrong way, and flare
is noticable in the viewfinder. Their only advantage
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1943673134
What is it?
Regards
Artur
--r-e-k-l-a-m-a-
Masz do pacenia prowizji bankowi ?
mBank - za konto
http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I've heard about panorama stitching, using wides is a _bad_
idea, because edge distortion makes overlapping tough. Use something
like a 100mm. This requires taking more photos, but the stitching is
apparently much easier. Mind, I've
I'm gonna reply, but not about astrophotography.
I have two mirror lenses, both 500mm f8: Lentar and
Spiratone. the Spiratone is much smaller than the Lentar.
I shoot the Lentar a lot. It is not a good lens, particularly
with regard to contrast. But it _is_ a 500 and it was cheap.
I've found
Christian, I've been thinking hard about buying an Optio.
Give us a lenghty considered review, please. I'll be hanging
onto the edge of my seat til I see it! - the review, that is.
-Lon
Christian Skofteland wrote:
I have an Optio 330 and think it's just great. Small size, CF, good optical
Good to have you back, Mr. Owens.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We finally got our electric power back late yesterday, after 5 days without.
Thank you Alabama Power, one of the many out of state companies who have
come to North Carolina to help restore some sense
On Thursday 12 December 2002 13:55, Artur Ledchowski wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1943673134
What is it?
Regards
Artur
It's a polaroid back for a Pentax 645 camera.
see also:
How? Really Big Hammer? I expect not, but share.
-Lon
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Forget it.
I got it to work.
Collin
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:47:45 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KAF forced focus movement
How can I FORCE (by pin
If you do a group shot of two people, shoot twice as many shots
as you think you should. By the time you get to 12 people, a roll
or two is in order. God I hate group shots.
-Lon
Dan Scott wrote:
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:00 PM, Michael Cross wrote:
On Saturday evening,
I'm by Gawd gonna name the next cat I find on my doorstep
Wheatfield. I like the sound of it grin.
No offense, Mr. Robb, you are a favorite of mine here.
-Lon
David Brooks wrote:
As far as the PDML goes, Bill,same old,same old:)
However we did get a new kitten.Not sure if we should name
I just tried my first print on Hahnemuhl's William Turner Digital Fine Art
paper and I'm convinced it is indeed the same stuff as Ilford Fine Art.
Beautiful stuff, in other words.
This was also my first attempt at keeping a scan at 48-bit color depth all
the way through to the printing stage (you
Subject says it all.
-Lon
Greywolf,
I always thought the people who have done it for years
were here to help relative beginners like me. That may
not be true, but I do sense giving back in here, and
it has helped me greatly.
Your posts, included.
-Lon
T Rittenhouse wrote:
There is something to be said for what you
Ditto that, for me, Mike.
The thing is most people think professional photographer = famous
photographer. There are many, many professional photographers in the world.
There are few famous photographers. I read somewhere a few years back that
the average wage for full time photographers was
I would guess there are maybe 25 people in the world actually making a
living doing that. There are a lot more doing it more as a self-supporting
hobby or as a sideline to other work.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL
F If you (or anyone) can come up with the URL for that site, please
F let me/us know - I'd be curious to see what some people have done to
F their LX's. Thanks.
Hi Fred,
it's
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/LX_CHG.html
Thanks for the tip, Frantisek, although (after rummaging around a
bit) I
GreyWolf is BACK, dammit. lol
-Lon
T Rittenhouse wrote:
As I recall, we went though this what is a professional camera thing about a
year ago, and hashed it out pretty thorouhly. Then I asked how we define an
amatuer camera. No one was interested. So I will give the definative answer
to
Good FOR YOU!. We all know that EOS really stands for
Elitist Other Snot. Grin. I've never cared to air my boogers in
public. The SMC 135 is a gem. So is the M 50 1.4. They
are both better lenses than I am a photographer, and I pack
both of these lenses most of the time.
-Lon
Pascal
I'd go Olympus, or mebbe Nikon.
This thread should flare on for a while.
-Lon
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
