Kenneth Waller wrote:
Congratulations Francis !!!
Feels great doesn't it.
Looks pretty nice to me.
What were the entry requirements regarding the images? Yachting in general
or??
They were quite loose, basically anything that a sailor might see while he's on
the water.
Cheers,
Thanks every one!
I'm un-subscribing for a bit while I'm travailing (just so you know I'm
not ignoring you on purpose). Have a great time while I'm gone (and get
over with all the K10d talk so when I come back I won't feel so under
privileged. :-)
Cheers,
Francis
www.islandlight.ca
--
PDML
Hello All
Since I am soon to receive my K10D, which will partly replace my *ist D, I
guess a little statistics is in it's place.
I had it for 29 months.
I did 45000 shots
I paid app.. 1180 USD incl. CF-cards, for it.
That's the total cost - just about.
That's in average 52 shots every day.
Each
Thanks to all who commented.
It really was just a grab shot - but then again I always try and make at
least one camera reachable.
Lighting and furniture compliments of this New York style apartment*. It a
beautiful but truly child unfriendly place.
Cheers,
Simon
*
Hi Mark,
That's a money shot if ever I saw one!
Thanks, but I've always taken the money shot to be used in a rather more
nefarious context (what can I say, I was young, I needed the money... ).
:-)
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On 21/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I really like the shot too, sorry. :-). What did you do, climb out on that
pole thing?
Don't talk about Sylwek like that ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 20/1/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Or perhaps if you just like that sort of thing.
(Had to say it before Cotty did...)
Not so much like...more a 'need' ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 20/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
BBC seems fascinated with America.
Fascinated with the world mate ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/03.htm
Cable release or wireless remote? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 21/1/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty. So would you be the serious weather man or the goofy
anchor side kick type?
If I get the lottery win, I think it would be a close-run thing to go
get a degree in either Meteorology or Biology. Hey, how about both.
Otherwise,
America IS the world.
Everywhere else is just tectonic plates with lumps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Sunday, 21 January 2007 7:54 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Music and Portraits
On 20/1/07, graywolf,
Hey Cotty,
Find the time, and do it now. Time as a way of slipping...
BTW, if you get a chance try and have a look at the doc - it's
remarkable, and most likely quite salient to plenty here.
Will do. Do you get a nod in the credits?
Simon
On 1/21/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just
On 21/1/07, Simon King, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will do. Do you get a nod in the credits?
Sadly not. It's been 27 years since I worked for Auntie. I couldn't
afford the drop in pay ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi Mark,
http://www.robertstech.com/wales.htm
interesting and encouraging to plan a trip to Wales. Nos 16, 17 and 21
are my favorites.
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino Subject: Re: Macro stand setup
William Robb wrote:
It's a bit overkill, but an enlarger chassis makes a great copy stand,
and
should be fairly inexpensive.
Very interesting. I've always wanted a copy stand but it's never made it
to the
Small error:
Cost pr image done with *ist D is of course only 0.04 USD.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt
Subject line says it all. He has been absent for a week.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Don't get any ideas, but this is art.
Do you mind if I steal it for my computer desktop?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J
and K Messervy
Sent: 21. januar 2007 04:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
Bob W,
You know AreTists, they are never bounded by measurements. :-)
While you or I were taking hard sciences and math, they were taking...???
I have a quote from Lord Kelvin in my office. To paraphrase it:
If you can't measure a thing, if you haven't put numbers to it,
your knowledge
As much as I know:
He returned home two evenings ago and was feeling a little weak but
otherwise ok.
We exchanged emails the following morning.
G
On Jan 21, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Subject line says it all. He has been absent for a week.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Praising K10D performance even with limitations
Bob W,
You know AreTists, they are never bounded by measurements. :-)
While you or I were taking hard sciences and math, they were taking...???
I have a quote from Lord
Oh yeah, from the guy who like a musician with 'perfect pitch',
can color calibrate photo processing machines from memory.
You may be an artist, but tell me again you don't measure anything. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
I try not to. It gets depressing ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/21/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be an artist, but tell me again you don't measure anything. :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Godfrey.
I doubt it very much.
For each face I will have perhaps 200x200 pixel. Most likely less.
This Flickr set illustates my point:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594491741789/
I admit neither of these images are very good, but this is the choise of
technolgy I have
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/one_lane.jpg
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jens Bladt wrote:
If I had used film and my MZ-S this figuring would have been very
different:
I would have taken only 33 % of the number of shots = 15.000 shots
I would have been able to use the camera for 29 more months before it got
obsolete, reducing the cost of the camera to 50%.
I'd look, but it's not for me.
Cheers,
Dave :-)
On 1/22/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/one_lane.jpg
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jan 21, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/one_lane.jpg
Good stuff!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks to everyone for your terrific advice. I've posted
infrequently, but I hope to actually post a photo one of these days,
when I work up the nerve, and if these macro photos work out, I'll
include one of them as part of a first bunch of photos.
Thanks again,
Micah
On Jan 21, 2007, at
Thank you Godfrey. Good to hear.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 21. januar 2007 15:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Does someone know how Shel is doing?
As
Obviously designed and decorated by someone who's never been to New
York, (but has visited IKEA).
Simon King wrote:
Thanks to all who commented.
It really was just a grab shot - but then again I always try and make at
least one camera reachable.
Lighting and furniture compliments of this
Gee, I wonder what made you think of me?
:)
ann
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/one_lane.jpg
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've checked all the variables numerous times, and to the best of my
knowledge, they're correct. The color space of both the file and the
working space is correct. I reinstalled the Epson print drivers. Still
no luck. Here are my settings (PhotoShop CS):
Settings: U.S. Prepress Defaults
RGB
Paul,
Your Photoshop color settings look fine.
I don't have CS on my system anymore so I can't check the print
settings in Print with Preview precisely, I don't remember all the
differences between CS and CS2. This page shows how I make the
settings for the Epson R2400 with CS2 ... note
52 shots avg. per DAY for 29 months? Thats a quite extreme a bit of
shooting isnt it?
Are you an everyday pro and what are you shooting that much OF? How do
you
even find time to shoot let alone post process that much photos for that
long
a time?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Something I always un-check is the High Speed box found on the
Advanced printing panel. (R1800)
Didn't do so once and the results were disappointing.
This is free!!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've checked all the variables numerous times, and to the best of my
I haven't found this to make much difference on the R2400. I've run
tests on the same print and the difference is only noticeable with
very high frequency, A3 Super sized prints.
G
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Something I always un-check is the High Speed box found on the
Hello Paul,
I've checked all the variables numerous times, and to the best of my
knowledge, they're correct. The color space of both the file and the
working space is correct. I reinstalled the Epson print drivers. Still
no luck. Here are my settings (PhotoShop CS):
Try the printer out
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark,
Methinks it needs a wider tonal range.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not
completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Bob W,
You know AreTists, they are never bounded by
measurements. :-)
While you or I were taking hard sciences and math, they
were taking...???
I have a quote from Lord Kelvin in my office. To paraphrase it:
If you can't measure a thing, if you haven't put numbers to
Put a smile on my face - well named.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 7:06:48 AM, you wrote:
MR http://www.robertstech.com/temp/one_lane.jpg
MR ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Sullivan
Sent: 21 January 2007 13:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Praising K10D performance even with limitations
Bob W,
You know AreTists, they are never bounded by
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
I like it, but it's a little dark overall. Also, a high frequency
image like that
Could also stand a not so tightly cropped view perhaps.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 9:54:29 AM, you wrote:
RW Mark,
RW Methinks it needs a wider tonal range.
RW Rick
RW --- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not
completely happy
You mean like standing under the snow machine at a ski resort and
talking about the blizzard that is hitting the area? Let's see, I think
I still have my photo of the aftermath somewhere
Yes, here it is:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/_images/Misc/Blizzard-of-05.jpg
David Savage
A bit late, perhaps, but anyway:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458277
This is a photo of the same picturesque porch in
Westchester NY that was the subject of an autumn PESO:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5242404
ist D, DA 16-45, ISO 3200, f/4 @ 1/20, RAW via ACR
To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing the right
gear for the job.
Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a scan
from a Pentax 6x7.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml
But paper is patient. So are HTML-files.
But what can
Half of your examples are grossly underexposed. I'm guessing those
are the digital samples. That makes the comparison irrelevant,
because underexposure causes image degradation.
Paul
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt Subject: Film vs. Digital - not a religion
To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing the
right
gear for the job.
Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a scan
from a Pentax 6x7.
I will try the test print. I'm also going to try printing with
colorsynch. But I'm beginning to suspect it's a printer problem. Good
thing I still have the box. I've finished printing my wedding pics
and was assembling the book yesterday. I want to reprint one or two
shots. I was trying to
A different and pleasing interpretation of the subject.
Paul
On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
A bit late, perhaps, but anyway:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458277
This is a photo of the same picturesque porch in
Westchester NY that was the subject of an autumn
I respect your depth of knowledge in regard to optical printing, but
I have to say I've never seen an optical print that resolved as much
detail as a superb scan. Of course most scans are not superb, and
most optical prints are not perfectly executed. This, of course,
makes the comparison
To start with, he's comparing the scanners capabilities to the direct
digital capture more than the actual image on the film. I think I could
easily skew a test into the 6x7 column by shooting a nice fine ISO 100
BW film and printing in a darkroom say an 11x14 print on a good paper
with a
I completely agree. I've compared a number of images which were pro lab
scanned and LightJet printed to prints which had been previously pro
lab optically printed. In each case, the scanned image carried more
fine detail. Didn't always require a loupe to determine either.
Difference was great
I've got no problem with that mate.
James
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 12:37 AM
Subject: RE: PESO - Repose
Don't get any ideas, but this is art.
Do you mind if I steal it for my
It's why JCO should be kicked off... and why, while the list should not be
moderated, that there should be, at times, judicial use of cutting someone
off.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Thanks for your response. I love kiddos :o)
I actually composed that one with a purposeful asymmetry, but I appreciate
the feedback.
rg2
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:04 AM
Subject:
In stead of arguing this and that; show me your digital group images.
Crop out one face covering 5-10% of the frame.
Lets see and judging for ourselves.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23
Nice job David. I especially like the 1st and last in column 1.
Tom C.
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: GESO: McNaught at the beach
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:37:09 +0900
G'day All,
No, not really. Digital images of this sort must be underexposed, in order
to avoid burned out highlights, to which thery are more prone than film
images.
regards
Jens Bladt
Nytarkort / Greeting Card:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45
Bob W,
Good for you!
I love the focus group types, such warm and fuzzy thinking!
Most of them don't even recognize the sign.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/21/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Sullivan
thanks very much for all the responses everyone. I appreciate your time :o)
rg2
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: test
I do.
rg2 wrote:
if you receive this,
No, not really. That's a digital myth. Underexposure is the enemy of
good digital photography
On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
No, not really. Digital images of this sort must be underexposed,
in order
to avoid burned out highlights, to which thery are more prone than
film
Who has the best deal for a package of K10D, grip, kit lens, and a spare
battery?
I don't what to pay a bunch of shipping and mark-up, ya know?
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
In terms of the tones, I probably would have done something like this:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've already made in the neighborhood of 100 prints with my Epson
R2400. I'm using the same setup as described by Godders and others here
-- Photoshop is determining color. All the prints matched my monitor
perfectly. Until today. Suddenly, from one
BH is among the best on price. And they are absolutely the best on
return policy and service.
Paul
On Jan 21, 2007, at 3:04 PM, cbwaters wrote:
Who has the best deal for a package of K10D, grip, kit lens, and a
spare
battery?
I don't what to pay a bunch of shipping and mark-up, ya know?
Thanks Mark,
I'll try that. But I already replaced all of the cartridges.
Paul
On Jan 21, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Mark Dalal wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've already made in the neighborhood of 100 prints with my Epson
R2400. I'm using the same setup as described by Godders and
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Could also stand a not so tightly cropped view perhaps.
The version on line is slightly cropped from the full image and
actually works much better than the uncropped version.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
I like it, but it's a little dark overall.
I tried a few
I hear ya Jens! I have had my DL for about 13 months, and shot ~2400
frames (only 6 shots per day :(, but I guarantee that I could not have
afforded to shoot that much film. I never got into photography
because I could not afford it, then one day I called a shop that had
some DL's on 30% off:
Oops, my error - misread watching for working
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Sunday, 21 January 2007 10:42 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Music and Portraits
On 21/1/07, Simon King, discombobulated, unleashed:
Will do. Do
Happy New Year!
I found a new model over Christmas. He adopted my parents, but he was
getting under foot- an little orange trip hazard.
Cheers
Mike
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My experience is more in line with what WR said. A great optical
print beats even a drum scan.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Well, let's see him.
Paul
On Jan 21, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Beaker wrote:
Happy New Year!
I found a new model over Christmas. He adopted my parents, but he was
getting under foot- an little orange trip hazard.
Cheers
Mike
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 22/01/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing the right
gear for the job.
Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a scan
from a Pentax 6x7.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
Hard to say, Mark. I htink I'm getting at what you are trying to convey
here - the brooding deep ancient tree
Cameta has the whole package (this includes the kit lens, which I'm
not sure you want) for $1099.95, which isn't a bad deal. I've dealt
with Cameta before, as have a couple of friends, and they're not bad
in the way of shipping and customer service, although I never had to
return anything
You've stated you are producing a group shot for the web, not for
printing. You put a bunch of unexposed, crappily rendered JPEG clips
up as comparison to your scanned and sharpened 6x7 clips, at double
the size they'll appear compared to the illustration here:
This one wasn done with a
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt Subject: RE: Film vs. Digital - not a religion
In stead of arguing this and that; show me your digital group images.
Crop out one face covering 5-10% of the frame.
Lets see and judging for ourselves.
I wouldn't consider shooting a group that
Evan Hanson wrote:
My experience is more in line with what WR said. A great optical
print beats even a drum scan.
I have found just the opposite to be true: I've rarely seen an optical
print that can compare to a well-done scan and print. Oh, certainly the
*resolution* and fine detail will
I must admit I haven't done much work to the digital files.
I did sharpen them, though, but that didin't help much due the the low
resolution. These crops were somthing like 100x100 pixel.
That's not a lot, is it?
Up rez'ing them wouldn't help either, I'm afriad.
More exposure would perhaps have
I spent a lot of time trying to sort out the whole film vs digital
thing. A lot of the things I worked through are on my blog, but this
link sums up where I finally wound up:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php?title=stuff_per_pixelmore=1c=1tb=1pb=1
Medium format and certainly
A couple bits of good news came this week.
On Thursday I got word from one of stock agents that he had sold one of
my snow crystals shots to the Sierra Club, for use in a future holiday
greeting card. I knew he was working on it but it was great to see the
deal close, and obviously it's an
Mark Cassino wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
Definitely not an image that works well at web size - which of course
means nothing since web size is the equivalent of a 4 x6 at best.
I'd probably try to play with the tonal ranges to boost the contrast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a problem with this shot.
There is this white glow or whatever is the term just above the roofs of
the buildings. Then there is same white artifact around the tree
branches on the far left. Could be this is some kind of HDR effect. Yet,
it makes this photo
Sitting in the window of the local coffee shop, you occasionally see a
bit of pathos. In this case a dog was left tied to a bench out in the
cold while her owners went in for a cup. She stood around disconsolate
until they stepped out of the door.
Adorama are good, too.
And I can (unfortunately) testify to their satisfactory
return exchange service; my first AF-540 was defective
(probably damaged in transit - I hate UPS), but I now
have an exchange unit where the wide-angle adapter and
catchlight reflector slide in and out properly.
On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Hello! (introduction)
You can never have too many lenses.
That with or without aperture simulators?
I don't differentiate.
Do you integrate?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
One from Boulogne:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/7757564
and another one from Liège:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/extra/buddies/display/7752110
Enjoy. Comments and suggestions as always most welcome.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne,
Congratulations Mark. Well deserved I'm sure. It's always gratifying to
receive some 'official' recognition.
Tom C.
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: A couple of woo-hoos Date: Sun, 21
Maybe he should ask Doug for refund. g
On 1/20/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wimp! :-)
Dave
On 1/21/07, W. Guy Finley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 19, 2007, at 11:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RE: PISS OFF JCO: Camera sold,but worries remain (yet
As always Mark, you make a great point.
On Jan 21, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I spent a lot of time trying to sort out the whole film vs digital
thing. A lot of the things I worked through are on my blog, but this
link sums up where I finally wound up:
On 1/20/07, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rg2 said
every development, every new experience they have, I get to see.
Like not having to be strapped in a chair anymore...
http://members.iinet.net.au/~celsim/sydney/slides/070119_07.html
...and is he happy about it!
On 1/19/07, rg2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott:
I hope you enjoy being a stay at home parent. It is both rewarding and can
cause several types of insanity. I am currently on maternity leave, with a
4 year son and a newborn daughter. It is rewarding because every moment,
every development,
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16300full=1
Please comment on the quality of light as I still want to learn more
about this light billiard I've been playing yesterday with the
diffuser and the flash.
Happy anniversary. You could have worn a tie. [8-)))]
Congratulaitions, Mark. You're snow flake shots are certainly worthy
of wider exposure. The Krappy Kamera contest is an even bigger win.
I've seen that show. It's excellent
Paul
Go Bears!
On Jan 21, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
A couple bits of good news came this week.
On
One more woo hoo.
The Bears are going to the Super Bowl! I waited twenty-one years for
this WOOO HOOO!
Paul
PS: Who doesn't care that his printer doesn't work for the moment.
On Jan 21, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
A couple bits of good news came this week.
On Thursday I got word
Ralf,
Good pictures, but not as good as your previous stuff.
I wish there was a top corner to the building on the left in pix#1.
The moving barge in #2 is distracting.
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/21/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from Boulogne:
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
